Ron ‘n Rachel Go Time Traveling

Fri, 12 October 2007 at 11:48 am

Costars Ron Livingston and Rachel McAdams grab lunch together on Thursday in Toronto, Canada, where they are working on their new film, The Time Traveler’s Wife.

Eric Bana, 39, plays Chicago librarian Henry De Tamble. Ron, 40, plays Gomez, the librarian’s friend and a liberal attorney who works for nonprofit organizations. Rachel, 31 (maybe), plays artist Clare Abshire.

Livingston is best known for his lead role in the comedy film Office Space, his stint on Sex and the City, and as Captain Lewis Nixon in the miniseries Band of Brothers. He most recently starred as an FBI negotiator in the now-canceled FOX series Standoff.

Livingston-mcadams ron-livingston-rachel-mcadams-01

Livingston-mcadams ron-livingston-rachel-mcadams-02

Livingston-mcadams ron-livingston-rachel-mcadams-03

Livingston-mcadams ron-livingston-rachel-mcadams-04

Photos: ONeill/White/INFdaily.com
Posted to: Rachel McAdams, Ron Livingston
Related posts:

33 Comments

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

# 1

Regina @ 10/12/2007 at 11:50 am

Rachel, 31 (maybe).
—

Lol. I think she’s 29, even her parents said so. I believe them. IMDb think they’re always right.

# 2

Kat m @ 10/12/2007 at 11:51 am

wahoo second. haha

# 3

~all ya'll~ @ 10/12/2007 at 11:57 am

she’s cute ~and I believe she is 30! But doesn’t look it. I’d say she looks about 26 or 27

# 4

azul @ 10/12/2007 at 12:30 pm

diosaaaaaa! la amooo
I LOVE HER!!

# 5

Roberta @ 10/12/2007 at 12:39 pm

WOW, an Italian!!!
Ciao, hai visto il film”My name’s Tannino”???
Have you seen the Italian movie “My name’s Tannino”?
Beh, è molto carina, she is very nice.

# 6

Andy @ 10/12/2007 at 12:50 pm

really, what’s so pretty about her?
she looks like many cheerleaders in my school.

# 7

tRISHA @ 10/12/2007 at 1:05 pm

LOVE her!! And Ron isn’t who I pictured as Gomez, but I love him as an actor. I’m sure he’ll be great in this role. Can’t wait to see this movie!

# 8

ukgirl @ 10/12/2007 at 1:11 pm

Ron is looking a little pudgy there

# 9

Krista @ 10/12/2007 at 1:50 pm

she looks 30 and so plain jane.

# 10

meee @ 10/12/2007 at 1:57 pm

she’s absolutely gorgeous…..and i love the fact that she’s so down to earth…love her!!!

# 11

David @ 10/12/2007 at 2:14 pm

Her mole and forehead distracts me.

Her films and acting are not that good.

# 12

Nick Naylor @ 10/12/2007 at 2:14 pm

Andy - Maybe she doesn’t look or act like a ***** compared to Megan Fox? Did that ever occur to you?

Krista - I have two words for you…Lens Crafters.

# 13

Nick Naylor @ 10/12/2007 at 2:15 pm

David - You’re stupid and gay. End of discussion.

# 14

BLT @ 10/12/2007 at 3:16 pm

I saw her movie where she’s nude. She has breasts like Keira Knightley. Gross!!!!!
She has the J-Lo butt too.

# 15

moi @ 10/12/2007 at 3:26 pm

Someone buy the chick in the green shirt something in her size please.

# 16

Joanna [Poland] @ 10/12/2007 at 3:40 pm

RACHEL IS THE MOST AMAZING ACTRESS EVER!

# 17

Zooey @ 10/12/2007 at 4:43 pm

She’s ugly and very stuck up.

# 18

Terry @ 10/12/2007 at 5:22 pm

I also find her very ugly. How did she become an actress?
Her filmography is a joke.

# 19

michele @ 10/12/2007 at 6:03 pm

She is so refreshing to watch. I saw her in a play in Toronto once and she has such a great presence on stage. She was fantastic.

# 20

? @ 10/12/2007 at 6:12 pm

I love her so much!!!

# 21

non @ 10/12/2007 at 7:23 pm

She’s very beautiful and one helluva talented actress!! Love her!!

# 22

Andrea @ 10/12/2007 at 8:33 pm

She looks like Jennifer Aniston.
yuuuck. we shall see if her movie is a hit.
Wedding Crashers didnt count because that was an ensemble
cast centering mostly on Wilson and Vince Vaughn.

# 23

faria @ 10/13/2007 at 12:06 pm

People here are crazy,and why do I sense that there is some posters using differnt names?
about her films, the tryly films that she carries were The Notebook and Red Eye
THe notebook made 115mil
The Red Eye made almost 100mil

This is better than most of Kate Hudson, Jennifer Aniston, Scarlett Johanso films, so I think tha SHE CAN carry a film or two

# 24

Ally @ 10/15/2007 at 3:58 pm

Huh, isnt lead female supposed to be Asian? Did they cop out??

# 25

Amanda Leigh @ 10/15/2007 at 5:39 pm

Asian? What book did you read?

# 26

Incansables @ 10/15/2007 at 11:49 pm

a real beauty

# 27

randy @ 10/16/2007 at 6:17 pm

I ran into Ron in the elevator at the sutton about 15 mins before that photo… it’s just a bad photo of the dude.

# 28

CJ @ 10/19/2007 at 2:03 am

If Ryan’s tired of her, just send her over this way.

# 29

mariah @ 10/28/2007 at 3:06 pm

i think rachel looks great! 31? really? i can see it i guess, but at first glance i’d say mid to late 20’s. she ages well i guess.

can’t wait for this movie! it looks great, lets just hope it is great. The book deserves a good visual interpretation of it.

# 30

Jon @ 11/04/2007 at 12:24 pm

You know, she’s very pretty and not a bad actress, at all, but I don’t think she’s high-caliber enough for this role. Talent-wise, I mean. I’m not trying to insult her, I just think a few more years on the circuit wouldn’t hurt before she tries the heavier material, because her filmography gives me a toothache, personally.
As light and fluffy as cotton candy.

She could also stand to diversify her roles a bit- with the exception of Mean Girls, her characters have all ultimately been sweethearts. She needs to try and break from the mold a bit. I know she has a smaller film in the can but she sort of reminds me of the two Jessicas (Biel and Alba) in that they all want heavier material but aren’t willing to show their skill. All insist on staying within the warm folds of the mainstream instead using their clout (whatever it may be) to get a role in a smaller, possibly indie, film and play a drastically different role than what they’re usually cast in (and for the three of them, that role is usually the girlfriend). It’s hard to feel bad for them when actresses, whatever you may think of their skill levels aside, such as Keira Knightley, Natalie Portman, ROsario Dawson, Scarlett Johansson, etc., are willing to try for something better or different.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Comment and Share!