Nicole Kidman: Baby Bump Where?

Five-months pregnant Nicole Kidman (in Prada) shows off her barely-there baby bump at a press conference for her latest film The Golden Compass at the Peninsula Tokyo on Wednesday in Tokyo, Japan.

“I have been to Tokyo quite a few times.” Nic told reporters at the press conference. “But this is the first time I have been to Tokyo pregnant. I am very glad to be here this way.”

Mrs. Keith Urban also told reporters why she chose to do this family-friendly field: “My Bella and Connor are 13 and 15. So they have seen the film and they loved it…my child inside won’t see the film for a long time. But I think once you have children you want to balance the work you do because they give up so much of you to your work. So occasionally you want to make films that they can take their friends to, they can go to the premiere of, that they celebrate.”

The Golden Compass opens in theaters in Japan on March 1. Domestically, the film has pulled in a healthy $70 million so far and abroad, has racked up a whopping $206 million. And counting!

Nic, 40, was joined on stage by director Chris Weitz and costar Dakota Blue Richards.

10+ pictures inside Nicole Kidman and her barely-there baby bump…

Kidman-barely nicole-kidman-baby-bump-where-01
Kidman-barely nicole-kidman-baby-bump-where-02
Kidman-barely nicole-kidman-baby-bump-where-03
Kidman-barely nicole-kidman-baby-bump-where-04
Kidman-barely nicole-kidman-baby-bump-where-05
Kidman-barely nicole-kidman-baby-bump-where-06
Kidman-barely nicole-kidman-baby-bump-where-07
Kidman-barely nicole-kidman-baby-bump-where-08
Kidman-barely nicole-kidman-baby-bump-where-09
Kidman-barely nicole-kidman-baby-bump-where-10

140 Comments

# 1

5 months pregnant? OMG! I look more pregnant than that after eating a bowl of pasta.

# 2

She actually DOESN’T have a baby bump! :o

# 3

I don’t like the dress at all but she’s stunning.
She’s a very tall woman and the baby bump is big after the 6-7th monto of pregnancy. Whatch Cate Blanchett, her baby bump is small and she’s almost 7 months pregnant!

# 4

she is absolutely stunning!
Amazing!!!

# 5

is she really pregnanat???

# 6

in the last pic it’s clear the bump, altough it’s small, but it doesn’t mean bad thigns because it’s small…

I love her look, black is great on her!

# 7

ohhh this woman is goreous! she is beautiful as ever!
Pregnancy is doing very well to her, because she shines and glows!
i’m very happy to her, can’t wait for sunday night to see her shine in red carpet!

# 8
candy boy @ 02/20/2008 at 8:08 am

she is a true fashion icon, the dress is not beautiful but she looks amazing wearing it! and her hair is very good also!
The bump is really small but that doesn’t mean anyhting and of course she is pregnant, stupid question!

# 9

I loved the film and i believe they will do the sequels because the films is doing great outside USA.
Dakot and Nicole look both so lovely!love them!

one word: GORGEOUS!

this woman is amazing beautiful! i’m so happy she is promoting GC in Japan, because with a box office success also in this asian country they will definetly make the other two movies! can’t wait for them!

she looks stunning. i love her hair and make- up. the dress is not pretty but it somehow looks good on her…sheer clothing are in so it shows that nicole does follows trends! those heels are cute eventhough they’re tiny, at least it shows that nicole’s trying to protect the baby…

the all look is perfect! black suits her a lot!
Love the hair and the dress, it’s different but Kidman as a weird fashion taste sometimes, which i love!

Why do I have a feeling that she’s lost the baby and she’s putting on a brave face? Anyway…they didn’t even need to photoshop her face on the poster behind her, because she was already botoxed out!

very true:”they’re tiny, at least it shows that nicole’s trying to protect the baby”.
when i see celebrities as Cate Blanchett or Halle Beryy or Jlo using high wells, i can’t belive myself!it’s not good for the baby!

