OlderRoseanne Barr Hates Oprah
Actress/comedian Roseanne Barr has made some wild accusations in her latest blog about talk show host Oprah Winfrey and Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. Here’s a summary of what she said (with spelling and grammar fixed):
– Barack is an empty suit selling “hope” in lieu of Truth
– Oprah helped to elect Arnold Schwarzenegger. I have no doubt that she voted her purse by doing this, as she is a large land owner in California, and that ilk fears Dems because they do not want to pay their “fair share” of Cali tax.
– Oprah has given us Dr. Phil. If that was not offensive enough to decent thinking people, now she brings us Obama. He has no ideas, no plan and nothing to add other than the cynical pacification of the masses with bedtime stories about hope.
– Oprah, you play the race card and the gender card too. You are a closeted republican and chose Barack because you do not like other women who actually stand for something to working American Women besides glamour, angels, Hollywood and dieting!
– It is historical that Oprah, beloved of women, chooses a flashy man with small credentials over a seasoned woman politician with 35 years of experience…and sells that to the female demographic who look to her for inspiration!
OUCH!!!!!
Share This Post:
515 Comments
170 first and last post @ 01/10/2008 at 6:40 pm re: #164 Orchid @ 01/10/2008 at 6:14 pm 162 TiredofthisCrap @ 01/10/2008 at 5:53 pm
“That tells us about those people. I hate to say it, but some people shouldn’t be allowed to vote. They’re too emotional.”
Or play in the stock market and screw it up for the logical, analytical ones. Love, love, love your post! will you be my friend, LOL?
——-
Hi again, friend!
I couldn’t believe ‘Tiredof thisCrap.’
Why couldn’t the evangelicals separate Gore from Clinton? Gore was running, not Clinton.
MS. Roseanne, I am not a fan of Oprah, but the fact is that she did some good things for people - What you have done so far, except showing your split tongue?
That´s actually quite funny.
————–I´m all for Hillary————————————————–YAY!
EVERYBODY’S TALKING ABOUT EXPERENCE.
EXPERENCE DOESN’T MAKE YOU BETTER THAN THE LESS EXPERENCE.
LOOK AT GEORGE BUSH, HE HAS ALL THE EXPERENCE IN THE WORLD. AND LOOK AT WHERE WE ARE TODAY.
AT WAR………………………………………………
DON’T TALK TO ME ABOUT EXPERENCE
OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT, WE NEED CHANGE.
OPRAH IS NOT A RACIST, WHY CAN’T A BLACK PERSON VOTE FOR ANOTHER BLACK PERSON WITHOUT BEING A RACIST.
OPRAH SAID SHE LIKE HILLARY, BUT SHE WANT CHANGE.
AND OBAMA CAN DELIVER THAT CHANGE.
ROSEANNE IS A LOUD MOUTH TROUBLE MAKER. THAT’S TRYING TO CAUSE A RIFT BETWEEN BLACKS AND WHITES. NOT OPRAH.
NOBODY’S COMPLAINED ABOUT BARBARA STRISAND. CALLING HER OUT BECAUSE SHE SUPPORTS A WHITE WOMAN. GET REAL. IT’S JUST AN ENDORSEMENT PEOPLE.
OPRAH CAN ENDORSE ANYONE SHE WANT AND THE INTELLIGENT PEOPLE OF THE U.S. CAN MAKE UP THEIR OWN MIND WHO THEY WANT FOR PRESIDENT.
AND TO THE PERSON WHO SAID OBAMA WANT WIN BECAUSE
AMERICA IS NOT READY FOR A BLACK PRESIDENT.
YOUR SO WRONG THE POLLS ARE PROOF. OBAMA WON IOWA AND WOULD HAVE WON N.H IF HILLARY WOULD NOT HAVE TURNED ON THE WATER WORKS WITH HER SOB STORY BY CRYING. WHAT A WUSS. THE FEMALE VOTER FELT SORRY FOR HER AND GAVE HER THEIR VOTES. (THE CRYING GAME). HER CRY WAS SO FAKE WHATEVER.
