Brad & Angelina Carry Kids to School

WAW the new video on splash is great
maddox is sooo cute

854 CLINIQUA | 06/21/2007 at 3:18 am

I’m sure AJ’s amazing annual Anderson Cooper interview will once again spike donations — last year it spiked donations by a half million, I’m betting this year it will be the same if not more. Angelina Jolie is a GREAT woman.

Particularly as compared to some narcissistic TV sit-com hack, who, not content with her empty life, empty interviews, and empty endorsement deals to add to her fortune - has to show herself at what else, a SELF-help party. Because unlike Angelina, Aniston’s SELF must come first, at all times. In her usual passive aggressive manipulative fashion, with her PR monster Stephen Huvane literally hovering over her shoulder, she forces the tabloid and yellow press to spotlight her victimhood as the hands of Angelina, as she subtly reminds the public just why they should be on her team.

The sad thing is, there are too many people, even after more than two years, and a few high profile relationships for her - that in an instant, are villifying Angelina all over again, and re-attaching Aniston to Pitt (even it’s only to his mother). It’s pretty sick. But that IS how it works. I think ultimately, those embittered jealous hags who don’t want to believe how GOOD Angelina is (on all fronts) and who don’t want to participate in changing the world for the better - can embrace the fiction that ‘Huvaniston’ peddles consciously and subconsciously (of scorned victim and evil poacher) - it’s a way of plugging ears and singing tra-la-la! They don’t want to BE like Angelina, it takes too much hard work, committment, passion, and intellect. It’s easy to embrace Jennifer, after all - she’s just as fugly as our ugliest girlfriend, she just has a great closet full of clothes, a good brand of spray on tan, a good plastic surgeon, colorist and hair stylist…being ‘like’ Angelina means traveling to Darfur, Chad and Sierra Leone, giving birth, raising kids, working, loving your man….

…being ‘like’ Aniston means keeping your 3 o’clock mani-pedi appt., cackling with your home-hens, and wasting time with your latest f**k-toy, whose using you.

Most do-nothing lame aSS b*tches can do that blind-folded. I know ho’s who manage that in their sleep - they grow on f**kin’ trees.

She’s relatable that way.

Angelina not so much. Angelina is amazing. Like Oliver Stone said, ‘Angelina must have led armies in past lives…’

While Maniston, in her former life, just MAY have been a tapeworm.

That’s why embittered b*tches, will always embrace Maniston - she gives them permission to be fug, do-nothing selfish no-talent worthless f**k-ups. SHE is them. She just has better shoes, and goes to a designer hair stylist to get her hair done - instead of BoRics.

Regarding Mama Pitt, Brad and Doug’s Comment.
I think what sometimes happens in the world of fandom, is that since we’re not privy to the goings on in the private lives of celebs, we assume they start and stop with our theories, as well as the tabloid and magazine speculation. I’m no different. A long time ago, I speculated on what I felt went down with Pitt and Aniston post split:

It’s simple, they were being very amicable until the news broke that Brad was seeing Angie (Kenya pictures were released - that’s when aniston said the infamous, ‘I was shocked and the world was shocked.’ - well we know she wasn’t shocked he was into Angelina, because he had already told her he was ‘attracted to her and that there was a connection between them’ - Aniston even let her friends spill the beans to that effect in her VF interview - the problem WAS, she was shocked he was LITERALLY into Angie. Heh.) That’s when her grudge match and war commenced.

That’s when she and Huvane set up the Vanity Fair attack. Her life as a victim and sad sack, Brad’s life as a cad, and Angelina’s life as a man-stealer - had started. Brad wasn’t happy with that article by a long shot - he was betrayed, we know this because he fired the pregnant Kristin Hahn (Aniston’s bestest pal and lackey) and left Aniston Plan B-less with a few crumbs. He then quickly had Angelina pregnant (planned), and cast her in the AMH role. He had cut all ties, and Aniston was SOL.

I have no doubt Aniston knew she f**ked up- and I expect at some point she issued an apology and tried to make amends for VF. It was at this point that she told Sawyer and Larry King that they still talked, ‘Pleasant, done,’ she said (around Oct/Nov ‘05). She added the ‘done’ because she had some pride. LOL!

