Rachel Bilson: Red, White and Blue Bikini

Tue, 15 January 2008 at 2:32 pm

Rachel Bilson wants to wish everybody an early Independence Day with a sexy salute!

The former O.C. starlet is bringing July 4th early, donning a red, white and blue bikini for the February 2008 issue of GQ Magazine.

Rachel’s bikini bod hits newsstands next Tuesday, January 22.

HAPPY ID4!

Posted to: Bikini, Rachel Bilson
Related posts:

72 Comments

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

# 1

God @ 01/15/2008 at 2:32 pm

1st

# 2

vicki Pasadena, CA @ 01/15/2008 at 2:35 pm

I think they airbrushed her to death. She looks like a lollipop.

# 3

CG @ 01/15/2008 at 2:37 pm

3rd!

# 4

Vanessahudgensofficial69 @ 01/15/2008 at 2:37 pm

New pictures video http://hudgensboy.skyrock.com

# 5

j @ 01/15/2008 at 2:40 pm

her body is nasty,she looks 10 from the neck down

# 6

anahita @ 01/15/2008 at 2:40 pm

it is looking like another persons body with her face

# 7

Orange Clockwork @ 01/15/2008 at 2:42 pm

DISTURBING.

# 8

amber @ 01/15/2008 at 2:42 pm

Yeah, they went overboard with the airbrushing. She’s a naturally pretty girl, they didn’t have to do this.

# 9

duh @ 01/15/2008 at 2:44 pm

yuck not sexy at all

she looks like a kid

# 10

stefanie @ 01/15/2008 at 2:44 pm

I’m sorry, but there’s nothing sexy about that girl. Nothing.

# 11

stefanie @ 01/15/2008 at 2:44 pm

I’m sorry, but there’s nothing sexy about that girl. Nothing.

# 12

two buck chuck @ 01/15/2008 at 2:44 pm

Insta-girl crush. Just add Bilson.

# 13

Amy @ 01/15/2008 at 2:47 pm

She looked so much better in the first season of the OC, before she lost weight. Her body looks almost anorexic.

# 14

the_original_nika @ 01/15/2008 at 2:49 pm

shes beautiful, but thats one ugly and tacky cover IMO.

# 15

selita! @ 01/15/2008 at 2:52 pm

her legs look creepy

# 16

Ziggazigah @ 01/15/2008 at 2:54 pm

GQ how disappointing, slowly turning into FHM… that Hayden P photo shoot was terrible now Bilson is in next to nothing on the cover? Geeze… Whatever sells magazines I guess.

# 17

Natalie @ 01/15/2008 at 3:05 pm

Shes a cutie in “real life” pics but she does not look good here… idk its like they airbrushed her body so much and shes already very thin as it is. Would have been more flatttering and classy to cover her up more.

# 18

Mia @ 01/15/2008 at 3:08 pm

that ain’t a very complimentray picture her legs look funny and her upper body looks bigger

# 19

the shiznack @ 01/15/2008 at 3:09 pm

YACK

# 20

LOL @ 01/15/2008 at 3:17 pm

she looks pin-up to me… a pin up who doesnt do nudes lol

# 21

FRESHRAGGEDYANN @ 01/15/2008 at 3:30 pm

way cute

http://WWW.VEECE.COM

# 22

sammantha @ 01/15/2008 at 3:36 pm

her head looks to big for her body…….It just looks weird

# 23

dorian @ 01/15/2008 at 3:40 pm

This is an UGLY Cover probably the WORST of this year

# 24

Zoe @ 01/15/2008 at 3:46 pm

I don’t like this pic of her. Not sexy at all.

# 25

tessa @ 01/15/2008 at 3:48 pm

Rachel is beautiful

# 26

Emily @ 01/15/2008 at 3:51 pm

o gosh.. i so love rachel and she is beautiful.. but that pose/camera angle is horrible.. makes her look so gross.

# 27

quelle surprise ! @ 01/15/2008 at 3:58 pm

OMG. what were they thinking ? what was RB thinking? just how is this that much rifferent from going taking your clothes off for a movie.

could they not have put hayden on the cover like during SW ? i bet he must be so proud now !

# 28

[~F a m o u s~] @ 01/15/2008 at 3:59 pm

She looks disgusting.

Jared, because of you (and this photo) I threw up all over my sidekick. Thanks a lot =\

# 29

Soph @ 01/15/2008 at 3:59 pm

I thought she was classier than this! I’m really disappointed. This has got to be the most disgusting pic of her ever!!

# 30

TooSkinny @ 01/15/2008 at 4:01 pm

She could stand to gain some weight, thin is okat but not if you look that

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Comment and Share!