Top Stories

Jennifer Aniston: Adoption Papers Filed!

Jennifer Aniston: Adoption Papers Filed!

Inspired by her friend Sheryl Crow & the suppot of her new man (British model Paul Sculfor), Jen’s filed the papers to adopt her own baby son

Jennifer Aniston is adopting, an adoption agency source tells OK! magazine.

Aniston is apparently working with the same agency Sheryl Crow used to adopt and would “love a boy.”

A friend of Aniston’s tells the magazine that she’s been thinking about adoption for a while and got the process going after seeing Crow with newly adopted son Wyatt.

“The process has 100% started,” a source says.

UPDATE: Jen’s publicist Stephen Huvane tells US Weekly, “It is completely false. Jennifer has not met with any adoption agencies.”

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Lea Michele loves Cyndi Lauper - PopEater
  • Mickey Rourke picks up a new puppy - Dlisted
  • Emma Watson relaxes in Jamaica - PopSugar
  • Jessica Biel shares what motivates her as an actress - LaineyGossip
  • Alec Baldwin doesn't have an interest in acting anymore - Celebuzz
  • Jaden Smith is the next Karate Kid - JustJaredJr
  • Nick Hogan is in a car accident after promoting safe driving - TheSuperficial
Joseph Marzullo/WENN

239 Comments

Pages: « 14 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 » Show All

Tabi | 06/13/2007 at 3:12 pm

Ahem. Its HEAR not ‘here’.

Pretty interesting, to say the least. Maybe your the one that needs the spell check.
………………….

lmfao!!

Scooby Doo @ 06/13/2007 at 3:29 pm

60 Lolly Pop | 06/13/2007 at 12:04 pm
She said her inspiration was Sheryl Crow not Brad and Angie? That’s rich! She is starting to concern me. Next thing we’ll here is the baby is from Cambodia or Vietnam. Excuse my snark, but really Jen. Adoption is a good thing and it isn’t new at all but why can’t she just admit who the idea came from?

Ahem. Its HEAR not ‘here’.

Pretty interesting, to say the least. Maybe your the one that needs the spell check.
171 Tabi | 06/13/2007 at 3:12 pm

Spell check would not have picked that up because “here” is actually a word. It is not misspelled it is just the wrong word. That’s why it did not pick up the fact that you used “your” instead of the correct word “you’re” (you are) in your post. Pretty interesting indeed…

I absolutley agree with Indie. Drop the bullshit already. This is about Aniston. What happened, did you get bored picking on her so now its time to pick on Lolly? *rolls*

southern belle @ 06/13/2007 at 3:43 pm

147 missouri girl | 06/13/2007 at 2:20 pm
To AMH will bomb | 06/12/2007 at 3:35 pm
Talk about rotten tomatoes…

The Break UP 33%

Along came Polly 27%

Derailed 20%

Rumor Has It 18%

=============================================================================================================================================

Jennifer Aniston will never be a major actress, but she could end up being a powerful force to reckon with behind the scenes as a producer. She does not need beauty to make it as a sharp businesswoman.

Comparing Jolie to Aniston is absurd because the main appeal of Jolie is her physical beauty. If she looked like Aniston and was a Goodwill Ambassador, we would barely care about her. Jolie’s advantage is her looks and a kind heart absolutely adds to her fame.

Jolie is a pretty good actress, but she doesn’t pull some of her characters off at all. Her accent in “AMH” sounds just like her accent in “Alexander,” and I hated it as well as the movie.

I also hated her in “The Good Shepherd.” She was good as the young, pre-wed nymph, but not as the mother or a young man and she had absolutely zero chemistry or connection with Matt Damon’s character.

Jolie’s movies are overall not that great. Most are fun and entertaining. They are exciting when she is the sexpot, but they’re not excellent pieces of work. She doesn’t get excellent roles. She is still not in the category of greatness. Her films basically make money because of her fan base and beauty, not her talent.

Greatness is Meryl Streep, Glenn Close, Audrey Hepburn, Liz Taylor, Hepburn, Cate Blanchett and many others who are able to transform themselves into a myriad of characters.

Lolly Pop @ 06/13/2007 at 3:44 pm

Scooby, you beat me to it! I wonder if Sara is still as she wrote “lmfao!!”? Nadira, thanks. I HEAR you and will drop it. I just couldn’t resist :-)

[Famous Fug Face] @ 06/13/2007 at 3:45 pm

people really love her.

lollyscooby, That was my mistake, and atleast I am not afraid to admit when I make one. ;)

As we all know most people do put ‘your’ instead of you’re or you are. Look around and you will see that. And Im sure if I back tracked through all of your posts I would find the same. However Here and Hear are two very different words with different meanings. Big difference. lol

Tabi you werent the one going around correcting everyones spelling in the first place, that was lolly pop. So dont be ashamed or anything. lol

ja is the ANTICHRIST!

lol at this whole adoption thing. Thats what I say. lol

To Southern Belle

I do agree that Meryl Streep, Cate Blanchett etc. are good actresses. But I must admit that Angelina Jolie is an excellent actress, too, if she really gets into the roles. Usually I don’t pay any attention to actors or actresses. But when I saw Gia (this my first movie with Angelina),I was fascinated by the person who was willing to play that difficult role. At that time I was more interested in Winona Ryder and Michelle Pfeiffer’s movies. After Gia I have never thought about it again, then “Girl interrupted” came, again I became very curious… While I have never been able to watch a whole serie “Friends”. Perhaps because am an European and don’t like that American humour so much.
Sorry, for disagreeing you but I am convinced that Angelina is talented. Sure her action movies ask just physical ability… However, Angelina is an actress. This is my opinion and I can accept yours.

