Angelina Jolie is a Garage Kinda Girl
Angelina Jolie drops off son Maddox, 6, the Lycée Français de New York school on the Upper East Side of Manhattan on Tuesday morning.
The mother-son team entered through the garage entrance this time. How do you think the family decides which entrance/exit to use each time?
And if you didn’t get the memo, Jon Voight was reportedly at the Waldorf Astoria hotel (where the Jolie-Pitts are staying) to see his goddaughter. He supposedly still hasn’t met any of his grandchildren, including Shakira Zahara.
Posted to: Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Celebrity Babies, Maddox Jolie Pitt
Related posts:








Older











174 Comments
She looks really young in these pictures.
new thread
#71: you are a ghoul! were you abandoned as a kid or merely dropped on your head by your own mother?
The loonies are out in full force. Cracks me up how people act like they know them. These people need to chill on allowing these kids to be in the media so much. There are plenty of famous celebrity couples that protect their children these two need to take lessons. I also think it’s funny how every time people complain about something they are doing they seem to change. Frauds that’s all they are they need to go away and let these poor children have some privacy. Before you loonies go ballistic on me look at the Beckhams you don’t see them flaunting their kids to the media…no they believe in protecting their kids. And do you honestly think Brangelina really cares what I say about them or that you defend them. You loonies need to go away and let the rest of enjoy the celeb gossip!!
544 Passing Through
You are indeed on a roll. You are too funny. You know maybe the trolls have gone back to school. You know troll school. They need to work on their skills for writing lies and ignorant falsehoods.
JUST JARRED readers = Annie Wilkes’ of the world.
#77: so they should live at motel 6 just to satisfy your sense of fairness? What part of they earned their money and they can darn well spend it on anything they need or want do you not understand. I’m sure you with your integrity are living in a cardboard box and eating from the dumpster to sympathize with those who are in poverty. Until you can show yourself what you are doing for humanity, STFU.
You are already polluting our air with your noxious presence as it is.
For those who are saying they are paying an obsurd amount of money to stay at the Waldorf, well if I remember correctly they are not staying at the actual hotel. Angie owns a condo which is connected to the hotel, she has owned it since I think the late 90’s. Therefore they may be exiting in and out of the hotel but they are staying at her place that she owns there. Even if they were staying at the hotel I’m pretty sure the production company for Brad’s film that he is filming there is comping the expense, and if not who cares they can afford it. It is their right to do as they will with their money just like it is ours to do with ours as we like (of course after taxes and bills), the only difference they have more of it.
$100,000/month on rent…how many New Orleans homes would that build? If you’re going to pretend to be a humanitarian, at least have the decency to move into a normal frickin home and not a palace. Other celebs live nice lives in regular doormen buildings in NYC, but these two yahoos need chandeliers. And wait till Brad decides he needs to redecorate to suit his midcentury modern aesthetic, that’ll be more waste and more money down the crapper.
hahaha
Comparing beckhams with brangelina in looking for attention?are you serious or you are just high or on crack?
VB pose for camera and change her positions whenever she is out with one of her kids even If she goes to toy store!!and honey no one cares about beckhams just you and people like you.
papz will follow brad and angie even If they go to one dangerouse area in africa,because many people like you and tabs are desperate to see them.that`s why you see many photo of them.
and you are wrong every one in this blog know that VB is attention ***** and she for sure feels desperate that she doesn`t get as much attention as she thought she would take.
To #101 LAM - get your tongue out of their a$$hole$.
134 natasha
show us how much money you give to donation from your income before criticing people for their work?even If Brad doesn`t give one cent to NO`s home he for sure does better work than you with your money because he brings attention to NO.
$100,000/month tax right off for Brad’s studio?
HA HAHAHAAAHAHAHA,
I hope the IRS hunts down this studio for abusing the tax system.
That is not right, especially when Bush is cutting back on education and health care to fund his out of control losing war in Iraq.
^^Yeah but natasha isn’t getting PR for being a good humanitarian and “green”.
That’s so ridiculous. If you are going to talk the talk then walk the walk.
#137 - new:
“people for their work”? their “work”? what work? photo ops? Have you heard her speak about her “work”? She’s unintelligible. Not the sharpest pencil in the box, but she’s hot so who cares, right? Youa re missing the point. If they care about the starving children and all that crap so much, then they are probably the only people who know that 100k per month is not peanuts, but can instead change the lives of thousands of children who would otherwise have no future, because they have gone there and seen the poverty for themselves. So to them, 100k should mean a whole lot more than marble floors and a Waldorf address, but unfortunately it doesn’t.
