Angelina Jolie: Pimp My Picture, Not My Life!

The thing is, it’s not a non story. It is a big deal for her, Brad, Marianne, the movie, the studio.

Well no offense but it’s not a big deal to anyone else than because this is the biggest non story I have read LOL. It’s a joke. I think the fans care more than anybody. Two weeks from now no one will give a damn. Including Fox News.

we are all a bunch of speculators. we don’t have any idea about any of this do we? you know it

#251: two weeks from now, AMH might not be in a lot of movie theaters. We want the ticket sales to expand, not diminish. Why do you think Paramount became horrified?

Control Freak~~~~~

Chez, I just saw your response. I was gone for a while. Your question was:”Why the sudden Change of Heart?” There was no sudden change of heart. Make a distinction between what is written and what is said in live interviews-With Ann Curry she spoke about her mom and brad and kids and this interview was about AMH, but Ann Curry did not pry-In print she spoke about family but the questions were not prying personal ones and she offered the information about PAX and Shiloh. One thing that irks me is the”blob” comment. She didn’t say Blob, the reporter suggested that, I do believe. However, if it was her word, why focus on that one word? It’s the same for Aniston. Aniston clearly said in an Interview that Brad was not THE LOVE of her life. I was thinking to myself, WHAT THEN IS the Love of your life? After the wedding she and Courtney and Lisa gave and interview and Aniston was clearly not overjoyed-
However, this media blitz of stolen husband, cheater, homewrecker, pregnant on purpose, too skinny, kissing brother, poor jen, turn the page, 8 million dollar, CNN “crawl”, vince is a great friend. . . is just or was just a little over the top- to put it in a nut shell

Jolie marches to her own drum, always has always will-

Pitt is happy where he is, if he stays he stays, if he leaves, he leaves,

Aniston FILED for divorce and has said that she has moved on,

You never miss that toy you didn’t want to play with until someone else has it in their hands. . . that, chez is a fact of life

it’s so sad how very few people understand the difference between reporting and mere sensationalism. really…many of the posters in perez and here are saying that it’s ironic blah blah blah because the premiere was for “reporters without borders”?!!

did this people think that “no borders” mean that reporters can just ask silly questions that don’t have anything to do with the movie or, ask about the celebrity’s private life instead of the real purpose of the whole event?!

are these people equating sensationalism with borderless reporting?!

well, here’s the truth! the media does NOT have an all-encompassing right to just field in questions they WANT to ask. instead, they are bound by a huge RESPONSIBILITY to shed light on what an event like this is all about—questions they NEED to ask! so let me explain further:

-instead of just rattling off questions, they should be able to know what’s APPROPRIATE at the moment or on a particular occasion
-responsible reportage is about asking intelligent, well-thought out questions that are meant to dig deeper into the whole focus of the event
-definitely not sensationalize by asking IRRELEVANT questions that stray away from the real topic
-lastly, the MEDIA should have RESPECT for the people they are interviewing or covering. they shouldn’t act as if personalities and celebrities owe their life, careers and their success to them

So, the real question is not for Angie to answer but for these people in the media, the reporters, broadcasters, writers and etc: WHO DO THEY THINK THEY ARE?

Do they think that just because they’re in the media and that they have their all-powerful media badge, they’re superior to everybody else? That celebrities and personalities should bow down to their every whim and grovel at their feet? Well, Angie just gave you the answer: a resounding NO!!!

It’s simple, today’s media must learn the value of real, honest to goodness reporting minus the sensationalism and learn to focus on what’s important–and not bicker and whine like a 7yr old when they don’t get their way!

We love you Angelina Jolie!!! YOU MAY HAVE MORE SUCCESS IN YOUR LIFE, YOU AND YOUR FAMILY.

All I wanna know is when is brad gonna wear some speedos and where will be be when he wears them. Lil’ Angie don’t have to answer nothing but that one question. Just that one. I love Brad-
I wanted to have his baby-
I wanna pour chocolate all over his chest and spread some rediwhip and just lick until my tongue gets tired!!!!
Hallelujah children! Hallelujah!
Yall young girlz jest don’t know-yall jest don’t know!

Fox, USA Today etc. got butthurt because they don’t give a crap about the movie.

262 Jane | 06/14/2007 at 4:33 pm
——————————

Jane, if you think America is a free country, you are sadly mistaken. The press in this is NOT allowed to ask whatever they want.

H*ll, in this country, the dicatator…I mean the President has town hall meetings where only his supporters are allowed in so they can clap like fools at whatever BS he spouts.

In this country, news channels like CNN, FOX, and MSNBC focus on Paris Hilton going to jail because thats what brings in the ratings and profits. On the same day Paris Hilton was being taken back to court, a senior General of the Miltary was resigning and people were dying in Iraq. And you know what the “free press” decided to focus on? That’s right.

Paris Fcuking Hilton.

And because Angelina Jolie dared to tell the “free press” to stay on topic regarding the movie, they felt offended because their freedom to use Angelina’s personal life and sensationalize it for profit was taken away from them.

I can totally understand why she would want to do this. She wants the movie to be about Daniel & Marianne Pearl, and not about her. If the reporters can’t understand that then it’s their loss. She would openly talk about herself in other interviews but for this movie, she wants the focus to be on the subject matter and discussions about her personal relationships would just distract from it.

“Who does she think she is?”

well for starters she’s the star you want to interview, you asshat! Clearly she is sought after and if you were doing YOUR job, you’d interview her about the god damn movie!

I say kudos to her! But, she’s going to feel the backlash from this…. they’ll start runnin’ every nasty POS gossip/rumor they can find in retaliation.

“In the most hypocritical move ever, Angelina Jolie tried to censor all her interviews yesterday while promoting A Mighty Heart, her new film about freedom of the press. Jolie had her publicists ban FOX News from the red carpet of her premiere, and then had her lawyer require all journalists to sign a contract before talking to her, which basically said nobody could talk about her personal life and that “the interview may only be used to promote the Picture. In no event may Interviewer or Media Outlet be entitled to run all or any portion of the interview in connection with any other story. … The interview will not be used in a manner that is disparaging, demeaning, or derogatory to Ms. Jolie.”

USA Today and the Associated Press canceled their interviews, and eventually Jolie cut off all print interviews when she heard the reaction. And if all this wasn’t hypocritical enough, the premiere was a benefit for the organization Reporters Without Borders and she’s got a tattoo on her back that says “Know your rights.” How did she go from the hottest woman on the planet to the most annoying one? Nobody would even care about this except that she’s running around the world pretending to be better than everybody else. It’s like finding out instead of helping all those starving children in Africa she’s actually been giving them wedgies.”