Top Stories

Angelina Jolie’s ‘Economist’ Article

Angelina Jolie’s ‘Economist’ Article

The Economist has published Angelina Jolie’s article for their annual spin-off issue, The World in 2008. CLICK HERE to read the full article.

In other news, Angelina Jolie’s adoption of daughter Zahara in July 2005 was completely legal, the agency involved said on Thursday.

Tabloids reported earlier this week that relatives of two-year-old Zahara, including a woman who says she is her birth mother, want the child returned to Ethiopia.

“The court in Addis Ababa approved the adoption after studying the document her grandmother wrote … saying her daughter, the mother of Zahara, had died and she was too poor to bring her up,” Tsegaye Berhe, the head of Wide Horizons for Children adoption agency told Reuters.

“The grandmother brought three witnesses to court who testified that Zahara’s mother had died and that her father was unknown … The court also investigated the social status of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt before approving the adoption. [The adoption was] legal and irrevocable. The controversy is media hype by unethical journalists exploiting the poverty of the grandmother.”

In other words, reporters paid the relatives to raise the dispute.


——————————————-

A year for accountability

Angelina Jolie, goodwill ambassador to the UNHCR, hopes for progress in bringing war criminals to justice

On a recent mission for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, I had the opportunity to visit a refugee camp in Chad just across the border with Sudan. Sitting with a group of refugees, I asked them what they needed. These were people who had seen family members killed, neighbours raped, their villages burned and looted, their entire communities driven from their land. So it was no surprise when people began listing the things that could improve their lives just a little bit. Better tents, said one; better access to medical facilities, said another. But then a teenage boy raised his hand and said, with powerful simplicity, “Nous voulons un procès.” We want a trial.

A trial might seem a distant and abstract notion to a young man for whom the inside of a courtroom is worlds away from the inside of a refugee camp. But his statement showed a recognition of something elemental: that accountability is perhaps the only force powerful enough to break the cycle of violence and retribution that marks so many conflicts.

I believe 2008 can be the year in which we begin seeking true accountability and demanding justice for the victims in Darfur and elsewhere. Through accountability we can begin the process of righting past wrongs, and even change the behaviour of some of the world’s worst criminals.

The international tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda have shown the way in convicting heads of state and generals for genocide and crimes against humanity. The UN-backed special court for Sierra Leone has already sentenced three former leaders of a pro-government militia to jail for war crimes committed during the country’s civil war in the 1990s.

In Cambodia, the joint UN-Cambodian court to try top former Khmer Rouge leaders with war crimes and crimes against humanity has begun calling witnesses. It has taken a long time to get even this far, but a trial is likely in 2008. In The Hague, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has begun trials of two of the Congolese leaders charged with fomenting killings and rapes amid the violence that has raged there for over a decade.

Make no mistake, the existence of these trials alone changes behaviour. Seeing the indictment of Thomas Lubanga and the detention of Germain Katanga by the ICC brought to mind a trip I had taken to Congo five years ago. In the Ituri region, where Mr Katanga’s reign of terror had been most intense, our group attended a meeting of rebel leaders. They had gathered in a field to discuss the prospects for a peace agreement—which were not looking very good. The conversation turned hostile and the situation grew extremely tense. At that point, one of my colleagues asked for the name of one of the rebels, announcing, perhaps a bit recklessly, that he was going to pass it along to the ICC.

It was remarkable: this rebel leader’s whole posture changed from aggression to conciliation. The ICC had been around for only five months. It had tried no one. Yet its very existence was enough to intimidate a man who had been terrorising the population for years.

Ending the cycle of violence

This is not an isolated example. Accountability has the potential to change behaviour, to check aggression by those who are used to acting with impunity. Luis Moreno-Ocampo, the prosecutor of the ICC, has said that even genocide is not a crime of passion; it is a calculated decision. He is right. Common sense tells us that when risks are weighed, decisions are made differently. When crimes against humanity are punished consistently and severely, the killers’ calculus will change.

My hope is that these examples of justice in the name of accountability will be just a few of the many to come. I hope that the Sudanese government will hand over the government minister and the janjaweed militia leader who have been indicted for war crimes by the ICC, and that the teenager I met in Chad will get to see the trial he seeks. I hope that those responsible for the atrocities in Darfur will be held to account, not only for that young man’s sake, but for the world’s.

Only through justice will we achieve peace. And only when there is peace will the world’s nearly 39m displaced persons and refugees be able to return home.

The strong preying upon the weak and the weak, upon achieving strength, extracting retribution: this is the nature of so many of the world’s conflicts. The role of aggressor and victim may alternate over time, the tools of destruction may become more sophisticated, but little else changes.

Despite the horror I have seen in my travels, the hopeful lesson I take is that we can begin to put an end to the cycle of violence and retribution that gives rise to war criminals and sets forth floods of refugees. Let 2008 be the year in which we see the principle of accountability put into action.

