OlderFri, 19 October 2007 at 12:25 pm
Suri’s Bottle of Barley Milk
Katie Holmes strolls around the Upper East Side of Manhattan with daughter Suri, 17 months, on Friday morning.
And if Us Weekly is accurate, Suri is drinking a mixture of barley water, milk and corn syrup!
Kaite, 28, was seen wearing black leggings, black patent pumps and a long turtleneck sweater with not-so-flattering olive and purple colored stripes.
The NYC marathon is less than two weeks away, Katie should be training now! Unless she’s not running the race this time around, which is more than likely at this point…
UPDATE: 10+ pictures inside of Tom Cruise with Katie and Suri…
Share This Post:
Photos: INFdaily.com
Posted to: Celebrity Babies, Katie Holmes, Suri Cruise, Tom Cruise
Related posts:
Posted to: Celebrity Babies, Katie Holmes, Suri Cruise, Tom Cruise
Related posts:
280 Comments
150 jema : 10/19/2007 at 3:04 pm
On the second to the last picture Suri looks like she has a BALD spot! ??? I don’t think that barley **** is working. Her hair is falling out. That’s why they have the come over on her forehead all the time. ugggg
———-
Suri has always had a natural part on that side of her head. Remember the VF pics..especially the cover.?you can see it.
She isn’t going bald. But I do wonder if she still has that pale strawberry birthmark still. Probably not, those things sometimes fade away.
I agree with you #120.
Suri is a cutie pie. Katie is a loving mom. Tom is cool! God bless them.
So glad to hear that Suri has TWO nannies.
That is PROOF POSITIVE that Katie is a FULL TIME HANDS ON MOM!
Other celebs only have ONE nanny for maybe 2-3 kids, Thye don’t care as much.
I can hardly wait to see Katie running in the NYC marathan. She will be SO fashionable in her heels and carrying Suri on her hip.
RUN KATIE RUN!
Katie and Tom look fab. Suri is a doll. Im excited about Tom’s movie. Adding Meryl Streep and Robert Redford…..WOOOOWWWW.
she’s evil alien baby!!!!!
When will Willaim Mapother claim his child? what a horrible father. i bet he just doesn’t want to pay child support.
I’m sorry, Suri is NOT cute….she looks very odd….
161 Koolaid drinker : 10/19/2007 at 3:35 pm
I can hardly wait to see Katie running in the NYC marathan. She will be SO fashionable in her heels and carrying Suri on her hip.
RUN KATIE RUN!
=================================================================
comeon this is just Katie’s plan for running away from Tom by pretending to enter a marathan. she is practicing by carrying Suri in high heels. If she can do that.. running carrying suri, while wearing running shoes will be a snap!
mother and child= very unattractive!
and what an UNFLATTERING outfit!!!
Ann #153: I don’t know if you noticed, but in more than one picture Katie actually poses with Suri for the paps. Evidently, she doesn’t share your opinion that sharing photos of children should be illegal.
I do wonder how all this makes the normal people in their families, like Katie’s parents and Tom’s two other children, feel though. Can’t be easy.
I think all of those people who said Suri was not real and that Tom was not the father should give the family a big apology. Suri is adorable and looks more and more like Tom every day.
I do have a concern (as much concern as a stranger can have), at 17 months, should she still be drinking a bottle regardless of the mixture? Also, is it true that she’s a little terror around the house? Love Katie and Tom!
Gee, I haven’t seen Tom jump on a couch in a long time, where is the love?
Tom is a good man. he is raising his cousins child as his own.
Damn You, william mapother.
She is so cute. I love her little outfit. And can we please stop the baby bashing. I feel that all babies are cute.
And though it is best to wean a baby off the bottle by 1, every parent will find that their child will do it before or after the one year mark, and that is a-okay. Whatever works for one family, may not work for another.
Reading the posts here, it is incredibly funny how many of us post here like we know exactly what is going on in these people’s lives. I mean seriously, we don’t and most likely will never know, so why pretend?
All we see are little snippets of their lives, and photos only take a few moments of a 24 hour day. So how in the world could we believe we can construct their true reality based on what we read/see/hear when they are but very, very small parts of a much larger whole?