However, after Angelina announced her pregnancy that December - I think Aniston was back to grudge match. Again, with Aniston it’s all about ‘how you make her look’ (ask her Mom). That was another sucker punch. They were again on no speaking terms I’m sure.

But that’s been a good year and some change - and back to what I initially said, there ARE things that may go on, out of sight — supposedly I heard she sent he and Angie well-wishes for Pax’s addition (via a card or whatever). With her career literally at ground zero, I imagine at some point between Shiloh’s birth and today - she FINALLY figured out, that it makes no sense to have Brad and Angelina as your sworn enemies from an ‘industry’ standpoint.

I believe that Brad was able to table the VF resentment and betrayal, and can be on friendly terms once again. Ditto her.

But ultimately, what Jane Pitt did this week was an unintentional (?) slap in the face. She knows how the rag press works, and if she doesn’t know, I’m sure her kids will be happy to tell her. Who knows, perhaps Jane has resentment that Angie is not marrying Brad, and plans to have her biological grandchildren out-of-wedlock. Not to mention the Jolie-Pitt name — perhaps that rubs her the wrong way too. Perhaps she and aniston get along, because one passive aggressive recognizes another straight off, who knows?

At the end of the day, it was all so unnecessary, particularly at this juncture.

Somewhere along the line, what I do know, is that this man (Brad Pitt), who while extolling some virtues of his upbringing doesn’t hesitate in saying it was narrow-minded, and speaking of how isolated it was. This is a guy who saw Saturday Night Fever, and was shocked, he said at the Italian roughneck New York culture he saw on screen, ‘it was like a different world,’ he said. He was sheltered, cloistered, and he wanted out. I’m sure there were aspects of it that didn’t sit well.

Jane and Bill Pitt still live in that world - I’m sure there are those in the community where they live who cannot take a shine to Angelina and her love for Africa, her multi-cult brood, and perhaps they look down upon Jane. Perhaps Jane feels like they do. They may even inquire about ‘Jennifer,’ and assume that Aniston ‘hates’ Pitt & Angelina for ‘what they did to her.’ Jane may feel that the public sympathies (the mini-vans we often speak of) lie with Aniston - and perhaps she is the kind of woman, who is motivated by peer pressure - it may have been important to her to demonstrate to the minivans back home, that at least she and Jen are on good terms, even though her son chose Angelina.

Bottomline, I think Jane visited FOR JANE. For back home.

While I think Brad left Missouri, and that life, to escape those small town narrow minded judgemental attitudes, that he inherently KNEW deep down in his soul, were wrong and f**ked up.

There’s a reason why he’s been with the people he’s been with - he was caddying strippers around when he first arrived in HW (non judgemental), he was living with unusual women (Juliette Lewis), embracing alternative lifestyles (best pals with Miss Etheridge), dating African American women, becoming engaged to Jewish ones…..

Which brings to mind his praising of the late Bruce Paltrow in his GQ interview post Maniston split — he loved him he said. He remarked that he was so different than his father, the way he talked and expressed his feelings. However, I never saw Brad or Bruce, arranging visits to each other when Gwyn was dating Ben Affleck. Brad would never have even mentioned his regard for Bruce Paltrow while he was with Aniston, because I believe she would have considered any reference to Gwyneth Paltrow’s family a threat or an affront while she was married to Brad.

I say all that to say, this is not a man, who lives to please his parents. He can control what he does, he can’t control them and what they do. In the end, I think it proves damaging to Jane’s own relationship with AJ and Brad, but I also think AJ’s priorities are that Brad and her kids are happy - and that’s it.

Brad loves his parents - he doesn’t idolize them — it begins and ends there.

People do not give Perez any feed back on his non story.Must we fall for the troll or tabloids person ridiculness.Perez is throwing AJ in right now because she is being discuss and he needs more hits to his site.You will only give him more hits more attention and more anti-AJ.Think and be wise.Let it Pass.Every time a hater throws in nonsense some fall for it.
Perez old shocking news is really no shocking news and some one has already disputed it.Let Perez fester out.I believe its a TROLL asking for the e-mail and acting as if OUTRAGED to stir up problems.Jared is the only fair source and very few others who you can go to for real news.So Let Perez fester in his lies and stench.We have Jared.Stop being distracted its the AMH week.

What’s Angelina’s lawyers email?

