Top Stories

Celebrities Fight Poverty… in German

Celebrities Fight Poverty… in German

Celebrities continue in the worldwide fight against poverty in the German “Your Voice Against Poverty” commercial that was shown during the G8 Summit in Germany.

(The Group of Eight (G8) is an international forum for the governments of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States.)

In the black-and-white commercial, 21 celebrities appear and speak German including Bono, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Penelope Cruz, Antonio Banderas, Claudia Schiffer, and miscellaneous German celebrities.

german-poverty-commercial-01.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-02.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-03.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-04.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-05.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-06.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-07.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-08.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-09.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-10.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-11.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-12.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-13.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-14.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-15.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-16.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-17.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-18.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-19.jpg
german-poverty-commercial-20.jpg



Your Voice Against Poverty (German Commercial)

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Miley: I've never heard a Jay-Z song! - PopSugar
  • Jon Hamm heads to Vancouver for Sucker Punch - LaineyGossip
  • Chris Brown: Details should remain...private - PopEater
  • Dakota Fanning covers Teen Vogue - JustJaredJr
  • Sammy Sosa looks a little different - Dlisted
  • An Australian official's not happy with Britney - TheSuperficial
  • Kristen Stewart walks to cure diabetes - Celebuzz
Photo: SEP/WENN

1,030 Comments

Pages: « 13 4 5 [6] 7 8 942 » Show All
hey there @ 03/28/2007 at 2:10 pm

117
sam Says:

idiot, go away.

fan of VOR @ 03/28/2007 at 2:15 pm

Angelina Jolie Is A Hypocrite And A Bad Mom, Says ‘US’

Did you really think that US was going to quietly let that whole Angelina Jolie thing go? Janice Min is reportedly peeved that People always gets the (apparently rigged) auction for the photos of her new Vietnamese son Pax Thien, and the mag’s (diffy) story about the adoption in last week’s issue clearly did nothing to quell her thirst for revenge.

This week’s cover lays it out more starkly than ever before, screaming, “HER TWISTED DOUBLE LIFE” and then, all PowerPoint style: She lied about becoming a stay-at-home mom! She and Brad are fighting about her adoption addiction! And the trump card: She uses her kids to manipulate the media! Oh, SNAP.

Inside, Mara Reinstein’s story reads like a big ****-you to both People and Angelina. Let’s examine the charges.

Charge: She lied about becoming a stay-at-home mom.
Jolie recently started shooting Wanted, an action movie, in Chicago. But according to US, Jolie “recently announced with much fanfare that she would be a stay-at-home mom, then accepted the Wanted role. Hypocritical? Perhaps. Then again, Jolie, 31, thrives on manipulating her own image. After all, despite not having a publicist (unheard of for a celebrity of her caliber), the actress has expertly reinvented herself as a devoted mother and girlfriend—despite her wild past as a self-confessed drug-using goth who dabbled in bisexuality and had a string of ‘lovers.’”

Assessment: Bringing up the goth/bisexuality bit is a low blow for the mag. There’s also a sidebar called “Angelina’s Wild Past,” in which her “outlandish interests” pre-humanitarianism (death, cutting, bisexuality, and blood lust) are detailed. But really, how many more times do we have to hear about how she and Billy Bob Thornton wore vials of each others’ blood around their necks? Regarding the stay-at-home mom hypocrisy, we’re inclined to decide this one a little more in Us’s favor. After all, Jolie also adopted Pax Thien as a single mom, even though she and Brad Pitt are raising all the kids together, to circumvent Vietnamese adoption rules that prevent unmarried couples from adopting.

Charge: She has an addictive personality, and Brad thinks she should chill out with the adoptions.
“After adopting three kids in five years, it’s possible that [Angelina's] picked up a form of domestic addiction… Sources tell Us that the couple of more than two years have been at odds about expanding their brood so quickly after Shiloh’s birth. ‘They had a huge argument before she left for Vietnam,’ says a source. ‘He wanted her to slow it down, spend time with Shiloh and have more biological children.” Also, Us asks, “Will Brad & Angie’s Relationship Last?” The answer, according to an “expert”: “Angelina’s behavior may cause problems because it’s hypocritical. Either you want to build a stable family or you want to be a woman with the career who’s flying off here, flying there, doing this film, doing that film. But you can’t have it both ways.”