Seriously, what do all these stars think when they try on these hideous dresses. “Oh this looks amazing!” Not! I hope she wears something nice for the Oscars.

the dress is great! i love it, true! it’s different and it’s true fashion icon.
I didn’t go to the premiere beacuse i have scholl but i would love to see in real life Nicole, she is such a great actress!

“But this is the first time I have been to Tokyo pregnant” “my child inside won’t see the film for a long time”

What a silly comments, don’t you think?

Maybe I should’ve read the article before I said that she might’ve lost her baby. Anyway, the only excuse I can think of is that she’s thin. Thin women usually have small baby bumps and I think another example is Victoria Beckham. Someone like Halle Berry or Kate Winslet have more fuller figures and therefore baby bumps would be more easier to detect.

It’s not only that she’s so tall that hides it, it’s also that she has very straight narrow hips so when you get pregnant it just makes you look even straighter b/c you fill out in the middle. She obviously is showing but she’s very thin, and hasn’t added any weight anywhere else (like hips or thighs) plus she works out like a feind.

Weird though how she couldn’t fly to Germany b/c she was “having a baby” (she said this in her taped piece for the Berlin Film festival) but can fly to Tokyo and then to LA for Oscars. Poor choice of words.

you know just because you are pregnant doesn’t mean you need to gain fifty pounds to fit the part. sheesh!

she really does sell herself well - toyko pregnant - when the baby is born she will inevitably complain about her lack of privacy - hypocritical

ClaireBabyGirl @ 02/20/2008 at 8:47 am

Seriously, those lips used to be beautiful…now they’re stretched like hell and it always looks like she’s struggling to move them!

whaddaya mean there’s no baby bump?..
It’s only been what? 3 or 4 months?..
jeezz..how much big do you want it to get all of the sudden?
it’ll show..
Nicole is always gorgeous…

she is perfect

Helena @ 02/20/2008 at 8:17 am

how dare this you to say botox when your fugly idol maniston had more surgery than nicole and please stop talking about miscarriage beside you should worry more about your barren fugly idol..

operaghost @ 02/20/2008 at 9:13 am

First babies take a while to show, but once you do get past that five month stage, you really pop quickly.

I am, of course, not counting any miscarriages she may have had, because it’s the last few months that really stretch out the core muscles, which is what makes second and third babies show so fast.

I think she’s terribly excited to be pregnant and to share her excitement with the world.

I also think she didn’t go to Berlin because she was too close to that iffy time where flying is not recommended. She’s past that now.

I can see a tiny hint of the baby bump, especially when she’s facing foward. She must have the kind of baby that catches the growth spurt during the last 2-3 months.

” naise @ 02/20/2008 at 9:08 am

Helena @ 02/20/2008 at 8:17 am

how dare this you to say botox when your fugly idol maniston had more surgery than nicole and please stop talking about miscarriage beside you should worry more about your barren fugly idol..”

Who said I was an Aniston fan? You sad, sad person.

I really can’t say much more damage - she just shite all over herself here! So why couldn’t she fly to Germany again?

Oh, and I forgot to mention, her face is Botoxed again thanks to a home visit from Dr. Hodgkinson! I wonder how this unborn child will turn out?

(sigh) nicole, you shouldn’t have gotten lip injections, see how prettier you look with natural lips (see poster of Golden Compass. Yeah, it’s photoshopped, but it looks more real than her own lips)

Seriously, what has this silly woman done to her face? Not only is she being selfish by having botox during pregnancy, but she also used to be beautiful during the 90’s!

A 24 hour flight to Germany is a lot taxing than a 8-9 hour flight to Tokyo from Sydney. Seems like a lot of dumbasses post on these boards.

How long is the flight from Tokyo to the US - whose the dumb ass now?

I really hope they continue with the two other movies, i loved it. hope it does well in japan
http://arabaquarius.blogspot.com/

[☆F a m o u s☆] @ 02/20/2008 at 10:00 am

of course you cant see a baby bump, she had the doctors botox her belly. duhhh!