Lions for Lambs : See This Movie
Matt Littman
I am not a critic, and I don’t pretend to be. I enjoy bad movies almost as much as I enjoy the good ones. Weird Science was as enjoyable for me as Raging Bull. Sorry, but that’s the way it is. I’ve blogged on this sight about my love for the best show on TV, Friday Night Lights. If you’re not watching it, well, I want you to know that in some Islamic countries, they kill you for less of an offense.
But even though it’s not really my role, I saw a film last night that I encourage you to see.
The film is Lions for Lambs. It stars three legends: Robert Redford (also the director), Meryl Streep (you may have heard of her), and Tom Cruise.
First, let me say that I enjoy nearly every movie that Tom Cruise has made. From Risky Business to Rain Man, to Mission Impossible, the one thing I always get from a Tom Cruise movie is that he seems to be the hardest working man in show biz. It always seems as if he is fully invested in the role he’s playing. I don’t care about his personal life.
Here, Tom has found the perfect role. He plays Senator Jasper Irving, a Republican who may be the future of the Party. Meryl Streep is his foil, a liberal reporter but one who once wrote a piece comparing Senator Irving to JFK. Senator Irving, a West Point alum, has conceived of a new plan to win in Afghanistan, and, as the movie opens, the plan is going into motion. The Senator is giving the scoop to the reporter who launched his career.
This is one-third of the story in Lions for Lambs. Another third consists of Robert Redford, playing a college professor, talking to a young, underachieving student about taking risks and fulfilling potential. He compares the student to two other grads, both of whom have gone off together to fight in Afghanistan - and that fight, the battle for the high ground in the Afghan mountains, is the new strategy that Cruise and Streep are discussing, and is the other third of the story.
The two soldiers (one is Derek Luke, the other an actor whose name I don’t know) both come from tough backgrounds, and America hasn’t given them much. But they believe that change comes from action, and so they have gone off to fight in the war rather than go on to graduate school.
The movie goes back and forth between all three connected tales. I was most taken with the Cruise-Streep story, because it does a good job of portraying two sides of a difficult argument. Senator Irving believes that even though we’ve bungled the wars, we still have to get it right or we’ll be paying the price forever. The reporter played by Streep believes we have failed so miserably that this is Vietnam all over again; no strategy is going to work. It’s over. Go home.
My joy from the movie came in watching the great, genuine performances, and I recommend it to all HuffPo readers.
Lions for Lambs : See This Movie
Matt Littman
I am not a critic, and I don’t pretend to be. I enjoy bad movies almost as much as I enjoy the good ones. Weird Science was as enjoyable for me as Raging Bull. Sorry, but that’s the way it is. I’ve blogged on this sight about my love for the best show on TV, Friday Night Lights. If you’re not watching it, well, I want you to know that in some Islamic countries, they kill you for less of an offense.
But even though it’s not really my role, I saw a film last night that I encourage you to see.
The film is Lions for Lambs. It stars three legends: Robert Redford (also the director), Meryl Streep (you may have heard of her), and Tom Cruise.
First, let me say that I enjoy nearly every movie that Tom Cruise has made. From Risky Business to Rain Man, to Mission Impossible, the one thing I always get from a Tom Cruise movie is that he seems to be the hardest working man in show biz. It always seems as if he is fully invested in the role he’s playing. I don’t care about his personal life.
Here, Tom has found the perfect role. He plays Senator Jasper Irving, a Republican who may be the future of the Party. Meryl Streep is his foil, a liberal reporter but one who once wrote a piece comparing Senator Irving to JFK. Senator Irving, a West Point alum, has conceived of a new plan to win in Afghanistan, and, as the movie opens, the plan is going into motion. The Senator is giving the scoop to the reporter who launched his career.
This is one-third of the story in Lions for Lambs. Another third consists of Robert Redford, playing a college professor, talking to a young, underachieving student about taking risks and fulfilling potential. He compares the student to two other grads, both of whom have gone off together to fight in Afghanistan - and that fight, the battle for the high ground in the Afghan mountains, is the new strategy that Cruise and Streep are discussing, and is the other third of the story.