115 hype : 10/09/2007 at 4:33 pm
Let’s stop this legend of the 1/3 of her income given to charity.
According to Forbes, the earnings of Ms Jolie between june 2006 and june 2007 are estimated at $20 million and for Mr Pitt it’s $35 million.
According to givingback.org, the amount donated to charity in 2006 by Jolie and Pitt combined (read combined) is $2,415,000.
Well, it seems quite far from 1/3 to me, it’s not even 1/20, and yes it’s less than the money I give in % .
=====================
You need to learn how to read. When Forbes said Angie’s earnings was 20M, Forbes was saying it is the gross amount. Please go to this link, //www.forbes.com/lists/2007/53/07celebrities_Angelina-Jolie_T5SH.html . Per the article, Forbes said, “……Management, agent and attorney fees have not been deducted……”.
In real life, the net amount is a lot lower after deducting expenses. Very often, when people talk about contributing, they are referring to a certain % from the net amount and not the gross amount.
.Since Angie set up the Jolie Pitt foundation sometime in 2006, she could have given 1/3 of her income to the foundation. and true , it is a donation with a tax write off on her tax return. Since a foundation is NOT required to disburse all the money received, therefore, the amount which you quoted 2.4 M is the amount which her foundation dished out to charities and NOT the amount which Angie contributed to her foundation. That said, you cannot use this 2.4 million as a benchmark to gauge her %.
In fact, any CPA will advise her to always leave a big chunk of money, ( meaning NOT to dish out all the money from the foundation) , to serve as principal. In that case, you can continue to have money to fund the projects. To explain in layman terms. Think the analogy “mother hen and egg “. mother hen = principal (money which Angie donated), egg = interest ( or money earned from the principal). Another good example is , think Harvard endowment. Harvard only hands out all the interest earned from the principal as grant money to the students. Harvard NEVER touches the principal . In other words, the principal is always kept intact in the foundation.
REASON: You want to perpetuate the principal, so that there is the INCOME STREAM (eggs from the mother hen) to continue funding your charitable projects.
I also want to point out that once Angie gives money to the foundation, she cannot use that money for her personal purpose. That money belongs to the foundation. She has the authority to direct where the money goes, that is to legitimate charitable organizations. Every year, the foundation needs to file a tax return with the IRS detailing all the receipts and disbursements.
I do believethat she gave 1/3 of her income to charities. Later, I shall find you the article which O Reily did an investigation on her, and found that SHE WALKS THE WALK.
In short, there is no info on the internet which gives the amount of her net income, and unless you see her tax return, you have no info on her donation to her foundation. Therefore, you post is WRONG.
#134: I hope your head hurts, your feet hurt, your bum hurts all day, all night, every second of the day. People like you are just so despicable that you probably can’t find anyone to talk to that’s why you haunt the more popular blogs. I hope you scream with pain everytime you see the JPs out and about, happy with each other. Squirm like a worm in a field of salt in your envy and jealousy. No matter how you deny it, you are angry at fate for making you into a p.iss poor fugly lowlife instead of a rich and beautiful JP who’s living the high life. That’s why even if you can’t stand them you still can’t resist looking at them either.
I saw a clip of Jon Voight, he does look old and sad.
Rumor has it he wanted to see Angie and the kids.
I think it’s time Angie forgive her father
and reconciles with him and let him see
his grandkids he wants to see so badly.
C’mon Angie he’s getting old and im sure
he is very sorry for all he had said about her in the past.
I know Angie does have a genuine kindred heart for all
the works she had done for UN and Refugees.
I can tell from watching her speaking about the destitutes;
she is very much passionate with her cause and
compassion for the lesser ones. I applaud her.
Thus it is time Angie should forgive her father’s
past mistakes he had done to her personally.
Parents do and say silly hurtful things to love ones…
but when the years passes by and they become older,
they do feel remorse for any misdeeds they have done
or not done enough to their children.
This is when children should learn to forgive them.
To Err is human, to forgive is divine.
tita get a life, what is your real name Angelina or what??? You remind me of a stalker. Run Brad and Ang Run!!