OBAMA & OPRAH FOR PRESIDENT
WOW ROSEANNE APOLOGIZE FOR HER COMMENT ABOUT OPRAH AND OBAMA SHE SAID SHE REALLY LIKE OPRAH & OBAMA.
AFTER SHE SAID SHE DIDN’T LIKE THEM AT ALL. SHE JUST A LITTLE 2 FACE WASHUP IDIOT.
Here’s one of the reasons why the evangelical came out ot vote in 2000: Gay marriage. It was a new issue but important to those who cared.
Gore did not even win his home state that year. They couldn’t separate him because he did not come out to denounce Clinton until the very end, by then it was too late for him. The Evangelicals wanted to know the same BS that went on during the Clinton Admin. wouldn’t go on with him. It was more or less a scare tactic used by the Republicans, vote Democrat and the country would turn to Sodom and Gomarrah(sp).
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/shapiro/2004-11-04-hype_x.htm
Someone asked, how do I know Hilary knew Iraq didn’t have WMD. I’ll address that later.
Hiliary has no experience. She has been in politics for years and done nothing. She and her husband take credit for the wealth of the economy, when the truth is the economy is cyclical and not controlled by the government. The sad part is there are no candidates worthy of a vote at this time. They all change their directions when in different states. Hilary promised health care reform. She had no control or ability to change it. Nor do any other candidates. The solution to taxes is to eliminate all tax shelters at any income level and have a flat tax of between 8 and 10%. Having lived in several states I find Illinois to be the most corrupt, hitting the utilities and taxpayers to correct the errors of not budgeting and cutting costs. The fact is any president has to work with Congress. We need to clean house at all levels, state and federal and start all over!!
WAY TO GO ROSEANNE - COULDN’T AGREE WITH YOU MORE. OPRAH IS THE MOST SANCTIMONIOUS PERSON - AND DR. PHIL, PLEASE. WITH YOU ON OBAMA. THANKS FOR SPEAKING OUT! KEEP GOING - YOU’RE ACTUALLY, AS ALWAYS THINKING FOR YOURSELF… BUT I LOVE OPRAH THE SHEEP SAY … YUK - DO THEY EVEN KNOW WHY THEY “LOVE” OPRAH????? I KNOW WHY I DON’T LIKE HER AND IT BEGINS WITH WHAT SHE DID TO JAMES FRY - AFTER THAT - I CAN’T EVEN SAY ENOUGH BAD THINGS ABOUT HER - I EVEN WONDERED IF PEOPLE WHO LIKE OBAMA- NOT- WOULD BE DISSUADED BECAUSE OF THE CHEESE FACTOR OF HER AUDIENCE - SHE EXPLOITED HER TV AUDIENCE WHEN SHE TURNED HER AND THEIR ATTENTION ON OBAMA. … WHO WOULD WANT TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH HER AUDIENCE I THOUGHT; THEY’RE A BUNCH OF MIDDLE OF THE ROAD - PRETEND SPIRITUAL SEEKERS, NOT, WHO SIT ON THEIR ASSES AND WATCH OPRAH AT FOUR IN THE AFTERNOON WHILE THEIR CHILDREN OR WHATEVER TAKE NAPS….. I MUST STOP MYSELF, SHE JUST MAKES MY BLOOD BOIL - OBAMA IS INCONSEQUENTIAL, BUT OPRAH COULD BE DANGEROUS.
really does look like it. no one good running anyway
205 HARRY @ 01/11/2008 at 7:53 am EVERYBODY’S TALKING ABOUT EXPERENCE.
EXPERENCE DOESN’T MAKE YOU BETTER THAN THE LESS EXPERENCE.
LOOK AT GEORGE BUSH, HE HAS ALL THE EXPERENCE IN THE WORLD. AND LOOK AT WHERE WE ARE TODAY.
AT WAR………………………………………………
DON’T TALK TO ME ABOUT EXPERENCE
OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT, WE NEED CHANGE.
