OlderMon, 07 May 2007 at 10:44 pm
Scarlett Johansson @ Costume Institute 2007
Scarlett Johansson in modified Stella McCartney Fall 2007.
To the right, Canadian supermodel Jessica Stam.
Who wears it best — SCARLETT JOHANSSON or THE RUNWAY MODEL?
Share This Post:
43 Comments
I too agree with a couple of comments above. I think Jared is using the word ” Supermodel ” too much. Half of these models ain’t nothing yet in the fashion world. Even Daria, whom many considered to be the next supermodel since Gisele, is now almost dissapeared from the fashion world. Let’s see how long can Gemma last. Staying power is as important as runway works and covers.
Btw, the model definitely wore that dress better than Scarlett. I still don’t get why the world is crazy about her. World’s sexiest? Please.
I think it looks really good on Scarlett.
About the “supermodel” thing, I think that all supermodels who did big campaings, appear on the models.com list, and are makeing a lot of succes like: Stam, Gemma, Carol Trentine, Daria can be considered supermodels. Gisele and Moss are what they call Uber models… those who are beyond all that.
I’m sorry about the english. Correct me if there’s any mistake.
runway model!
runway model
scarlett’s legs look unshapely in that dress. it’s too short for her and distracts attention from her best assets.
Runway model. This dress was made for someone skinny.
MODEL. scarlett looks like she’s taking drink orders by the 5 cent slot machines.
model.
and i’m the one that hates Stam..
Jessica Stam looks way better. I really can never get into ScarJo’s looks. She always looks so much older than she is and so cheap!!! She has never looked fresh and young.
i dont like this scarlett dont know why but she has some talent, but she’s not really pretty.
Scar looks overrated as usual the model looks better and classy.
I always go for the real person over the model but this is the exception. It looks MUCH MUCH better on the model, but then again I think my biggest issue is that Scar Jo’s hair and makeup looks completely dreadful.
that fishnets look kind of obscene with that dress. sorry, Scarlett! Jessica rocks that dress, not you!
btw: hate the colour.
The model but of course! What the he l l was Scarlett thinking - that she can get away wearing this Tinkerbell outfit on her full figure. Geeeeeze!!!
She’s a knucklehead, indeed.
But her body is so intense that she looks better than the vapid, pretend-bored, stick-like neutered “girl” next to her.
She exudes humor and life, not attitude like the weasel model.
A man can’t keep his eyes off her in this dress and wouldn’t look twice at the model. It’s about the woman in the dress, not the dress.
Jessica.
I believe Scarlett wears it better. Curves are better than bones any day. The supermodel’s legs are almost non-existent she is so skinny. It’s gross I’m sorry that is what I believe. I don’t like Scarlett’s hair though, but I don’t like the model’s shapeless hair either. I just think she needs to eat once in a while but what can I say I like women with toned meat-on-the-bones bodies a.k.a. healthy looking bodies. I just don’t believe she should be considered a super model when she looks like she barfs after every meal. This isn’t what little girls should aspire to be. I believe in being healthy and in shape and I’m glad Scarlett embraces her curves, because that is much sexier. The super model’s facial structure is gorgeous I’m not saying she isn’t beautiful but she would be better with a few more pounds.
Scarlett needed to do something different with her hair. but i give her props for making that dress interesting. Stella McCartney’s stuff is soo plain/ugly. Jessica looks great too, but she’s just so pretty. It’s a shame that Stella is so unorginal and can’t make the dress stand out on it’s own though.
Pages: « 1 [2] Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!