Angelina Jolie: The World in 2008 [The Economist]

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Sandra Bullock wins a custody battle - PopEater
  • A High School Musical star hits Broadway - JustJaredJr
  • As The World Turns will end in 2010 - Dlisted
  • Matt Damon and brother Kyle are biker boys - PopSugar
  • Johnny Depp takes photos with fans - LaineyGossip
  • Britney Spears may be back on her own very soon - TheSuperficial
  • Rihanna: Megan Fox is yummy - Celebuzz
PNP/WENN

2,216 Comments

Pages: « 183 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 » Show All
The real lou @ 11/19/2007 at 1:16 pm

Please let’s not let the trolls turn the thread into a weight debate.So many cranky and snarky people this holiday week,what a shame!

I’m asking this question in here; because you guys know ALL the conspiracy theories there is!!

Well, i read the horrible story from this week “Life and Style magazine”, about the “fight” between Brad and Angie is the after-party from the Beowulf L.A. premiere, BUT people in another site posted an article from Variety.com were they said that there was NO after-party!!

Yeah, this article blows out of the water the Life and Style story, BUT My question is… How can Life and Style LIE like this and can get away with it??

Hi Guli,
No we have’nt met before thank you for taking time to yo greet me.
I post once in a while but I’ve been in this site long enough to remember. I really enjoy this site all you guys are awesome.
PEACE TO ALL AND GOD BLESS THE JOLLIE-PITTS.

2177 sidney

shitzy!!!stop presenting your magazine.you can`t hide. :)

2150 KELLY

I had to come from lurking to say this. It’s PG-13 to be at the discretion of a parent or guardian for children under 13 for a reason. Even Angie said her kids would have to be older before they can watch it and Maddox is 5. I am sorry but I don’t believe the film is suitable for 5 year olds. It has alot of suggestiveness and violence. Even my fourteen old nephew thought that they talked about sex a little too much. To each its own but that’s just my opinion. I loved the film and if I receive and flack oh well but I am only giving my honest opinion…

Hello to everyone…Congrats to Beowulf being #1! I hope that the BP’s enjoy this holiday week in quiet domestic bliss wherever they go… God bless the Jolie-Pitts!

2177 sidney :
****************
This is kind of lie is not new. Tabs have been written this kind of lie for 3 years. Brad and Angie ignore these lies. We as their fans should do the same. ignore.

oh sorry here is the article from Variety that i’m talking about:
http://www.variety.com/vstory/VR1117975549.html?categoryId=38&cs=1

2172

I know she was skinnier at times when she was unhealthy. she doesn’t look like she is at a healthy weight right now, Or maybe she just looks better when she’s heavier. In Tomb raider she looked healthier.

2182 nicole
————

Yeah, you are right!! But this time with this LIE, this tabloid didn’t even check that a respetable site like Variety.com confirmed that there was NO after-party!! So i cannot understand why they printed the lie about nonexistent after-party anyway!! They are despicable!!

fans let`s stop answering to this idiot 2184 l poster.She exactly knows what she wants and is doing it to put this thread down.peace :)

hey Sam!!stop acting,we all know you are here in this time. :)

Wow, past 2000 posts friends!

I am just so puzzled people make such a big deal about Angie’s weight. To my knowledge, this woman has always been thin and that is her body type. I understand AniSTONERs who struggle with their weight as their idol, have a very difficult time swallowing that—there exists women who don’t get fat, or posses genes as such—and they always need a ‘punching bag’ out of Angie, her low weight could be a target? Give me a break!

BTW I’m not ‘that’ type; I never got back into my pre-marital weight after living in France as a newly wed–Food was so good there LOL And while nursing my son from post operation I noticed I am craving for sugar as comfort, so when people are stress or miserable, they find consolation in food, I guess. We just made another ER run last week, after my son got a fever and tummy ache AGAIN. My husband feared some kind of complication and the surgeon on call told us to bring him in at 1AM… Luckily it was nothing… never a dull moment as parents! The next day we were invited to the Met (opera) and I had to wake my poor good hubby up a few times during the performance, having only a few hours sleep the night before in the hospital….

2077 tabitha :

Thank you. I will go there right now. I appreciate your responding. I don’t think guli and I were able to connect. I am going to see it again on Wednesday with my older. That should also help clear up my question. Peace :smile:

Long time Lurker @ 11/19/2007 at 1:30 pm

MF- are you in a hurry for work this morning? I saw you greeted someone a Happy Birthday but you forgot to post the New video you made HAPPY BIRTHDAY MICHELLE. That person may have been so special to you to make this beautiful video. I am posting it so BAMPZS see your
wonderful video. Lucky her!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62oxDIKFEd8

2184 l
——–

Angelina’s weight is fine!! I mean, i’m also naturally skinny and it’s very hard to gain weight and it’s hurtful when other people call you aneroxic, just because you are natural skinny!!

