OlderFri, 01 June 2007 at 2:16 pm
Aniston’s $5 Million Tell-All Book
Is Jennifer Aniston really writing a $5 million tell-all?
Radar Online doesn’t think so!
To the left, the real photo of Aniston carrying an art catalog and sunglasses.
To the right, Star Magazine holding a “$5 million manuscript” and no glasses.
“Jennifer has no plans to write a book,” Aniston’s rep has said Us Weekly.
Share This Post:
114 Comments
look at angelina’s long monkey arms, and her elbows stick out. OMG! She is anorexic looking!
CHINNY the MAN with BOOBS…MANISTON…BORN HALF MAN AND HALF BEASTY BEAST WITH ELONGATED CHIN..NOW, THAT’S ONE UGLY CREATURE.
————-liny————-
So true.
I don´t want to have children either, and I´m not a bad person.
(only a little…)
# 72 | liny @ 06.02.2007 8:44 am
You people are amazing - you really think that the only way to be blessed is to have children?
Having a child is not for everyone, and not having or wanting children doesn’t make you a bad person. I think there are already waaaay too many people in this world to encourage people to have more children.
Wake up and realize that poverty, famine, and even global warming is all due to overpopulation. Having children is not necessarily the answer to a happier life. Don’t be so closed minded.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That’s absolutely positively right!Overpopulation and global warming must be stopped! So let’s round up all the little children and throw them in the gallows. Yeah!
What is really amazing here, is how you completely miss the point. Yes, not everyone is cut out to be a mother, not everyone enjoys having little rugrats running around the house or having to worry about someone else’s well being when you can barely think about yours and you’re right, having children is not the only way to be blessed.I applaud people who don’t cave under societal pressure and have children when they know they won’t be good mothers…but that isn’t the point is it? It was never about Jennifer Aniston not wanting to have children, it’s about her telling her husband, who really wanted children and the public (most of which were fans of her husband and clearly wanted to see him get what he desired)that she would have children, when she had no intention of doing so and then siccng her fans on him for going elsewhere to fufill his dreams of fatherhood.(And before you say “no she didn’t, I say yes she did or people like you won’t be here trying to use overpopulation as an excuse for her deceit)
Anyway, It’s all moot because Brad Pitt has his children and he’s very, very happy. Jennifer has whatever she has and I honestly do wish her well. Now if only her fans will wish her the same thing by not always singing the “Poor Jen” anthem. She hates it…it makes her skin crawl.
This cover story was not worth a second glance. Everyone knows Star is crap.
By the way, You/Me I don’t undersand what you mean when you say AJ continues to talk about the triangle, please enlighten me.
people,recognize,its not just her chin—-its the masculine shape of her entire face, she is misses potato head—the whole shape of the face is abnormal.thats why she hides the wierd shaped face with that friends rachael do an hardly ever pull that hair back.
African Girl, please don’t twist around my comments. I never said we should throw children anywhere, only pointing out a very real fact. People start having kids blindingly before really thinking what kind of world they are bringing them in.
I’m also not taking sides here with anyone, but the comments that say that so and so is a bad person and not blessed, and selfish and all of that just because they don’t have children are absolutely ridiculous.
This social brainwashing that we all must have children needs to stop. Our species is not endangered and we have gotten to a point in which we can look to other things, besides raising children.
However I agree with you on the fact that JA said that she wanted children and didn’t, I’m sure she has her reasons which we will never know about and cannot criticize.
It’s just that some people don’t stick to the right argument.
she has a gene defect an im not being mean,its true,on her dads side, look at her features on her face,the chin the cheeks how elogated her face is,her face says it all, defect.bad facial genes,and add shes mental,she smokes.
This story is obvious B.S. Star is assinine.
What I do not understand is why fans won’t believe the three people involved. Jen said..no cheating during the marriage. Free to do what he wants now that we are seperated. Sad that it ended..sure. Lonely sure. But proud of the marriage and how we ended it.
Brad and Angie say..really attracted to one another. After seperation..we were together for the M&MS promo tour and began seeing each other.
Why is it so difficult to believe that that is all there is to the story? We know the whole story..they already told it to us.
Could it be that she was hurt that he hit the ground running and started a relationship so soon? Could he have waited a little longer before starting his new relationship? Absolutely. But it happened. She was in bed with Vince before the ink dried on the divorce as well.
I just do not get the amount of hatred and venom thrown at all three involved at what appeared to be an amicable divorce until the tabloids got a hold of it.
Sad for all three. People HATE Angelina for something she more than likely didn’t do. And people yell at Jen for playing victim when she tried to say..don’t feel sorry for me. And yeah..Oprah didn’t help, but maybe she thought it would make her fans see that she is ok..back fired.
