OlderTue, 15 January 2008 at 2:32 pm
Rachel Bilson: Red, White and Blue Bikini
Rachel Bilson wants to wish everybody an early Independence Day with a sexy salute!
The former O.C. starlet is bringing July 4th early, donning a red, white and blue bikini for the February 2008 issue of GQ Magazine.
Rachel’s bikini bod hits newsstands next Tuesday, January 22.
HAPPY ID4!
Share This Post:
72 Comments
1st
I think they airbrushed her to death. She looks like a lollipop.
3rd!
New pictures video http://hudgensboy.skyrock.com
her body is nasty,she looks 10 from the neck down
it is looking like another persons body with her face
DISTURBING.
Yeah, they went overboard with the airbrushing. She’s a naturally pretty girl, they didn’t have to do this.
yuck not sexy at all
she looks like a kid
I’m sorry, but there’s nothing sexy about that girl. Nothing.
I’m sorry, but there’s nothing sexy about that girl. Nothing.
Insta-girl crush. Just add Bilson.
She looked so much better in the first season of the OC, before she lost weight. Her body looks almost anorexic.
shes beautiful, but thats one ugly and tacky cover IMO.
her legs look creepy
GQ how disappointing, slowly turning into FHM… that Hayden P photo shoot was terrible now Bilson is in next to nothing on the cover? Geeze… Whatever sells magazines I guess.
Shes a cutie in “real life” pics but she does not look good here… idk its like they airbrushed her body so much and shes already very thin as it is. Would have been more flatttering and classy to cover her up more.
that ain’t a very complimentray picture her legs look funny and her upper body looks bigger
YACK
she looks pin-up to me… a pin up who doesnt do nudes lol
way cute
http://WWW.VEECE.COM
her head looks to big for her body…….It just looks weird
This is an UGLY Cover probably the WORST of this year
I don’t like this pic of her. Not sexy at all.
Rachel is beautiful
o gosh.. i so love rachel and she is beautiful.. but that pose/camera angle is horrible.. makes her look so gross.
OMG. what were they thinking ? what was RB thinking? just how is this that much rifferent from going taking your clothes off for a movie.
could they not have put hayden on the cover like during SW ? i bet he must be so proud now !
She looks disgusting.
Jared, because of you (and this photo) I threw up all over my sidekick. Thanks a lot =\
I thought she was classier than this! I’m really disappointed. This has got to be the most disgusting pic of her ever!!
She could stand to gain some weight, thin is okat but not if you look that
her body looks distorted, look at her right leg! I can’t believe this was published!
achh, well that looked forced..
Not Good.
Rachel is beautiful, but it certainly doesn’t show here.
Nice going GQ - this has been the first magazine shoot she has done in months and it is pretty horrible.
I’m not sure this is Rachel’s bikini bod. Her upper body isnt that much bigger than her bottom half!
On second look….it’s not THAT bad. Maybe the outfit was in poor choice? And the lighting maybe….
and she always looks so beautiful. how could they have messed someone like her up ?this is just bad, bad, bad
She’s trying to go for the pin up look! She likes wearing vintage clothes so, she is going for the pinup effect and yet she does not pose nude. LOL!
SMACK my head! Whoa!! What a concept??! What a f*cking DINGBAT! LOL! You can tell she had padded inserts in her bra. How silly is that? Silly girl!
UGLY! Her bowed legs are gross! She has a truly awful ’shape’ even though she is thin and her ribs are jutting with deformed misshaped, bowed legs. Her body reminds me of a worm! Just awful and WHAT a tacky photo! Also she is wearing so much make up she looks like a drag queen.
It looks like they ‘captured’ her head in Photoshop and made it bigger! LOL This girl is an ugly mutt!
I am so sick of magazines advertising disgustingly skinny girls all the time. Being that thin is NOT attractive! And everybody wonders why girls (and guys) have such body image issues. You want to help fight eating disorders? DON’T PUT THAT ON YOUR COVER!!!
One word: cheesy.
SHE looks AMAZING! She is naturally pretty and has a GREAT body!
I love that little bikini outfit!
Go Rachel!!!!♥♥♥
oh noooo… big disappointment… :(
she looks like she’s playing a kid or something and she looks like she ate a stick…….
Well at least she looks WAY BETTER than the disgusting naked Vanessa Hudgens pics:)
She really is an AMERICAN BEAUTY♥
44th!!! LOL
She’s adorable, although the pose in the picture makes her body look not quite right. Her legs look proportionally too short for her body, although we all know that she looks great normally. There were pictures online yesterday of her taken in a bikini and long skirt where she looked amazing. She has a tiny build, but doesn’t look anorexic AT ALL. Just because someone is little doesn’t mean they are sick. Not everyone is built the same way.
BTW, could the suit they put her in be any more tacky?
Man, she has a body of a 12 year old. It’s kind of perverse.
This is coming from the leprechaun who can’t act her way out of a paper bag to save her life and went to Playboy in skimpy clothes to say she won’t flash the flesh for films? And, then dissed Natalie Portman? Now this? Google her name and you’ll find a lot more pics like these of her and all the wa back during her O.C days. This twit is such a hypocrite. She’s actively going for the pin-up sex symbol status but says the opposite and says she wants to be taken seriously. Then admits she wants the celebrity right after saying she wants a career. Actions speak louder than words. Yeah, this is a way of getting it….for 15 minutes and being treated like a piece of meat at the grocery store (no offense to the boys. if the girls willingl do it, than they have every right to drool.)
