Angelina Jolie Carries Son Pax

586
lylian Says:

March 19th, 2007 at 9:17 pm - flag comment
Ughhh please:

I havent had a chance to watch Dirt where I live. I actually think that a series about the tabs could actually be a lot of fun if done properly. There’s been TV series about fashion magazines and proper investigative journalists so I thought that Dirt would actually have a lot of potential because it’s clear to me that many dirty tricks are being played in the world of tabloids + paps. They buy information, the manufacture information, they make up information, and sometimes, they even have a scoop or 2.

From what I’ve read unfortunately, it seems that the series is not very well executed initially. Even the TV channel carrying it has said that it takes up to episode 5 for it to become good.

For my 2 cents worth about Courtney, I think she was pretty fair in the VF interview. She pointed out that Brad had told Jennifer of his attraction to Angelina, that he fought it for a period of time and that she didn’t think he cheated on her best friend. Brad didn’t, according to Courtney just turn tail and dash off as soon as he realised that his feelings for Angelina were strong. He was sufficiently committed to his marriage to fight an attraction and to give his marriage a shot - or else, why fight the attraction to Angelina at all?? Courtney is one of the reasons why I do think Brad didn’t cheat on Jennifer. Also, Brad actually, did try to resuscitate the marriage.

I also respect Courtney for having the guts to put herself on the line and star in a TV Series that is totally different to Friends. It is better to have tried and failed then never to have tried at all.
====================

Good post again, Lylian. I must say that what CC said in that VF article is the main reason why I am still a B&A fan. I am no saint, but I would never like anybody who cheats on their spouse. I think AJ said about the same thing in one of her interviews. She said she would not be interested in a guy who cheats on his wife. I totally identify with her on that matter.

615
ida Says:

March 19th, 2007 at 10:00 pm - flag comment
when is that so call kiss with big chin comin up, let me know so that i can stay off all entertainment news because they will be talking about it to make her feel like a movie star which she is not? help me out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
March 27th, if anyone is awake….

OK, Star - I have a early morning, so my ramblings for the night are through…got alot of Florida beaches to roam on tomorrow. So Goodnight John Boy.

the haters are just plain crazy,they see the truth but close their eyes,only to be opened for lies.i really feel sorry for them

AG, LMAO! :lol: Oh God, that’s classic! I heard about that conversion therapist….yes and I bet he feels absolutely nothing when he’s hugging all those menz. lol

633
mmm Says:

March 19th, 2007 at 10:19 pm - flag comment

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Look, kiddie candy is back.

tabitha says the tabs like to twist peoples mind,some say girls are with her,others say they are home with brad.i say they should mind their buisness and stop spreading rumour.i know brad will be so happy to see his sons and the love of his life angie

624
? Says:
March 19th, 2007 at 10:11 pm - flag comment

now they say Just Maddox and Zahara are with Angelina.
—————–
I don’t think so.

When Angie first arrived in Ho Chi Mihn city it was only her and Maddox.

People reported that only Maddox was and is with her in Vietnam.

Time magazine said the same.

USA Today said that Zahara and Shiloh stayed in L.A.

The Associated Press said in their last article that Pax will soon join his tow other siblings back in L.A.

There are no sittings of the girls in Vietnam. If they where with her it would have been reported when she arrived in Hanoi yesterday noon.(Vietnam time). But they only said about Maddox and Pax.

Jared quoted what Us Weekly reported and we all know what this tabloid stands for.

Some outlets are just coping from other articles that may have a false information.

Angie will meet with the US embassy on Tuesday and she will head back home on Wednesday.

I’m not saying that Reuters is right, just that probably most of the articles that mentions that the girls are with her are based on reuters updates.

633
mmm Says:
March 19th, 2007 at 10:19 pm - flag comment
——————
That is just another of the uncountable Ritzygal’s aliases… :lol:

593
UGHHH,please…..You/Me Says:

March 19th, 2007 at 9:25 pm - flag comment
Mmmmm, well I like the show, but yeah I’ve read that’s it’s not doing well and it wouldn’t break my heart if it went off the air. It’s not the show itself that I was defending, it’s more the injustice of dissing something just because of association.
————–
And I don’t think I’M the fanatic here, the only mistake I made was to jump all over Izzie’s a s s because I jumped to conclusions. Sorry about that Izzie.

================

There you said it in your own words, you don’t care much for the show, but will defend it because of it’s connection to JA. And the fact that you immediately jumped on Izzie, shows what is in your subconscious. You are here to defend JA first, and above all. You have all the right to do it, but don’t try to be such a hypocrite about it. I am curious. Do you go to the Female First blog about B&A? What do you think about what is posted there? if you have never read those posts, then don’t come here to preach to B&A’s fans here. We are a thousand times more civilized than they are.

let us not let one rat disturb us.i am too happy to reply to haters today

505
credit:Lola Says

Wonderful post, well written,thoughtful, insightful, and a good read. I think you just about covered everything. I thought of something when I read it, but now I can’t remember what it was. Which probably means it wasn’t important. Really good.

there are posts missing. What’supp?