Newer Newer
Older Older

Violet Affleck’s Walk in the Park

Sun, 27 January 2008 at 4:07 pm

Violet Affleck hit a Pacific Palisades park playground sans Hollywood power parents Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner on Saturday.

The 2-year-old cutie was watched over by her nanny. Maybe Ben and Jen went to do some more house hunting together?

10+ pictures inside of Violet Affleck’s walk in the park…
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-01
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-02
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-03
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-04
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-05
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-06
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-07
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-08
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-09
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-10
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-11
Violet-park violet-affleck-walk-in-the-park-12

Photos: Matei/JRI/Bauer-Griffin
Posted to: Ben Affleck, Celebrity Babies, Jennifer Garner, Violet Affleck
Related posts:

66 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All
# 61
afflicted affleck @ 01/28/2008 at 4:05 am

Violet is cuter and much more animated than suri or any other celeb baby I personaly love all of them but you have to be an idiot if you can’t see how freaking adorable and playful she is
I’ve seen all celeb babies she is always the one smiling (making faces like suri doesn’t meen it’s not cute but she is not shown smiling as often as V)
I saw the video (thanx #60) and she was smiling and very loving :)
Just goes to show that pics really don’t reflect reality…
cute cute cute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Report Abuse
# 62
I ment to afflicted affleck^^^ @ 01/28/2008 at 4:06 am

but oh well :P

Report Abuse
# 63
Jane @ 01/28/2008 at 4:44 am

I also believe it is inappropriate to show photos of Violet and her nanny. Violet is not a celebrity, but the overexposed child of famous parents.

The parents appear to be complicit in exposing her to positive paparazzi attention, but she is a child that should not be ’selling’ anything, including advertising space.

Report Abuse
# 64
why?? @ 01/28/2008 at 6:53 am

do you think that Jane ? if the parents want to go and do every day things with their child they should with or without the paparazzi there!
don’t you get it they are trying to give her some normalcy it’s those stupid agencies that need to get sued(I totally would have sued them)
and realize that the kids are not part of the package.
I hope these pics get to Jennifer and Ben’s hands I really don’t think they thought the paps will chase their daughter if they are not with her!

Report Abuse
# 65
*Sarah* @ 01/29/2008 at 7:22 am

Awww, Violet looks lovely :) she doesn’t look particularly happy here though. Perhaps it’s because she can sense that the nanny’s stressed by the intrusion. Or maybe it’s because she’s a normal kid who misses her mum when she’s not there.

Report Abuse
# 66
ella @ 01/30/2008 at 2:22 am

she is growing into a beauty ! ! !
those thoughtful looks! ! ! what a cutie!

ahhh, who cares about the ears . . . cutie all the way!

Report Abuse

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.