Nicole looks gorgeous - I think she needs to keep a bit more pounds on her after birth as well - she looks more fresh with a bit of fat.

She looks beautiful as always. Still don’t agree that she’s botoxed, though. She might have had her lips done a bit, but they (who knows) but they look gorgeous. What is hilarious after reading these comments is that her lips and face look exactly the same in person and in the poster for the movie. I think some of you are grasping at straws trying to find flaws.

terrific choice! she is beautiful! i love always her choices.

people, please informe first: Nicole didn’t go to Berlin because the distance Berlin and Sidney is more than the double comparing to Sidney to Tokyo!!!
I think for a normal person it’s easy to understand why she didn’t go to Brelin and went to Tokyo!

She is glowing! and happy for sure! she is so excited with her first pregnacy that she can’t hide it!
I like her hair like this.
Hope she has a hit on Sunday!

she’s gorgeous. jared your titles have been stupid and insensitive lately. what’s up with that?

i alaways admire Nicole for her talent and beauty, past year i was a little bit worried because both things were geting wrong, but now i’m just proud of her again. She is making great fashion choises and i loved GC and Margot (which she definetly should be nominated for an oscar). I don’t understand many times so much hate people show here for her.i would really tlike to understand.
No matter what you say, she will always be the greatest, and i’m really sorry for some guys here, because you will not stand this!

so what if she’s had botox? it’s called maintenance people. and it’s her personal choice. i’m sure she’s had her lips done although i must say that they haven’t looked this good in a while. anyone know who her doctor is?

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 10:23 am

For all those thinking the dress is gorgeous and she looks great in it, give me a break. If you saw a “regular” person walking around in that THING you’d laugh your asses off and you know it. Please. It’s the most horrible looking thing I’ve ever seen. As for her flying, I guess the flight to Tokyo is alright to take. Not concerned about radiation anymore is she. Don’t go telling me the flight to Tokyo is shorter than to the U.S. That’s an excuse. Let’s add up all the miles she will have charted with this pregnancy at the end and see how many of them were for her husband and his career. How many will be for her career: the oscars, movie premiers, photo shoots, etc. It’s a bunch of bull and it’s funny some people don’t see it.

mossy - do you have a brain? It is a known fact that Botox causes birth defects in pregnant lab animals. You are injecting a bacteria into the body - do you seriously believe that is good for an embryo/fetus?

Not the fan of the dress, but she’s extremely beautiful and gorgeous in everything even the most daring one! Real fashion icon.. Can’t wait to see her choice for the Oscar. . .
I am sure she will do everything to keep her unborn child safe, so everything ’bout botox like what people talking about it’s just completely SILLY !! luv nicole always. . . =>

dear Keith’s amanda :

do not forget Nicole is not a ” regular person” as you said, and she is not walking around!she is in a premiere! big difference.

and than if you dislike the dress you have all the right to say it, but please respect others opinion….

Mediterranean @ 02/20/2008 at 10:39 am

She has never said her due date. She only confirmed her pregnancy. She is less than 5 months, at least she looks like one to me.

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 10:39 am

I realize she’s not a “regular” person, and that’s why I said that. Notice I said IF she was a regular person wearing this. If she was a regular person and you went to a function where you saw her/someone wearing this, would you like it? I wouldn’t. Either way, it’s the most horrible looking dress I’ve ever seen.

#20- “Weird though how she couldn’t fly to Germany b/c she was “having a baby” (she said this in her taped piece for the Berlin Film festival) but can fly to Tokyo and then to LA for Oscars.”

Going to Berlin from Sydney would mean almost 20+ hours of flight time! That’s a lot of flying.

Going to Tokyo takes about half that time, definitely less of a strain! She can then rest up overnight before heading to LA, which is slightly under 10 hours fromTokyo.