Larry King interview part 1

LARRY KING, CNN ANCHOR: Tonight, Angelina Jolie — from Hollywood wild child to superstar mother of four to U.N. goodwill ambassador.

KING: And one half of the world’s most famous couple.

KING: And now, finding hope and humanity amid true life terror in her new film, “A Mighty Heart.”

JOLIE: Hello.

KING: Angelina Jolie on fame and family, acting and activism and what she sees in her future.

It’s all next on LARRY KING LIVE.

I have the pleasure to welcome back to LARRY KING LIVE Angelina Jolie, the Oscar winning actress.

Her latest film will open a week from tomorrow. It’s “A Mighty Heart,” based a memoir of the same title by Mariane Pearl, the widow of murdered journalist Daniel Pearl of the “Wall Street Journal.”

Her partner, Brad Pitt, is one of the film’s producers.

She’s the mother of four and the United Nation’s goodwill ambassador.

And I might add, on a personal note, this is a terrific movie. I already gave it notations. I must salute you on it.

Was it hard to capture someone living? ANGELINA JOLIE, ACTRESS: Yes, of course. And somebody — and she’s a — she’s a really complex woman. She’s a really interesting woman. So not a simple woman to play. But really the most difficult thing was I got to know here and I have such a great respect for her. And so to have the responsibility to kind of help express to the world or show the world, somehow interpret who she is and hope that through that, helps people understand her better. So I took that responsibility to heart and that made it hard.

KING: She appeared on this show quite a few times.

JOLIE: Um-hmm.

KING: And you studied that?

JOLIE: I studied those interviews many, many, many times.

KING: What are you looking for? In other words, are you looking for speech intonation?

JOLIE: Yes, both. I mean I had — I had all of her interviews on audio and I would just listen to them over and over and over again. But she also has a very interesting way of speaking, not just because her accent is Cuban/French, but she — it’s interesting the things that she — you know her well. When she speaks about politics, when she’s passionate, she is so forward and clear.

She’s very private, so when she’s asked about other things, she hesitates. And, you know, see — I suppose it was that, too, seeing where she goes inside and where she’s direct.

KING: She’s sort of like someone else I know.

(LAUGHTER)

KING: Why did you do this movie?

JOLIE: I believe in the message of this movie. I think people can interpret it different — many different ways. But to me, the most important thing was that you — the idea of this story — a lot of people see it as a story about the division between our cultures and faiths and hate and anger and violence.

And when I read her book and started to work on this, it was very clear that it was a story about rising above all of the fear and the anger and actually coming to a place of dialogue and tolerance. And about this group of people, from different backgrounds, from different faiths, who came together.

So it was — it was a positive story and I thought that was necessary today.

KING: And beautifully directed.

Now, Brad Pitt produced it?

JOLIE: Yes, he was one of the producers.

KING: Did you induce him to do that? Or did…

JOLIE: No. No. He had bought the book a while ago.

KING: Oh, he bought the book?

JOLIE: Yes. Yes. No, he was — he was a — like all of us, he saw her interviews with you and some other interviews at that time and was impressed by her and read the book and (INAUDIBLE)…

KING: Did he cast you?

JOLIE: No. No, she cast me.

KING: She did?

JOLIE: Yes.

KING: She had a say in the film?

JOLIE: She had a say in pretty — everybody had agreed — Brad has such respect for her as a producer that he never was intent on I have to get this movie made. He simply just said if it falls into the right hands and goes in the right direction, it will be beautiful. But everybody promised Mariane that if it ever took a direction she didn’t want and was uncomfortable with — the same with Ruth and Judea — that we would stop. We wouldn’t — it wouldn’t be done. And so everybody stayed true to that.

KING: Was it any kind of a problem when you’re involved with the person who is also producing?

JOLIE: I suppose — no, it wasn’t. It was lovely.

KING: Because the producer’s in charge, isn’t he? Or the director’s in charge?

JOLIE: He — yes, Brad is a great producer, though. He really was — he cared so much about the story and wanted to make sure it was all right and worked very hard to do all the things a producer needs to do. But he really backed off and let everybody do their work.

KING: Did you work for less money?

JOLIE: Yes, I did.

KING: Because you loved it?

JOLIE: Yes. Yes.

KING: What was the total budget of this movie?

JOLIE: I don’t know, but I know that it’s eligible for the Independent Spirit Awards.