The two soldiers (one is Derek Luke, the other an actor whose name I don’t know) both come from tough backgrounds, and America hasn’t given them much. But they believe that change comes from action, and so they have gone off to fight in the war rather than go on to graduate school.
The movie goes back and forth between all three connected tales. I was most taken with the Cruise-Streep story, because it does a good job of portraying two sides of a difficult argument. Senator Irving believes that even though we’ve bungled the wars, we still have to get it right or we’ll be paying the price forever. The reporter played by Streep believes we have failed so miserably that this is Vietnam all over again; no strategy is going to work. It’s over. Go home.
My joy from the movie came in watching the great, genuine performances, and I recommend it to all HuffPo readers.
go see this
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:48 pm Post subject:
——————————————————————————–
Another great review via Yahoo for HuffingtonPost.com!
Lions for Lambs : See This Movie
Matt Littman
I am not a critic, and I don’t pretend to be. I enjoy bad movies almost as much as I enjoy the good ones. Weird Science was as enjoyable for me as Raging Bull. Sorry, but that’s the way it is. I’ve blogged on this sight about my love for the best show on TV, Friday Night Lights. If you’re not watching it, well, I want you to know that in some Islamic countries, they kill you for less of an offense.
But even though it’s not really my role, I saw a film last night that I encourage you to see.
The film is Lions for Lambs. It stars three legends: Robert Redford (also the director), Meryl Streep (you may have heard of her), and Tom Cruise.
First, let me say that I enjoy nearly every movie that Tom Cruise has made. From Risky Business to Rain Man, to Mission Impossible, the one thing I always get from a Tom Cruise movie is that he seems to be the hardest working man in show biz. It always seems as if he is fully invested in the role he’s playing. I don’t care about his personal life.
Here, Tom has found the perfect role. He plays Senator Jasper Irving, a Republican who may be the future of the Party. Meryl Streep is his foil, a liberal reporter but one who once wrote a piece comparing Senator Irving to JFK. Senator Irving, a West Point alum, has conceived of a new plan to win in Afghanistan, and, as the movie opens, the plan is going into motion. The Senator is giving the scoop to the reporter who launched his career.
This is one-third of the story in Lions for Lambs. Another third consists of Robert Redford, playing a college professor, talking to a young, underachieving student about taking risks and fulfilling potential. He compares the student to two other grads, both of whom have gone off together to fight in Afghanistan - and that fight, the battle for the high ground in the Afghan mountains, is the new strategy that Cruise and Streep are discussing, and is the other third of the story.
The two soldiers (one is Derek Luke, the other an actor whose name I don’t know) both come from tough backgrounds, and America hasn’t given them much. But they believe that change comes from action, and so they have gone off to fight in the war rather than go on to graduate school.
The movie goes back and forth between all three connected tales. I was most taken with the Cruise-Streep story, because it does a good job of portraying two sides of a difficult argument. Senator Irving believes that even though we’ve bungled the wars, we still have to get it right or we’ll be paying the price forever. The reporter played by Streep believes we have failed so miserably that this is Vietnam all over again; no strategy is going to work. It’s over. Go home.
My joy from the movie came in watching the great, genuine performances, and I recommend it to all HuffPo readers.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20071019/cm_huffpost/069126
_________________
That is one fugly robokid.
oh and I see all the scientolgy nutjobs are out in force today!
and yeah I spelt it wrong but seeing as it’s a made up word for a made up load of rubbish it hardly matters a jot!
why is Tom in only one picture? It looks like He was photoshopped in
shiloh dresses her same cloths and shoes over and over again!!! at least suri wears new cloths every single time…new expensive ones!! they r a very successful family!! God bless the three of them!!
Scientologist see cross eyed , aftera ll thats how Midget caould say he was cured of dyslexia when he cant even write a name …with the scientologhy glasses , he can now see..remind me of Eddie murphy in trading places…” I can walk” in Midgets case is ” I can read ” (5X)..What an uneducated ****, couldnt find any woman to stay his buttfucking **** self,he had to brainwash her upfront for 2 weeks to “FALL IN LOVE”
Roger friedman is still waiting on her explanaitno for the dissapearance..ahahha
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1427367/posts
Pages: « 1 … 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 … 12 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!