Roseanne Barr Hates Oprah
Actress/comedian Roseanne Barr has made some wild accusations in her latest blog about talk show host Oprah Winfrey and Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. Here’s a summary of what she said (with spelling and grammar fixed):
– Barack is an empty suit selling “hope” in lieu of Truth
– Oprah helped to elect Arnold Schwarzenegger. I have no doubt that she voted her purse by doing this, as she is a large land owner in California, and that ilk fears Dems because they do not want to pay their “fair share” of Cali tax.
– Oprah has given us Dr. Phil. If that was not offensive enough to decent thinking people, now she brings us Obama. He has no ideas, no plan and nothing to add other than the cynical pacification of the masses with bedtime stories about hope.
– Oprah, you play the race card and the gender card too. You are a closeted republican and chose Barack because you do not like other women who actually stand for something to working American Women besides glamour, angels, Hollywood and dieting!
– It is historical that Oprah, beloved of women, chooses a flashy man with small credentials over a seasoned woman politician with 35 years of experience…and sells that to the female demographic who look to her for inspiration!
OUCH!!!!!








Older










515 Comments
Hi Orchid,
If you return, I wanted to share this article with you. It’s a rallying call and maybe enough to keep up “the spirit.” …don’t dismay.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/09/AR2008050902298_pf.html
Quitters Never Win
By Ellen R. Malcolm
Saturday, May 10, 2008; A15
When I was growing up in the 1960s, I wanted to play basketball. In those days, the rules said girls could dribble only three steps and then had to pass the ball. To make sure we didn’t overexert ourselves, we weren’t allowed to cross the half-court line. It’s a wonder our fans (our mothers) could stay awake when a typical game’s final score was 14-10.
It’s remarkable that my generation of women entered the workforce and began to compete in business, politics and the hurly-burly of life outside the home. How did we ever learn to locate, much less channel, our competitive instincts in a world that made us play half-court and assumed that we would be content staying home to iron the shirts? It’s a tremendous tribute to women of my generation that we sucked it up and learned to compete in the toughest environments.
Which brings us to Hillary Clinton running for president. This brilliant woman believes that she can compete for the most powerful office in the world. She believes that she can do a better job than any of the men running to lead our country through these challenging times. And millions of Americans, women and men, believe that she is correct.
Yet over and over again the media and her opponents have claimed that she is defeated — it’s over, she can’t win, she’s a loser. And over and over again — in New Hampshire, on Super Tuesday, in Texas and Ohio, in Pennsylvania last month, and in Indiana this week — female voters poured out of their homes to cast their ballots for her. They know that women can compete, and they want to make sure that women, especially this woman, can win.
It’s not surprising that low-income working women are the cornerstone of Hillary’s success. Many of these women live on the edge of disaster. A pink slip, a family member’s illness, a parent who can no longer live alone, a car that won’t start or a mortgage rate that goes up — all are threats that could devastate the family. And yet these women do what women have done for ages. They put on a confident face, feed their children breakfast and get them off to school. They don’t quit. They suck it up and fight back against whatever life throws their way.
They see in Hillary Clinton a candidate who understands the pressures they face. As they watch her tough it out against all odds, refusing to quit and continuing to compete against whatever the media and her opponents throw her way, they see a woman as tough and resilient as they are. They clearly want her to win. Her victory, I believe, is their victory.
So here we are in the fourth quarter of the nominating process and the game is too close to call. Once again, the opponents and the media are calling for Hillary to quit. The first woman ever to win a presidential primary is supposed to stop competing, to curtsy and exit stage right.
Why on earth should one candidate quit before the contest is finished? Democrats need not be so fainthearted. Both of the party’s remaining candidates have raised tens of millions of dollars. Both have the respect of Democrats nationwide. Each has a progressive agenda that stands in stark contrast to Sen. John McCain and his adherence to Bush administration policies.
