Jennifer Aniston is a Flower Girl
Sun, 13 January 2008 at 11:47 pm
These are the pictures I referred to in an earlier post from tonight.
Jennifer Aniston was seen shooting scenes with costar Aaron Eckhart near a Ford Falcon van parked at a Hyatt hotel in Vancouver, Canada on Sunday. Aniston’s character is a florist–hence all the flowers, gardening bag and pruning shears.
Eckhart plays a widower whose book about coping with loss turns him into a best-selling self-help guru. On a business trip to Seattle, he falls for a woman (Aniston) who attends one of his seminars, only to learn that he hasn’t yet truly confronted his wife’s passing.
35+ pictures inside of flower girl Jennifer Aniston…

Older
Angelina Jolie
Brad Pitt
Celebrity Babies
Jennifer Garner
Jennifer Aniston
Katie Holmes
Vanessa Hudgens
Us Weekly
401 Comments
wow PICS 19 THRU 21 LOOKS like major thinking of how to act in this scene…..Like rachel in 1997 or like rachel in 2001??
WHat should this Brain-surgeon do?
jennifer needs another hairstyle . is this the only style she has .. . maybe if she cut it and got it really wavy curly or something….even if its ugly at least its something different ( so boring jen)
She looks gorgeous!
jewel @ 01/14/2008 at 12:13 am #18
—————————————————–
Agree! Why doesnt she get a brain and do like some edgy tv. she cant make it in the movies and is ruining whatever career she could beat out of her set-up-by-publicist-marriage with Brad.
she needs to get over herself accept she is tv and stop wasting time in movies. U R NOT A MOVIE STAR,Chins!!!
Jen looks gorgeous as usual!
She needs a new, fresh look. She has had the same hair for a decade.
Yeah, I don’t know why she keeps that stupid old hairstyle either.
I bet all those nasty-*sses who are trashing Jen’s looks are sooooo beautiful themselves,huh? lmao…
Jen looks great, fresh and sexy. Doesn’t matter if you love her or hate her, she still looks good. Fleshy thighs? lolololololll But I agree about the hair, she needs a new style.
All you people who hate on Jen (and Brad & Angie for that matter) are just a bunch of nasty piece of works. Envious of these three people because they are what you are NOT. Beautiful, intelligent, sexy, and rich.
Jolie loses the GG and you post two Aniston threads?!?
Way to pour salt in the loonies wounds Jared.
lolololololol
atomic @ 01/14/2008 at 12:44 am Jolie loses the GG and you post two Aniston threads?!?
Way to pour salt in the loonies wounds Jared.
lolololololol
===========================
Jared does it on purpose becuase he knows the Loons will want someone to take their anger out on and that someone is always Aniston.
Don’t you know it’s her fault Jolie lost?
The old grey mare gained a LOT of weight. Flynet has a pic up of her backside and damn…you must hear beeps when she’s backing up. If you can’t see how much she’s gained you’re damn blind
is always Jennifer’s fault.
Oh yeah and she has fleshy arms there JenJen
Jennifer looks great!!
Just think. She was once Mrs. Bradley Pitt. Mrs. William Bradley Pitt.
Did she get cheekbone implants?
I think Jennifer looks lovely.
She has an average weight. Jeez. I bet you would all love it if you were famous and people called you fat.
OMG some of you people are insane! Jennifer is not fat by any means! I wish i looked as good as her and i am practically half her age!
Just think. She probably would have remained Mrs. William Bradley Pitt if she had given Brad the baby he was yearning for.
She looks like Valerie Bertinelli but of course no one goes on and on about her being gorgeous because well we all know why.
http://z.about.com/d/movies/1/0/O/h/P/ratatouilleprem37.jpg
BTW why no HQ close up???
