Will Smith Gets Immortalized

Tom “acting” nutty? No need to act, he simply is!
And ever since WS compared $ciento to the Bible, he’s lost me, I’m not going to spend another cent on anything he does.

Tom is only using Will’s media event to get himself some media attention..Tom will use anybody and everybody he can to get attetnion…He does not care about Will and his family…I agree with number #16, he only wants WIll in his CULT SO THEY CAN GET WILL’S MONEY…Since Tom’s career is going down he will be more than happy to bring’s Will’s career down with his..

Introduction

Part two of this report is a candid look at celebrities in the Church of Scientology: how they are recruited, how they are used, and how they are controlled. It explores how the secret society of Scientology is trying to take over and control large numbers of Hollywood celebrities to use Hollywood’s media influence as leverage to recruit new unsuspecting members from the public. (In appendix 2 you will find the largest list of Scientology celebrities that has ever been assembled.)
KEEP READING AT:
http://www.factnet.org/Scientology/celeb1.htm

Little drops of water make a might ocean..a lot of $10 unit make a million dollars…see how Tom Cruise is doing so far at the box offfice..you better believe in consumer power….its the people who make and break you with the almighty hand of the media leading the effort!!

A former Scientology celebrity speaks out

Here are some excerpts from an article on Scientology and celebrities from Premiere Magazine (9/93.) In it is a courageous interview with Diana Canova.

“I remember having a choking anger against anyone who ever said anything against Scientology,” says actress Diana Canova (Soap), a former member. “I would get crazy, I was just so angry. I would have done anything for them.”

During her seven years in Scientology, Canova experienced the Celebrity Center from both sides of fame. “When I started, I wasn’t in television yet. I was a nobody–I’d done some TV, but I was not one of the elite, not by a long shot–until I did Soap. Then it became . . . I mean, you really are treated like royalty.”

“There was always pressure to get other celebrities in. The first time I walked in those doors, they said, ‘Just give us all the money in your bank account. You’ll get it back tenfold.’” When she joined, auditing prices were about $25. “It went up to about $175 in the early ’80s,” she recalls. “That was shocking to me. I was beginning to wonder, Is it really worth it? They’re telling you, ‘Don’t spend $100 an hour on a shrink’s couch, it’ll ruin your mind.’ Auditing is so much better?”

“It took me years before I decided to quit,” says Canova. “I guess finally I was so fed up with being afraid. You’ve heard all these horror stories . . .” Canova warns: “They’re capable of doing a lot of things.”

Canova says she spoke up because she thought it was important. “I see some of my friends having to keep their mouths shut for personal reasons, for business reasons,” she says. “I don’t believe that’s right. If it’s going to be termed a religion, or a church, then those kinds of fears have no business being there. Nobody should be afraid. And you can quote me on that.”

From other celebrities who are out

Singer Lou Rawls, 42, still appears on church membership rolls, even though he has long been disaffected. “Lou is no longer involved in Scientology, it’s not an interest at this point and never will be again,” his agent says. “He doesn’t want to be associated with those people.”

John Brodie, a former San Francisco 49′ers quarterback, was involved in Scientology from 1970 to 1982. He was one of the first 25 Scientologists to reach the level of OT 7, considered a formidable accomplishment by members. Still, Brodie says he never considered himself part of the group. Brodie said he gave up promoting Scientology after some of his friends in Scientology were expelled and harassed during a power struggle with church management. “There were many in the church I felt were treated unfairly,” Brodie said.

There are many Hollywood people who have left Scientology but fear speaking out. Some of them leave and just order Scientology to stop using their names and “success” stories. Hopefully, because of this report and the full Scientology celebrity listing at the end of part two, more former Scientology celebrities will begin to tell their stories in the media.

http://www.bible.ca/scientology-poor-famous-members.htm
he poorer and famous Hollywood Scientologists
John H. Richardson - Catch a Rising Star
Premiere, September 1993

Scientology’s membership boasts some of Hollywood’s top talent, despite one of the most sinister reputations of any modern religion.

“The evidence portrays L. Ron Hubbard as … virtually a pathological liar when it comes to his history, background, and achievements. The writings and documents in evidence … reflect his egoism, greed, avarice, lust for power, vindictiveness, and aggressiveness against persons perceived by him to be disloyal or hostile.”
- Paul G. Breckenridge, Jr., Judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles, June 20, 1984

AFTER HIS WEDDING TO NICOLE KIDMAN, TOM CRUISE was the guest of honor at a dinner party given by the powerful Creative Artists Agency at the trendy DC3 Restaurant, overlooking the Santa Monica Airport. Cruise sat at a table with CAA kingpin Michael Ovitz, often called the most powerful man in Hollywood. Right next to them sat David Miscavige, often called the most powerful man in the Church of Scientology, the self-help religion that promises “auditing” will “clear” its followers of the fears and traumas blocking them from total success–at a typical cost of $300 to $400 an hour. Nearby were two full tables of Scientologists. According to one of the guests, the Scientologists around Cruise were “like they always are–very direct, very attentive, very protective–hovering over Tom. And shaking a lot of hands.”

Across town, a former Scientologist named Nan Herst Bowers was agonizing over a letter she’d recently received from her 23-year-old son, Todd. “Dear Mom,” he wrote, “I am sending you this letter to let you know that I have to disconnect from you … I can’t see you, the babies, or Jim until this is all over and handled.”

Maybe Jada Pinkett is with her heavy metal rock band right now.

where is katie love her. thanks jj for this

love tom .

will rocks

Kool aid drinker are abundant..alert !! ahhaha
__________
Cruise Control

Tom Cruise refused an interview with PREMIERE. When we presented our fact-checking questions, we received this response.