Dear ol’ 76 jack — stupid little a**h**e that you are. We can ALL donate 1/3 of our paychecks if we want. It will hurt us just as much as anyone else. Rich people have greater expenses. Donating 1/3 is not easy for anyone, period. We will all get tax breaks if we donate to charity, whether we are rich or poor. Any time any one of us goes on vacation and stays at a nice hotel, that money could also go to charity. Or are you calling every person in the world a hypocrite? Including yourself???? Can you never buy anything nice for yourself? Let’s stop the pretense. What AJ does is fantastic, and not everyone can or will do as much. As for the fact that she actually goes to those places and sees and lives around the actual conditions, and brings back first hand knowledge… that woman is a saint. Now Buzz off.
141 Baker Hughes : 10/09/2007 at 5:20 pm
————-
Props to Baker Hughes for explaining how foundations work. There seems to be an abundance of posters with a mistaken, simplistic understanding of the bigger world. I personally hope that the Jolie-Pitts are reserving a nice junk in chartible foundations for each of their chidlren so they can take over their direction when they are older. That’s quite a legacy to hand down. And the kids can laugh that their foundations were seeded with anti-paparazzi money.
As for those lists cited by 115 hype : 10/09/2007 at 4:33 pm
———————–
Both sources that hype quotes (Forbes or givingback.org) are unreliable as sources for both income and donations. First, they have no idea how much these people make. Oprah makes twice what they credit her with. Similarly, Brad Pitt makes much more than cited. Do you really think these celebs are giving out their income info for publication? They even admit they’re just guessing. Givingback.org has an entire list of caveats which serve as a reminder that thir info is pretty useless and meaningless.
Both sites are dependant upon others for their information. It isn’t as if there is some definitive repository of this info. They are essentially a gossip site for charitable efforts by celebs. The Forbes article is a gossipy fluff piece. Many times the money noted on the list as donated is actually money going to that person’s own foundation like Tiger Woods. There’s nothing wrong with that but it doesn’t mean the money was spent in that year. Nothing wrong with that either. Just that the whole site is completely misleading and subject to misinterpretation. The Washington Post recently printed an expose of his Tiger Woods’ 3 charitable foundations. For instance, one of them sets up golf tournaments and for every dollar raised they spend a mere 16 cents for charitable programs. And for one so-called “charity” they raised around $15 million and only ended up with less than $1 million for charity after all the tournament expenses were paid. That’s a terrible ratio. All 3 foundations were found to be rife with conflicts of interest and self dealing by board members.
The site also doesn’t include donations pledged in another year. So it doesn’t list the $5 million commitment over a 5 year period to Jolie’s Cambodian project which has now grown into an entire millenium village. That would have to be listed in the year it was pledged and not the year or years the money was actually given.
So stop wasting your time creating whole elaborate scenarios about their or anyone else’s charitable giving based on unreliable sources. It’s totally meaningless. When are people going to stop being so gullible and believe everything and anything they read? Anyway, fantasies based on math are soooooo boring.
why do the fangs think they know JP better than the “trolls”? you read the same tabloid cr*p that we do. You go through the same websites we do. You watch the same interviews of them that we do ( when and if we do) and watch the same bomb movies that we have. So why is it that when an anti comments on some facts about them we are automatically out of our minds?! You people know nothing more than us. You just like to deny the facts and sugarcoat some of the hard truths about them. No one is saying they aren’t generous with the charities - but merely stating a fact that they don’t contribute what they claim and yet they continue to brag about it! They need to shut it and stop seeking praise for every good deed. That’s why most can’t warm up to them or the image they try and portray!
Just a side note about the trolls. The Jolie Pitt haters are bragging at their Jolie Obsession site that they are posting here just to try to get banned by Jared. One of them bragged they they spent hours here on Sunday goading posters with posts ragging on Angie’s looks. They were actually upset when they were ignored. A couple of them claim that they were banned from here for simply not liking Jolie.
It’s an odd obsession they have. They have more pics of the JPs there than JJ has here.
Bill O’reily looked into it and found out that Angie was telling the truth when it comes to her donations. So you hatahs can shove it where the sun don’t wanna shine.
Hi JJ again,
I know someone here cannot sleep at night because Brad and Angie are staying at the Waldorf. First, they have an entourage (employees) who help them with their kids. Second, when they sign a contract to make a film, there are certain clauses in the contract before they sign that the studio or corporation will accommodate their needs and expenses including travel specially if they are filming on location. So, some of this hotel bills (especially for Brad) is paid for by either Warner Bros. Vantage, or Universal, etc. whichever isin charge of Burn After Reading.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!