School’s Out for the Jolie-Pitts!
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie bring big brother Maddox, 5, to pick up Pax, 3, and Zahara, 2, from school at the American Embassy compound on a very wet Thursday afternoon in Prague, Czech Republic.
School might be out for Pax and Zee, one of them made a green graduation cap!
Maddox looks like he got a hair-cut… and he’s getting so big!
Watch the video of the Jolie-Pitts here. It’s quite cute to watch Maddox and Pax running through the rain!!
Posted to: Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Celebrity Babies, Maddox Jolie Pitt, Pax Jolie Pitt, Zahara Jolie Pitt
Related posts:








Older










1,094 Comments
Plese don’t forget rating this movie.
Fake watchers had been devaluing this film.
see above {users rating}
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mighty_heart/
I sometimes wonder about the people who run blogs and write for gossip columns. They have no issue with spreading such venom. Maybe it’s because a lot of these people who run blogs are gay men and don’t have children. I can’t help sterotype but some women (the desperate kind) and some gays are extremely catty towards females they find threatening. And I’m not trying to be anti-gay about my statments. Believe me, I’m the last one to like that. I’m socially liberal but I can’t help but think that this might be part of the reason why these people are so nasty towards AJ.
584 Elaine | 06/21/2007 at 8:23 pm
I just wanted to share on the topic of Angie’s weight loss. I don’t know the cause of her weight loss, but I went through a similar ordeal January 2007. My only child was killed at the tender age of 19. I was so consumed with grief until it took others to point out my weight loss. I was looking gaunt and frail to others, but my appearance was the last thing on my mind. After 3 mos I went back to work and got on the scale. I had lost almost 20 lbs in 3 mos. I thank God for having love ones around me who cared enough to pull me through. My faith pulled me out of despair and now I am taking care of myself. I am taking vitamins and supplements when I don’t have the desire to eat. Just wanted you all to know that grief can be brutal if not dealt with properly. I have been a nurse for 24 years and still needed the faith, love and support from others to get through my ordeal. I have learned how to grieve properly. I am praying that Angie will find that time heals all wounds. Cherish the memories and enjoy life to come. Don’t judge her unless you’ve walked in her shoes
–
thanks for posting your story and giving some of us an insight of what Angelina maybe going through.
932 PAGING CLINIQUA | 06/22/2007 at 1:44 am
Ivy2006 needs an asswhooping over at jjb.
———————
;-)
Jolie’s ‘Heart’ pumps life into Oscar Chatter
By Gregg Kilday
29 minutes ago
LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - There’s no official starting gun to the annual Oscar race, and the finish line for the 80th Annual Academy Awards isn’t until February 24. But a number of races already have begun — some quietly, some not so quietly.
This weekend, Paramount Vantage is launching “A Mighty Heart,” director Michael Winterbottom’s re-creation of the kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl at the hands of Pakistani militants. Starring Angelina Jolie as Pearl’s wife Mariane, who led the search for her husband, the film debuted in May at Cannes.
As of Thursday, the documentary-like thriller rated an 80 percent positive rating on RottenTomatoes.com, but higher-end critics have been even more positive. Vantage isn’t being shy about using the “O” word: Print ads quote Ben Lyons of E! Entertainment proclaiming, “The early favorite for best picture at this year’s Oscars,” while TV ads also invoke its Oscar-worthiness.
Actually, months from now, when the Oscar campaigns are in high gear, “Heart’s” awards hopes probably will coalesce around Jolie’s performance as the actress succeeds in the tricky job of capturing a real-life woman whose tragic story made headlines in 2002. But a nomination isn’t automatically guaranteed since this year’s best actress field is one of the strongest in years.
Lionsgate already has released Sarah Polley’s “Away From Her,” a portrait of a couple coping with Alzheimer’s, starring a luminous Julie Christie as a woman battling the disease, which could earn the actress the fourth nomination of her career. Picturehouse recently launched “La Vie en Rose,” starring French actress Marion Cotillard as chanteuse Edith Piaf. At the Seattle International Film Festival, which concluded last weekend, Cotillard was rewarded with the audience award for best actress, a harbinger of future trips she could well make to the winner’s podium.