Wow, the Keith crazies must be missing some serious brain cells. If you’re not such dumb asses, why don’t you look it up. Whichever way you look at it ,the flight from Sydney to LA or Tokyo is less than half the time to Berlin. Seeing that she had this travel schedule lined up due to professional committments, it was wise of her not to subject herself to unnecessary travel and remain in Sydney.

is really necessary all this discussion about going to Tokyo and not to Berlin?please everyone who has a brain can understand why and many people already explained!
gosh some people make me wondering if intelegence is really for everyone!

gerry the question here is not about intelegence.everyone here understands very well why Nic didn’t go to Berlin film festival. they are just so envy and immature that they want to critize her for anyhting!
that is the real reason!

she looks divine here.and happy and that’s the most important thing to me as a huge fan of hres!

The point is - she can’t fly from Oz to Germany for a charity event that really didn’t get much recognition, but she can fly from Oz to the US to be a presenter at the Oscars!

Yes, who cares about Tokyo vs. Berlin? Did someone get their feelings hurt or something? The woman has suffered multiple miscarriages in the past and, I’m sorry, but I think that gives her the right to make decisions about her lifestyle that put her at baby at the least amount of risk. I also think that carries over to whether or not she uses Botox. I have never thought she uses it and being pregnant and still having gorgeous skin like she’s had forever makes me believe she hasn’t even more. It’s common sense. She wouldn’t do anything to harm this pregnancy.

If I was her, I’d bítch slap the surgeon!

Mediterranean: Nicole’s parents said the baby is due to born in July, so the five mounths!

again really (nr 55), do you know the distance between Sidney and USA?
i don’t think so….

not the bigeest fan of the outfitt but her face and hair are perfect! she is looking so beautiful in last appearences….

that’s true samantha. JJ site is full of envy unhappily!

No apparently intelligence is not required to post , nor is being able to spell 53 or having discerning vision (all you who think she hasn’t had botox or at least is addicted to face freezing skin cream like Freeze 24/7
No one gets less wrinkles w/age and fuller lips!)

and calling someone a “hater” because they speak or want the truth or don’t like someone is so juvenile. As is thinking b/c someone doesn’t like someone they must be jealous. Ridiculous!

betty - what are you saying - she’s not coming to the US? Sorry, it has been confirmed that she is a presenter at the Oscars!

i’m the biggest fan of her dress! it’s pure fashion people! ok, it’s different from what we used to see in Hollywood, but that’s what make me think Nicole and Cate are so unique in terms of style! they are not boring and always the same and Angie or Aniston or Bullock, they like to take risks!

LOVE her EYES!!!!!

SO glad the Botox has worn off, she looks like the old Nicole. Lovely!

No more evil Botox brow arch.

really, do you know to read? i don’t think so….
i know she will go to the oscars, i only asked you if you know the distance between USA and Sidney?

she looks radiant! i’m so happy for her! and i love Golden Compass, she was perfect as Mrs Coulter! i want the rest of the story!please do the sequels!

kEITH&nICOLE_fAN @ 02/20/2008 at 11:16 am

Thank you, PJ and Betty! I absolutely agree with you that traveling to Tokyo then on to LA is much less taxing than for her to fly to Berlin.

Keith’s Amanda and Really: please check some online websites for flight times before you embarass yourselves further with your stupidity. Just for your info:

Sydney to Berlin: almost 24 hours of flight time
Sydney to Tokyo: about 11 to 12 hours
Tokyo to LA: under 10 hours
Sydney to LA: about 13.5 hours

All you NK haters should consider a few things:
- Nicole may have already lined up to attend this Tokyo premiere before she knew she was pregnant. That’s part of her contractual obligation to help promote the film and she had committed to do it. Having done that, she can’t take any more ADDITIONAL flying to go to Berlin.

- Isn’t it just possible that she may have wanted to go to Berlin for the Cinema for Peace, but the organizers told her that video-conferencing will be okay too in deference to her pregnant state. Nicole and Unifem are to be applauded for taking advantage of technology to enable her to “be there” without having her make a 24-hr trip one way to deliver a speech that’s less than 30 minutes!