Way tacky, and completely unflattering. What was she thinking? What was GQ thinking? I’ll be glad when Jumper hits theaters. Maybe all this nonsense will go away. Please go away.
This is a really bad picture. It looks like her head is on another person’s body. Didn’t anybody see the picture before it was published? I can’t believe people thought this looked like a good cover.
Do you really take what these people say in interviews seriously? Of course she wants the celebrity. Anyone who goes to Hollywood craves the fame that comes along with being lucky enough to get a role that gets watched. That doesn’t mean they can’t also want a career. It’s par for the course.
BTW, there is something to be said for leaving something to the imagination. Wearing a bikini or underwear on film is slightly different than dropping your drawers completely.
Too skinny. Visible ribs and an inability to fill put your bra is NOT sexy.
YUCK….Granted she has the body for a bikini but Give me Natalie Portman anyday
They did a poor job over at GQ. I cannot believe they published this, it’s not good at all. She must’ve pissed someone off there, this is the worst cover I’ve seen from them in a while. It’s a shame because she’s such a cute girl. Hopefully the pics in side look better. Although I really don’t like it when she trys to do the sexy posing thing, because she’s not sexy. She’s more on the cute/adorable/pretty side.
She’s a naturally gorgeous girl, why did they do this to her? Anyone who was involved with this cover needs to seriously reconsider their decisions. The lighting, the pose, the airbrushing, the outfit…ick
you people are CRUEL.
She’s a really pretty girl but that is an awful, tacky picture.
Waaahhhhahhahahaha - no matter how many sexy outfit/s this wannabe would try on, she’ll always look ill-fitted, like a creepy midget girl playing dress-up. And, those cankles will never go away, no matter how emaciated and gross her upper body gets - she just has a terrible figure. GO AWAY, - you are a pathetic, try-to-hard, fish out of water LOSER *****!
@ # 46 -
This is coming from the leprechaun who can’t act her way out of a paper bag to save her life and went to Playboy in skimpy clothes to say she won’t flash the flesh for films? And, then dissed Natalie Portman? Now this? Google her name and you’ll find a lot more pics like these of her and all the wa back during her O.C days. This twit is such a hypocrite. She’s actively going for the pin-up sex symbol status but says the opposite and says she wants to be taken seriously. Then admits she wants the celebrity right after saying she wants a career. Actions speak louder than words. Yeah, this is a way of getting it….for 15 minutes and being treated like a piece of meat at the grocery store (no offense to the boys. if the girls willingl do it, than they have every right to drool.)
——————————————————————————————–
VERY WELL SAID… RIGHT ON TO THAT!
omigod, she looks so terrible here!, she usually looks beautiful ,but i agree, she is more cute and adorable than sexy and this is just trying way too hard, She has lost ALOT of weight since the first season of The OC and you can see her ribs. She’s also very pasty, she used to be really tanned, She should NOT have done this photoshoot and i would be sueing if i were her lol. poor Rachel
“AGHHH,
REPUGNANCE!
REVULSION!
I’M DISGUSTED!,
MY EYES!, MY EYES, MY EYES! “
American Beauty my ass.
Try again.
This GQ coverage MAKES ME FEEL LIKE I SHOULD LOOK AWAY… SIC!
Mischa Barton’s body is lot more tolerable than this goblin!
What kind of BEGGING / BRIBING tactics that RB’s agent/publicist have to pull off just to have this WORTHLESS GQ coverage?! She got no stable career, makes no money nor even endorses anything not even tampons. She doesn’t even affect consumer spending - If anything she makes people NOT spend money. WAKE UP PEOPLE. Let’s focus on REALLY beautiful & talented individuals instead of this trolly wannabee!
She will as always be VERTICALLY & VISUALLY CHALLENGED! Thanks for this comedic piece for such downers today…
i love that girl, but it aint working. I dunno why, but sexy isnt working for her. http://arabaquarius.blogspot.com/
@# 60 - American Beauty my ass…
That was LMAO!
But she reminds me more of the movie, AMERICAN TAIL coz she looks like FIEVEL MOUSEKEWITZ here!
More like a pineup photo for the Smurf’s! LOL! She is what you call Smurf eye candy!
lolol. GQ the Smurfs edition.
All I can say is that this imp should quit on all her DELUSIONS and just STAY PUT all her photoshoots in the shopping malls, starbucks, pet stores, gas station, flea markets or to any place at LA as long there’s a good buy - believe me she looks much better standing there!
Best comment I read about this picture,
“She looks like a 12 year old photoshopped skeleton.”
@ Who Cares!
Yeah…..She is bikini trim! Who cares?! Natalie Portman would and should have had been shot on the cover with the famous Princess Leia bikini on. That would have generated more sales to GQ! That would have done a hell of a lot more justice then the patrotic salute. Excuse me. Rachel hands are weird looking to me. It seems like she can’t straiten them out?? Weird??? 8)
she looks like she’s forcing to smile…
UGLY
she looks 15 but she s 26
that’s ridiculous for her
i would be ashamed if i was her
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!