Gwyneth Paltrow - “W” Magazine September 2007

“GODDESS” Gwyneth Paltrow goes through a major transformation for the September 2007 issue of W magazine. (This issue will be the magazine’s biggest issue ever… and we know how big that magazine is to begin with!)

On returning as the girlfriend of a superhero played by Robert Downey Jr. in soon in Iron Man: “It’s been a long time since I’ve done a big part in a movie, and I’m very excited. Robert called me and said, ‘Don’t you want to be in a movie that people see?’ And he’s right.”

On her growing brood: “Maybe in four years, I’ll have two in a row really quick again. But then at that point, when everyone’s potty-trained and sleeping through the night, are you really going to go back?

On her future adoption: “My husband really wants to adopt. So I don’t know, I’m sort of open for anything.”

Gwyneth, 34, is married to rocker Chris Martin and has two kids — daughter Apple, 3, and son Moses, 1.


Posted to: Gwyneth Paltrow
Related posts:

92 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All
the real tita @ 08/07/2007 at 4:44 pm

#31: of course she has nothing in common with Jolie… Gwynnie is a social climbing Anglophile who thinks she’s too good to be an American. Although she’d rather be across the Atlantic where she keeps an English husband and proper domicile, she’s not that petty that she would begrudge the Americans of her presence. After all she is not averse to accepting gigs in the US to earn her daily bread and get some coverage.

Oh, Jolie is an acclaimed goddess…GP and JA are self proclaimed. That’s another difference!

(pssst!…if that’s what snake venom does for you? I’d change to turtle wax or frog spit!)

Out of lurking @ 08/07/2007 at 4:48 pm

# 39

In what TABLOID have you read that?!

She CHEATED on BP.

Stinks of PR, all the way.

IF those HW “stars” (what an IRONY!) would
try and be HONEST, what INTERESTING (read:
disgusting) things would we know! But,
thinking of that, better no!)

She became Donatella? That should be a
compliment for her, because Donatella is a
real fashion icon (at least, something real).

JustJared u re such a wonderful Blog!
u make my day!
Love Gwyneth Paltrow .,Love her!
about the Cover, actully the she looks soo new & unexcpetable , if any1 who said that the she looks weired look at all the covers of w mag, they alwayshave made things up! they made a strange photoshots for the Celebs on the covers!
she looks soo cool & her pic is like Damn Hotnesssss!

love love love her!
can’t wait to see the whole pics!
but plllz Jared don’t 4get to post the whole pics & the interview!
thxxx so much my dear ..

46 [~Famous~] :

Yes, so true. Angelina is a heroine to me too. She is so brave and courageous. Love her! (knew you’d come around)

I liked Gwyneth years ago. Apple is very cute. Don’t think Gwyn looks her best in this picture.

I can’t wait to see whose side all these rabid Brangelinas will take when the saintly couple finally have to admit publicly that all’s not well under their joined halo.

65 Johanne : 08/07/2007 at 5:16 pm

I can’t wait to see whose side all these rabid Brangelinas will take when the saintly couple finally have to admit publicly that all’s not well under their joined halo.

Why do you think they are saintly? No fan I know thinks that way.Why are you anticipating the break up of a family with 4 young children?

That is sick, and in my opinion, evil.

And why are you bringing this up on GP’s thread?

Stop reading tabloids. They darken the heart and soul.

I can’t stand her, but if she get you Jolieloons all foaming at the mouth -more that usual- I love it.
lololololol

I like Gwyn and ordinarily she looks fantastic - this is not her best look. I think it’s the angle - whatever, she’s making a comeback, good for her. One unflattering cover is no big deal. I hear Julia’s getting back into play too - all these Oscar winners and their little kiddies bustling around filmsets. Excellent! If she plans to have two more back to back in 4 years, well goodness help her, it’s going to be harder to bounce back than it is now - but I guess that where the personal chef, trainer, nannies, etc come in. Somehow I see adoption in her future …

She never was a great beauty but she looks absolutely ugly here. W must not like her.

Looks 15 years older!

I like the look. Gwyneth is beautiful . She has the classic blonde look.

