Top Stories

Ryan Seacrest Bombs as Emmys Host

Ryan Seacrest Bombs as Emmys Host

Sunday’s 59th Primetime Emmy Awards tanked in the ratings!

It scored the lowest ratings ever for the awards show franchise, a 4.3 rating/11 share among adults 18-49 — which is down 17% from last year.

Only 13.1 million viewers tuned in, making it the second worst in history!

The record low was in 1990, when it aired on Fox and drew 12.3 million. Last year when the show aired on Aug. 27 on NBC, it lured 16.2 million viewers.

SEACREST OUT!!!!!

JJ Links Around The Web

  • A possible D.C. Housewife crashes a White House dinner - Dlisted
  • An ambulance is called to David Hasselhoff's home again - PopEater
  • Justin Timberlake hangs out on the Social Network set - LaineyGossip
  • Zoe Saldana poses in a bikini for Details - TheSuperficial
  • Glee will make way for American Idol - Celebuzz
  • Zac Efron gets starstruck - JustJaredJr
  • Kate Hudson and Ryder check out Cirque du Soleil - PopSugar

88 Comments

# 1

I thought Ryan did a OK job. I dont think you can blame the ratings solely on the host. I mean people are just sick of watching awards shows because there are so many of them. The Emmys were a little over 3 hours last night. Thats just crazy!

# 2

as much as i think he is a tool, ryan had nothing to do with my decision not to watch. awards shows are always boring and this year in particular i didn’t care about any of the nominees.

# 3

I’ll be honset, I didn’t watch the whole thing but this guy is annoying as h e l l!
I can’t figure out why but he is. Maybe because he thinks and acts like he’s smarter than everybody else.

# 4

I didn’t watch the awards. It had nothing to do with Ryan Seacrest. I haven’t watched a TV awards show in years because (for example) the supporting actress for drama category. They were from the same show - Grey’s Anatomy and the Sopranos. There was one other show represented. I don’t watch either of those shows because I don’t have HBO, and Grey’s Anatomy is just like every other one hour drama, to me.

Also, I don’t think it is a level playing field when you can have cable and regular TV represented. You can do a lot more on cable than you can on regular television.

# 5

ooops honest.

# 6
biyatch07 @ 09/17/2007 at 4:13 pm

I aggree with the previous post- award shows are boring and self-congratulatory events. The pre-show fashion is more interesting than the actual award show itself. Last night was super BORING. Thank goodness Colbert and company were around to liven things up a bit

# 7

Guess all that pimping he and the E! Channel did was for not!

I don’t know of a more deserving person for this to happen too. Ryan PeeCrust thinks to highly of himself and thinks he can make or break a star.

Hey Ryan there is a big piece of humble pie just waiting for you!

# 8
Lillianne @ 09/17/2007 at 4:14 pm

Not Ryan’s fault. It was simply boring. Boring. More blah blah blah blah, want to thank who knows who they’re talking about.

# 9

HAHAHA. BUT I DON’T THINK IT’S HIS FAULT!

LOVE ANGELINA @ 09/17/2007 at 4:15 pm

LMAO. He was terrible. Please get a REAL comdian or let Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert, heck even Steven Carrell, host the show. Most of the presenters were funnier than Ryan. The presenters should have hosted the show. LMAO.

I like the guy, he was soooooo funny in Knocked Up, but he did an awful job.

did not watch,ryan is anoying as hell

paula & simon @ 09/17/2007 at 4:16 pm

Some people didn’t tune to watch Emmy last night because they knew Ryan was a host.And he was boring and trying to be funny which he’s not…He’s more like bitchy…

HAHAHAHAHAHA!! That is fantastic news, get him outta there, hahahahaha!!!

daph

I’ll be honset, I didn’t watch the whole thing but this guy is annoying as h e l l!
I can’t figure out why but he is. Maybe because he thinks and acts like he’s smarter than everybody else.

______________________________________________

I TOTALLY AGREE

Patmycrotch @ 09/17/2007 at 4:21 pm

Not about who hosted it was the Right wing network .. DUH!

[~Famous~] @ 09/17/2007 at 4:21 pm

ryan did just fine. the emmys suck, people don’t want to watch that sheit no matter who the host is.

