Brad & Angelina - “A Mighty Heart” After Party

Where are the reviews for the movie from the premiere, that’s what we should focus on.

I hope we aren’t subjected to reprimands for discussing this topic. For once, this is an interesting, multilayered issue.

Something just came to me… remember the Cannes press conference when a journalist stood up, introduced himself to Mariane, and promptly apologized to her for asking whether she watched Daniel’s beheading? Although I construed it as his making himself a part of the story, but at least, for once, a journalist took responsibility for crossing a line.

448 liar that what you are dreaming of

It took brad, angelina and paramount almost 6 months to get pass the incidents in india and the whole white actress playing a black one. Now, today ALL blogs and news are talking about the fox incident. One more time the movie gets forgottten. Thank you angelina.

I’m happy that usa today and AP didn’t agree to sing the contract either.

453 piper, with a low | 06/14/2007 at 10:51 am

I hope we aren’t subjected to reprimands for discussing this topic. For once, this is an interesting, multilayered issue.
______________________________________

I agree.

That tatoo is exactly the reason we know she is not the kind of person that you think she is.

456 Mmmmm | 06/14/2007 at 10:53 am
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Funny when people bring up freedom of speech it seems only Fox has that freedom not AJ. Fox has the right to say whatever they want to say and they are and they have been but in turn AJ has the right the same right to talk to who ever she wants to under whatever terms she deems necessary. Fox has the right to except those terms or not. See how that works AJ actually has freedom of speech also and she actually exercised it.

458 Mzslil | 06/14/2007 at 10:56 am
=============

My question to you is, why do you watch a channel that you seem to dislike so much? It’s not like there is no other ones out there. I never watch Fox.

460 African Girl | 06/14/2007 at 10:57 am
426 Mmmmm | 06/14/2007 at 10:29 am
********
Or we could just divert those funds to something of more importance…getting YOU a brain before your empty head falls off from lack of support…WOW!
====================

:lol: :lol: AG. Right on.

I have a question tho… I dunno what the rules between artists and reporters in the showbizz are, but are they obligated to answer reporters’ personal questions?
Is there a way that Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, GC can tell them to f*ck off whenever the personal questions come up? Can they tell the papz to mind their own business or something like ”no comment. next please.” Is this possible? I’ve never seen any of them saying that. They are always nice . It’s as if they’re scared of the reporters, they’re scared the papz will say bad things about them. Don’t anyone agree on that one?
I’d really like to see someone like Angelina or Brad Pitt to do this some day because the press is getting really ridiculous with their banal personal questions.
please answer my questions. Thank you.

ohh angie | 06/14/2007 at 11:04 am
I get the don’t ask personal questions part BUT she can’t tell a reporter that if they want to get an interview with her they HAVE to write ONLY positive things about her. I’m happy she’s getting bashed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Where exactly did she say that? Really where? She said to stay on the topic at hand, the movie and the interview could only be used to promote the movie. The reporter can say whatever they want to say about her, her life, her children but the can’t use the interview to help them do that. What part of that don’t you get?

Where exactly did she say that? Really where? She said to stay on the topic at hand, the movie and the interview could only be used to promote the movie. The reporter can say whatever they want to say about her, her life, her children but the can’t use the interview to help them do that. What part of that don’t you get?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here

The interview will not be used in a manner that is disparaging, demeaning, or derogatory to Ms. Jolie.”

About namibia and dictatorships:

Namibia

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005
Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
March 8, 2006

Namibia is a multiparty, multiracial democracy with a population of 2,030,000. On March 21, Hifikepunye Pohamba became the country’s second democratically elected president; Pohamba was elected in November 2004 and replaced Sam Nujoma, the country’s first president and leader of the ruling South West Africa People’s Organization (SWAPO). International and domestic observers agreed the 2004 general elections, in which SWAPO won three-quarters of national assembly seats, were generally free and reflected the will of the electorate despite some irregularities. The civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces.

The government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in several areas. An extreme disparity in income levels of black citizens and white citizens and high unemployment in the black majority continued to pose serious challenges. The following human rights problems were reported:

security force use of excessive force during arrests and detentions, which resulted in deaths and injuries
arbitrary arrest, lengthy pretrial detention, and lengthy delays during trials
government attempts to curb media and nongovernmental (NGO) criticism
violence against women and children, including rape and child abuse
discrimination against women, ethnic minorities, and indigenous people
child labor
During the year local human rights groups noted fewer restrictions on the media and a decrease in abuses committed by security forces. The government also took steps to curb corruption.

_________________________

The full report can be found here from the US department of stage website:

http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61584.htm

LOOKS LIKE FOX NEWS DOESN’T DO THEIR RESEARCH!!!!!!!