Maybe your right Indie, I guess most people realy didnt know that. How old are, btw’???

Ands sorry, Lollypop.

Scooby Doo @ 06/13/2007 at 4:06 pm

182 Tabi | 06/13/2007 at 3:49 pm
lollyscooby, That was my mistake, and atleast I am not afraid to admit when I make one.

I’m no spelling bee winner or grammar giant myself, but it was necessary. Enough with the BS already! I almost forgot what the subject of the thread was. I’ll never understand why strangers attack other strangers. I only said something because it seemed like one person was getting beat up pretty good. Anyway, this whole discussion is useless because there is a story out saying JA is NOT adopting. Anyway, see y’all! I’m off to the grocery store.

Charlotte it is called life. This man left for a reason. Much as everyone likes to think he let his ***** do the deciding, Brad Pitt has had access to beauty long before Jennifer and throughout their union. Why then was Angelina the great temptress he could not keep away from? In a case of rape or abuse you do not blame the victim, but in this she deserves some responsibility. We have all become well aware that having children was one of the major issues and most likely there were others, however how anyone can say he didn’t wait her out is beyond me. And granted we are not talking about everyday people who literally have to raise their children from the ground up (as in actually changing diapers, driving to school, buying the groceries, balancing the check book, etc.) we are talking about people who can literally enjoy the better aspects of parenting as there is hired help to do the dirty work. If she was not ready then it was all mental. Who is to say that would change or ever will? I mean just like clockwork they have denied this one as soon as they spilled it out so really now? Marriage is not just for the happiness of the woman.

I think if she had poisoned her ex-husband the outrage would not be as great because all the while there is going to be a group of townspeople yelling CHEATER which makes all even. People please get out of this 5th grade girl power attitude. Women’s liberation didn’t erase the structure of marriage. She just was not holding up her end of the deal…

Lolly Pop @ 06/13/2007 at 4:15 pm

No problem! My apologies to you Sara as well. P.S., I wrote all of my comments myself.

I don’t understand why people hate Jennifer so much… she keeps to herself and is trying hard just to be happy, why not adopt? Being a mother is the best thing that could happen to her.

Good for her. I think she’ll be a great mother! She seems like she has such kindness and compassion.

According to my mother, a true lady never reveals her age. :lol:

-> Middle twenties. =)

And Im glad that you apologized. Lolly Pop realy deserved to have one given to her. :)

suspicious package @ 06/13/2007 at 4:26 pm

Huvane has already issued a denial to US Weekly. Never saw that one coming!

You people get so rabid about this woman, if she’s futile in your eyes I am not sure why you are on this thread. Seriously, I agree with the last poster, if you are all adults writing these hateful remarks about someone, that’s sad.

Lolly Pop @ 06/13/2007 at 4:37 pm

193 Indie | 06/13/2007 at 4:25 pm

Indie, Thanks for injecting some commonsense into this thread. I might have been one of those that went a bit overboard. Thanks for reeling us back in :-)

That’s fake

No worries, Lolly Pop. :) Its only natural for people to want to defend themselves when they are ganged up on. I have done it many many times. I sometimes lose my temper at people here when I realy should have just ignored them. No one is perfect. ^_^

southern belle @ 06/13/2007 at 4:57 pm

Coco,

I never watched Friends. The few minutes I caught didn’t make me laugh. It’s not my type of humor.

I loved Angelina Jolie in Gia and Girl Interrupted also, BUT…

Those characters were right in line with her. She used to model. She once used drugs. She could identify with Gia’s pain and have a field day with the role. Gia wasn’t a far enough stretch, and again, Jolie was incredibly beautiful in the movie. That fact alone drew many people in. They were mesmerized.

Girl Interrupted was another perfect role for Jolie because she was wild, exotic, rebellious and beautiful but disturbed. I just don’t think these roles were that difficult for her to play.

Jolie’s characters are somewhat over-dramatic. I want to see her once play a smaller-than-life character where her acting skills really show through, but I haven’t seen her do that. If she was really serious about acting, I think she would probably attempt to do live theater like “the greats” almost always do at one time or another in their careers. I don’t think Jolie is that into it and when she gets a little older and less marketale, she will fade out of acting and will concentrate on her goodwill work and raise her children full-time. Acting is not her passion like it is for many other actors.

Glenn Close played a crazy, sexy, woman in Fatal Attraction and was so believable. She can play the Vice President and a down-home country woman or anyone’s mother. She could do this when she was younger also. I think Cate Blanchett can also do it all and be believable. Meryl Streep is not gorgeous or young, but I’ll watch her films because I know the acting will be spot on. Through her great acting ability, she will add something special.

So far, when Jolie plays a more regular character, she’s pretty bland. If the movie doesn’t showcase her beauty, I generally don’t want to see it. Though AMH is an important film, I feel no desire to see it in a theater. I will wait for it on DVD.

Does this woman ever tell the truth? She was just on Larry King last year, ..he asked her if she would ever want to adopt and she said NO, ADOPTION IS NOT FOR ME.!!!!!!

I WILL BELIEVE IT WHEN I SEE IT.

Pages: « 14 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.