OlderMon, 17 December 2007 at 12:49 pm
Gemma Arterton is a Bond 22 Girl
22-year-old British actress Gemma Arterton (St. Trinian’s) will be the next Bond Girl, confirms Empire Online.
It’s not certain what her role in the film will be or if she will be the main Bond girl, like Eva Green in Casino Royale.
Pictured: Gemma at the world premiere of St.Trinian’s at The Empire Leicester Square last Friday in London, England. 10+ pictures inside…
Share This Post:
43 Comments
and her teeth, my lawd!
who? unknown!
booooooo!
Exactly Liza, like I said, it’s Hollywood. I just said that it’s disturbing. I don’t like it. It’s getting absolutely horrible out there. The next thing you know, the average age of a leading woman is going to be 20, anywhere from 18 to 23 and the leading man will be whatever. It’s sick.
She does have a cute face—one of the better-looking female Brits I’ve seen besides Rachel Weisz and Thandie Newton.
Hahaha, #26! No offense to the British–LOVE them, because I think they have THE best talent—BUT,
most of them don’t exactly have good teeth. Don’t know why–maybe it’s the tea.
Her skin looks shocking…even with all that make-up on.
Her teeth are fine. She just needs a bit of teeth whitening work done. I really dislike the whitened horse teeth that they give people on the American makeover shows. They look ridiculous.
“bataglio” I’m sorry to have to burst your bubble but not all women are pencil thin like Eva Green. To my mind, she looks normal. A lot of women have curves, in fact, the majority of women in America wear a dress size 12 -14. I’m in the minority, i wear a much smaller one. And as for the rest of your comment, from what I understand Daniel had to approve the casting. Gemma would not have gotten the part if he did not like what he saw in her.
“the majority of women in America wear a dress size 12 -14″
didn’t yo’ mama tell you that just b/c everyone does something or is something - still don’t make it right to do or be that? if the majority of women in america is 12-14, then american women are BIG. 12-14 is BIG. it’s back bacon, thunder thighs, fupa, gargantuan BIG. it’s get-away-from-the-ice-cream BIG. heck, it’s skip-one-meal-a-day,-you-won’t-die BIG.
Well, bataglio, since you’re so judgemental exactally how small are you ? From your attitude, am I to believe that you have a perfect body with no flaws? I’m sorry that women who wear size 12-14 or have curves like Gemma offend you personally. I guess that means you wont be going to see Bond 22, If you do, then you’ll have your eyes closed so you wont have to look Gemma when she’s on the screen.
I notice though, that in your comments, you did not address the issue that Daniel has casting approval. As I said before, Gemma would not have gotten the role if the producers, director, and Daniel did not like what they saw. What pray tell, do you have to say about that?
liza, i hate to repeat myself, so i’ll just refer you to a prior post… if you’re interested in what i look like (though it has no bearing on the discussion; 12-14 is big regardless of what i look like), please do a search on “alice kim”, the 8/13/07 thread, and read the bataglio @ 08/21/2007 at 9:39 pm response (#106?).
re daniel having a say in the casting; he also dates a_ss-face satsuki, so i am not surprised at his poor taste in women. i plan on seeing bond, yes. i fully expect bond girl will have been requested to lose 20+ lbs by that point, and will likely sport veneers, so as to not offend the sensibilities of moviegoers who surely wouldn’t be pleased that their $9 netted them a fattie w/yellow teeth for a bond girl.
.bataglio, i did as you suggested i went on the to the 8/13/07 and read the response number 106. Guess what, I am not impressed. As for your suggestion that Gemma would be asked to lose 20 + lbs so as not to offend the sensibilities of moviegoers, what you should have said is offend “my sensibilites”.
Well, I hate to tell you this, but the the producers, the director and Daniel are not all interested in what you think. Bond 22 will make lots of money even if Gemma stays exactly the way she is now. As I said before, if she offends you personally, when you see the film all you have to do is close your eyes when she’s on the screen,. As for Satsuki, perhaps Daniel learned a long time ago that physical appearance is only skin deep. It’s the person’s character that matters most. A lesson you obviously have not learned,
*confused*
…i didn’t think the point of this exchange was to impress you, but rather to get you an idea of what i look like. based on that, i’d say - mission accomplished.
re “my” vs. “everyone’s” sensibilities, let me assure you that yellow teeth blown up to movie screen proportions are guaranteed to offend indiscriminately.
She has a pretty face and she’s not even wearing much make-up. Not a fan of her hairdo though.
why do u all think that she sucks?
she is a really good actress and you are all obv jealus of her coz u all suck!!!!
Gemma is AMAZING in st trinians i wish i looked like u!!!!
Gemma is AMAZING in st trinians i wish i looked like u!!!!
@snap:
Pages: « 1 [2] Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!