I think it’s the make up, different shading can do wonders
you/me i can see you here surpporting your idol. just stop pretendingabout brad/angie You never get annoyed with people abusing them
here’s Valerie
http://www.cable360.net/images/articles/25079_1186771090.jpg
Here’s Jennifer
http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery/photos.php?yr=2008&mon=01&evt=aniston-flower&pic=jennifer-aniston-flower-girl-06.jpg
eLAINE @ 01/14/2008 at 12:47 am
————————————————-
I think these pictures are to neutralize (damage control) those Mexico bikini pictures. I’ve read many posts commenting her flashing her butt at her (not so young) age. Many were asking why she had to stage those photos knowing very well the paps were there. She probably wasnt thinking right.at that time.
Plastic surgery expert @ 01/14/2008 at 12:05 am It looks like someone’s tried to get high cheekbones via cheek bone implants. It’s pretty obvious when you look at pic # 4 (side profile). And don’t tell me it’s due to her weight gain as you can’t “gain” cheekbones!
___________________
This is the official debut of her new face in a movie isn’t it?
Restylane cheek implants, restylane mouth filler upper lip, sand blasting of her mouth lines (the Dustin Hoffman parenthesis bracket thing she had is now gone) and a much MUCH shorter schnoz (which doesn’t do her any favors as now there is even MORE space between her fat nose and upper lip). Man, her lips are so thin, Vince Vaughn probably had paper cuts around his ween.
Anyone who wants to be an actress should take my advice. Sometimes you have to sacrifice for a role, and take on the physicality of it - because Maniston is almost ALWAYS the celebrity tv sit-com hack known as ‘Rachel Green,’ in every single solitary craptastic movie she does - and hardly EVER a real actress, we always have the highlights and the orange tan, no matter what.
Chicago, dead of winter? Perma-tanned spray on body bling, and bleached blonde highlights.
Seattle where the sun shines hardly ever? Perma-tanned spray on body bling and bleached blonde highlights.
Siberian Prisoner of war? Doesn’t matter - Maniston has to work the same look she’s had for the last decade on TV: Perma-tanned spray on body bling and bleached blonde highlights.
All this shows is how little she invests in her audience, and in the movies she takes on. Looking ‘good,’ (whatever she perceives that to be), is more important than ACTING.
It’s why she’s spent about several hundred thousand reconstructing her face, building it up - shortening the nose we’ve seen her with for 15 years, and poofing out her face with restylane (the weight gain is less about the lack of male hormones that she’s no longer taking, and more about filling in her face to balance out the restylane implants that she has now - believe me)…
THAT is what’s important to her.
She’s the luckiest fakest, sorriest, waste of space celebrity who thinks she’s an actress who deserves to make movies, this side of Jessica Simpson.
Except Jessica Simpson is actually the better actress.
No, seriously. She is. That’s not saying much - because it’s not hard to get a one up on Maniston.
Wow, what a wide meaty face. Very hammy. Like a big side of pork her face is. ..and her in that thick belted sweater? Not a good look. Looks like a sausage in a skin. A linebacker. ..and yeah why does she go to mexico and get tan and get highlights knowing she’s gonna be shooting a movie Seattle? You get the feeling if they cast her in a period piece in London (it won’t ever happen, don’t worry) - she’d still be getting the spray on tan, and highlights around her low forehead. LOL
you guys need to get a life.
why do you need to say such horrible and nasty things about these people who you don’t even know?
i wonder what you say about your people you do know, your own friends.
oh.
and i wonder what they say about you.
She looks good–much better than without her clothes and her bottom in the air! I feel sorry for her–everyone rags on her, but she did lose the hottest man on earth–even if it was her fault!
Wow she beginning to age like Barbra Streisand…not good.
why is she wearing a short sleeved sweater with furry boots & scarves & stuff. A sweater belted? A long lanky model can only
pull this look off but of course Jen thinks she’s prettier then a model.
LOL….another Rachel role 13 yrs later.
I wonder if she’ll be doing these roles till 60?
can’t do much other acting…errr…pretending to act.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 … 14 » Show All
Share This Post:
Comment and Share!