Assessment: Equating Angelina’s adoption with her drug struggles and seeming sex addiction is a shrewd move, and raises the “she’s actually crazy” specter subtly yet effectively. Then there are the allegations that she and Brad are at odds over the new adoptions, which would poke holes in their attempts to show the world that they’re one big happy family. Regarding Shiloh, Us also brings up the famous quote from British Elle, in which Angelina says she feels “so much more for Madd and Zee because they’re survivors, they came through so much… Shiloh was privileged from the moment she was born. I have less inclination to feel for her… A newborn really is this…yes, a blob!” Angelina’s said that she was just responding to the interviewer’s suggestion that Shiloh was a blob, not actually calling her daughter a blob—but word is that she often refers to her only biological child that way, and shows her other children blatant favoritism. Again, Us goes for the low blow by suggesting that the pair’s relationship could be in trouble because of Angelina’s quest to adopt more kids.

Charge: She uses her kids to manipulate the media.
“The day Jolie picked up Pax at the orphanage, where paparazzi swarmed, she said, ‘Photographs make him upset… I’m sorry for bringing this into his life.” And yet, just days after picking up Pax, Jolie staged photos of herself, Zahara, Maddox and Pax and sold them to U.K.’s Hello! magazine and People magazine… Jolie has a long history of using the media to her advantage. In April 2005, she and Pitt were photographed—in a shoot widely believed to have been orchestrated by Jolie—in PDA-free poses on a beach in Kenya with Maddox standing between them…”

Assessment: Jolie did come under fire for allowing the media frenzy surrounding her adoption of Pax, and some whispered that it was unseemly for her to have subjected Pax to a photo shoot so quickly after adopting him. But would Us not have published those photos? It’s also interesting that they’re finally coming clean about the Kenya photos by saying that the shoot was “widely believed to have been orchestrated by Jolie.” That’s code for, “The shoot was orchestrated by Jolie and we knew it, but we played along and bought the photos because it was such an explosive story, and we proceeded to run months’ worth of unflattering stories and photos of Jennifer Aniston because we were on Team Jolie, but now we feel like we have been mortally betrayed.” —Doree

Sad Thing @ 03/28/2007 at 2:17 pm

That sad thing is that the entertainment media will once again use US Weekly’s story about Angie as the holy grail. They dare not do it with the Katie Holmes story, but they will with Angie. She’s an easy target for them and sadly people will end up believing their lies to be true. As you can tell by the rants of the haters on this blog and others.

I’m proud of how Angie and Brad have kept their eyes focused on the what’s truly important in this world (like this ONE Campaign) and not get caught up in the media garbage that surrounds them. They are truly to be admired for their commitment and tenacity to remain a loving family that sees no boundaries in race or country.

Janice Min’s retribution will come back to her haunt her. As an Asian woman I truly believe in karma. And this action brought on by spite will come full circle.

credit: CMAR @ 03/28/2007 at 2:23 pm

to Huvanne paid worker I’m asking you to read what CMAR said.

CMAR Says:

For the FF vermins hiding and reading our posts, here’s a primer: what you put out in life, is exactly what life rewards you with. If its any of the 7 deadly “sins” you get them all back and more than you bargained for; if its any good thing, you get that all back and much much more.

The fact that Angie is confounding all you haters who cant understand how it is she could be reaping so many rewards when she has been so “evil” lol; its because you have been looking at her through “evil” eyes (including the nasty tabs), so its understandable that you are now confounded.

129 says,yes that is true,good never loss,but evil doesnot pay.i hope were ever they are they are bonding as a family

127
fan of VOR Says:
********
LINK! I like the style of the blogger.

credit: Frenchy @ 03/28/2007 at 2:27 pm

Frenchy Says:

Why don’t people realize that Brad & Angelina provide stability for their children by being with them and having the SAME routines all the time anywhere they travel?

Bedtime at 8 is the same anywhere in the world. Cereal breakfast at 7 am is the same anywhere in the world. Lunch time, playtime, and Brad spending time before each child goes to sleep stays the same no matter where they are in the world.

Stability means establishing a ROUTINE and STICKING with it wherever you are.

Instability can mean living in one area but changing up routines on a whim, inconsistent bedtimes, meala times. naps, strange new faces in your core family, etc….

guli you still around

Excellent posts—- Many thanks. I can’t name everyone since all of them are great!!! The tabloids are a dying bread their sales have dropped drastically (since everything is on the internet before they can publish it) so who can they use to try to jack up sales , Angie…. They are doing it for money and everyone knows it… Great job Angie and Brad for sticking it to the tabloids. In a few weeks, JMHO, PEOPLE will have the EXCLUSIVE pics and interview of the WHOLE family. The tabbies know it and its driving themm crazy :lol: :lol: :lol:

why cant they fight for something in america or adopt a kid from here what is wrong with this people out society needs their help to … losers

