OlderTue, 15 January 2008 at 2:32 pm
Rachel Bilson: Red, White and Blue Bikini
Rachel Bilson wants to wish everybody an early Independence Day with a sexy salute!
The former O.C. starlet is bringing July 4th early, donning a red, white and blue bikini for the February 2008 issue of GQ Magazine.
Rachel’s bikini bod hits newsstands next Tuesday, January 22.
HAPPY ID4!
Share This Post:
72 Comments
o gosh.. i so love rachel and she is beautiful.. but that pose/camera angle is horrible.. makes her look so gross.
OMG. what were they thinking ? what was RB thinking? just how is this that much rifferent from going taking your clothes off for a movie.
could they not have put hayden on the cover like during SW ? i bet he must be so proud now !
She looks disgusting.
Jared, because of you (and this photo) I threw up all over my sidekick. Thanks a lot =\
I thought she was classier than this! I’m really disappointed. This has got to be the most disgusting pic of her ever!!
She could stand to gain some weight, thin is okat but not if you look that
her body looks distorted, look at her right leg! I can’t believe this was published!
achh, well that looked forced..
Not Good.
Rachel is beautiful, but it certainly doesn’t show here.
Nice going GQ - this has been the first magazine shoot she has done in months and it is pretty horrible.
I’m not sure this is Rachel’s bikini bod. Her upper body isnt that much bigger than her bottom half!
On second look….it’s not THAT bad. Maybe the outfit was in poor choice? And the lighting maybe….
and she always looks so beautiful. how could they have messed someone like her up ?this is just bad, bad, bad
She’s trying to go for the pin up look! She likes wearing vintage clothes so, she is going for the pinup effect and yet she does not pose nude. LOL!
SMACK my head! Whoa!! What a concept??! What a f*cking DINGBAT! LOL! You can tell she had padded inserts in her bra. How silly is that? Silly girl!
UGLY! Her bowed legs are gross! She has a truly awful ’shape’ even though she is thin and her ribs are jutting with deformed misshaped, bowed legs. Her body reminds me of a worm! Just awful and WHAT a tacky photo! Also she is wearing so much make up she looks like a drag queen.
It looks like they ‘captured’ her head in Photoshop and made it bigger! LOL This girl is an ugly mutt!
I am so sick of magazines advertising disgustingly skinny girls all the time. Being that thin is NOT attractive! And everybody wonders why girls (and guys) have such body image issues. You want to help fight eating disorders? DON’T PUT THAT ON YOUR COVER!!!
One word: cheesy.
SHE looks AMAZING! She is naturally pretty and has a GREAT body!
I love that little bikini outfit!
Go Rachel!!!!♥♥♥
oh noooo… big disappointment… :(
she looks like she’s playing a kid or something and she looks like she ate a stick…….
Well at least she looks WAY BETTER than the disgusting naked Vanessa Hudgens pics:)
She really is an AMERICAN BEAUTY♥
44th!!! LOL
She’s adorable, although the pose in the picture makes her body look not quite right. Her legs look proportionally too short for her body, although we all know that she looks great normally. There were pictures online yesterday of her taken in a bikini and long skirt where she looked amazing. She has a tiny build, but doesn’t look anorexic AT ALL. Just because someone is little doesn’t mean they are sick. Not everyone is built the same way.
BTW, could the suit they put her in be any more tacky?
Man, she has a body of a 12 year old. It’s kind of perverse.
This is coming from the leprechaun who can’t act her way out of a paper bag to save her life and went to Playboy in skimpy clothes to say she won’t flash the flesh for films? And, then dissed Natalie Portman? Now this? Google her name and you’ll find a lot more pics like these of her and all the wa back during her O.C days. This twit is such a hypocrite. She’s actively going for the pin-up sex symbol status but says the opposite and says she wants to be taken seriously. Then admits she wants the celebrity right after saying she wants a career. Actions speak louder than words. Yeah, this is a way of getting it….for 15 minutes and being treated like a piece of meat at the grocery store (no offense to the boys. if the girls willingl do it, than they have every right to drool.)
Way tacky, and completely unflattering. What was she thinking? What was GQ thinking? I’ll be glad when Jumper hits theaters. Maybe all this nonsense will go away. Please go away.
This is a really bad picture. It looks like her head is on another person’s body. Didn’t anybody see the picture before it was published? I can’t believe people thought this looked like a good cover.
Do you really take what these people say in interviews seriously? Of course she wants the celebrity. Anyone who goes to Hollywood craves the fame that comes along with being lucky enough to get a role that gets watched. That doesn’t mean they can’t also want a career. It’s par for the course.
BTW, there is something to be said for leaving something to the imagination. Wearing a bikini or underwear on film is slightly different than dropping your drawers completely.
Too skinny. Visible ribs and an inability to fill put your bra is NOT sexy.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!