So why are some Democrats so afraid? We simply need to count every vote, let the remaining states have their say and see the process through to its conclusion.
Hillary Clinton certainly has the right to compete till the end. But I believe Hillary also has a responsibility to play the game to its conclusion. For the women of my generation who learned to find and channel their competitiveness, for the working women who never falter in the face of pressure, for the younger women who still believe women can do anything, Hillary is a champion. She’s shown us over and over that winners never quit and that quitters never win. We’ll cheer her on until the game is over. And we hope that when the final whistle blows, we will have elected the first female president and the best president our country has ever had.
Hi Orchid,
I’m back to listening to the pundits and some have not given up on HRC. One even reminded everyone that Bill Clinton didn’t get the nomination until June. I’ve decided NOT to listen to the general media hype as opposed to these political experts who have more insights. They are now saying that Obama may seriously consider asking HRC as a running mate which may be the only way he will beat McCain. They are also saying that the reason why HRC is not withdrawing is not only because ‘why should she?’ but that she is keeping her name in the game for the possibility that in order to beat McCain Obama will “realize” he needs her on the ticket as the VP.
Re: the MI and Florida issue, it seems like the Democratic party may be wanting to “punish” Florida and Michigan Party players but they are hurting the voters of those two states who have a right to vote and have a say in the primary…it sure seems like a power play by the Party…which really makes me mad…they are neglecting the most important issue of who are the important ones…i.e. the voters within their own Party who voted thinking their vote would count.
Re: # 500 Orchid @ 05/10/2008 at 3:31 pm
don’t know about HRC running as an independent…this country is not yet receptive to an independent winning…I think it will come but it doesn’t seem the timing is right yet. There aren’t enough “independents” in numbers or “notoriety”. The more voters who become frustrated and mad at the two current major political parties, the more likely they will become independents and split and not align with any. Other minor parties who have attempted to supplement the gap and lure the dissatisfied have failed dramatically. I think the true “independents” have lost confidence in “organized” parties. I’ve been an independent for over fifteen years and cross over all the time because for me it’s the candidate, not the “blanket goals” of a Party…it’s that Libertarian in me, LOL. IMO Schwarzenagger more so than McCain, is the closest ideal to an “independent” candidate embracing attributes of both current parties. California liberal Republicans, conservative Democrats and independents embraced him.
The pundits are saying that HRC has branded herself as the “comeback fighter, never giving up” which will help her in four years…which is interesting because it is based on the assumption that McCain will win or if Obama wins, his term will be mediocre. They are claiming if HRC dropped out she will have an “Ed Muskie” reputation as a forever loser and it will work against her in the future if she wants to try again. Another interesting comment is that HRC is staying in because for whatever reason if Obama has another gaffe or is “pushed off the stage by the Republicans, she “wants” to be there to step in and she would be foolish to step down.
504 first and last post @ 05/10/2008 at 5:57 pm Re: # 500 Orchid @ 05/10/2008 at 3:31 pm
don’t know about HRC running as an independent…this country is not yet receptive to an independent winning…I think it will come but it doesn’t seem the timing is right yet. There aren’t enough
“independents” in numbers or “notoriety”. The more voters who become frustrated and mad at the two current major political parties, the more likely they will become independents and split and not align with any. Other minor parties who have attempted to supplement the gap and lure the dissatisfied have failed dramatically. I think the true “independents” have lost confidence in “organized” parties. I’ve been an independent for over fifteen years and cross over all the time because for me it’s the candidate, not the “blanket goals” of a Party…it’s that Libertarian in me, LOL. IMO Schwarzenegger more so than McCain, is the closest ideal to an “independent” candidate embracing attributes of both current parties. California liberal Republicans, conservative Democrats and independents embraced him.
——-
That’s how it should be, really. I think now is probably very close to being possible for an independent party, but I guess they lack a leader, and Schwarzenegger can’t be it because he was Austrian.
Anyway, I expect many to cross over. At least that’s what they said.
