Katie Holmes’ NYC Marathon Victory Party

I think she stopped somewhere before the finish line, she has a bit of make up on, no sweat, and wearing her rings??? When I do marathons, I wear no makeup, get all sweaty, and take my rings off because of swelling! And I also feel like collapsing at the end!! There would be no way I’d be partying that night, I’d be too tired!

As someone who has manned the medical tent at the finish line of a marathon for the past 5 years, I can tell you that people finish 26.2 miles in completely varying conditions. Some collapse due to dehydration and need to be carried in on a stretcher, some walk in and look as if they’ve barely broken a sweat. To look at these pictures and assume that, based on your personal experience, you can tell there is some sort of hoax or lie about whether she ran this race is effing ridiculous.

She has mentioned for years that running is the main way she keeps in shape. She seems motivated and fit and it seems completely within the realm of possibility that she ran the NYC marathon. AND that she stopped and had some makeup applied before people took pictures of her at the finish line. Hell, if I knew that I was going to be photographed and the pictures would end up all over the world, I’d probably do it to.

Good on you gal, I can’t even run 2 kilometres. I am I falling in love with this couple? or what?

I love how they compliment each other…they look like a beautiful couple. Now I wonder about Tom’s and Nicole’s adopted children…no one has heard any information about them…
I hope these pics were’nt hoaxed…I was saying to my sister how boney in the chest she looks and said maybe when you’re running your chest bones poke out more…lol…anyway, she looked well rested and great that evening….being that it was a 26mile run, that wasn’t bad…I used to do walkathons for 26miles…so, running I’m sure is a little different…but, it will give one time to rest up and go on for the remaining day.
Many blessings to the happy couple and their children.

Athena

AN AMAZING GIRL!!!!!!!!!!

Hugs and kisses to Katie
and Tom.

Im proud of her. Cant wait for her film to come out.

I think Jared missed the boat on this one……….it wasn’t a Victory party…..here’s the real story

Sunday night, Tom Cruise rewarded high-ranking members of the Church of Scientology with tickets to a private screening of his new movie, “Lions for Lambs.”
This is the provocative anti-war movie which he executive-produced for United Artists with partner Paula Wagner.
I rather doubt that director Robert Redford, who’s also a co-star, and Cruise’s other co-star, Meryl Streep, had any idea that the screening room at the Museum of Modern Art and the cocktail party following was full of Scientologists, including the two big honchos of the New York division.
But others from the standard screening-invite list recognized strangers in their midst. As one inside observer snipped, “Who are all these people?”
While Streep and Redford’s guests included family, friends and associates, nearly all of Cruise’s retinue came from the Church.

They included Rev. John Carmichael and president of the New York chapter Lori Alpers.
Other Scientologists whom Cruise invited included Jim Woodworth and Carole Hamaker, each of whom have taken extensive classes in the organization. Another couple, Marian and Cal Henry, also have dozens of classes under their belts.
Cruise’s other Scientology guests were Randy Hepner, a jet pilot, and John Danielson, partner with former Bush Department of Education Secretary Rod Paige in Chartwell Education.
In 2005, Danielson, according to published reports, tried to push Applied Scholastics, a Scientology education program, in the St. Louis public school system.
Just in case something went wrong, he also invited Scientology’s New York lawyer, Eric Lieberman.
Cruise also brought to the screening wife Katie Holmes, her parents and brother, as well his own mother and sister, cousin Amy Mapother, and hot young actor Wes Okerson, whose sole credit, according to the Internet Movie Database, is a small part in a relatively unseen film called “The Grand.”
Also invited by Cruise was Las Vegas home builder Ernie Domanico and real estate agent Bob Barnhart. Cruise could very well be buying a home in Sin City or investing in a new development.
All of the Scientologists, said keen-eyed observers at the screening, wore little gold pins in their lapels.
Considering how Cruise’s proselytizing about Scientology may have cost him ticket-holders during the promotion for his last movie, “Mission: Impossible 3,” it’s certainly curious that he risked having so many of his church pals in attendance — especially with United Artists’ financial investors from Merrill Lynch and other banks also there.
Even though Cruise has a financial stake in “Lions,” he didn’t stick around to discuss its merits.
After the movie was over, Cruise and company took off, leaving movie legends Streep and Redford, as well as MGM /UA bigwigs Harry Sloan and Rick Sands, to handle the after-party upstairs in the museum.
Other guests were glum they didn’t get to see Cruise and Holmes up close and personal.
But as one insider put it, Holmes, who’d just finished the New York marathon, seemed “robotic.” Maybe she was just tired!
It was a much different scene than Saturday night’s buoyant “Lions for Lambs” screening hosted by chef Andrew Borrok. That list included Fran Drescher, Jamie-Lynn Sigler, Rocco DiSpirito and fashion designer John Varvatos, all of whom congratulated Borrok on his recent celebration from Tiffany and Co. for being one of their best customers!

#86…she gave a tree away…to ONE family on the day you’re talking about, and guess what…..they had photographers there to make sure the world knew about it.
And since you seem to be in the know about ALL her on-the-down-low charitable work can you please share with us here what they all are??? Because I’d realy like to know, since she actually is not involved in ANY charities

Katie looks stunningly gorgeous. I cant wait to see all this tonight on television.
My thanks to JJ ofcourse.

I’m gonna bet the farm I won’t get an answer from #86