OlderTue, 15 January 2008 at 2:32 pm
Rachel Bilson: Red, White and Blue Bikini
Rachel Bilson wants to wish everybody an early Independence Day with a sexy salute!
The former O.C. starlet is bringing July 4th early, donning a red, white and blue bikini for the February 2008 issue of GQ Magazine.
Rachel’s bikini bod hits newsstands next Tuesday, January 22.
HAPPY ID4!
Share This Post:
72 Comments
YUCK….Granted she has the body for a bikini but Give me Natalie Portman anyday
They did a poor job over at GQ. I cannot believe they published this, it’s not good at all. She must’ve pissed someone off there, this is the worst cover I’ve seen from them in a while. It’s a shame because she’s such a cute girl. Hopefully the pics in side look better. Although I really don’t like it when she trys to do the sexy posing thing, because she’s not sexy. She’s more on the cute/adorable/pretty side.
She’s a naturally gorgeous girl, why did they do this to her? Anyone who was involved with this cover needs to seriously reconsider their decisions. The lighting, the pose, the airbrushing, the outfit…ick
you people are CRUEL.
She’s a really pretty girl but that is an awful, tacky picture.
Waaahhhhahhahahaha - no matter how many sexy outfit/s this wannabe would try on, she’ll always look ill-fitted, like a creepy midget girl playing dress-up. And, those cankles will never go away, no matter how emaciated and gross her upper body gets - she just has a terrible figure. GO AWAY, - you are a pathetic, try-to-hard, fish out of water LOSER *****!
@ # 46 -
This is coming from the leprechaun who can’t act her way out of a paper bag to save her life and went to Playboy in skimpy clothes to say she won’t flash the flesh for films? And, then dissed Natalie Portman? Now this? Google her name and you’ll find a lot more pics like these of her and all the wa back during her O.C days. This twit is such a hypocrite. She’s actively going for the pin-up sex symbol status but says the opposite and says she wants to be taken seriously. Then admits she wants the celebrity right after saying she wants a career. Actions speak louder than words. Yeah, this is a way of getting it….for 15 minutes and being treated like a piece of meat at the grocery store (no offense to the boys. if the girls willingl do it, than they have every right to drool.)
——————————————————————————————–
VERY WELL SAID… RIGHT ON TO THAT!
omigod, she looks so terrible here!, she usually looks beautiful ,but i agree, she is more cute and adorable than sexy and this is just trying way too hard, She has lost ALOT of weight since the first season of The OC and you can see her ribs. She’s also very pasty, she used to be really tanned, She should NOT have done this photoshoot and i would be sueing if i were her lol. poor Rachel
“AGHHH,
REPUGNANCE!
REVULSION!
I’M DISGUSTED!,
MY EYES!, MY EYES, MY EYES! “
American Beauty my ass.
Try again.
This GQ coverage MAKES ME FEEL LIKE I SHOULD LOOK AWAY… SIC!
Mischa Barton’s body is lot more tolerable than this goblin!
What kind of BEGGING / BRIBING tactics that RB’s agent/publicist have to pull off just to have this WORTHLESS GQ coverage?! She got no stable career, makes no money nor even endorses anything not even tampons. She doesn’t even affect consumer spending - If anything she makes people NOT spend money. WAKE UP PEOPLE. Let’s focus on REALLY beautiful & talented individuals instead of this trolly wannabee!
She will as always be VERTICALLY & VISUALLY CHALLENGED! Thanks for this comedic piece for such downers today…
i love that girl, but it aint working. I dunno why, but sexy isnt working for her. http://arabaquarius.blogspot.com/
@# 60 - American Beauty my ass…
That was LMAO!
But she reminds me more of the movie, AMERICAN TAIL coz she looks like FIEVEL MOUSEKEWITZ here!
More like a pineup photo for the Smurf’s! LOL! She is what you call Smurf eye candy!
lolol. GQ the Smurfs edition.
All I can say is that this imp should quit on all her DELUSIONS and just STAY PUT all her photoshoots in the shopping malls, starbucks, pet stores, gas station, flea markets or to any place at LA as long there’s a good buy - believe me she looks much better standing there!
Best comment I read about this picture,
“She looks like a 12 year old photoshopped skeleton.”
@ Who Cares!
Yeah…..She is bikini trim! Who cares?! Natalie Portman would and should have had been shot on the cover with the famous Princess Leia bikini on. That would have generated more sales to GQ! That would have done a hell of a lot more justice then the patrotic salute. Excuse me. Rachel hands are weird looking to me. It seems like she can’t straiten them out?? Weird??? 8)
she looks like she’s forcing to smile…
UGLY
she looks 15 but she s 26
that’s ridiculous for her
i would be ashamed if i was her
Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!