OlderGemma Arterton is a Bond 22 Girl
Mon, 17 December 2007 at 12:49 pm
22-year-old British actress Gemma Arterton (St. Trinian’s) will be the next Bond Girl, confirms Empire Online.
It’s not certain what her role in the film will be or if she will be the main Bond girl, like Eva Green in Casino Royale.
Pictured: Gemma at the world premiere of St.Trinian’s at The Empire Leicester Square last Friday in London, England. 10+ pictures inside…
Angelina Jolie
Brad Pitt
Celebrity Babies
Jennifer Garner
Jennifer Aniston
Katie Holmes
Vanessa Hudgens
Us Weekly
42 Comments
first
she has nothing special . I mean no special face, no special hot body….and her hair looks stupid.
Lucky byotch!
I have no idea who this girl is but I doubt many people on this side of the pond do. She looks like an interesting choice in that she’s not-judging from these pictures-what I would consider in the classic Bond girl mode. Which is a good thing.
No one can be a better James Bond Girl than Eva Green, she was the perfect one. Totally on.
And Firts by the Way!
Not first anymore… You guys are fast!
bu…bu…bu…bu…but I thought the new bonds girl was going to be a pushing 40 woman that was on a sitcom called ‘Friends’?
Eeewww I need to be cast as a Bond girl
NEW NEW VIDEO FOR VANESSA HUDGENS CLICK HERE: http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=jY2pQZPHiLM
I agree with gala.
Well she’s not exactly Eva Green.
Lady G @ 12/17/2007 at 1:00 pm
———
Lol, yeah that’s what I heard too.
What happened to Chinny???
Probably a small role but she looks pretty, but a tad too young. Maybe she will be Bond’s daughter???? Just joking. She has this olden day English rose look, except she isn’t blonde. Pretty in my opinion and hopefully less gothis than Eva Green.
Hollywood is definitely getting more and more disturbing. I wonder how far they are going to go with the huge age gap between the lead women and men. Bond men are required to be at least 40 yrs old. This girl is 22! C’mon, the last girl that played opposite Daniel Craig looked like a baby. I don’t know exactly how old she was, but she wasn’t anywhere near 30 I’m sure. They also tried to make her look older with her hair styles and costume. Why not get an age appropriate woman and dress her accordingly instead of getting these babies and making them look older? It’s sick, IMO.
If I was Daniel Craig’s current girlfriend, I’d be nervous.
And pissed! Watch out, you know he had to approve the casting. Yikes!
She’s cute n’all, but Eva G. totally rocked it!
Eva green couldnt be the next bond girl anyway you turds, she died in the first film.
Give someone else a chance….losers of the highest kind (*shaking head*)
It’s quite simple SweetyKat, because it’s Hollywood. James Bond is every male fantasy, the good looking super spy who not only gets all the great gadgets, action scenes, but also gets the women. Nothing plays better than a man who’s 40 being able to get a girl in her 20’s.
Personally, I think Eva Green was perfect in Casino Royale.
It enables the male ego to get a woman in her early 20s as opposed to a woman in the her mid 30s,
Theory goes the younger you get them the more you know you still got it as a man….
She looks nice just another unfamiliar face which will make the movie that much better and believable, if you use people who are in the media a lot, then it detracts from the film their in. Common sense.
Who chose her?
diablo, que malo gusto.
Gemma is beautiful and talented! Great choice for a more “down-to-earth” Bond girl.
http://gemma-arterton.net/
She is so beautiful, moreover her hair style looks gorgeous…
http://HairCare.blogcu.com
She’s no surprise, she looks like the typical european white bond girl soo…i don’t get where the discrepencies come in.
Oh well she’s hot, i’d hit it
WHAT! she’s big, what the hell. Danny can’t be breaking his back carrying a sack like that if he needs to save her a_ss from the baddies!! And she looks like a cross btw. a rabbit & a squirrel!
and her teeth, my lawd!
who? unknown!
booooooo!
Exactly Liza, like I said, it’s Hollywood. I just said that it’s disturbing. I don’t like it. It’s getting absolutely horrible out there. The next thing you know, the average age of a leading woman is going to be 20, anywhere from 18 to 23 and the leading man will be whatever. It’s sick.
She does have a cute face—one of the better-looking female Brits I’ve seen besides Rachel Weisz and Thandie Newton.
Hahaha, #26! No offense to the British–LOVE them, because I think they have THE best talent—BUT,
most of them don’t exactly have good teeth. Don’t know why–maybe it’s the tea.
Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
Share This Post:
Comment and Share!