KING: Then it wasn’t a lot. It wasn’t a lot.

Were you very happy with it?

JOLIE: I was happy when I got a call from Mariane and when I heard from Ruth and Judea. And then I was happy. I was…

KING: If they liked it, you were going to like it?

JOLIE: Yes. Yes. I was uncomfortable until that moment.

KING: You also met Daniel’s parents, right?

JOLIE: Um-hmm.

KING: They live in UCLA. They live — they go — I’m involved in UCLA and their foundation.

JOLIE: Uh-huh. Yes, they live in L.A. so…

KING: They’re very nice people.

Did you get emotionally involved?

JOLIE: Yes. Yes, you can’t not. It is — even before I — I think anybody, especially maybe an American at that time, we were all emotionally involved in this story simply because anybody watching this interview probably remembers that time, remembers hearing what happened. And so we’re all connected. And he is a symbol. And she and her strength was a symbol at that time, so…

But to get to know the family is very emotional. And they are — and that’s what I think led us all through the production of it. We were in constant reminder that this was a story about real people. And this was a real man who was killed in a horrible way and this is a real little boy that’s going to grow up and learn all about this and maybe see this film.

KING: Yes.

JOLIE: And we have a responsibility to him. And so we never forgot that.

KING: Whenever I saw the place mentioned at the bottom of the movie, is that where you were?

JOLIE: I — well, my — I was always in India for the filming. I had been to Pakistan. But for the filming, I was in India.

KING: It’s always in India?

JOLIE: But in — well, no — my character.

KING: Yes.

JOLIE: But, no, Michael…

KING: The other parts, though?

JOLIE: … Michael shot in Pakistan and around the world and (INAUDIBLE).

KING: Who was the director?

JOLIE: Michael Winterbottom.

KING: Now that’s important for an actress, I know, to be in simpatico with him.

You hadn’t been directed by him before, right?

JOLIE: No.

KING: How did it go?

JOLIE: It was amazing. He — he’s a really rare director. He has a very unique style. He’s very documentary — he’s very news- oriented. He’s very focused on issues in the world and this part of the world that he had done different films about — about this part of the world. And he did a story on refugees — a film on refugees that I loved.

So he brings a real — a real knowledge. But, also, he has this very improvised way of doing it. We had no trailers. We had no lights. We used to joke about lighting ourselves by the light of our computer to try to get some light on us, as women but (LAUGHTER).

But we had no…

KING: Whoa.

JOLIE: We had no…

KING: Big stars don’t do that.

JOLIE: It was the — it was — I was so grateful to remember what it was to be an actor and to remember what it was to be a part of a team.

KING: Well put.

Angelina Jolie is our guest.

The film opens a week from tomorrow

i love the splash video,so cute,the jolie pitts are indeed having fun in prague

230 Mmmmm | 06/21/2007 at 11:27 am
AMH will bomb. I’m saving my money for “Sicko”
*********************************************

Speaking of Sicko, it’s time for you to take your meds. We don’t want you to fly into a manic rage and have to be committed again, now do we? Don’t you just love the crazies? Litte do they know, they’re helping to run the number of comments way up! Love em’ or hate em’, Brad and Angie are the MOST popular celeb couple around. Keep the comments coming you B&A hating loonies!

I just heard a radio review on A Mighty Heart. She said she didn’t like that type of film but acknowledged that Angelina’s performance was good.

My sense in reading all the interviews, good and bad is that Angelina is better than the film itself. What seems to be turning some of the critics off is the frantic rapid documentary style filming that Winterbottom does. People were not ready for it. I don’t know how someone can have a preconcieved idea on what this film would be like especailly since many did not read the book. What were they expecting?

385 wha? | 06/21/2007 at 12:46 pm
369 errr

so you want Angelina to be a cheater with a man *****, nice.

_______________________________

Like none of the three - JA, AJ or BP have ever cheated before!!!!! It’s Hollywood!!
Having Sex with people you work with is the norm…

Hey, she’s not married. She’s just committed to raising her kids with him, nothing more.

porque todos los trolls se llaman Mmmmm,errr,wwww etc…no saben escribir su nombre?ya me parecia a mi

Come on people!!!! Almost 400 post - keep it going!!!

i wonder what tabs and gossip blogs will do when they see less and less of the jolie pitts,maybe they will focus on someone else,