Awful cover! She looks like a man.

a realist @ 08/07/2007 at 7:36 pm

15 CLINIQUA : 08/07/2007 at 1:27 pm
“maybe in 4 years…she’ll have 2 in a row?” uh…isn’t she like 35 now? what’s she talking about? who waits til they’re 40-42 to have two kids back to back if they don’t have to? It’s not like fertility in your early 40’s is always a sure thing…let alone the age factor period. She is sooooo disingenuous…she really just wants to come off younger than she is by saying that…lolol..what a silly transparent fool. still if ol’ aSS aniston is reading that and got pissed off at her all over again…I’m happy. …and btw, both of them narcissistic beechies is older than angie. muahaha.
*****************************
Your post is so right on, CLINIQUA.
I don’t see how Brad got mixed up with two narcissistic b*tches.

a realist @ 08/07/2007 at 7:40 pm

31 Kalina : 08/07/2007 at 1:59 pm
Gwyneth Paltrow is a very classy woman and a very talented actress, as well
***********************
Gwyneth is a snobbish b*tch. She needs to keep her narcissistic snobbish ass in England where she thinks the people are more intelligent. Her words.

Dirty Denise @ 08/07/2007 at 7:43 pm

That photo is airbrushed to death. Gwyneth is NOT pretty. She is a PLAIN JANE.

Not a fan of Gwyneth but I kinda like the cover.

i love gwyneth a lot!

‘Cousin It’ gone ‘Blonde’ anyone?..Gwen I like her sometimes, but the bad things she has said about ‘America’ really did’nt like. This pic is awful. Gwen is not a beauty she’s homely,its a fact thats ok thats what she is.
I’m not suprise Brad stayed with Gwen when she was a mess.
Brad stayed with Aniston and she has said she is always a mess,her words, google it.
‘W’ should have nix this pic. The eyebrows alone are to thick and dark, and its to obvious with the photo-shopping.

I want so much to like this woman….and it is impossible.

#44- in referencing to #31/kalina or whatever sh*t- i could not have said it better…

Ace Tomato @ 08/07/2007 at 11:15 pm

Terrific actress, if pretentious, but hey, she actually IS highbrow, well bred & educated and married to an artsy limey. What else would she be but snooty?

She doesn’t look remotely like Gwyneth Paltrow, which is probably the point of this look. And I bet she had a blast doing it. Why not? She’s an actress. She’s known to have fairly delicate, somewhat etheral, feminine features. The heavy eastern european butch look is probably hard for her to get on her bone structure, so here you go - a new achievement. For the photostylist anyway.

That being said, just because I understand it doesn’t mean I like it. Ultrafug.

Yikes!

She’s a pretty girl. Why is trying to look like Donatella Versace?

Who dressed her? It looks like another one dud just like this one:
http://a.oscar.abc.com/media/2007/images/91×179/74th_PaltrowG.jpg

she’s a pretty girl with a pretty face but this cover is eww! her hair is gorgeous but there’s something seriously, wrong with her eyebrows. also, the position of her face is very awkard…aiya!

KrungKrung @ 08/08/2007 at 1:24 am

29 JB : 08/07/2007 at 1:50 pm
I thought this was Donatella Versace when I first saw this photo. Are sure they didn’t mix up photo’s? I know that Gwyneth has been hanging out with her but I didn’t know she had morphed into her. Scarey.

====================================================

my thoughts xactly, aycaramba

Wow, she looks awful! She has never been a delicate beauty…but this cover really does make her look incredibly manish.

I love Gwyneth photo shoots. She has many looks and always does a good job, regardless of the clothes and make-up. Although her husband hasn’t added to her popularity with his arrogance, I do still look forward to a Gwyn movie or mag cover. As for the Aniston comparison, Gwyneth has more talent in her left baby toe nail than Aniston has in total. That goes for modeling too! Gwyneth didn’t hammer Brad either, which Anifannies should note is true class…something they don’t seem to grasp in their worship of her in her “I vant to be left alone” threads.

SAD! Shame on W. Gwyneth is very plain but even she doesn’t deserve a cover this FUGLY.

lallaloolly @ 08/08/2007 at 1:38 pm

i like it. wierd, but i like it.

I recently watched GP in the film “Sylvia”, and she was mesmerizing. I don’t really care what she looks like, I respect her acting ability. Remember, she won an Oscar? However,this porno hairdo is not flattering. Ever since Gwynnie got married, she seems lost, and her fashion sense is dreadful. Donatella Versace must be so flattered by Gwyneth’s modelling of her corpse hooker persona!

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.