I personaly thought the show was okay, even though I changed the channel every 3mins.

Patmycrotch @ 09/17/2007 at 4:23 pm

Btw who cares about TV actors? Arent they worthless? According to most posts .. everyone complains about “only being a TV actress” like it is the worst thing in the world. Serial killers have more credit then TV actors do on this site.

I DIDN’T WATCH BECAUSE OF HIM.

I’m not surprised. He sucked.

You can’t blame Ryan, it had nothing to do with him. The Emmy’s are coma inducing. They are seriously boring! What makes them think we want to see these over paid celebs be rewarded with a ugly gold statue? Yawn.

I didn’t tune in because I didn’t care about any of the shows being nominated… I don’t care about tv in general anyway. I watched the emmys via internet “updates.” That’s how the awards shows should go down anyway. You just pick and choose the clips/winners you want to watch. Skip over the hosts entirely. Now, if Mr. Wentworth Miller had been in the audience, I would have been glued to the set. Maybe. Just go ahead and say I would have been.

Good I can’t not stand that tool Seacrest

[~Famous~] @ 09/17/2007 at 4:30 pm

lol @ people pretending they didn’t watch the show because “he was hosting”

like he was on stage the entire show. lol fcuking idiots

just sayin! @ 09/17/2007 at 4:35 pm

GOOD! I’m not too crazy about SEACREST anyway. I think he’s too fake…

Yes, because of him, I did not watch it last night.

I love Ryan but I dont care for the actors and the shows.

Patmycrotch @ 09/17/2007 at 4:38 pm

3rd most hated person in the world (1st Jennifer A, Angelina J) and now Ryan. Why exactly? Oh yeah because Angelina does not like him. What a joke. Amazing that American Idol is one of the highest rated shows and he has hosted that for how long? People do not watch award shows anymore and most of on a FOX.

Seacrest or Whoopi the Emmys will bomb. The winners are flukes because there are no great competitions.
All the great actors and actresses are mostly in the movies now.

There is nothing award winning about very many shows….
They go on and on about who is wearing what…(who cares)
Real actors on television shows are a hell of a lot more interesting than a nimrod like Hayden Pantierre, ANY of the desperate housewives….
Ryan Seacrest is a buffoon

17 famous
How did you know the show is ok when you keep changing your channel every 3 minutes. Stupid…

Seacrest Out, LOL

I thought it was a bit bad taste when he and that guy did the Vanessa Hudgens joke was a bit fresh to do it i thought

Angie loves Pie @ 09/17/2007 at 4:41 pm

Funny, how all the threads talk about the people that were on the show but no one watched? LIARS!

Football was more interesting than the Emmys. Actually MTV,VMA,Oscars and Emmys ratings have been falling.

Back then the shows and stars were way way better such as the real glory days of ER,Friends,X-Files,Everybody Loves Raymond,JAG,Sex and the City,Six Feet Under,Sopranos,Friends,Frasier,Dawson’s Creek,Buffy,Angel,Alias,Roswell,Cheers,Ed,Gilmore girls,Felicity,7th Heaven
and many others.

now how many CSI’s we have? Greys cast that dont get along with the divas in Desperate Housewives,so many stupid reality shows,
and comedies now are not even funny; more like crude.
NBC is a joke network and they only have Heroes that’s more like wonnabe X-Men. CW’s big show ratings is America’s top model.

I also miss hottie Simon Baker in The Guardian, the beloved NYPD Blue,90210,Saved by the Bell,Fresh Prince,Charmed,Third Watch,Party of five. Sad sigh.

It feels good @ 09/17/2007 at 4:56 pm

Hihihi serve him right.

personally i just wasn’t interested in any of the people nominated/shows and plus i was watching FOOTBALL!! WOOOOOOO

i actually preferred Ryan and his style….without overdoing the jokes and all which former hosts do as comedians.

must admit, the ratings should be blamed on viewers getting bored with the show as a whole….same programs, same celebs year in, year out - and getting so predictable.

thought they’d make more of a production out of the Sopranos to give them a proper farewell but that didn’t happen

don’t mind Ryan doing the hosting again… more classy and the production a lot chic!

Congrats to America Ferrera!!!!

It wasn’t the host - it was the craptasticness of the nominations. I decided not to watch the minute they were announced. The lame wins made my choice go down even easier.