Next weekend, another possible contender enters the field when Focus Features debuts “Evening,” Lajos Koltai’s screen adaptation of the Susan Minot novel. Vanessa Redgrave stars as a dying woman looking back over her life.
And that’s just the best actress heat, which is destined to get more crowded as the year progresses and other films — like Universal Pictures’ “The Golden Age,” in which Cate Blanchett reprises the role of Queen Elizabeth I, which earned her an Oscar nomination for “Elizabeth” in 1999 — enter the field.
At the same time, other categories are just beginning to take shape. Next weekend also will see Disney’s release of Pixar’s “Ratatouille,” which is earning rave advance reviews. Although just nine reviews have been posted on RottenTomatoes to date, they have registered a resounding 100% approval rating. There’s still a wide array of animated films to come: among others, 20th Century Fox’s “The Simpsons Movie”; DreamWorks’ “Bee Movie”; and Sony Pictures Classics’ “Persepolis,” which uses animation to tell a very grown-up story of a young Iranian woman caught up in the Islamic Revolution. So “Ratatouille” isn’t necessarily a shoo-in, but by summer’s end, it’s likely to have established itself as the animation front-runner.
However it ultimately fares at the box office and with critics, Michael Moore’s “Sicko,” which also moves into wide release next weekend, is sure to kick-start discussions about the documentary race. The film itself already has elbowed its way into the national conversation.
Reuters/Hollywood Reporter
My prayers are with Angie.
From The New York Post:
PROFILE IN COURAGE
By LOU LUMENICK
June 22, 2007 — ANGELINA Jolie, whose offscreen antics have consistently upstaged her acting career since winning an Oscar seven years ago, puts aside her celebrity long enough to deliver a dazzling performance as Mariane Pearl in “A Mighty Heart.”
Greatly abetted by the no-nonsense, very un-Hollywood-ish approach that British director Michael Winterbottom takes to this fact-based thriller, Jolie dons dusky makeup, dark contact lenses and corkscrew curls.
She’s surprisingly successful at disappearing into the role.
Mariane, of course, is the widow of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal reporter who was kidnapped and executed by Islamic fundamentalists in Pakistan.
“A Mighty Heart,” adapted by John Orloff from a memoir by Mariane Pearl, focuses on five agonizing weeks beginning on Jan. 23, 2002 at the Pearl home in Karachi, Pakistan.
Daniel Pearl, who is researching a story on shoe bomber Richard Reid, disappears after a scheduled meeting with a source.
The Afro-Cuban-Dutch Mariane, a fellow journalist and onetime radio host in her native France, quickly assembles an international team - Daniel’s colleagues from the Journal and Pakistani and American officials - to find her husband.
Even before it’s revealed the source is bogus and Mariane starts getting e-mails containing ominous photographs from the kidnappers, it’s clear that Daniel is in real trouble.
Because he’s Jewish, some in Pakistan assume he’s a Mossad agent. Because he’s American, others suspect he’s working for the CIA.
“A Mighty Heart” is remarkably apolitical, considering that it comes from the director of the Bush-bashing “The Road to Guantanamo.”
The focus is on the desperate hunt for Pearl’s kidnappers, and Mariane never stops asking questions - even though she’s six months pregnant with the couple’s first child.
Though she’s a devoted and apparently fearless journalist, the film doesn’t adequately explain why she chooses to spend her pregnancy in such a dangerous place.
Winterbottom isn’t the sort of director who spells things out neatly.
He also doesn’t encourage movie-star showboating. Jolie isn’t allowed to let loose until Daniel’s body is found.
Even then, Winterbottom shoots in near-darkness - but it’s still enough to pretty much guarantee Jolie a Best Actress nomination.
Among the standouts in the well-chosen cast are Irfan Khan (”The Namesake”) as the resolute head of Pakistan’s anti-terrorist unit and Archie Panjabi as Mariane’s reporter pal Asra, whose Indian nationality alone is enough to make her a target in Pakistan.
Daniel Pearl is played by Dan Futterman (the Oscar-winning writer of “Capote”), a look-alike who makes the most of his extremely limited screen time, primarily flashbacks of the Pearls’ life together before Daniel’s kidnapping.