2177 sidney : 11/19/2007 at 1:16 pm
_______________________
They have been lieyng since they are together. Here’s this are the covers (and stories) of some of the tabloids in 2006:
http://pics.livejournal.com/pittimpressions/gallery/0002xdeg

They can get away because the american laws allow it.

2177 sidney : 11/19/2007 at 1:16 pm

The magazines claim they are for entertainment purposes only. They also use code words that will exonerate them for lible & slander. They use the worlds “sources say”, “a close friend says”, “a family member says”, “reports say”, “the dog says”, etc…they are very vague with specifics. A real authentic journalist will have not only the actual quote of a story but the names of the person being quoted. They will also fact check their articles. You don’t need a degree in journalism to dish about clebs. You can make up everything and make a million dollars as an editor. As long as you keep within the codes that the average reader has no clue about, that how you get away with it. It’s a gossip rag not a legit magazine. Gossip rags are not legitimate magazines.

TABLOID lied @ 11/19/2007 at 1:34 pm

The magazine Lies & Style LIED. As is evidenced by the variety article, ( a trade paper), there was NO AFTER PARTY.

http://www.variety.com/vstory/VR1117975549.html?categoryId=38&cs=1

If there really will be a Second Coming of 3-D, then the first major sighting came at Monday’s “Beowulf” premiere.

“This is going to point things in another direction,” said Warren Beatty as he left the Village Theater. “And you have to leave your home to see it,” said Norman Lear. “This is historic.”

Both the Village and Bruin theaters had been fitted with Real D systems that included a silver screen that polarizes light and a device added to the digital projector that creates the left and right eyes images sequentially; the aud received special glasses.

Wearing those glasses was an unusually strong industry crowd that included pic’s helmer Robert Zemeckis along with Oliver Stone, Steve Tisch, Kathleen Kennedy and Frank Marshall, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Helen Mirren and Lawrence Bender.

“Zemeckis is taking the medium by the horns and steering it into the future,” said co-writer Roger Avary. “He’s using it for his own specific control fetishes.”

For an event of its size and attendance, preem was a bit unusual in that there was no after-party. But funds that would have gone for the fiesta were donated to Zemeckis’ alma mater, the USC School of Cinematic Ar

OT, The home of the paparazzi get a clue. Maybe everyone else will follow:

Italy cracks down on gossip in media

2192 juju
———-

THANK YOU SO MUCH for posting that link!! I didn’t know that site!! And i’m sorry for the question that i asked; but i asked that question, because i cannot understand why the tabloids want to hurt the Jolie-Pitts so badly!! Yeah, i just don’t get it!! I mean, they want to hurt them NOT just because of the money they make from them, but it seems that they have other motives for doing it and i’m astonish by this!!

Italy cracks down on gossip in media
By Eric J. Lyman

Nov 17, 2007

ROME — An Italian circuit court ruled Friday that reporting gossip in Italy will be illegal unless it helps make a larger point about the figure in question.

The case is part of a wider effort to improve standards on Italian television. State broadcaster RAI said this year that it would stop airing reality programming when current contracts run out, and the company also announced plans to remove advertising from one of its three networks by the end of 2009 in order to allow it to broadcast more cultural programs without consideration for economic factors.

Upon announcing the ruling, the Rome court said it would “remove gossip that exists only for gossip’s sake.” But critics said it will have little impact on content producers adept at framing reporting so that it can take on an unexpected context.

The most significant aspect may be that it gives prosecutors ammunition for attacking problematic programs that are guilty of breaking only the anti-gossip rules.

“Everyone will abuse the gossip rules, but now those who do will risk being sanctioned,” said one television producer quoted by news agency ANSA. “The rules cannot be enforced universally but some will have to worry about their rivals using the rules against them.”

The rules apply to television, print and radio media.

Find this article at:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/international/news/e3i7e950a3587b9f30f3b183d22d410bb7f?imw=Y

2194 TABLOID lied : 11/19/2007 at 1:34 pm
____________________________

Not only that, but:
1- There is a video of Angelina and Brad leaving the premiere hand on hand and entering their car.
2- There are pics of them kissing inside the theater and reports (from people that where there) of the love looks between them.

piper, with a low @ 11/19/2007 at 1:47 pm

2150 kelly : 11/19/2007 at 12:43 pm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

IMO, it’s too gory for a 5 year old. Maybe if you saw it first and familiarize yourself with the objectional parts and cover his eyes, then maybe.

But no…

2197 Frenchy
—————-

I wish that the USA will do this to useless Gossip in this country!! Yeah, i wish that Life and Style, In Touch, Star and National Enquirer would DISAPPEAR!!

I hate the way this tabloids attacks Brad and Angelina!! Yeah, I’M SICK & TIRED of this attacks towards the Jolie-Pitts!! ENOUGH WITH THIS BULLSH!T

Pages: « 183 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.