Angelina Jolie @ Tribeca Film Festival

JP ~ 914 thank you for my favorite video! There were so many great
post today.. so much to be excited about, wishing you all the best.

goodnite!

Why is Bai Ling mentioned?

Bai Ling is Chinese.

The poster “interesting” is a RACIST. I’ve seen the negative comments from her about Z in prior threads. . Now, she is bringing in Bai Ling. This is not due to of Bai Ling’s sexual preference. The hater brought her in because the hater is a RACIST AND BECAUSE Bai Ling is Chinese. The hater hates non American.

The poster “interesting” is a RACIST. I’ve seen the negative comments from her about Z in prior threads. . Now, she is bringing in Bai Ling. This is not due to of Bai Ling’s sexual preference. The hater brought her in because the hater is a RACIST AND BECAUSE Bai Ling is Chinese. The hater hates non American.

Haters are mentioning Wycleff because he is Black.
Had he been white, haters would NOT say anything.

Haters are mentioning Wycleff because he is Black.
Had he been white, haters would NOT say anything.

b>Haters are mentioning Wycleff because he is Black.
Had he been white, haters would NOT say anything.

Haters are mentioning Wycleff because he is Black.
Had he been white, haters would NOT say anything.

Cool . I can’t wait to read the whole interview. Seems like a good one.

Anistonisaliar (your name sound like a new disease), thanks for the refreshing article from glamour.
It seems Angie was meant to play Mariane’s role.

It’s late and my post is awaiting moderation, so I’ll post it in two parts, sorry for the double post.
Lylian (1)

Lylian,
German is my native language!! :lol:
If you like fairy tales, I have two wonderful links for you, you can read the stories online.

Here are some of the Grimm’s fairy tales in English
http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/grimmtales.html

There are some tales that are not bloody and you could read to your daughter, I personally like Frau Holle, Hans in Luck, Bearskin. Particularly bloody and scary: Fitcher’s Bird, The Girl Without Hands, The Willful Child,

910
lylian Says:
April 29th, 2007 at 10:57 pm - flag comment

The stereo typing of men and women really saddens me. Clearly stereo types are difficult to shake off, even in the birth place of feminism – America, even 50 years after the start of feminism.
******************************************

That’s a great observation lylian.

One thing that I noticed is that though women’s lib movement made headways and aided in paving the way for women’s rights and equality but it’s also a shame that those in the forefront of the movement seems to be hell bent in making men as the common enemy. In some way, the idea that if makes you less of a woman if you recognize the differences between a man and a woman, and acknowledge the fact there are areas when/that men are stronger or if you stand behind your man and support your man. Why do we have to set up enemy or demarcation lines?

And on the other side of the coin, there are those who demonize women who seem to have found a way of balancing being a woman of the world and also enjoys and relishes being a lover, a mother, a socially aware citizen and be successful in their chosen fields.

And sadly we see a handful of them posting here. I say “handful” because most of the women of these world are busy living their lives, carving their own niche, making their mark, surviving, fighting for an existence, and helping people and making a difference in this world. I don’t think a woman struggling to makes ends meet or barely surviving in a hand-to-mouth existence will neither have the luxury of time nor the inclination & heart to spout hatred against a woman who fights for basic rights of women and children. I don’t see women in remote villages toiling their farms along with their men malign somebody who gave deserving families a chance to better their lives thru livelihood programs, for that is their hope too - alieviating themselves from dire poverty and enjoy the fruits of their labor and realize their goal of sustainable economic freedom. How can a mother in a refugee camp utter such vile words against a woman who held her hand and listened to her story and one who voices their concerns and echoes it to the ears of those that cares enough to understand, and carries it to those people who have the power to put programs into actions.

It is no wonder that women of equal strength understands and admires all these aspects of Angelina Jolie and her like - because they see and recognize the same weaknesses and strengths in themselves.

There are many women who exemplies the true essence of being a woman (in the words of Sushmita Sen), those that leads by example - and Angelina Jolie and Marriane Pearl are one of them.

Yeah, they divorced because Brad wanted to have childrens and Maniston NOT!!

But i’m so glad that was Angie who make Brad’s dream come true on having childrens!! Angie giving Brad childrens, is one of the many reasons i love her!!