I’ll start watching the Emmys again, whomever the host, as soon as they start nominating the best shows around, not Boston Legal, Two and A Half Men, etc. This is the same august institution that had to create a rule so the members stopped giving people acting awards for appearances that lasted LESS THAN 30 SECONDS.

I agree with #32 Charlene. My sentiments exactly.

I actually couldn’t give a $*%&( about the Emmys this year. TV has gotten really boring and the shows that won, no one watched (30 Rock won best sitcom???? Excuse me???? DAMN!) And outside of “Idol”, who really cares about Seacrest???? I know **** Clark and you, sir, are no **** Clark.

Ryan is GAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYY ! It is always awkward to watch someone who doesn’t realize that the ENTIRE world realizes that he’s a *** try to be hip and make come-on remarks to both sexes in Prime Time; walk out in a faggy black and white outfit; come out in a most unfashionable skinny black tie circa 1970; introduce a man/woman couple as “stunning” and “also stunning”. . . . . . .

Ryan - come out already and drop a couple of the jobs. We’ll all be happier. You’re way over saturated in the markets.

I WATCHED THE BEGINNING ITS NOT LIKE I EXSPECTED RAIN
TO BE FUNNY OR ANYTHING. BUT IT WAS JUST A BORING SHOW
IN ALL. BUT I WOULD HAVE PERFERED TO SEE SOMEONE FUNNY
HOST.

It’s rather funny/degrading to major networks to know that a silly Disney made-for-tv movie, High School Musical 2, drew a much bigger crowd than the Emmy Awards on a major tv network. Even last year’s award show too!

The primetime shows and stars are not as good as before. Ryan is a nice guy and his L.A. radio station is the no.1 listened radio in Calif.

The only shows I watch now are Bones,Idol and Dancing with the Stars but I hope Idol will have better talent because its becoming stale lately too.
The cable shows are dominating more in Disney its High School Musical
while on Lifetime Channel Army Wives is big hit.

are we tierd? @ 09/17/2007 at 5:37 pm

I think people are getting a little bit tierd of Hollywood.

Double Agent @ 09/17/2007 at 5:55 pm

How can it score the “lowest ratings EVER” if you then go on to say, “making it the second worst in history!”… which one is it; worst ever or second-to-worst?

Who cares about the emmys. they are ridiculous and should only be published in the newspaper they after they are picked. And Ryan Seacock can host that all he wants.

http://www.ilsvont.com

28 Patmycrotch : 09/17/2007 at 4:38 pm
3rd most hated person in the world (1st Jennifer A, Angelina J) and now Ryan. Why exactly? Oh yeah because Angelina does not like him. What a joke. Amazing that American Idol is one of the highest rated shows and he has hosted that for how long? People do not watch award shows anymore and most of on a FOX.

————

angelina not liking him is a result of him being annoying as h e l l. but that’s not the reason people find him annoying. start thinking instead of spending time to find someone to patyourcrotch.

yeah..
the emmy’s were kind of boring
and i thought they could have picked a better host

what was the comment that he said about vanessa hudgens?
@($#*%#$(*%@#($

agree with 24. poor ryan. it’s not really him… people just don’t care haha.

Several reasons:

The pre-awards shows take away from the actual awards telecast.

In addition, there’s nothing to see these days on the pre show. They used to be only 2 hours before the show now there’s like a countdown to the awards as many as 5 hours before the show and on some tv stations, days before the show.

The shows are almost all ensemble with no breakout star that one must see.

There’s no glamour to the Emmy’s anymore.

Too many awards shows awarding for the same thing. People’s choice, Golden Globes and Emmy all nominate for tv shows. There should only be three awards shows on the air, one for TV one for Music and one for Film. All the other awards should be on cable or not televised at all.

Ryan was actually very good because he kept out of the way of the broadcast.

the theatre in the round set up a disaster from the moment it was thought up of. I’m sure that person is fired. That setting is only good from plays and musicals not an awards show. The reason? A big one that James Spader mentioned. One of the rudest things you can do is give you back to a live audience. Half the theatre saw nothing but the backside of the presenters and winners.

They should not air it next year just make it a banquet dinner.