The movie eschews demonizing Pearl’s killers and instead focuses on the difficulties of international communication - a theme it has in common with “Babel,” another film that was produced by Jolie’s husband, Brad Pitt.
“A Mighty Heart” isn’t nearly as affecting as the earlier movie, though. Like Mariane Pearl, it’s tasteful and restrained - there is only the briefest snippet from the beginning of Daniel Pearl’s death tape, which Mrs. Pearl has refused to watch.
Still, it’s pretty heavy going for a summer movie.
lou.lumenick@nypost.com
A MIGHTY HEART
Well acted, well made.
Running time: 108 minutes. Rated R (profanity). At the Empire, the Cinema 1, the Chelsea, others.
952 just thinking | 06/22/2007 at 2:29 am
I sometimes wonder about the people who run blogs and write for gossip columns. They have no issue with spreading such venom. Maybe it’s because a lot of these people who run blogs are gay men and don’t have children. I can’t help sterotype but some women (the desperate kind) and some gays are extremely catty towards females they find threatening. And I’m not trying to be anti-gay about my statments. Believe me, I’m the last one to like that. I’m socially liberal but I can’t help but think that this might be part of the reason why these people are so nasty towards AJ.
————————
You’re absolutely right, I have long maintained this. Some gay men can be vicious, just like the worst and most catty female - as you say. Not surprisingly, when AJ was with an unknown brit actor, or BBT (nobody’s idea of a pin-up) — a lot of people were nowhere near threatened or jealous of her, they thought she was an eccentric who would never really reach a pinnacle of mainstream fame and adoration. They could accept her great beauty, because she was so eccentric and ‘out there.’ No risk that she’d ever get to be Homecoming Queen, ya know? She was regulated to the goth chick, at best maybe the ‘cool goth chick.’ But she surprised everybody, washed the black out of her hair, ditched her tattooed weird boyfriend, got the quarterback to fall in love with her and worship the ground she walks on…and she glided up on that stage, wearing the tiara and waving the scepter - and some people refise to accept it…Ted C. and all the other b*tches and c*nts, would LUUUUV to be Amy Irving w/ her bucket o’ blood, just waiting for the right moment….but Angelina seems to always get her cosmic justice (the consequences of living a good decent compassionate life, IMO)…….and much like Carrie…she’ll have those b*tches screamin’ for help sooner rather than later.
“Still, it’s pretty heavy going for a summer movie.”
Why didn’t they release it in the fall, anyone knows?
Today I have been so busy with picking up and copying good reviews here.
They are all admiring Angie.
I can not wait reading you fan’s good reviews tomorrow.
Please please don’t forget rating this film at Yahoo and Rottentomatoes and IMDb etc.
Haters will be full force to devalue this film at those movie sites. It happened on the day MR& MRS Smith was released.
I don’t know why they released it in the summer, but I was surprised that the NY Post gave it such a great review. Evidently their Page 6 doesn’t speak for the rest of the paper.
Rottentomatoes ratings as of right now: 78% for general reviews and 86% for COTC reviews.
cliniqua,whatever good u r thinking u r doing ur just beyond not gettin ur point across and i personally am soo over ur posts that go on 4ever and get nowhere.
Was reading the a local newspaper over dinner tonight and the review for AMH was titled “A Classy Heart”. The reviewer really enjoyed the film and appreciated the class and tact with which the murder of Daniel Pearl was handled.
738 Sheri | 06/21/2007 at 10:25 pm
——————————————–
I saw your post and I just wanted to say a big THANK YOU. You are not alone in your observations and I appreciate you speaking your mind on this subject. I find it deplorable that some of the people here supporting the Jolie-Pitt family and who post such wonderful posts, videos, articles and such can turn around and be so utterly intolerant of another fan’s point of view. We are grown women, for the most part, and yet some continue to act like they are in Grade 8. If they don’t figure out how to be more tolerant of other peoples’ point of view, eventually they will drive off some of the newer fans of the JP’s who bring fresh ideas, viewpoints, etc. to the discussion. Then they will turn to tearing each other apart and stabbing one another in the back I guess.
While all of us who support this wonderful family appreciate what they have brought to this thread they aren’t doing themselves, or anyone else, any favours by acting like they own the site (which is the sole property of Jared) and looking down their noses at other fans.