Didn’t Ralph Nader say he’d be in the race???
504 The pundits are saying that HRC has branded herself as the “comeback fighter, never giving up” which will help her in four years…which is interesting because it is based on the assumption that McCain will win or if Obama wins, his term will be mediocre. They are claiming if HRC dropped out she will have an “Ed Muskie” reputation as a forever loser and it will work against her in the future if she wants to try again. Another interesting comment is that HRC is staying in because for whatever reason if Obama has another gaffe or is “pushed off the stage by the Republicans, she “wants” to be there to step in and she would be foolish to step down.
——-
She is feisty! I like it that she isn’t dropping out. I saw **** Morris, who used to work for Bill Clinton, on TV saying that she should run in 1012! He expects McCain to win.
503 first and last post @ 05/10/2008 at 5:40 pm Hi Orchid,
I’m back to listening to the pundits and some have not given up on HRC.
One even reminded everyone that Bill Clinton didn’t get the nomination until June. I’ve decided NOT to listen to the general media hype as opposed to these political experts who have more insights.
I know, and I’m tired of hearing her opponents calling for her to pull out, so I’m not watching politics on TV now. Just pick up things from the news.
They are now saying that Obama may seriously consider asking HRC as a running mate which may be the only way he will beat McCain.
Ugh! Of course if he does, she’ll do what she wants, but I don’t think she should. Why be his Veep. What do you think?
They are also saying that the reason why HRC is not withdrawing is not only because ‘why should she?’
I agree, but her opponents are saying that she goes on because she needs to attract funds.
Her campaign is in debt. I heard (maybe it’s just a story) that he has said (let it be known!) that he would help her pay off her debt.
I guess he would do that in return for her campaigning for him in Nov. I wouldn’t campaign for him!
…she is keeping her name in the game for the possibility that in order to beat McCain Obama will “realize” he needs her on the ticket as the VP.
Oh, I think he realized that long ago. Imo, the ticket should be HRC/BHO, not the other way around!
Re: the MI and Florida issue, it seems like the Democratic party may be wanting to “punish” Florida and Michigan Party players but they are hurting the voters of those two states who have a right to vote and have a say in the primary…it sure seems like a power play by the Party…which really makes me mad…they are neglecting the most important issue of who are the important ones…i.e. the voters within their own Party who voted thinking their vote would count.
I hope MI and Florida are able to do something, and not let the party ignore them.
Hi Orchid,
I don’t think Hillary should take Obama’s VP offer, “if” he offers. I’m not sure what she would gain by doing so…gosh she deserves so much more than that.
re: her being in debt, wish I had saved that link where the pundits laughed at Hillary being concerned with her debt…they said that was least on her mind because there was some campaign law (can’t remember the details) that will reimburse her in full.
re: bringing the party together…that is such a croc!! I was annoyed at Edwards for throwing his support to Obama for what appears to be the sole purpose of “uniting the party”…what bull. The system is in a mess and uniting the Democratic Party will not make the system more fair, nor representative of the voting public.
I’m really confused with McCain…was scanning the radio and ended up listening to a very conservative radio talk show because I heard his name being mentioned and the two talk radio hosts were belittling McCain for being a Democrat in his policies and stances on issues…did you know that he almost switched from Republican to Democrat to run in the primary? There were comments that he is NOT a Republican and a traitor to the party and that anyone who votes for him is voting “Democratic”. they reminded the audience that McCain was one of the infamous “gang of 14″ who opposed Bush on many issues and that McCain has voted consistently against many Republican backed legislature..a renegade Republican…has an interesting ring to it.
What do you think of McCain? I’m not happy with his Iraqi pull out date of 2013…need to research that more, just read the headlines.
Maybe Edwards wants to be Veep. I have been avoiding the political discussions on TV but, as I said before, I do pick up stuff from the news. Now I’ve heard that there is the possibility of HRC considering the Veep position? Ugh!!!
