Top Stories

Angelina Jolie Talks Beowulf, Motherhood and More

Angelina Jolie Talks Beowulf, Motherhood and More

Check out this brand new interview with Angelina Jolie promoting her newest film Beowulf. Watch her as she talks about the film, motherhood, her co-stars and more.

Angie discusses the beauty of her character as Grendel’s mother (Crispin Glover plays Grendel).

“So I thought it was all really sexy,” she said. “And I loved that there’s this transition that she’s not really beautiful. She can morph into what other people perceive as beauty but she is this other creature.”

Peep the galaxy backdrop. Hot, huh?

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Jennifer Garner's alleged stalker is arrested - PopEater
  • Heidi Klum and her kids go to the mall - PopSugar
  • The Jersey Shore gang rocks out - Celebuzz
  • Nicole Kidman doesn't care to talk Scientology - Dlisted
  • Celebs come out for Vanessa Hudgens' party - JustJaredJr
  • A CSI: Miami star is arrested - TheSuperficial
  • Penelope Cruz & Javier Bardem visit NYC - LaineyGossip
Rachel Worth/WENN

984 Comments

Pages: « 133 34 35 [36] 37 38 3940 » Show All
findamanneedsone @ 11/15/2007 at 1:50 am

875 prince in purple spandex

angie in purple shoes is..HOT!! prince..ewww..he looks like a tiny pimp whose cheap ladies are standing in the street corner..imbalance..prince is not good enough for angie!!!

862 observation : 11/15/2007 at 12:31 am

I’m not Cliniqua, honey. Only Jill is Jill.

Passing Through @ 11/15/2007 at 2:24 am

727 sharon : 11/14/2007 at 6:40 pm
713 Lady G : 11/14/2007 at 6:31 pm
Now this is what I’m talking about. Whoa!!!!

Credit JJB!

People.com has corrected that ridiculous “ripped pants” story.

CORRECTION: PEOPLE.com’s Nov. 12 report on the London premiere of Beowulf inaccurately stated that Angelina Jolie’s pants split on the red carpet. This report was based on photos and newspaper reports showing what appeared to be a split seam. Jolie’s stylist says it was a zipper and the pants did not, in fact, split. She wore them home after the premiere. PEOPLE.com regrets the error.

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20159637,00.html
—————–
This is great. I hope People magazine learned their lesson.

+++++++++++++++++++

What good is the People retraction if the tabs don’t follow suit? None. And none of the tabs will follow suit. They’d just as soon go out of business than admit to be wrong, AGAIN, about anything to do with Angie.

I was just channel surfing and I came across Meet Joe Black.
I know, I know, it wasn’t exactly one of Brad’s best movies but I still really liked the soundtrack and Anthony Hopkins was at one of his finest if you ask me.
Anyway, my point:
I was reminded of that single one line that I liked in that film, “What’s wrong with taking care of a woman; she takes care of you.”
Totally so sweet, and reminds me of the way he his with Angelina.

Jolie-Pitts rock!

Credit JJB.

I’m so proud of Angelina Jolie and many of her accomplishments.

Add one more title to Angelina Jolie’s resume: As of Nov. 14, she’s also a columnist, in this case for The Economist. Jolie penned a piece about accountability for the genocide in Darfur for the high-minded magazine. Although Jolie is no stranger to philanthropy, she doesn’t often square off so publicly against the issue of genocide. According to Trevor Neilson, her advisor on political and philanthropic issues, Jolie raises the question: “If the world can’t hold people accountable for planning and implementing a genocide, what can we hold people accountable for?”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21778310/

785 gena : 11/14/2007 at 8:50 pm
_______________________________

She answer, because someone contacted her. Most of the stories from the tabloids, they contact her, she tells them they are wrong but the go ahead with the story any way.

Second link that goes with my post #880….

Credit JJB.

http://www.economist.com/

Passing Through @ 11/15/2007 at 2:34 am

744 Mr and Mrs Smith : 11/14/2007 at 7:06 pm
Hey Style and sagrera, here’s something for you. Wait till 6:38 and see very clearly BOTH BRAD AND ANGIE getting into the same car. After all, seeing is believing.

http://lulop.com/folder/10776/MpegBrangelinaBeowulf?media=video

+++++++++++++++++++

Seeing is believing? Shame on you M&MS…you should know better than that. There are hundreds of people who’ve made their living trying to debunk the grassy knoll. Two words for ya - Zapruder movie.