The tabloids are fueling all this misinformation and people are totally buying as fact. Its crazy!
#83 Ima,WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, couldn’t have said it better myself.
# 63 | magnolia @ 06.02.2007 2:57 am
Regis asked her so do you ever babysit, and she just about yelled NO, thats not part of being a god mother.
**************************************
LOL! What does she think being a Godmother is about? Writing a check twice a year and sticking it in the kid’s birthday card and Christmas card? That’s probably all she’s capable of doing.
I saw that commercial on TV last year when she was talking about Saint Jude’s Hospital and they had her put her arms around a child. The expression on her face was priceless. She looked like she’d rather hug a pile of dog poop.
# 83 | Ima @ 06.02.2007 11:17 am
“Could it be that she was hurt that he hit the ground running and started a relationship so soon?”
*************
You got it.
“Could he have waited a little longer before starting his new relationship?”
*************
He could have, but as you said yourself, “She was in bed with Vince before the ink dried on the divorce”.
“…people yell at Jen for playing victim when she tried to say..don’t feel sorry for me. And yeah..Oprah didn’t help, but maybe she thought it would make her fans see that she is ok..back fired.”
*************
Oh honey, please. She can’t have it both ways. Either she is going to pick up her life with grace and dignity and get on with it, like Nicole Kidman, who is a class act, or she is going to ***** and moan on Oprah, but she can’t do both at once. The woman’s a hypocrite. “Poor little me, see how brave I am, my ex is missing a sensitivity chip but don’t feel sorry for me.” Can you see something out of wack there?
# 72 | liny
“Wake up and realize that poverty, famine, and even global warming is all due to overpopulation. ”
Please lily, try to understand global problems without an imperialist point of view. Global warming is because of the unequal use of energy by the developed country habitants. Do you know the per capita emissions in the US vs. in India? I will tell you: by 2003 19.3 and 1.19, respectively. Did you read about the colonial history of francophone Africa? Did you read about the great famine in India and think about it is not because lack of food but because of lack of entitlement? Have you ever thought about the “haves” and “have-nots” around the world? How about the landless poor? Infant and under 5 mortality is still very high, why do you think in many cultures, children are not named until their first birthday?
1960s were the times when the “population bomb” was the concern, today it is the unequal distribution of resources within and among countries. Before accusing other people’s life chances, try how much your life style is contributing to the problems around the world. Hope these will entice your curiosity and take you out of narrow mindset.
~curly
# IMA, well said. I REST MY CASE.
Just want to refresh our memory, this is what a beautiful ad is.
http://alljolie.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/angelina-jolies-shiseido-ads/#more-195
Some of you have only been here a while. The issue was never about whether she wanted to have kids. It was about the VF interview and things that were aimed at Brad. Whether she meant to try to hurt his career or him as a person is only known by her, but it didn’t work. Now seriously let me tell you, I was not a fan of Brad of Angie, In fact to this day I have only seen 2 or her movies and 2 of his. I have to be honest with you, if WILLIAM BRADLEY PITT tried to flirt with me when I was single and Angie’s age, I would have been on him like “white on rice!” I respect Angelina for not letting a good man escape-The cheating is a non-issue-most ppl with neuronal synapses know he didn’t-Jen said she was through and didn’t care what he did, so he did it. I can’t respect that attitude, but it was her choice. I have been married a long time, and I can tell you, giving up is not a part of the equation for happiness and yes it depends on the circumstances. But it would take a hell of a lot of circumstances for me to leave BRAD PITT! It’s not just about the body, but he is intelligent and he can discuss a range of issues that have nothing to do with hair and make-up so say what you want it certainly is your choice-I have nothing against JAniston, I will say it now and I have always said it, she bends over and lays down way too much for me-No one can stand on you or walk on you if you stand-She has been called a B*T&H so many times, but I don’t believe she is one at all. She needs to come to the South and take some B*T*H lessons! She’ll straighten up and fly right like you’ve never seen! Vince Vaugh should have never been able to even smell “Miss Emma” the best he would have been able to get would’ve been a polaroid picture, if you know what I mean. You can’t be so desperate to make ppl think you are ok until you hook up with just anyone. Regardless-she can do whatever
ATTENTION JJ LOONIES
I AM ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAS BEEN COPYING AND PASTING YOU RIDICULOUS COMMENTS AT FF. I READ YOU THOUGHT I COULDN’T POST HERE BECAUSE I’D BEEN BANNED. HA HA GOTCHA!!!