OPRAH IS NOT A RACIST, WHY CAN’T A BLACK PERSON VOTE FOR ANOTHER BLACK PERSON WITHOUT BEING A RACIST.
OPRAH SAID SHE LIKE HILLARY, BUT SHE WANT CHANGE.
AND OBAMA CAN DELIVER THAT CHANGE.
ROSEANNE IS A LOUD MOUTH TROUBLE MAKER. THAT’S TRYING TO CAUSE A RIFT BETWEEN BLACKS AND WHITES. NOT OPRAH.
NOBODY’S COMPLAINED ABOUT BARBARA STRISAND. CALLING HER OUT BECAUSE SHE SUPPORTS A WHITE WOMAN. GET REAL. IT’S JUST AN ENDORSEMENT PEOPLE.
——-
No, Harry! The reason we are where we are today is because W is NOT experienced. Btw, it’s experience, not experence,
Whether it’s Hillary or Barack, either one will be a first, a change, for the USA. First woman or first African-American.
Check out another website about Oprah Winfrey and her connection to the child sex slavery, fake priests and other bizarre cults.
http://www.newspiritualbible.com/index1
I’m not a big fan of Rosanne, but I have to say I agree with her. I haven’t liked Oprah since she did that road trip show with Gayle where some very odd things happened like:
1) The most powerful woman in the world can’t figure out how to check herself into a hotel? I guess Oprah is like the aliens from Signs who can fly their alien asses from some far away galaxy in a spaceship but can’t seem to figure out how to turn a door ****…
2)Oprah’s been best friends with Gayle since they were in their 20’s but never knew that her tone deaf friend likes to sing with the radio
I was okay with Obama till Oprah backed him, now if he wins the democrat nomination instead of Hillary…..I’ll probably vote Republican…let me go barf now.
Hello Roise
You go Roise everyone acts like their scared of Oparah. I’m not and im glad to fine Someone else who aint.Oprah is a fake white people made oprah with her racist ass.
Re: #212 Orchid @ 01/11/2008 at 9:20 pm response to
#205
Hey there friend,
I saw post #205 yesterday and was tempted to post that GW DOES NOT have experience and I was going to mention that if elected Hillary would be the FIRST women. HARRY totally missed that “change” and that tells you alot about HARRY…gosh we have some psychic action going on here…you beat me to it…can’t believe it…kind of spooky.
PS I was also going to mention that GW spurred his anger and subsequent war with Iraq based on the fact that Hussein had a hit on his Daddy, he even made a statement to that effect.
208 TiredofthisCrap @ 01/11/2008 at 10:09 am
Here’s one of the reasons why the evangelical came out ot vote in 2000: Gay marriage. It was a new issue but important to those who cared.
Gore did not even win his home state that year. They couldn’t separate him because he did not come out to denounce Clinton until the very end, by then it was too late for him. The Evangelicals wanted to know the same BS that went on during the Clinton Admin. wouldn’t go on with him. It was more or less a scare tactic used by the Republicans, vote Democrat and the country would turn to Sodom and Gomarrah(sp).
——-
Yes, and ignorant people are easily influenced, manipulated. That’s why I think if Barack is the candidate, the Republicans will try the same thing. Scare the ignorant masses. It worked 8 years ago!
216 first and last post @ 01/12/2008 at 2:31 pm Re: #212 Orchid @ 01/11/2008 at 9:20 pm response to
#205
Hey there friend,
I saw post #205 yesterday and was tempted to post that GW DOES NOT have experience and I was going to mention that if elected Hillary would be the FIRST women. HARRY totally missed that “change” and that tells you alot about HARRY…gosh we have some psychic action going on here…you beat me to it…can’t believe it…kind of spooky.
PS I was also going to mention that GW spurred his anger and subsequent war with Iraq based on the fact that Hussein had a hit on his Daddy, he even made a statement to that effect.
——-
Yes, and then he sent other people’s children to fight a country that had nothing to do with 9/11. As Matt Damon said, he should have sent his daughters too.
Obama is a good speaker, but many say that he needs more time. He hasn’t been a senator for very long. He also hasn’t explained what changes he is talking about, what changes he plans to make.