Here’s a review of Beowulf posted on AOL:

Note: The Beowulf screening that I attended was held at a massively awesome IMAX cinema in London. The film was presented in a frankly stunning 3-D format that I honestly cannot wait to experience again. Having said that, I shall try to review the Part II: The Movie

My main problem with Robert Zemeckis’ most recent animated experiment (The Polar Express) was that it was very lovely to look at, but I found a hollow core at the center. Very little heart, and even less of a narrative, basically: A cinematic novelty item. But when I heard that Zemeckis would be teaming with writers Neil Gaiman and Roger Avary for a relatively faithful adaptation of the legendary Beowulf poem, I was more than a little intrigued. Having recalled enough of Beowulf from high school to know that it was a grim and moody adventure story, I filed this flick into my “wanna see” pile and waited to see how things turned out.

So to those of you who don’t have an IMAX cinema within driving distance, I can offer the following: Beowulf is a surprisingly ballsy experiment and an unexpectedly entertaining flick. Ballsy because, for a movie so pricey and massive, it sure is DARK — and entertaining simply because it’s a fast-paced and wonderfully pulpy throwback to the “swords and sandals” adventures that we all loved as a kid. Sure, there’s a little “strangeness” to the affair: The CGI characters (many of whom look exactly like the actors who provide the voices) take a little getting used to, and some of the more florid moments come dangerously close to ‘camp’ territory, but at its best, Beowulf is like Shrek meets Frank Frazetta on the set of 300. (And frankly I’m kind of stunned that the filmmakers got away with a PG-13 rating on this film; it’s really quite harsh, violent and gory! Yay!)

If you don’t remember much of Beowulf, here’s a very brief recap: A horrific creature called Grendel is massacring King Hrothgar’s men, so a call goes out for heroes. Along with a dozen brutes, Beowulf arrives on the Danish shores and promises to rid the countryside of the rampaging beast. But once the creature is thwarted, well, that’s when the trouble really begins. Suffice to say that Grendel has some close relatives who don’t take too kindly to his defeat. Thus begins a cyclical tale of power and corruption that’s pretty damn fascinating. I mean, the epic poem hasn’t survived for 1,300 years for no reason.

You want to just sit back and enjoy a pulpy adventure movie? Beowulf works best in that capacity, but this is coming from a guy who owns Legend, Krull and The Sword and the Sorcerer, so clearly I’m kind of a sucker for the genre. Lead (voice) actor Ray Winstone provides a gravelly gravity to the titular hero, and he’s more than capably flanked by Brendan Gleeson as the loyal warrior Wiglaf. John Malkovich skulks around the background, adding a little color, and Crispin Glover is chillingly effective as the tortured Grendel. Much ink will be spilled over the virtual performance of the (virtually) naked Angelina Jolie, and while the “creation” is certainly alluring, I found her presence to be one of the flick’s more nagging (if relatively minor) distractions. (Most of the actors, even Anthony Hopkins as a garrulous king, manage to sink into the characters, but Jolie simply stands out as … Jolie.)

Sure, one can nitpick the finer details until the cows come home, but the beauty of Beowulf is that Zemeckis and company were compelled to create a big-time, big-movie spectacle — and on that scale they’ve succeeded quite powerfully. The film maintains a wonderful “dark storybook” vibe that carries a viewer through the ‘rough spots’ with very little trouble, and I could spend a few meaty paragraphs detailing the sheer awesomeness of the action sequences. (Short version: They’re amazing.) Also, the pounding Alan Silvestri score is the composer’s best work in years.

Best of all, this adaptation brings some sense and accessibility to an epic story that, frankly, most people know very little about. That’s not to say it’s a precisely faithful adaptation (because it’s not), but the movie stands as an unapologetically enthusiastic marriage between old-school heroism and modern-day wizardry.

Plus it kicks ass!

Dang, didn’t post right. Reposting. (This review was written by an AOL member who saw it in London.)