She is absolutely stunning

this is her first pregnancy, so it takes forever to pop - with my first, I was around 20 weeks (5 months) before I popped - so that fact, combined with her height & fitness (she’s probably has abs of steel) keep her looking less pregnant than she is…

I’m soooo glad to Nicole’s come to Japan!! Because I’m Japanese.And Thank you for Nicole, because she is pregnant. I’m avery very big fan of her and I wanna see her!! IAlways LOVE YOU NIC!! PLEASE have a great moment with Keith in Japan!

She is gorgeous

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 11:26 am

#55 Really, this is exactly right!

You guys are making excuses that the trip to Tokyo is a lot shorter than to the U.S. from Australia. BUT you are missing the big point. She IS flying to the U.S. for the Oscars now. And I don’t care if it’s starting from Japan! In order to get to Japan she had to fly those 9 hours from Oz!! Now she will fly from Japan to U.S. soil. It will EQUAL THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME IN THE AIR! That’s what you guys are missing! In the end, she will have been exposed to the same amount of flying time and radiation she was so scared of!!! Do you see this now??? Cut it in half, I don’t care, she’s still doing the thing she said she was afraid of, which is flying/radiation. And why? Because it’s for HER! Her movie, her Oscars! Not the Grammys which would have supported her husband. Not Germany which would have supported the charity she is supposedly fond of.

Look what you just posted!

Sydney to Tokyo: about 11 to 12 hours
Tokyo to LA: under 10 hours
Sydney to LA: about 13.5 hours

So she’ll end up flying 22 hours for her little side trip to Tokyo - instead of flying direct to LA 13.5 hours. So she risked the health of her baby on that “radiation” flight by adding another 8.5 hours of flight time!

Your point is pointless!

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 11:31 am

#68 Don’t tell me not to embarras myself anymore. Please don’t embarrass yourself anymore with those flight times. In the end she will have traveled the same amount of time/radiation, which is what she was afraid of supposedly, to get from Tokyo to the U. S. The same amount in the end had she gone straight from Oz to the U.S. Also, she flies her own private jet, so let’s not talk about comfort. She has every comfort and luxury on her private jet, so it won’t be taxing on her. Don’t give me the time change difference either, because Keith flies back and forth thru this time difference every two weeks. And don’t tell me she’s pregnant so it’s more taxing. It’s taxing to do the chopped up flights/time changes too. There are no excuses.

Keith&Nicole_Fan @ 02/20/2008 at 11:35 am

eeek… I don’t know why this site messed up my screen name in the previous post.

Keith’s Amanda and Really:
- why all the preoccupation with Nicole’s travel plans? Did you ever question why Cate Blanchett, for example, was flying all over the world attending film festivals, photoshoots and movie premieres while pregnant, but not doing a single charity event?

- Just for the record, Nicole DID show her support for Cinema for Peace and Unifem by making herself available for the videoconference. She DELIVERED the key message to all the attendees. I’m happy that they made good use of videoconferencing. In the business world, especially with larger corporations, this is very common. It cuts down on travel time and expenses!

Keith&Nicole_Fan - why isn’t she doing a video conference for the Oscars then?

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 11:41 am

#76 The only reason there is concern over it is because SHE MADE THE CONCERN OVER IT! By getting her face on the VIDEO FOR GERMANY AND SAYING SHE COULDN’T BE THERE BECAUSE SHE IS PREGNANT. And because of those retarded articles saying she can’t fly because of the concern over radiation! She made it a big deal.

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 11:46 am

Know what? Let’s get back to her comments. “My child inside”?? What a way to make the difference between your adopted kids and the one you are carrying Nicole. If I were her kids, I’d be pissed at all the adoption/natural child comments.

Jesus, people. Who cares?? She makes decisions for the same PERSONAL reasons you or I would.