[~Famous~] @ 09/17/2007 at 6:22 pm

ryan’s extremely hated on this site, all by angelina’s cult. she’s an uptight stuck-up bish and he catches hate for it - gotta love groupies. Lol seacrest’s a hustler who works harder than any illegal mexican. LOL 20 jobs and counting. he’ll be hosting major tv shows for the next 30 years, get use to him. ha

To Elliott

I agree that the shows have become self congratulatory and crude in mood and less festive.

ryan who? @ 09/17/2007 at 6:27 pm

54 [~Famous~] : 09/17/2007 at 6:22 pm
ryan’s extremely hated on this site, all by angelina’s cult. she’s an uptight stuck-up bish and he catches hate for it - gotta love groupies. Lol seacrest’s a hustler who works harder than any illegal mexican. LOL 20 jobs and counting. he’ll be hosting major tv shows for the next 30 years, get use to him. ha

*************************************************

Ryan is hated everywhere, not just on this blog, for the same reason Tom Cruise is.

There are lots of factors on why the Emmy’s tanked.
1. It’s football season, so half the male audiance is gone.
2. everybody hates Ryan Seacrest. you attach his name to somthing and you’ll only get annoying tweenage girls and gay guys. Straight men will boycot anything with his image.
3. The Emmys are made by professional Critics. A lot of people beleive that critics are elitiest who smell their own farts. so the Emmys don’t matter much to us common folk.
4. There was a major WWE pay-per-veiw going on at the same time, goodbye more of the male audiance.

Basically every guy had somthing better to watch. and people who hate elitiest were willing to avoid this. and everybody who hates ryan seacrest avoided this. Result only women and gay guys watched it.

I didn’t watch t5he Emmy’s specifically due to Ryan Seacrest being the host..Can’t stand the arsewipe.Bleh

I hate Phonies @ 09/17/2007 at 6:39 pm

Ryan Seacrest is the phoniest piece of crap going. As soon as i heard he was hosting the emmys i knew to take a pass. Can’t stand to listen to him for more than two mins, change the channel.

57 Daniel : 09/17/2007 at 6:31 pm
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So that the trick. Try to find a way to get the fanboys and male audience interested….hmmmmm.

counter programming seems to be a great strategy.

Another reason is that we all know the winners could put people in a coma so why not spice things up with hot presenters? Why must the presenters be gasbags as well? Did they have to have Alec “creepy” Balwin present? but they couldn’t get one of those guys from Prison Break to present?

I tuned in, saw Ryan Gaycrest and then I tuned out.

Gearbox... @ 09/17/2007 at 6:52 pm

Ryan, I don’t know who you had to BLOW to get that gig, I don’t even understand how he got so famous with his effing chicklet teeth…..just go away.

I’m not homophobic, but I have a problem with so called straight men like Ryan and Tom Cruise.

Come out of the closet and stop grossing straight women out.

Well the show was on Fox and the Emmy’s approached Fox about Ryan. The Emmy people were kinda afraid because they thought he was overexposed but they went with him anyway. BIG MISTAKE. He also hosted E’s pre-show!

I thought Ryan was very good. And I enjoyed the show. The only thing I didn’t like was the tribute to the Sopranos by the Jersey Boys. It seemed more like a tribute to Frankie Vallie.

I think the ratings were down because so many people want to see the New England Patriots (post scandal).

Wooden Legs Angelina @ 09/17/2007 at 7:10 pm

Ryan is the next **** Clark granted the gay **** Clark, he is hated because of wooden legs.

i did not watch the emmys either. i think they are long and boring. if i am interested in whether or not a show i like won, i just read the paper or computer news.

absolute truth @ 09/17/2007 at 7:36 pm

Ryan is soooo over rated and soooo over exposed,couldn’t have happen to a nicer guy.

He needs to stay far away from all award shows. Fans didn’t like the way he treated Brad and Angie.

I think the host has too little to do with the rating unless it is Timberlake hosting or so…People are just sick of the Hollywood SH!T…

people has spoken! especially here in cali! ryan seacrest is soo full of himself and he is not a humble person! GOOD FOR HIM! maybe after this hopefully he will come down from the clouds that he think he is in!

allisoncoverdale @ 09/17/2007 at 9:57 pm

The way he’s always talked highly of vanessa, and about his love for her, and then to make fun really pissed me off. And i don’t care what any of you have to say, this is MY opinion.