Note: The Beowulf screening that I attended was held at a massively awesome IMAX cinema in London. The film was presented in a frankly stunning 3-D format that I honestly cannot wait to experience again. Having said that, I shall try to review the film in two parts: the presentation and the film itself.

Part I: The Presentation

Holy ****ing moly. I’ve simply never seen anything like it. IMAX 3-D and a movie that was tailor-made for this kind of presentation. Not a “big-scale” movie that just happened to look good on a giant screen (like, say, Superman Returns), but a film that was actually constructed with the giant 3-D exhibition in mind. And to say it works resoundingly well is an understatement on par with “baby ducks are cute.” Having spent the last thirty years scouring through as many movies as humanly possible, I consider myself a passionate-yet-cynical flick-watcher. It takes a lot for me to be “stunned,” “dazzled,” or “amazed” — but this screening of Beowulf is something I’ll remember for a very long time. Basically, this is the finest “3-D” experience I’ve ever witnessed, from the “yikes, it’s coming right at me!” stuff to the feeling of total “immersion” in the story. On a purely visual scale, Beowulf is one of the most entertaining movies I’ve ever seen.

Spend the extra gas money if you have to, but find an IMAX theater and see the flick there. You won’t be sorry.

Part II: The Movie

My main problem with Robert Zemeckis’ most recent animated experiment (The Polar Express) was that it was very lovely to look at, but I found a hollow core at the center. Very little heart, and even less of a narrative, basically: A cinematic novelty item. But when I heard that Zemeckis would be teaming with writers Neil Gaiman and Roger Avary for a relatively faithful adaptation of the legendary Beowulf poem, I was more than a little intrigued. Having recalled enough of Beowulf from high school to know that it was a grim and moody adventure story, I filed this flick into my “wanna see” pile and waited to see how things turned out.

So to those of you who don’t have an IMAX cinema within driving distance, I can offer the following: Beowulf is a surprisingly ballsy experiment and an unexpectedly entertaining flick. Ballsy because, for a movie so pricey and massive, it sure is DARK — and entertaining simply because it’s a fast-paced and wonderfully pulpy throwback to the “swords and sandals” adventures that we all loved as a kid. Sure, there’s a little “strangeness” to the affair: The CGI characters (many of whom look exactly like the actors who provide the voices) take a little getting used to, and some of the more florid moments come dangerously close to ‘camp’ territory, but at its best, Beowulf is like Shrek meets Frank Frazetta on the set of 300. (And frankly I’m kind of stunned that the filmmakers got away with a PG-13 rating on this film; it’s really quite harsh, violent and gory! Yay!)

If you don’t remember much of Beowulf, here’s a very brief recap: A horrific creature called Grendel is massacring King Hrothgar’s men, so a call goes out for heroes. Along with a dozen brutes, Beowulf arrives on the Danish shores and promises to rid the countryside of the rampaging beast. But once the creature is thwarted, well, that’s when the trouble really begins. Suffice to say that Grendel has some close relatives who don’t take too kindly to his defeat. Thus begins a cyclical tale of power and corruption that’s pretty damn fascinating. I mean, the epic poem hasn’t survived for 1,300 years for no reason.

You want to just sit back and enjoy a pulpy adventure movie? Beowulf works best in that capacity, but this is coming from a guy who owns Legend, Krull and The Sword and the Sorcerer, so clearly I’m kind of a sucker for the genre. Lead (voice) actor Ray Winstone provides a gravelly gravity to the titular hero, and he’s more than capably flanked by Brendan Gleeson as the loyal warrior Wiglaf. John Malkovich skulks around the background, adding a little color, and Crispin Glover is chillingly effective as the tortured Grendel. Much ink will be spilled over the virtual performance of the (virtually) naked Angelina Jolie, and while the “creation” is certainly alluring, I found her presence to be one of the flick’s more nagging (if relatively minor) distractions. (Most of the actors, even Anthony Hopkins as a garrulous king, manage to sink into the characters, but Jolie simply stands out as … Jolie.)

Sure, one can nitpick the finer details until the cows come home, but the beauty of Beowulf is that Zemeckis and company were compelled to create a big-time, big-movie spectacle — and on that scale they’ve succeeded quite powerfully. The film maintains a wonderful “dark storybook” vibe that carries a viewer through the ‘rough spots’ with very little trouble, and I could spend a few meaty paragraphs detailing the sheer awesomeness of the action sequences. (Short version: They’re amazing.) Also, the pounding Alan Silvestri score is the composer’s best work in years.