“Yes, we can” what?
Hillary has a very important plan, her health plan. It didn’t work last time, but I hear that changes have been made, and some commentators say it’s now doable.
With 47 (?) million people with no health insurance, something has to be done for them. If it’s true what I heard on TV, apparently the health/pharmaceutical industry has already started courting her, probably expecting her to win in November.
Then Iowa happened……., but then New Hampshire happened…….
It’s many months till November! If the Democrats aren’t careful, the opponents will probably win the WH again!
217Orchid @ 01/12/2008 at 4:10 pm
“…and ignorant people are easily influenced, manipulated. That’s why I think if Barack is the candidate, the Republicans will try the same thing. Scare the ignorant masses. It worked 8 years ago!”
Moreover is it “scare the ignorant masses”…or give them false hope. Hope is cheap and easy, reality is not. Your must be a Dostoevski fan eg The Grand Inquisitor”…love that read.
I’m like’n you more and more.
re: 218 Orchid @ 01/12/2008 at 4:43 pm
“Hillary has a very important plan, her health plan. It didn’t work last time,…”
and the major hitch is no one individual in Washington (or any state government for that matter) at a level of power who can make “change” can do it alone. The check and balance system does work but manipulaters in this government have made it into “The Art of Politics, Lesson 101”.
re#220,
should read “manipulators in this government.”
Orchid,
re: 219
I meant Obama gives them false hope that he can “make everything right” and on the other side of that the Republicans will use Obama to not only “scare the masses” as you put it but subsequently to “give false hope of what they can do in turn.”
Ohhhhh…JEALOUSY is not becoming…
LOUD-MOUTHED HAG, Roseanne Barr is totally trailer park trash…
She’s one to call the kettle black, when she is supporting Hillary CLinton because she’s a woman…
First , let’s stop repeating this fake “35 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE”. She’s only been in the Senate for several years…
The only 35 years of experience Hillary Clinton has is tolerating her husband’s deviant behavior…
Finally, David Brooks stated that Karl Rove, George Bush and **** Cheney want Hillary to be President, even over the Repulican candidates because she will continue the Afghanistan/Iraq policies…
NO WAYYYYYY!
222
first and last post @ 01/12/2008 at 5:31 pm Orchid,
re: 219
I meant Obama gives them false hope that he can “make everything right” and on the other side of that the Republicans will use Obama to not only “scare the masses” as you put it but subsequently to “give false hope of what they can do in turn.”
——-
It’s great to be able to say and what you want when campaigning, and make promises you might not be able to keep. Once you’re sitting in that chair in the Oval Office, there are other things to consider.
223 No Vested Interest @ 01/12/2008 at 7:36 pm
…….
Finally, David Brooks stated that Karl Rove, George Bush and **** Cheney want Hillary to be President, even over the Repulican candidates because she will continue the Afghanistan/Iraq policies…
——-
People say a lot of things. Who knows what’s true.
No need to argue about experience. Hillary definitely has more experience than Obama.
Obama makes nice speeches, and John Kerry backs him over his running-mate, John Edwards, because Obama made that stirring speech during the 04 campaign.
224 Orchid @ 01/12/2008 at 10:14 pm 222
first and last post @ 01/12/2008 at 5:31 pm Orchid,
re: 219
I meant Obama gives them false hope that he can “make everything right” and on the other side of that the Republicans will use Obama to not only “scare the masses” as you put it but subsequently to “give false hope of what they can do in turn.”
——-
Candidates say so much when campaigning, and make promises they might not be able to keep. Once you’re sitting in that chair in the Oval Office, there are other things to consider.
I don’t believe the winner, whether Rep or Dem, would be able to pull out the troops immediately, which is what I’m guessing the majority of the people want. Do you know that the US maintains over 700 bases around the world? (heard it on CNN, I think).
Also, “better to fight them there than having to fight them here,” which I find rather arrogant. Apparently, people from other countries don’t matter!
Pages: « 1 … 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 … 21 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!