Jennifer Aniston: Adoption Papers Filed!

The difference between Aniston and Jolie is that one said she wanted kids and never had or even seemed like she wanted them. The other said she only saw herself as only adopting, went ahead and adopted, met a man who wanted to have a bio kid and actually considered it. To fulfill her partners wishes and to have their child and also continue to adopt.
It’s about standing by your word and considering your partners word. Jennifer didn’t seem to do that for Brad.

Oh please, they’re all the same. Brad and Angelina just have a better spinmaster for their PR. Celebrities are publicity whores by nature. It’s what they do for a living.

Maybe she didn’t want to have a child while her career was still in higher gear? What’s wrong with that? There are many woman today who are career focused and we’ve all seen how you can go from hot to not in Hollywood. How does wanting to be a mother now that she has the time and desire to focus on it make her a hypocrite? If anything, it’s more admirable that way.

And I’m sorry, but once you hit a certain age, many of us DO become inspired by our friends who are starting families, however they are starting them. It doesn’t necessarily make you a copy cat, but it may make you realize what you truly want. If she were copying Brad and Angelina, she’d have adopted 6 by now and be dragging them all over the world.

I hope she does. It is a great experience and something to direct her attention to and away from Brad. They are divorced!

OH GOD NO. POOR KID!!!!!! :(:(:(

Curiousgal I agree thats the only way she will get an oscar. LOL

Didi you are a riot. :D

lollypop you trying to prove yourself was emberresing to look at. SORRY!! Just admit when wrong and drop it!! Otherwise it comes back in your face. It takes a bigger person to own up. Always remember that :D!

does anyone know why people in the states cant adopt from there? isnt that were angies kid is from???

And why doesnt she adopt from a poor country!!!?? Doesnt she care at about starved children??? b!tch!

Celebrities are all the same. Brad and Angelina just have a better spinmaster for their PR. Everyone in Hollywood is a publicity *****, by nature. It’s how they make their living - let’s not be naive.

So what if she chose not to have a child while her career was at its high point? If anything, it’s commendable that she waited until she has the time and desire to focus on it more fully. How exactly does that make her a hypocrite? And anyone knows you don’t have a child just to keep a man - it’s a recipe for disaster. Any man who leaves his wife because she’s not ready yet is either an *ss or doesn’t love her or both. Either way, good riddance.

Many women, once they reach a certain stage in their lives, become inspired by their friends and family starting their own families. It doesn’t necessarily make them a copy cat - just aware of something they didn’t know they really wanted. If she were truly trying to copy Brad and Angelina, she’d have 4-5 already and be dragging them all over the world.

When they askd her 2 years ago while she promoting her movie if she want to adopt? She said that is not me now this. What a liar.

lollypop you trying to prove yourself was emberresing to look at. SORRY!! Just admit when wrong and drop it!! Otherwise it comes back in your face. It takes a bigger person to own up. Always remember that!
132 Madgie | 06/13/2007 at 1:39 pm

Let me prove myself one more time and give you a spelling lesson. The word is spelled: embarrassing not as you wrote “emberresing”. Always remember that! Now, I hope you admit that you are wrong and drop it because remember, “It takes a bigger person to own up”. Now troll, poof! Be gone!

Oh but they do care else they wouldn’t spend so much time and effort to make an impression. The livelyhood of celebrities depends on the public believe it or not so if I think this chick is full of it and won’t buy **** with her face on it then guess what, that’s a problem for her now isn’t it? She has all the money she’ll ever need but that isn’t enough because she’s still in the game for a reason. She, like the rest of them, want to be acknowledged. Some claim for the work while others simply want to be seen. So yes I DO matter.

But it’s funny still how few who view Jennifer favorably will address anything other than making excuses for the obvious. This is the same woman who could not fathom babysitting her godchild, does anybody REALLY think motherhood is one of her top priorities? I can at least respect Brad and Angelina because when they go on and on about their family & blah blah blah at least, AT LEAST it is because somebody asked or it is somehow inquired about. This chick has fallen off the radar so common sense suggests that her people have to make a ******* announcement that she is still alive and that pisses me off.