[To the editor:] I got Tom Cruise to answer the questions and I offer them to you on one condition.

The condition is that you use the questions exactly as they were asked and use the answers exactly as they were given.

We have agreed that if any changes are contemplated by PREMIERE we can then withdraw all of the material and nothing can be printed without our specific approval.

With that in mind I send these sheets on to you and would appreciate hearing from you once you have an opportunity to look at them.

Sincerely, Pat Kingsley [Tom Cruise's Publicist]

1) At a birthday party at DC3 David Miscavige and Paula Wagner sat at Tom’s table. Is that true?

I never had a birthday part at DC3. A post-wedding party was given me by CAA, specifically my agent Paula Wagner and Mike Ovitz. Several hundred people were in attendance. At dinner I did sit with David Miscavige, in addition to Paula, Mike and at least 10 other individuals. What’s the point?

2) He joined the church via Mimi Rogers. Is that true?

I became a Scientologist while married to Mimi Rogers. No, I didn’t join the Church via Mimi or anyone else. My involvement in Scientology at that time was my own as it currently is. The question indicates some built in misunderstanding or intentional misconception as one doesn’t “join the Church” as you must already know.

3) Scientologists regularly visit Tom on the set of his movies. Is that true?

No this isn’t true. I am occasionally visited on the set by industry people, business associates and people who are all my friends. Some are Scientologists and some aren’t. To ask me if I’m visited regularly is like asking a Catholic actor if he is visited regularly by Catholics. However, so as to have no misunderstanding, I assume the question is whether Scientologists who are Church staff or officials regularly visit me. The answer is no. As a matter of fact, during the shooting of my last three films, I was visited a total of one time during the shooting of one of these films by friends of mine who are also church staff. They saw me for about one hour over lunch.

I have heard this allegation before, indicating I have “handlers” and find it repulsive. I wish I could see my friends more often, but they are as busy as I am.

4) That Tom frequently spends weekends at a Scientology retreat at Gilman Hot Springs.

This is false. Although I have been there, I haven’t EVER spent a “weekend” at the Scientology property (it isn’t a “retreat”) in Gilman Hot Springs. In the last 2 years or so, I only remember going to the Gilman Hot Springs location once, for a day and a half. And it was even in the middle of the week. My free time, what little I have, is spent with my family at home. And in any event, I have never spent time in any Scientology location for recreational purposes.

5) That his staff have been invited to Scientology offices to take courses.

I have never heard of this and don’t even know what it means.

6) His near constant companion is DM.

My near constant companion is my wife, Nic. Dave Miscavige is a good friend of mine and while we both wish we could see each other more often, due to my schedule and his we rarely ever see each other. This question is just off the wall. We are friends. And how is this relevant to anything? It’s offensive that I should even have to answer this question.

7) Nan Herst Bowers was a Scientologist who was separated from her children by the church. She wrote a letter to Tom saying the church is protecting him from the fact that she “outed” Tom as a Scientologist and that the church broke up her relationship with her children. (Her letter to Tom was asking him to help her.)(*)

I don’t know Ms. Bowers. I have never heard of her. Nor has anyone in my office. I have no idea what this is about except it is bizarre as nobody “outed” me as a Scientologist, and the implication that one would be “outed” as a Scientologist is insulting.

Finally, I have no idea why my religion, or anybody’s, would be the subject of an article in PREMIERE and that is why I have refused to participate in any interview. These questions indicate my original feelings about this story were accurate. I have taken the time to answer your questions in such detail, so that there can be no question about their inaccuracies.

I make movies. And when PREMIERE wants to talk about the movies I make, I have been and will continue to be willing to discuss such at length.

But these questions indicate that a reporter is stuck on some preconceived notion as to what Scientology is or how it relates to people’s lives. I have gained a lot from Scientology. I know what it is and how it can help people from my own personal involvement and study of the subject. Not one of these questions has anything to do with that. The reporter’s angle is clear. The Church of Scientology doesn’t run my life or career. By being asked to answer these questions I’m perceived as having to defend my religion or Church and by having to deny accusations a false negative impression is created. This is not what freedom of religion is about. My friends in the church don’t regularly visit me on the set. But so what if they did? Years ago, a friend of mine sits at my table at a party and now it’s an issue with PREMIERE?

I know the inference as I have seen it in other articles. The problem is it’s wrong. This line of questioning shows a lack of interest in learning what the Church of Scientology represents. I know more about Scientology and the Church and its staff than any reporter I’ve ever met or whose articles I have read. I know the good work they do. I shouldn’t be subjected to an inquiry on my religion. Likewise, my Church shouldn’t be subjected to press disparagement because I’m a member.

My work speaks for itself. It’s on the screen for everyone to see. And as far as PREMIERE is concerned that should be the end of the matter.

* Editor’s note: PREMIERE presented this as an allegation. This question contains factual inaccuracies that have been corrected in the text of the article.

cant you koolaid drinker write something original other than I adore, I love..what foolishness are you people rising from….

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH….#36 if you love him so much….you may want to learn how to spell his name

HAHAHAHAHA

he Mia, thanks for the interview paste, very interesting

The cult lovers on here are a bunch of illiterate zombies….just the kind that Scientologists like…..poor self-esteem, introverts, easily influenced..no wonder you write such childish and stupid things like ‘i adore them’, ‘i love him’ and all your elementary talk. You all sound like a bunch of fifth grade brainwashed teenyboppers.