Wed, 14 November 2007 at 10:08 pm
Jake Gyllenhaal is Plaid to Meet You
A solo Jake Gyllenhaal strolls down an alley near Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills and picks up his car at a parking garage Wednesday evening.
Jakey G. was casually dressed as always, looking outdoorsy in his plaid buttondown, jeans, and black shoes. Are those… Uggs? Clogs? Slippers?
Jake and Rendition hook-up Reese Witherspoon headed north to California’s wine country this past weekend, staying at the Carneros Inn in the Napa Valley.
Viva Gyllenspoon!








Older









34 Comments
Jim, those are clothes Jake has worn many times before in old pictures. You can see him in that shirt in pictures from years back. The jeans he had worn a lot a couple of years ago. I know this because it has been mentioned on a few of his fan sites. They have also shown the pics of him cleary wearing that shirt and those jeans. So no they are not new and have nothing to do with being Reese’s boytoy. But I am sure you know that already.
The tired and boring comments about a “showmance” between Jake and Reese doesn’t mean their relationship is actually fake.
Nono I agree!
Think of all the minds and hearts he would open if Fake Witherspoon came out. Poor guy is feeling more and more trapped by these denials.
Think of all the minds and hearts he would open if Fake Witherspoon came out. Poor guy is feeling more and more trapped by these denials.
JAKE is absolutely HOT! The people´s guys are totally blind!
Nono, you are naive. Showmance is a marvelous word and very accurate too. Money is what makes Hollyweird go round if you haven’t figured that out yet. [You probably think love and sex motivates it but that shows how confused you are]. So when actors make a public display of their “love” for each other and smooch in public, etc., etc., you have to understand that they are doing it for the publicity that will up their income in various ways. They aren’t smooching just to make you envious or happy or whatever. Wise up.
Jim, I an not naive. I know about showmances and since I don’t actually know Jake or Reese I don’t know if they are real or not. Unlike you, I make no claims on them. You just seem to have a weird agenda.
I don’t know them either and don’t know anymore than you do about what they do in bed, if they get into bed. I merely said that when two actors make a public matter of their relationship it has to be essentially for some pecuniary profit. Actors don’t display themselves before the public except for money. Now on to money. I was checking how much Jake’s movies have made. Proof was a poof: cost 20 million to make and took in 14 million world wide. Jarhead did better: cost 72 million to make and took in 97 million world wide, but that isn’t any big amount by Hollyweird standards. Brokeback was cheap to make and was quite profitable. Zodiac cost 65 million to make and took in 84 million; again not much by Hollyw. standards. And Rendition has made only 14 million so far. No word on what it cost, but I would imagine more than that. So however much of a celebrity Jake is I imagine he is not regarded as a big money maker in Hollywood. Now Dan Radcliffe at 18 years of age IS a big moneymaker. That is why he is getting something like 25 million dollars for each of his next two movies. Jake got 3 million for Jarhead. Some difference. Perhaps Jake needs a little wizardry in his future.
Jim, maybe Jake doesn´t like to do blockbuster! I heard he said someone had to get money with TDAT and it´s not him.
It´d be more easy to him to do onlymovies like these after 2004 perhaps he ´ll do it still! He put risk with BBM !
About Daniel Radcliffe, only time ´ll show us as his career can be! Maybe any actor did the same as Harry Potter. See 007 ! Daniel Craig will get 60 million for the next! I like him but, in my opionion, other actors could do better… Sometimes the actor must obey his agent…
Pages: « 1 [2] Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!