You ask how I know? Think on this: if she and her boyfriend were caught candidly leaving a club or taking a walk or whatever then maybe just maybe I might leave the window of possibility open that the media picked up on it and hence the story. BUT that is not how it went down. He’s leaving the house yet nobody can seem to catch them together? Oh and its also not true, but again he’s coming out of the house just to leave to impression still. PLEASE. PR is my field of study but the blind could see this.

hello jen..in case you read this know that there are alot of your fans,who are so very proud of you, getting on with your life holding your head high,a free independent woman ,making good choices,having good friends,looking and acting healthy, good to see you smiling again,aftyer such public humiliation, you go girl, and lets have a moment of silence, fo poor sad cliniqua. she muct be prosrate,with anxiety today.

To those who say, “Didn’t say she wouldn’t adopt,” — Didn’t Angelina say she’d never have a biological baby? Answer: YES. I read it with my own eyes years ago after she adopted Mad. People Change.

NOW THE REAL REVIEWS ABOUT A MIGHTY HEART…..

About Jolie’s performance - CANNES: Trumpet the cause, don’t dwarf it + models dissed at the Du Cap, a Rolls ride and Clooney in zoom
By Liza Foreman

“When I did make it into the cinema to see “A Mighty Heart,” “We Own the Night,” and “Ocean’s 13” frankly I asked myself why I’d bothered. The first featured Angelina in one of, I thought, the kitschy-est performances of her career. Following on from the work of Jennifer Lopez in “Bordertown,” which was laughed out of the cinema at the press screening in Berlin, it makes you wonder whether it’s not better for actors of a certain stature to trumpet these causes rather than dwarf such important political films.”

PS…Ocean’s 13 BOMBED!!!! barely 33 million???!!

Angelina Jolie ((((dwarfed such important political film)))))

Jolie’s performance was (((kitschy)))))

A Mighty Heart WILL BOMB!!!!!! It’s unfortunate because Marianne Pearl deserves better.

_______________________________________________

Yet ((((another True & Bad Review))))

For A Mighty Heart:

(((A MIGHTY HEART WILL BOMB!!!))))

the tomato meter is falling at rottentomatoes… it was 86 last week, 78 this week:

for example:
A Mighty Heart, by Ed Gonzalez
Posted: June 7, 2007

Bad Michael Winterbottom movies are not uncommon, but none have been as useless as A Mighty Heart. The film’s only achievement may be what Premiere’s Glenn Kenny acknowledges as the director’s understanding that audiences are no longer able to look at Angelina Jolie onscreen without seeing Angelina Jolie. Winterbottom recognizes the actress’s iconicity as a force that must be reckoned with—which is to say, disguised. Except the tricks he employs to help the actress disappear into the film’s tapestry of uncertainty aren’t exactly new and reek of evasiveness. You could say they’re as transparent as this painstaking chronicle of a police investigation is gutless.

Asking no questions, giving no insights, and demanding nothing of his audience, Winterbottom dramatizes the last days in the life of Daniel Pearl in his typically cold, hyperventilating fashion: cinematography that looks like the walls of the Lincoln Tunnel, shots that don’t last more than five seconds, and lazy cultural specificity. His faux sense of urgency attempts to keep the blood pumping, except all it does is camouflage this historical recreation’s almost disturbing lack of resonance. Getting at nothing about Daniel’s wife Mariane (Jolie) as a woman or a journalist, or the ethical conundrum of Americans living in foreign lands, Winterbottom settles for a cliché portrait of a wife waiting for her husband to come home

Madgie, The United States banned all adoption from Cambodia in December 2001. Adoption applications that were submitted before December were processed (on a case by case basis apparantly) to make sure the children there realy were orphans. Angelina had already filed papers to adopt her son before the ban.

When I started seriously considering adoption, a Cambodian baby girl was what I had had my heart set on, but after researching the Country we found that U.S had put a ban up due to illegal trafficking. Apparantly some orphanges over there are not very trustworthy, as two infants were snatched from their birth mother and one of them was in the process of being adopted by a U.S couple.

It realy sucks because there are so many over there that need a home, and many people over here are willing to give them one.

Maybe if she adopts more kids than Brangelina, Bran, er, Brad will come back.

She should have a bio baby if she wants to screw a kid up. There aren’t enough white kids to go around and growing up in Hollywood isn’t the best environment.

Which reminds me….not long ago tiny pets were the accessory for celebs. Now it’s adoped babies. What next?