Then there is also her comment about Robert Kennedy. I don’t know anything about it, but I heard she has apologized. I’ll be finding out about that.
I’m sorry to hear about Senator Kennedy being so sick. I’m sure he has the best medical care. Saw on the news that he went sailing very soon after leaving the hospital.
Good health is the best thing to have.
508 first and last post @ 05/15/2008 at 11:54 pm Hi Orchid,
I don’t think Hillary should take Obama’s VP offer, “if” he offers. I’m not sure what she would gain by doing so…gosh she deserves so much more than that.
ITA
re: her being in debt, wish I had saved that link where the pundits laughed at Hillary being concerned with her debt…they said that was least on her mind because there was some campaign law (can’t remember the details) that will reimburse her in full.
I’m glad to hear that!
re: bringing the party together…that is such a croc!! I was annoyed at Edwards for throwing his support to Obama for what appears to be the sole purpose of “uniting the party”…what bull. The system is in a mess and uniting the Democratic Party will not make the system more fair, nor representative of the voting public.
The system is unfair. If they want to make it fair, bring the party together and all that, they should allow MI and Florida to vote./b>
I’m really confused with McCain…was scanning the radio and ended up listening to a very conservative radio talk show because I heard his name being mentioned and the two talk radio hosts were belittling McCain for being a Democrat in his policies and stances on issues…did you know that he almost switched from Republican to Democrat to run in the primary? There were comments that he is NOT a Republican and a traitor to the party and that anyone who votes for him is voting “Democratic”. they reminded the audience that McCain was one of the infamous “gang of 14″ who opposed Bush on many issues and that McCain has voted consistently against many Republican backed legislature..a renegade Republican…has an interesting ring to it.
What do you think of McCain? I’m not happy with his Iraqi pull out date of 2013…need to research that more, just read the headlines.
Why be confused! I’m sure he will be flexible about Iraq. He will have to be! Anyway, even if he lets them stay there, they don’t have to fight. How about rebuilding what they have destroyed, and what AJ has suggested - help the refugees come home and resettle. THAT will win hearts, and improve relations between the US and the ME!
Even BHO, who is determined to bring the troops home, has said that if necessary, he’d send them back! Imagine the cost! He promises in his campaign speeches to ‘bring them home’ just to win votes.
Since HRC seems to be on the way out, and since McCain is kind of ‘in the middle’ between the two parties, I think Democrats who don’t care for BHO, could happily vote for McCain!
The Republicans have a problem. I’m starting to think the die-hard McCain haters among them wouldn’t mind voting for Hillary if she is the candidate, but I’m afraid she won’t be.
Now that I think about it, I like this renegade Republican. He is not a party-man. He thinks for himself! I like that. Plus he is a war hero.
I really don’t know all their complaints about him. I only remember that ‘he is not conservative enough.’ Well, he is their candidate, and if they don’t vote for him, they get BHO, who is ultra-left! Worse, for them.
How are you, FALP? Is your computer still being difficult?
508 first and last post @ 05/15/2008 at 11:54 pm
I don’t think Hillary should take Obama’s VP offer, “if” he offers. I’m not sure what she would gain by doing so…gosh she deserves so much more than that.
ITA
re: her being in debt, wish I had saved that link where the pundits laughed at Hillary being concerned with her debt…they said that was least on her mind because there was some campaign law (can’t remember the details) that will reimburse her in full.
I’m glad to hear that!
re: bringing the party together…that is such a croc!! I was annoyed at Edwards for throwing his support to Obama for what appears to be the sole purpose of “uniting the party”…what bull. The system is in a mess and uniting the Democratic Party will not make the system more fair, nor representative of the voting public.
If they want to make it fair, bring the party together and all that, they should allow MI and Florida to vote.