I CAN POST HERE ANY TIME I WANT AND WILL. I JUST WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT I WAS GOING TO PASTE YOUR COMMENTS AT FF EVERY DAY BUT NOW I HAVE DECIDED TO ONLY DO IT, EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE.
THIS WAY YOU WILL STOP BEING CAREFUL WHAT YOU SAY LIKE YOU ARE BEING NOW. NOW YOU WILL NEVER KNOW WHEN IT WILL HAPPEN.
SEE YOU LATER LOONIES
#91
just what the heck are you trying to imply looney ass?? by the way, your caps lock gone wild…just ask CHINNY CHIN CHIN MANUSTON for advice if you are planning to hang yourself sicko!!! YOU and CHINNY deserve each other, coz both of you are born LOSERS and WHINERS
LOL.. what is FF?? Oh well..post my comments please please please? Just make sure to give me credit where credit is due.. Ima.. that is spelled I.M.A.
# 93 Ima
what is FF??
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It’s a wonderful information-filled site, feel free to visit at your leisure:
http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/forum-40.html
FF means female fugs fan of Maniston who are the most evil, vile group of haters.
Her book won’t be more than 1 page! But it’s still very hard work for Jen, good luck!!!!!
Angelina is nothing but a Publicity *****, she collects children around the world to cover up her SINS and gain publicity……
Jennifer is a down to earth…classy….good hearted female……nobody can change that……….
I’ve noticed many JA haters critisize her looks.
Superficial, much? and she’s not hurting anyone so why are y’all so worked up over nothing?
Please lily, try to understand global problems without an imperialist point of view. Global warming is because of the unequal use of energy by the developed country habitants. Do you know the per capita emissions in the US vs. in India? I will tell you: by 2003 19.3 and 1.19, respectively. Did you read about the colonial history of francophone Africa? Did you read about the great famine in India and think about it is not because lack of food but because of lack of entitlement? Have you ever thought about the “haves” and “have-nots” around the world? How about the landless poor? Infant and under 5 mortality is still very high, why do you think in many cultures, children are not named until their first birthday?
1960s were the times when the “population bomb” was the concern, today it is the unequal distribution of resources within and among countries. Before accusing other people’s life chances, try how much your life style is contributing to the problems around the world. Hope these will entice your curiosity and take you out of narrow mindset.
~curly
———————————————-
Curly - all you did by your statement was confirm what I said. Let’s see, overuse of resources by developed countries, and here I am talking about trying to control population in countries where you and me are at - which are developed countries.
The only reason why the US has more emissions than India is because the majority of the people don’t have access to those resources. But, I’ve been to India and that is all changing, and once those 1 billion persons have access to the same resources than in the US, you’ll see the numbers then.
Of course the deveoped countries misuse and overuse the resources, that is human nature - and the more people are on this earth the worse it would get.
Yes, there is child mortality, but that didn’t change anything in China did it? There is a reason why now there are millions of single children there.
Thanks for letting me you point of view, but I am not trying to accuse, I am also like you bringing my opinion to the subject.
As for doing my part to reduce consumption, I’ve already a headstart - I don’t live in the US.
99 | lily
Fertility rate in Europe is below the replacement rate, the US is the only developed country where fertility is above replacement rate (2.34 or something close to it). Both sides of the ocean have or are in the process of implementing strict immigration policies, so overpopulation is not a concern for exploitation of natural resources in the developed countries. I think this explains “here I am talking about trying to control population in countries where you and me are at - which are developed countries” part of your post.
Over- and misusing resources and following arguments such as “that is human nature” conceal the byproducts of the economic system that we live in. Tragedy of commons is not as prevalent as we think.
The population of India makes people shudder when it comes to resource use, but rarely the inequalities entrenched in India give people a second thought about future resource use. Bangladesh is one of the poorest and most populous countries, but it is already paying the price of global warming. So, “once those 1 billion persons have access to the same resources than in the US, you’ll see the numbers then.” is not a robust forecast, it is unlikely that those one billion will have the same access to resources before first paying the price of global warming.
I am not sure if I understand what your post means by “Yes, there is child mortality, but that didn’t change anything in China did it? There is a reason why now there are millions of single children there”. For any mechanism that tries to engineer social policies, such as one-child policy in China, is doomed to counter unintended consequences eventually. The marriage system in China is already showing acute shortage of brides. Furthermore, because of one-child policy, China is not a good example for high child mortality. How about Haiti, lack of public health system combined with high fertility and high child mortality?
And lastly, not living in the US is not necessary and sufficient to give any random person an advantage when it comes to conservation of resources.
Thanks for your follow-up and elaboration, however I still believe your first post above misses the fundamental systemic problems in natural resource use and blame the poorest of the poor.
~curly
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!