Keith&Nicole_Fan @ 02/20/2008 at 11:49 am

Keith’s Amanda and Really:

Can you even read? I said:
- Nicole may have already lined up to attend this Tokyo premiere before she knew she was pregnant. That’s part of her contractual obligation to help promote the film and she had committed to do it. Having done that, she can’t take any more ADDITIONAL flying to go to Berlin.

Nicole routinely flies to LA without you folks even knowing it. Her children are there and she DOES visits them. Tom Cruise even mentioned she was in town shortly before the holidays, in an interview he gave to OK! magazine.

So what if she attends the Oscars? She should be there as this is the 80th anniv and the organizers may have invited all the past winners, of which Nicole is one. Whether you choose to admit it or not, Nicole remains one of the top A-listers and is heavily sought after by the Oscar organizers to be a presenter. Up until a week or two ago, the Oscar show was still very iffy because of the writers’ strike. Now that’s settled, it’s great for Nicole to show her support for the Oscar show by agreeing to be a presenter.

Now you’re just reading way too much into things. This post has gotten ridiculous.

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 11:51 am

I’m not saying she shouldn’t go to the Oscars. But it sure would have been nice to see her husband at the Grammys!

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 12:03 pm

Oh and another thing Keith&NicoleFan. This is your line: She should be there as this is the 80th anniv and the organizers may have invited all the past winners, of which Nicole is one. The same thing has been said about Keith and the Grammys. It was the 50th anniversary if I’m not mistaken and he should have been there, just like Nicole should be at the 80th Oscars ceremony. Instead, he was watching her walk around in the dust taking pictures in an ugly blue dress.

They put her picture on the article last week about BOTOX being deadly and harmful to some individuals and to pregnant women and the fetus. She had just said that she would stop dying her hair and getting botox. DUH She’d already dyed her hair and had BOTOX before she knew she was pregnant as is the shame with most harmful substances in a pregnancy. You have already done what you do for a month or more by the time you find out you are pregnant. Ideally a person should clean themselves up and they start trying to have a baby.
She’s so overrated and plays the high and mighty for all her worth. No wonder Tom divorced her, inspite of her affair while married to him.

Keith&Nicole_Fan , please don’t loose time with some stupid people.they are too stupid or they don’t want to understand.please leave them away with all their hate and envy!

Keith&Nicole_Fan @ 02/20/2008 at 12:17 pm

#84 - Amanda:

Keith was exactly where he wanted to be on Grammy’s night! It’s no one else’s business why he chose not to attend the Grammys.

Just for the record … Nicole was invited to be a presenter at the Oscars. Keith was NOT a presenter at the Grammys, nor a performer. BIG DIFFERENCE!!

JJ give me the pleasure to first time post here and give my personal experience in this Japonese premiere of Golden Compass.
I live in Tokyo and as big fan of the books and Nicole Kidman i decided to go.I couldn’t loose this chance and great i did it.
It was so wonderful and i had an amazing experience! Many people were there (maybe too much i would say) and we all have a great time.

My experience with Miss Kidman now: she is gorgeous, beautiful, charming, stunning,….i have no words….i always admire her but after this i’m totally devoted to her. She was so kind and sweet to everyone, always smiling and thanking to everyone….
She is so tall and thin, people were very admire because she is really tall for a woman. I have to say she is the most beautiful creature i ever seen in my whole life! and her tinny bump was there, I SAW IT!!!!!
Dakota and Nicole seem to like a lot each other and they shared a lot of secrets.lol

To end: i just want to thank to Miss Kidman for beaing such a nice lady, for giving me the chance to come true one of my biggest dreams, wich was, see her in real person.

That dress is beautiful. I can clearly see her baby belly. The dress is a trompe loiel (fool the eye). The designs of the dressmake you look at the designs but not the bump. she is CLARLY pregnant in that first picture. below the lace ares is wear she’s bulging. She’s carryihng her baby low not high. that’s why you can’t see to well. I can!

