Wyatt Crow Sports Pacifier and Headphones

Sheryl is an idiot, the nanny and Wyatt look so miserable there. I won’t blame the nanny because I’m sure the nanny is the one who takes care of Wyatt when he cries and when he wakes up at night. I bet sheryl only takes Wyatt out when there are cameras…

Concert is not a ideal place for a 3 month old. And have the nanny taking care of a 3 month old in such environment/ condition is selfish, so I feel very sorry for the poor nanny too.

I have a 8 month old boy and I think I need to call child protective service on Sheryl. She is horrible!

ps i know other celebrity idiots such as gwyneth paltrow and gwen stefani took their kids to concerts (i’m sure the headphones work awesome) NOT

24 jennifer anniston is hot

==========

Sorry to burst your bubble , Aniston was still smoking like a chimney. she was recently spotted sharing smoke with Sheryl in a b-day bash, and the most recent one was while driving.
and PLeez…….stop she will be a good mom say. if this woman really want to be mom as she ’s been telling evevybody for the last 10 years. she would have at least one while very married to her ex-husband either NATURALLY, IVF OR ADOPTION.!!! NOPE, she didn’t tried any one of it, she didn’t try ! she didn’t want one.!!! that’s a fact.
Only her idiot fans believed she want children, she had stop smoking, believed smart water was better than alternative for tab water , she’s a great actress, and lastly, beleived what the media hype tell us , she ’s beautiful and stunning. OMG!!!!1 YUCK!!!!!!

Crow was thinking of herself when she allowed the baby to stay onstage. The baby would not have missed her for a couple of hours. Very Selfish IMO. Next time Crow think of the baby first.

Sheryl can never be a mother as good as Angelina when she first had Maddox even though Angelina didn’t give birth to him, she knew how to take care of him properly.

what an idiot. someone needs to slap that goofy grin off her face. why bring a young baby like that to a concert? poor kid looks so miserable and uncomfortable. the nanny looks thoroughly entertained as well, she is doing such a good job of smothering the child’s face with the pacifier. sheryl for mommy of the year!

how can we expect jennifer maniston’s friends to have any better sense? i mean, they are her friends after all.

I am sorry but there IS NO EXCUSES to take a little baby to a concert !

I mean, I have seen babies crying loud being terribly agitated and overstressed by the music during wedding parties ! That is no good ! And all responsible parents there dediced to leave early because it stressed the baby who cannot handle all the crowded loud environment.

Of course babies like music but at this age it is more soft melodic ones that their intern ears can handle.

This is the basics of raising a child ! SOFTNESS, SOFTNESS and more SOFTNESS that’s the key words !

They don’t need all the excitment, loud music and crowded environment of a concert ! It’s not healthy, it’s stressful and that is definitely not good at all for the peaceful environment they really need at this stage of their life !

Really even little girls know that !: babies need QUIET , PEACEFULLY ENJOYABLE AND RELAXING ENVIRONMENT with the kind of music IN PAR !!! That’s why they usually have peaceful melodic ones on their toys, not loud rock & roll and the likes !

She is idiot! Period !

40 Johanne : 07/29/2007 at 5:23 am
Yes, and if she left him with the nanny for fifteen minutes,she’d be neglecting them.
She can’t win.
For the record, she does not smoke, has not for years.
And those of us who work with musical equipment know that these headphones work. You clearly don’t know what you are talking about.
Babies cry. And nannies don’t smile 24/24. What are you blaming the nanny for, that she’s got her eyes on the stage for a second?
Get a life, not everything is about Jen versus Saint.
_________________________________________-
Take Chin out of it. If Crowe would have just showed up and played her concert and left the baby with MamaNanny, nothing would be said. People normally don’t watch her every move.

The headphones may work, but on a baby that age, it just looks like he is very uncomforable IMO.

It was a photo op, at best.

I was just thinking that Cheryl Crow is probably glad that she’s not with Eric Clapton now. He hasn’t aged well.

Give the woman a break - bringing the baby to the concert wasn’t the smartest of ideas, but there are so many others who are doing worse things. Once Crow hears about the comments in these blogs, she’ll learn another lesson about mothering.

No need to take him to the concert … was it?

48 wth? : 07/29/2007 at 9:15 am
WTF? Why is she taking a baby to a concert? He looks uncomforable and those headphones look so heavy on his little head. Wouldn’t it be better to let him stay home with the nanny? Look at her smiling like an idiot while the nanny looks completely bored and the baby does look tortured.

Last time she took him out when she was running in the heat. Someone help this woman.

Oh, and leave the whole Aniston and Jolie debate out of this. It has nothing to do with these pictures.

———————————————————————

ITA !

What i find the most disgusting is that tortured look or at least real discomfort expressions of the kid and yet her mother is there unable to notice it, to read it and stop it…instead she is standing there all SMILING while looking at the obvious discomfort of her own child ! That’s what I find inexcusable, even more than that stupid move of bringing him to a concert ! That wasn’t a smart move but she could have ended it and yet she didn’t.

I don’t trust women who are unable to read their child expressions and just stand there enjoying their time while being unable to protect their own child for any discomfort they may experience let alone the ones they provoke and put they kids into. that’s UNMOTHERLY to the fault, if you ask me. That’s the primal move of a mother : to protect her own child.