Angie and Brad have been to some of the most impoverished parts of this planet and they would never in a million years presume to look down their noses at anyone, regardless of age, ethnicity, education or financial status the way some of the fans here do. I believe they would be very disappointed to see people who say they admire this family for their numerous incredible qualities conduct themselves in such a manner.
This is a place where the fans of the Jolie-Pitts should be able to come to share their enjoyment of this family, and their points of view (as opposing as they may be), not a Grade 8 clique. Please conduct yourselves accordingly.
Evidently their Page 6 doesn’t speak for the rest of the paper.
It’s clear that some people will do anything so that Angie will not be nominated and that the film will be a failure. Someone has already written that… that Angie would not get support from the press (or some press) after the incident with Fox and all of that.
It’s sad…
RE THE TED C SMEAR: If you change “boyfriend” to “husband” you probably have POSH! To me the ‘Fake a la Ferocity’ is key. Posh has a fierce stare that is commented on endlessly and the biggest FAKE boobs on the radar at the moment. I definitely think the ‘fake’ points to someone with a boob job in any case…
A Blow to the Heart
By Ann Hornaday
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 22, 2007; Page C01
Amournful sense of inevitability pervades “A Mighty Heart,” in which Angelina Jolie stars as Mariane Pearl, whose husband, Daniel, a Wall Street Journal reporter, was kidnapped and beheaded in Pakistan while his wife and a team of colleagues and investigators frantically tried to find him. The movie, an adaptation of Mariane Pearl’s memoir and directed by Michael Winterbottom, brings those dreadful weeks back with brutally vivid detail as a taut, meticulously crafted police procedural. Part thriller, part melodrama, “A Mighty Heart” recalls last year’s “United 93″ — in its technical prowess and artistry but also in its harrowing emotional arc, one that clearly aims to inspire viewers, though it may just as likely leave them feeling utterly wrung out.
Welcome to the new Cinema of Compulsive Reenactment, wherein excruciatingly painful recent events are rushed to the screen with breathless, almost fetishistic detail, and whose precise aims are subject to interpretation. Is this instant mythologizing a form of catharsis? Closure? Rank exploitation? Or a particularly American, impatient brand of revisionism, designed to create an immediately usable past?
In “A Mighty Heart,” Angelina Jolie is transformed and transforming as the woman whose journalist husband was murdered by terrorists in 2002. (By Peter Mountain — Paramount Vantage Via Associated Pr
These are the philosophical questions that haunt “A Mighty Heart,” and it answers with a degree of subtlety and sophistication that skeptics might find surprising. The film begins on Jan. 23, 2002, the day Danny was taken hostage and a day like any other for the Pearls, both working as journalists in Karachi. (He’s played in the film by Dan Futterman.) Danny is tracking down a lead to a possible connection between al-Qaeda and Richard Reid, the British “shoe bomber”; Mariane, a freelance journalist and six months pregnant, does some interviews, goes shopping for that night’s dinner and checks at regular intervals with Danny by cellphone.
By dinnertime, when he hasn’t come home, the first clouds of apprehension begin to gather. Awareness dawns slowly, then with a terrible, crushing certitude as Danny doesn’t pick up and Mariane makes the first call to the U.S. Embassy. Soon the house the Pearls have been sharing with fellow journalist Asra Nomani (Archie Panjabi), is filled with American diplomats, Karachi police and eventually the FBI, portrayed in one of the film’s few comic flourishes by an amusingly no-nonsense female agent played by Jillian Armenante.
Winterbottom, like his countryman Paul Greengrass (who directed “United 93″), has been experimenting with realism to terrific effect in recent years, with films such as “Welcome to Sarajevo,” “In This World” and “The Road to Guantanamo.” In “A Mighty Heart,” he brings all his talents to bear on a vivid, densely layered portrait, not just of one woman but of a city. With handheld cameras and a fearless sense of urgency and spontaneity, he plunges viewers into the neon-lit thrum and impossible beauty of Karachi (where some scenes were filmed), conveying not only its fascination for foreign correspondents like the Pearls but also the daunting, needle-in-a-haystack task of finding Danny in all that teeming humanity. Even amid the polyglot cacophony and chaos, “A Mighty Heart” skillfully threads viewers through a complicated skein of players, political agendas and dead ends in an investigation that ranges from al-Qaeda to Mossad to Pakistan’s political opponents in India.