Wow! She’s just glowing with happiness.

oh Min you’re such a lucky person! i would die to had one day the chance to meet Nicole in person!

thats the worst dress I ever seen

“Just for the record … Nicole was invited to be a presenter at the Oscars. Keith was NOT a presenter at the Grammys, nor a performer. BIG DIFFERENCE!!”

Oh my God - he was nominated and won you idiot! Is Kidman nominated for an Oscar - no - she never will be again!

I meant she is CLEARLY pregnant!

Nicole is beautiful and happy. I wish her and Keith the best always.

# 87 Keith&Nicole_Fan @ 02/20/2008 at 12:45 pm

#93 Really, really idiot -

Many nominees chose not to attend. Keith is no different. Are you implying Keith knew beforehand that he was going to win and should have gone???

Once again, Nicole was invited to be a presenter at the Oscars. Keith was not scheduled to be a presenter nor performer at the Grammys. He chose not to attend. If you really have an issue with that, write his management and lodge a complaint. Don’t blame it on Nicole.

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 12:48 pm

For the record, Keith was nominated for the grammy and won. Nicole is not nominated. No wonder really, with so many great movies to nominate her for: The Invasion and Margot at the Wedding. LOL I don’t know what his personal reason was for not being there, but I hope it wasn’t to follow her around her photo shoot.

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 12:52 pm

Has anybody else flung names around except for you Keith&Nicole_Fan? You keep calling people idiots and stupid. All we’ve done is call Nicole ridiculous in that dress and point out how she is still traveling around when she was quoted last week as saying she won’t do it for fear of her pregnancy. The name calling is unnecessary.

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 12:56 pm

And don’t come back saying Really called you an idiot first. I read the post where you first said to me about “stupidity”.

So being nominated for an award means nothing, but presenting an award is everything? Interesting concept, so it should be a bigger night for Miley Cyrus than any of the women nominated for actress of the year?

That has got to be the most hideous thing I have ever seen her wear. Where are Stacy and Clinton, from TLC’s What Not To Wear, when you need them???

http://www.umyths.blogspot.com
http://www.nicolekidmansforehead.com

I hope she wears a nicer dress to the oscars I wonder if shorty will walk the red carpet with her

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 1:06 pm

Shorty. LMAO that’s hysterical

She is not 5 months pregnant because she is due in july.

#87 There is a big difference. Keith was nominated and WON his Grammy!!!! When was the last time Nicole won an award for her acting? Keith should have been there to get his award, instead he thumb his nose at the Grammy’s. He had to hold NK’s hand at the photo shoot. Keith’s career is getting so bad that he has to tour with Carrie to fill the seats in the arena’s.

