Jennifer Aniston Keeps Traveling and Traveling

#118

Why is it so important to you that a celebrity, who has no effect on your life, should tell you an intimate truth about themselves?. What are you lacking in your own development that requires a total stranger to justify themselves to you?. Why do you need her to admit that to you?. How does that improve your life?.

If she admitted that, would it make it easier for you to admit things about yourself?. Are you relying on a strangers’ actions to inform your own decisions?. Maybe you don’t want children and if a celeb admits it, then you feel it’s somehow okay that you don’t want them. Is that it?.

Obviously if she’s lying, you certainly don’t matter to her. Emotionally mature people don’t rely on the approval or disapproval of others. Here’s an original thought, maybe Aniston is unable to carry a pregnancy to full term. Maybe she and her ex, experienced miscarraiges. Maybe he left because he desperately wanted children and couldn’t stay because of that. So what.

Why is this personal info about an entertainer necessary for you to have peace. Just enjoy their talent, their private lives are theirs. If anyone seriously expects and needs a celeb or any public figure to divulge personal information to them, then, YOU have some mental issues.

You people who keep going on and on about these people; how much you hate them, you really need to ask yourselves why this hatred is necessary for you to get up in the morning. You need to search yourselves and your lives and identify where this hate comes from; how it’s affecting your daily life and, how you can find a release from it.

This level of hate and passing judgement on others, is absolutely unhealthy for YOU.

anon 123

What was Aniston trying to jusify by spreading her biz in Vanity Fair? If she and her friends had never done that , then I could agree with what you said. If your were speaking about Reese , my goodness even Jessica Simpson did not do what Aniston did. She is the one who felt the need to explain her pain and her biz to the public. I think she and her fans always seem to forget that. She is the one who has allowed the public to discuss what was said in the interview. Had she never done that interview, we would have nothing to discuss.

#122

I understand what you’re saying. Most movie roles don’t require an actor to completely change themselvels. I think roles that revolve around a specific period in time e.g., ancient, biblical, renaissance, french revolutionary, futuristic etc, etc, do require an actor to change their appeaance. This make the performance more real. I am able to suspend immediate reality and believe the characters being portrayed.

Aniston doesn’t do those kind of movies. Yes, she does romantic comedies. That’s her strong suit. Will she always continue to do those, who knows?. I adore Jim Carey, but he grew from slapstick tv, to comedy movies, to currently taking on dramatic roles.

Robin Williams’ career is one that has evolved. I’m not sure if all actors know from the start how they want their career to evolve, or, if some of them experience the evolution naturally over time.

I’m not equating Anistons’ talent on the level of Carey and Williams okay. Right now she may be very comfortable with the roles she chooses. Obviously, people keep writing roles like these, and, there will always be actors who want to play them.

I don’t know if there will come a time that Aniston will surprise us. I don’t know if she will feel a need to become an action hero; to play a evil character. She may not even know that herself.

What I am aware of is this. Studios are making money from her movies. Everyone in the entertainment industry has a bottom line, money. If she weren’t making money for others doing these rom-com movies, she wouldn’t be getting these parts. Sylvester Stallone made millions doing actions hero roles. They worked for him. When he tried to do comedy, it didn’t work.

Aniston may be on of those actors that best suit a certain type of role, because of her range of skills. She may one day decide to go behind the scenes and become a great director or producer. Who knows. I think acting is a profression that allows growth in many directions if the person is open to.

Even if Aniston is satisfied making only rom-coms, that’s her career choice. She is entitled to have the career she wants, as long as the public enjoys her choices. When they no longer do, then, she’ll have decisions to make.

I think the roles an actor chooses is based on their own comfort level. In life, we all evolve, some more rapidly than others. She may have a plan to do these for x amount of time and then branch out in another direction-other types of roles, who knows. An actors agents tries to get the roles their clients want. Right now this seems to be what she wants.

I’ll enjoy her career as I’ve enjoyed the career of others. I’ll continue to marvel at the choices an actor makes. I’ll be happy for them when they are able to surprise me.

I enjoy watching different styles of acting. I don’t think anyone should be judged based on another persons’ choices. This happens to be how I think about everything in life. To each his own, as long as they’re happy; action-hero, rom-com, suspence/thriller, horror, sexpot-whatever. There’s an audience for each type.

Read the synopsis. ~yawn~

Another Aniston movie I won’t be going to see.

So Yuliana, it’s wrong to have a lot of kids is it? Using one example to tarnish every other ‘cow’ with the same brush. And whats wrong with a man wanting children in a marriage? its a need that a lot of men have and it’s a completely natural need. The fact that Aniston didn’t want to meet that need or couldn’t, meant he went to someone who would. That speaks volumes about their relationship and obviously their bond wasn’t strong enough to get over the kid problem, otherwise they would still be together. Angelina seems to give Brad some peace which was lacking in his life before, so good for them. But in your pursuit to defend Aniston don’t go hating on people who want big families. There is nothing wrong with large families. I grew up with 5 siblings and 33 cousins and I had the best childhood I could ever hope for and never once felt neglected or ignored. Catholic families are usually large anyway so we were all used to getting in each others hair all the time. I can understand you wanting to defend Aniston but to criticise Angelina for having children is bloody madness.

I miss Jen thanks a lot for making a new thread about her , I love her so much and she looks beautiful and what with the haters

BWA HA HA HA HA HA!

SMOLDERING SEXUALITY?

Just see Derailed and you know she doesn’t have smoldering sexuality. Girl next door looks, and American Sweetheart (in the Meg Ryan mold) but never smoldering sexuality. They just don’t go together.

bet, when was she planning to have her baby as her next project, she had projects a plenty with Derailed, Rumor Has It, Friends with Money and The BreakUp after Friends was finished, and none of those projects had her as pregnant. So when was she planning to have the baby? Brad was already in his 40s, he didn’t plan on doing a Warren Beatty and have them in his 50s and 60s because he wanted to be an active father. Besides, they separated in 2005, she had plenty of time to get preggers in between their wedding in 2000 and their separation in 2005, but she never stopped smoking, never stopped working.

Oh well, if you want to believe she was planning to have babies and it was Brad who got impatient, have at it.

i find the haters so entertaining. coming up with their own theories about this celebrity based on their own translations of magazine interviews. i mean, wow, talk about credibility. and if there’s anybody who’s not over things and getting on with their lives, it’s the haters, they just can’t seem to let go.

UGLY!

Yoliana

Armpit always date famous women, only. It is becuase it is the only way that he knows to be on the front page.

Oh come on, bet, Brad and Angie met in 2004, and they both denied being involved back then.

So what happened to 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003? And in Friends, Rachel was even written in as pregnant to accommodate Aniston if she got pregnant, but did she ever? Nope.

Now, you say, so what is the different for jen to be pregnat while she was working , while your idol can be pregnant while she was working. No difference whatsoever, it is that Jennifer chose not to be pregnant, and Angelina chose to get pregnant. That’s it, bottom line.

Okay, gotta go get a root canal. Gotta be more fun than this!

Prue Halliewell

Bragnloonies since you guys are obessed about her prengnacy , let me give you what I am thinking that they were planning to have the baby when the freind ends, and he checked out and start banging someone else , is that can solve the problem about you guys obsesstion about her pregnancy loonies

I post about the work yourself bring up that Jen start working not to be preganant , i reply to you that working can not stop you from pregnant. Your idol himself checked out and start banging someonelse.

SPECULATION + HATE = BRANGELINA FREAKS

#20, your comment makes no sense! What are you trying to say?