Quite wisely, Winterbottom doesn’t get too caught up in the ticktock of Danny’s fatal journey, instead using brief flashbacks to speculate on how his abduction occurred. “A Mighty Heart” instead focuses on Mariane, played by Jolie in brown contact lenses and a diadem of black curls to resemble Mariane, who like Joan Didion in “The Year of Magical Thinking” reacts like any good journalist would to being ambushed by personal horror: She keeps her head, assumes control and takes notes. Like Didion, she’s one cool customer.
Jolie is a star of such super-stratospheric proportions that the chances of her disappearing into a character role would seem slim at best. But it turns out that she is the perfect choice to play Mariane, not only because she delivers a restrained, understated performance but because her persona as a citizen of the world — as a U.N. representative, activist and mother — so seamlessly meshes with the global consciousness that the Pearls represent. She blends just as seamlessly with “A Mighty Heart’s” fine ensemble of supporting actors, including Panjabi and Will Patton as U.S. consul Randall Bennett.(Mariane’s quietly appalled gaze as Bennett extols the virtues of Pakistan’s notorious interrogation methods is a moment of physical eloquence typical of Jolie’s astute, vanity-free performance.)
Mariane and Danny emerge in the film as two people at home no matter where they are on the planet, plunging headlong into the countries they’re covering. They’re not adrenalin junkies, as so many foreign correspondents are characterized, but connection junkies, reveling in vagrant moments of mutual comprehension. Of course, it was precisely comprehension that failed when Danny was murdered for being an American, a journalist and a Jew — a blow to his own ideals that makes the film’s agonizing denouement all the more shattering.
But Mariane refuses to put her husband’s murder in a context of American exceptionalism or even personal outrage; during one of her first television appearances, she notes that during Danny’s captivity several Pakistanis were victims of terror. One gets the idea that for Mariane, her fiercely held humanism isn’t a matter of sentiment but rather seasoned practicality: It’s about accuracy.
A central, even existential contradiction vexes “A Mighty Heart,” which is that one can deeply admire it as a piece of filmmaking and still harbor misgivings about why we need to have these stories packaged for the big screen. If that bigger question will never be easily resolved, “A Mighty Heart” still avoids its genre’s twin pitfalls of gratuitous masochism and cheap sentiment. “United 93,” for all its rigorous refusal to engage in reassuring theatrics, never quite transcended the former; as for “World Trade Center,” which also focused on the events of Sept. 11, 2001, its eagerness to impose redemptive meaning on that day resulted in a surfeit of the latter.
“A Mighty Heart” threads this needle with sober assurance, offering a clear-eyed retelling of Danny Pearl’s murder but finally, in focusing on Mariane’s response, delivering an affecting and, yes, redemptive lesson in moral comportment. Faced with unspeakable grief, Mariane doesn’t give in to xenophobia or selective indignation, but with her best self turns her loss into a plea for the cosmopolitanism she and her husband personified.
One can only hope that the nuance with which the filmmakers make this point won’t be lost on audiences more accustomed to the rhetoric — political and cinematic — of retribution. Ultimately, “A Mighty Heart” is an epic romance, at once doomed and full of hope, about two people in love with the world, even when it didn’t love them back.