I’m really confused with McCain…was scanning the radio and ended up listening to a very conservative radio talk show because I heard his name being mentioned and the two talk radio hosts were belittling McCain for being a Democrat in his policies and stances on issues…did you know that he almost switched from Republican to Democrat to run in the primary? There were comments that he is NOT a Republican and a traitor to the party and that anyone who votes for him is voting “Democratic”. they reminded the audience that McCain was one of the infamous “gang of 14″ who opposed Bush on many issues and that McCain has voted consistently against many Republican backed legislature..a renegade Republican…has an interesting ring to it.
What do you think of McCain? I’m not happy with his Iraqi pull out date of 2013…need to research that more, just read the headlines.
I’m sure he will be flexible about Iraq. He will have to be! Anyway, even if he lets them stay there, they don’t have to fight. How about rebuilding what they have destroyed, and what AJ has suggested - help the refugees come home and resettle. THAT will win hearts, and improve relations between the US and all of the ME!
Even BHO, who is determined to bring the troops home, has said that if necessary, he’d send them back! Imagine the cost! He promises in his campaign speeches to ‘bring them home’ just to win votes.
Since HRC seems to be on the way out, and since McCain is kind of ‘in the middle’ between the two parties, I think Democrats who don’t care for BHO, could happily vote for McCain!
The Republicans have a problem. I’m starting to think the die-hard McCain haters among them wouldn’t mind voting for Hillary if she is the candidate, but it looks like she won’t be.
Now that I think about it, I like this renegade Republican. He is not a party-man. He thinks for himself! I like that. Plus he is a war hero.
I really don’t know all their complaints about him. I only remember that ‘he is not conservative enough.’ Well, he is their candidate, and if they don’t vote for him, they get BHO, who is ultra-left! Worse, for them.
How are you, FALP? Is your computer still being difficult?
PS - Fixed the bolding in the middle of #510. I hope it’s right this time! :lol:
How do you Morons know 100% that Roseanne hates Oprah she did’nt even say one word about hating her. All she said was that she STRONGLY dissagres with oprahs opinion. And that she believes that a Strong women who actually has been in politics for over 30 years( Hillary Clinton) is more sutable for the presidential position. Hillary has done multiple politacle positions in her life time and that does include her being the former presidents wife #22. And #5 Maybe if you had some schooling when you were a little punk your vocabulary would not be filled with swear words. Oh! and # 29 the same goes to you because Roseanne is a strong women because if knew what her life was like as a child you might rethink your comment. Another thing #29 your a complete idiot because your probably the type of kid that his little mommy drops him off at school and goes back home does her nails while daddy is earning the big bucks to keep you sorry spoiled rotten good for nothing ingrates fed. Ha! Hope you guys liked my comments. Have a nice day.
Sincerly,
barrieboy23
Oprah is a fake, and anything she says should be over examined with a fine toothed comb. Don’t believe the queen of all media, because she’s just like the rest. No one gets to the top without a good lie, unless you are Mozart, or Leonardo, and they almost died in poverty. This over burdening behemoth should not be viewed as infallible, just because she runs amedia semi-empire… who does she think she is, Randolph Hearst? Just goes to show that no matter what color anyone is, we are all created equal, and will pull the same tricks, equally.
Besides, she was endorsed by Spielberg many years ago when they did “Color Purple” who happened to have the first Obama event two to three years ago in Hollywood, thus bringing in media and Hollywood crowd, making it chique. They want to make you feel racist, if you don’t vote for Obama. Personally, I don’t like their tactics.
What Roseanne said about Oprah and Obama is true. People wake up and smell the coffee. These two are doing nothing but brainwashing you and stealing your money. Then they go on lavish spending sprees. They laugh in your faces and figure more ways to steal your money. They both are racist. Eventually they will show their true colors. Just be proud you can sleep at night. Knowing you are not telling people lies, all to steal their money, and rob their minds. They both need to seek counseling.
Oprah is an anti-American but yet she still won’t leave this country. She doesn’t invest here like she does in africa or if she does it’s only in black neihborhoods. Oprah is a fake just like her boy Obama.
Pages: « 1 … 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!