Best of all, this adaptation brings some sense and accessibility to an epic story that, frankly, most people know very little about. That’s not to say it’s a precisely faithful adaptation (because it’s not), but the movie stands as an unapologetically enthusiastic marriage between old-school heroism and modern-day wizardry.

Plus it kicks ass!

jamisonmom @ 11/15/2007 at 5:50 am

759 vickifromtexas : 11/14/2007 at 7:25 pm
what the hell????? are all of the haters one person changing names or i am confused? what is the damn deal with the broken english? i mean ok if you are just learning but only the haters speak this way? i think it is one crazy ass who is posting under several names.

————————————————————
I dislike B/A but I do not speak broken ENGLISH. I TYPE, PUNCTUATE, CAPITALIZE BETTER THAN YOU MISS B1TCH.

jamisonmom @ 11/15/2007 at 5:52 am

Your from Texas that explains it all, ya’ll.

Lady G

Thanx for the link and info!!!!

I watched Beowulf on the first day of showing here in the Philippines (Nov.14, 2007). The movie is really outstanding. Words are not enough to express how impressed I was of Beowulf. I would like to congratulate all the people behind the movie, from the producers, screenwriters to the actors/actresses, for making it a wonderful, pleasurable viewing experience. This is a work of art. So creative & innovative! Visually, impressive!! Performance-wise, impressive! Plot & story, impressive! Dialogues, impressive! Everything is impressive! Once again, CONGRATULATIONS!!!

Regarding Angelina’s role as Grendel’s mother….I could not imagine any other actress who would play that role except Angie & no one else. She really performed it effectively. She’s mesmerizing & captivating. Once again, she still commands a very strong screen presence. The look in her eyes, the way she walks, her voice, everything. Though it is a very small role, it is still very significant & I think without her, Beowulf would just be a simple story about slaying monsters, and that’s it. But with the character of Grendel’s mother, everyone (King, Grendel, Beowulf etc) revolves around her. The subject of heroism, temptation, strength, pride, lust, honesty, glory, etc. are what this film makes it so special and something to think about. So, I am very fortunate to have already seen this movie, and twice at that!

Missouri Fan @ 11/15/2007 at 6:34 am

http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u72/chat_020/67yz2hz.jpg

Dear BAMPZS FAns around the world,
Please open the above link!
Thank You! :smile:

Char

Missouri Fan

U 2 :)

Missouri Fan @ 11/15/2007 at 6:35 am

889 neer : 11/15/2007 at 6:24 am

Good Afternoon there neer!
Lucky you and thanks for the great recap!

Missouri Fan @ 11/15/2007 at 6:38 am

891 Yes : 11/15/2007 at 6:35 am
Missouri Fan

U 2
***************
For you my sweet lady Yes!!

http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u65/lashorty6977/angel.gif

briseis

Good Morning! :)

Missouri Fan

Hi, you’re so sweet! :)

I Love You Too :)

Ate Char

Will be back later, gatta go. Maybe i’ll go my last lesson.

G’day :)

Missouri Fan @ 11/15/2007 at 6:46 am

Dear Ameena,

I feel so blessed
to have a friend
as wonderful as YOU!
Thanks for always
being there!!

Want you to know the e-card you sent me yesterday
is beautiful! The comments you added touch my heart.
Thank you so much! { Kisses and Hugs }

With much love to you,

Char

Ps: My Little boy is leaving today…

Ate Char

Will be back later, gatta go. Maybe i’ll go for my last lesson.

G’day :)

saraicita @ 11/15/2007 at 6:46 am

890 Missouri Fan : 11/15/2007 at 6:34 am
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u72/chat_020/67yz2hz.jpg

Dear BAMPZS FAns around the world,
Please open the above link!
*****************************************************************
Hello, my friend. I wish you a beautiful, productive and happy day
:)

Missouri Fan @ 11/15/2007 at 6:47 am

898 Yes : 11/15/2007 at 6:46 am

OK, Take care.

Pages: « 133 34 35 [36] 37 38 3940 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.