Step off

Love Angies new nose @ 09/17/2007 at 10:11 pm

Please Sarah Silverman was doggin Britney and Paris at the height of their scandal and everyone thought she was funny. He is hated because of Brad and Angie. The cult followers would hate their own kids if they spoke ill of the JPs.

His insensitive interview blasting Angelina Jolie at the Golden Globes when she had just lost her mother was unbelieveable. I’ll NEVER watch him again!

maybe gaybe @ 09/17/2007 at 11:05 pm

Please idots if you think Brad and Angie have such power and can make so many people follow as “cult”, they sure are much popular than you bisshes would like to believe. Stupid American pigs.

I don’t watch award shows any more because they’re stupid and boring. Celebrities make enough money, get plenty of attention and the whole thing is fake….

they thank God as if they cured cancer, drone on about the importance of their “work” as if they’re building homes for the handicapped or something truly valuable, and the commercials are boring, too.

Anything worth being said has already been said at every other award show.(they’re always “blessed” to work with a great cast, grateful to have a wonderful director, and the “nice” ones mention craft services…YAWN!)

Sorry for the rant but all these award shows are narcissistic. And they’re a total snoozefest….and PS am sick of celebrities voicing their political opinions as if they actually live in the real world. And PPS am sick of hearing people whine about success and the paps etc…

Maybe gaybe–

I would have said this if he had done it to ANYBODY. He was insensitive and used her to make himself look good.

Ryan is overexposed, red carpet, emmy’s, superbowl, yuck, he’s not funny or personable. Can’t stand him anymore.

I think this is because of the many bad shows that are today. The good shows today you can count in one hand! They always cancelled de good shows so why should I wacth an award show when I don’t care which one is gonna win, most of them suck anyway.

Wendy Smith @ 09/18/2007 at 2:56 am

I love Ryan Seacrest snd thought he did a really great job…kept the show moving and no annoying jokes….He was a class act and it’s one of the only award shows I could watch from beginning to end without having to change the channel….can’t figure out what everyone hated….I think Ryan is getting bad reviews for no real reason except he’s so handsome and perfect…people hate him for that because they’re jealous!

Don’t think it’s his fault either, though he annoys the crap outta me with his “funny comments”

Bisbalina @ 09/18/2007 at 3:45 am

Good for him!! I don’t like Him!

Not sure why people are dissing TV or TV actors…the TV has had wayyyyy hugher quality art than the movies ever since Sopranos began…the major Hollywood movies have been pure swill….total garbage….sequel after sequel….I would rather watch a season of Lost or Six Feet Under or Office than sit through another lame action flick!

There were several reasons that this year’s Emmy Awards show was boring…

1. Ryan Seacrest hosting was a bad idea. They needed a comedian to liven things up and keep us entertained in between speeches. Ryan is suffering from over-exposure and so are we, the unfortunate TV viewers…please, give it a rest!
2. Fox was so trigger-happy with the censor button, switching to that awful shot of the venue when someone dared to speak in a way they thought might be offensive to the viewers or the Administration…they drained away every bit of excitement or anticipation about what might happen or what someone might say.
3. That whole “theatre in the round” idea fell flat, too…what brain thought that up? It distracted the presenters and the viewers.

This was the worst Emmy’s show I’ve seen and if they let Ryan Seacrest host next year, I’ll just watch the pre-shows and post-shows and skip the actual Emmy’s. I may boycott them, too, if Fox carries the show again. Enough with the censorship!

I thought Ryan did a fantastic job! I think he’s funny, down to earth, not to mention cute. :-) The Emmys was just boring this year and waaaaay to long. Ryan did a fine job.

Oh, and I want to add that actually, Ryan was the ONLY reason I watched. :-)

The Fox network should of known Seacrest is a joke.He is not funny and is about the most stupid host on T.V.The idol thing is bad enough.We do not need that show to find singers, actors, or anything else.Seacrest had his 15 minutes of fame like most of the winners on that show…time to put them all to bed.He has to go and the that show must go after that.What a waste!

I didn’t even watch, but oh well. Ryan probably won’t be the host next year.

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.