Fake-a-la = Pam-e-la
965 good grief | 06/22/2007 at 3:23 am
RE THE TED C SMEAR: If you change “boyfriend” to “husband” you probably have POSH! To me the ‘Fake a la Ferocity’ is key. Posh has a fierce stare that is commented on endlessly and the biggest FAKE boobs on the radar at the moment. I definitely think the ‘fake’ points to someone with a boob job in any case…
————————————
Most certain, it’s a lie. 99,9999…% of what those people write are lies. But worse than the lie is that those people dont have the balls to speak clear…
965 good grief | 06/22/2007 at 3:23 am
RE THE TED C SMEAR: If you change “boyfriend” to “husband” you probably have POSH! To me the ‘Fake a la Ferocity’ is key. Posh has a fierce stare that is commented on endlessly and the biggest FAKE boobs on the radar at the moment. I definitely think the ‘fake’ points to someone with a boob job in any case
______________________
First of all, let me just say that I don’t believe Ted has anything on anyone, not Pam, not Posh, or whoever else — he knows jack sh*t — and I think when push comes to shove and he gets in hot water, he will of course back off and probably clear Angelina (but in the meantime, and by then, his objective will have been achieved - which is, that people will be discussing HIS ‘blind item’ ad nauseum, because he made them THINK it was Angelina Jolie). His objective is to have people thinking and speculating that he is talking about Angie. He’s done that. The fact that we can come up with others that fit SOME of the criteria is irrelevant. The only person that he designed it to fit better than others, is Angelina. He WANTS the discussion to commence fast and go everywhere, no one else gives him the mileage that Angie does. So the Blind Item is tailored best to her (for instance, sure some things fit Posh, but what HW “movers and shakers” are going to be concerned over her? see what I’m saying) - nevermind that it’s a lie of course.
825 CLINIQUA | 06/21/2007 at 11:44 pm
Re the Sun Times and Bill Zwecker…
———————–
I like your post, not just this time but even other times. Please never go away it will be so dull.
Hi,
I know this is slightly off topic - but I wanted to ask about the deleted wedding scene in MAMS. Did any of you see the way Brad smiles towards the end of the kissing scene. It looks as though he’s really enjoying the kiss and doesn’t want to stop. Its also quite intense the way Angie grabs him at the beginning of the scene. She wanted him bad and he wanted her. They just had very different ways of showing their passion in that kiss - it seemed so real and worked so well. Very natural. Love it!
From sunny South Africa.
966 Washington Post.com review | 06/22/2007 at 3:30 am
Thank you so much for posting this.
I don’t know about anybody else but this has to be the best review yet. A* for the writer.
You’re preaching to the converted :-) Ted C is scum, no question about it, and out to do his worst against Angelina. Just speculating that IF he actually wasn’t talking out his thunder down under that Posh would be my guess. As for Hollywood movers and shakers… whoever is producing her reality show and was gearing up for her big debut in the U.S. would fit the bill. Best as I know it has been scaled down to a one hour special at this point, but it was created as a series concept. Not big movers and shakers, but nevertheless movers and shakers.
Add in the big splash that the Beckhams are expected to make with moving to LA in general and there could be more than a few concerned parties.
I am optimistic that the demographic that will go see AMH is not likely to buy into the tabloid garbage anyway. I certainly hope not!
Hi,
I know this is slightly off topic - but I wanted to ask about the deleted wedding scene in MAMS. Did any of you see the way Brad smiles towards the end of the kissing scene. It looks as though he’s really enjoying the kiss and doesn’t want to stop. Its also quite intense the way Angie grabs him at the beginning of the scene. She wanted him bad and he wanted her. They just had very different ways of showing their passion in that kiss - it seemed so real and worked so well. Very natural. Love it!
From sunny South Africa.
————————————-
I also like it. If there’s some who haven’t seen it you can see it in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH_GORWWdqI
180 Estelle | 06/21/2007 at 2:31 pm
163 let it be
——————
I saw that, Angie was crying and I was crying when I saw that little boy, at that moment, I wish I could just take him into my home and give him so much love to take away his fears and his pains…and after I saw faces of so many children…*sighed*, my heart break, now I know how Angie felt the first time, when she saw them in person. I think I would just fall apart. You know, after the show, I went to my kitchen and get a glass of water, I was starring at the glass of water in my hand and thinking, how fortunate I am…with just a glass of water in my hand, compare to millions of refugees, I’m a rich person.
**************
That’s one of the reasons I really admire this woman. I remember when there was a landslide in my hometown. I assisted a friend who was a volunteer. I had to quit the scene quick cause it was just so heavy, emotionally. I mean, we were just there distributing used clothing (of which some are not fit to wear anymore), and you would see these people falling in line, who would normally not wear some of the clothes we were distributing ( they were that OLD.. I mean how many of us would buy new clothes to give to refugees/ to people whose house burned, etc.?) and it would just break your heart.
And Angelina gives not only MONEY but her TIME and more importantly, HERSELF. She CARES…
Pages: « 1 … 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 … 44 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!