Assessment: Equating Angelina’s adoption with her drug struggles and seeming sex addiction is a shrewd move, and raises the “she’s actually crazy” specter subtly yet effectively. Then there are the allegations that she and Brad are at odds over the new adoptions, which would poke holes in their attempts to show the world that they’re one big happy family. Regarding Shiloh, Us also brings up the famous quote from British Elle, in which Angelina says she feels “so much more for Madd and Zee because they’re survivors, they came through so much… Shiloh was privileged from the moment she was born. I have less inclination to feel for her… A newborn really is this…yes, a blob!” Angelina’s said that she was just responding to the interviewer’s suggestion that Shiloh was a blob, not actually calling her daughter a blob—but word is that she often refers to her only biological child that way, and shows her other children blatant favoritism. Again, Us goes for the low blow by suggesting that the pair’s relationship could be in trouble because of Angelina’s quest to adopt more kids.

—————————-
wow they actually PRINT that she doesn’t love shiloh! LOVES IT!

guli any more videos, even some old ones

lurker opinion @ 03/28/2007 at 2:44 pm

I read some of the same BS that Us mag wrote on blogs that haters love to gather. Us mag doesn’t have any inside information just copy/paste from the internet.

i just saw on tmz that there was a bomb threat on E ,said ryan seacreast was not there

credit: GetReal @ 03/28/2007 at 2:47 pm

GetReal Says:

Referencing Angies thoughts/actions and growing pains 10 years ago holds no water . You were once a teenager .. are you going to be known as one forever ? you were once wearing diapers .. are you going to be known as a diaper wearing woman forever ? you were once a smoker but quit years ago … are you going to be known as a smoker today ? Everyone has a past and everyone learn, grown and mature from the life lessons.

Unless, she is currently smoking, doing coke, tanning, talking without action, lying, obsessively harming herself through botox and plastic surgery then you can call her out on it .

……..But instead Angelina has taken on greater roles since 2001, she’s avail herself to UNCHR, supporting numerous causes helping the world in her own little ways, took up responsibility to be a mother and now a proud mom to 3 beautiful children. These actions can only be associated with one who is compassionate, responsible , nuturing and loving .

Some of you folks continue to twist every action of Angelina

.. the reality is that you all have it mixed up with someone else who we all know (Aniston) .. one who is still living her life like she has been 10 years ago - not taking responsibility, not maturing , nothing changed .. not her looks, not her hair, not her brain and whatever actions that are associated with her …she continue to live in the dellusional past . Tha is what I call scary and mentally unstable.

i just saw on tmz that there was a bomb threat on E ,said ryan seacreast was not there
++++++++++++++
The only one I really care at e! is Ted! Save Ted!

great says what do you mean

Ida —yep I’m still here ROTFLMAO… They tried everything for the past three years and nothing works!!!!! Just love it :-)

Ida, I haven’t heard from Sheri or Susie today, I’m sure they’ll be here later.

Ida, here is another one from Lady Ell. She made this one for BLD (Brad’s Liberation Day) cyber-party on October 2 , anniversary of the divorce becoming final :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q7loRlt3-g

fan of VOR

You have NO proof that Jolie actually called her bio child blob. You have NO proof that she blatently treated her other other children with favoritism.

You used the phrase, ” word is…..” meaning NO concrete evidence. This is the same as, ” sources, insider, friend…..” etc.

Think about it, NO one has access to their household. You did NOT work for them. You are NOT their employee. Therefore what you said is GROSSLY ERRONOUS.

lurker opinion @ 03/28/2007 at 2:58 pm

I wonder what celeb will be the first to kiss US magazine a*s so they will not write a negative story? So far Cruises and Jolie Pitts has told them to kiss off. We can see what happens if you don’t kiss Min butt.

chill pill @ 03/28/2007 at 3:02 pm

BCBG you need to CHILL fan of vor is just copying what US WEEKLY wrote in their article this week.

Little Un — does WW1 and WW11 ring a bell in your head?

The poster fan of VOR is actually a Huvanne paid worker. Notice, in her post, she is happy that us mag did this article since us did one on Aniston.

Notice she used the word, “word is”, this means nameless, which means non existent. She also used the phrase “blatent favoritism”. These are clues which tell who this poster is.

She used the post to covers her hate with “analysis”.

fan of VOR @ 03/28/2007 at 3:07 pm

BCBG is dumber than dirt. That post is straight from GAWKER.com. I forgot to give a link.

Why would the poster “fan of VOR” have a copy of the mag? Today is only Wednesday.

Ritzygal once said, ” I come here for info. You made my job easier” . I wonder if this “fan of VOR” is her.

Pages: « 13 4 5 [6] 7 8 942 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.