Okey, SORRY for the double post!! But i posted two times; because i thought my first post didn’t show in the website!! But my message is the same… I LOVE ANGIE FOR MAKING BRAD A FATHER!!!!

Latest on Benajamin Button

BODY DOUBLES WANTED: Principal photography may have wrapped on Brad Pitt’s “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” but there’s some interesting post-production shooting at hand on the David Fincher film. Casting forces on the flick, from F. Scott Fitzgerald’s story of a man who begins life in his 80s and reverse-ages, have been seeking body doubles for Pitt and leading lady Cate Blanchett — including a 26-year-old version of Pitt, a lean 155 pounds at 5-foot-11. Casting notices refer to the wearing of a G-string and possible rear nudity. Then there’s a body double wanted for Blanchett as she might appear at 56, a 5-foot-9 actress willing to don pasties and a G-string and maybe show her backside as well.

Also, they’ve been looking for twins to portray Pitt’s character at … 4 months old. The production is specifying “happy babies only,” an interesting note in the wake of stories that baby Shiloh Jolie-Pitt won a role in the picture when the twins initially hired to portray Cate as a baby could not be calmed down enough to shoot. Mellow, cheerful Shiloh was brought in on her daddy’s advice and saved the day. Not bad for a 10-month-old.

You know I just read part of the interview, and I am upset . Marianne Pearl lets the cat out of the bag. Jennifer Aniston and her friends should hang their heads in shame. This interview puts to rest to lies that have been said about Brad.

Excerpt from Vanity Fair:

“When Brad and Jen were in the marriage, having a baby was not his priority—ever,” says one mutual friend. “It was an abstract desire for him, whereas for Jen it was much more immediate. So is there a part of Brad that’s diabolical? Did he think, I need to get out of this marriage, but I want to come out smelling like a rose, so I’m going to let Jen be cast as the ultra-feminist and I’m going to get cast as the poor husband who couldn’t get a baby and so had to move on?”

From The Upcoming Glamour Magazine

CL: And was the movie a thought for either of you at that point?
MP: …I had met with Brad separately about the movie, [but] he wasn’t connected at all with Angie at that time. To be honest, I wasn’t even sure I wanted to do a movie…. Everybody was using terrorism for their own political agenda at that time, and really, this is a story about Danny. But when I met Brad—well, out of all the studios, he was the only one who had actually read the book!

AJ: Really?

MP: Really…and I could see already that he wanted to have children, and to raise them in a world of tolerance…. I don’t think I would have done it if I didn’t feel a direct connection to Brad and, then, Angie.

The next interview Aniston does, someone should ask her point blank. To address the situation. Aniston should not be allowed to give any more interviews while hiding behind sources called “mutual friend”. I am truly disgusted, and I now realize that kids were a major reason for Brad’s divorce. Pearl said that for a reason, because she knows the truth as Angie’s friend she put that out there, and I am happy, at least another side is out there.

Another issue while Aniston is always quick to deny rumors, about nose jobs, or anything that she feels is damaging to her image, she NEVER denies rumors that put Brad and Angie in a bad light. It is NOW more than obvious that this role was never hers to begin with and the only reason plan b got the rights was due to Brad, not Aniston. When it was announced that Angie would play Pearl, Brad and Angie were put in a bad light, on entertainment shows, and print, the media made it seem like this was her role. She did nothing to deny it. Gave interviews and never said anything to correct it.

Honestly she should be ashamed of herself and be truthful. The media is not doing thier job, and the next publication or journalist , that interviews this pathetic excuse for a decent human being, needs to ask her the tough questions, ask her point blank to tell the bloody truth.

Do you guys realize that after the divorce, almost every interview she did, mentioned how much she wanted kids, Oprah mentioned it, In Style, Larry King, but the day it was announced that Brad and Angie were expecting, the subject of children has never been brought up again. This trick needs to be called out and if she is suppose to be classy, then she needs to tell the truth.

972
Anistonisaliar Says:

I agree, good post and thanks for posting the interview. Whatever happened to objectivity in journalism/media? The media is almost always slanted in one way or another. I guess nobody questioned her hard because at the time everyone thought she was going to break out a la nicole kidman, post divorce. I bet in four years time she will regret VF, and acknowlege her part in the divorce just like paltrow did!