#87 said:
Once again, Nicole was invited to be a presenter at the Oscars. Keith was not scheduled to be a presenter nor performer at the Grammys. He chose not to attend. If you really have an issue with that, write his management and lodge a complaint. Don’t blame it on Nicole.
~~~~~~~~~~

So how do YOU know Keith wasn’t invited to present at the Grammy awards? How do you know he wasn’t invited to perform?

You are disregarding what is clearly evident from the video of him at her photo shoot. He gave up the Grammy night so he could be her lapdog and lick at her nasty toes.

She is a vile woman. Selfish and she dresses funny. You have outdone yourself Nicole. This dress is a new level of ugliness. And you look even more unattractive pregnant.

Poor Keith.

SHE IS A GREAT ACTREESS AND GOOD FASHION ICON, SHE IS SO CLASSY AND ELEGANT MUCH MUCH BETTER THAN KATIE H. SHE’S NEVER DEPEND TO ANYBODY EVEN TO “TC”.
BUT I HOPE SHE PUT CURLY HAIR AGAIN. SO SEXY FOR HER.

You can she a small baby bump in the last pic. When my friend who is real small framed was pregos you could not tell she was prego until her 6th or 7th month. Ms. Urban :-) looks like she’s carrying low, may be a little Keith JR.

pr person @ 02/20/2008 at 1:59 pm

Keith’s amanda… don’t play the victim… if you have a problem with someone calling you and really, out on your “stupidity” … then move on. You both aren’t on here only stating that Nicole’s dress is ridiculous, or talking about her traveling. You are also whining about how her husband stayed in Australia during the Grammy’s. You also brought up her children and made a comment regarding the adoption/natural issue. So there is more to it than your “all we’ve done….” comment.

Keith&Nicole_Fan @ 02/20/2008 at 2:02 pm

Amanda and Really,

Bottomline, it’s Keith’s personal choice where and how he chose to spend Grammy night. Stop blaming Nicole for him not showing up at the Grammy’s.

what’s your point keith’s amanda? you’re only his in your mind, but actually there is only one woman who belongs to him in real life I mean his wife namely Nic aka Keith’s Nicole and not you. keith might have won a grammy, but Nicole’s got the Academy Award and thousands of prestigious awards, she’s one of the greatest actresses of whole time, and in case you don’t know people didn’t really know about who Keith Urban was until he married her.

Nicole said in an interview recently that she doesn’t tell Keith what to do and he doesn’t tell her what to do. Keith did NOT attend the Grammys in 2007 either and he was nominated! He didn’t win so nobody really noticed or cared where he was. It was obviously his choice not to go last year. Bottom line is Nobody knows what goes on in anybody elses marriage so you haters should just mind your own business. Maybe Keith didn’t think he would win like last year so “HE” decided not to go. Keith loves his wife and chose to stay with her over an award. I know you haters can’t understand that. Obviously nobody in your lives would do that for you. Don’t be jealous.

Bethlehem @ 02/20/2008 at 2:29 pm

I love Nicole so much, I love TGC , she´s so beautiful, so sweet, so cute, I don´t know why some people only see bad things, I love Nicole and if u don´t like her why waste time in this page talking about her?

If ya’ll think Keith’s amanda and I are so terrible, why don’t you take a peek at what other people think of your Queen? The two of us aren’t so bad after all! Not too many people can stand her outside of NKU Land!

http://www.dlisted.com/node/23834#comments

Raise your hand if you still think Kidman is classy. Once AGAIN, she wears a see-through dress. Don’t tell me you don’t see the black underwear AGAIN!

http://www.splashnewsonline.com/2008/02/20/nicole-kidman-premieres-the-golden-compass/

Wow, between REally and Keith’s Amanda, this thread has become really childish.
Keith and Nicole appear to be really in love. All that matters is what they feel for each other and the people they care about who genuinely love and care for them. I love Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman separately and together, but think it is really sad that their fanatical fans seem to know what is best for either both or each individually. If a fan really loves Keith then they will respect his choice of a mate, wife, friend, lover: Nicole and vice versa.

She is so beautiful and happy.

She looks so good. She’s glowing! And I a little belly there!

My mom is 4′11 and she was VERY thin..so when she was pregnant with me she didn’t start showing until she was 6 or 7 months. My family members kept asking where I was. =)

yes, the black undrear was a nice touch.

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 4:02 pm

Oh that was good Lennie. I’m his in his mind?? LMFAO Why? Because of my board name?? If you only knew.

Keith's amanda @ 02/20/2008 at 4:20 pm

By the way, don’t misinterpret my post above. I don’t think or wish I was his. LMFAO That’s too funny. Apparently, you don’t know Amanda.

Nicole is glowing with her pregnancy. She’s a stunningly beautiful woman anyway. Tall women do not show early…I’m 5′8″ and weighed 110 lbs. at the beginning of each of my 4 pregnancies. I didn’t have to wear maternity clothing until my 7th month….my babies were average weight & length–7 lbs., 20″. When you’re tall and thin you have so much more room for the baby to spread out.

shoes4life @ 02/20/2008 at 4:46 pm

I had a friend who hardly showed at all and then when she got to her 8th month into her pregnancy it was like overnight she was huge! Some women barely show until late into their pregnancy. I use to tease my friend and ask her if she was sure she’s pregnant because literally she could still wear some of her loose fitting clothes and only went into full pregnancy clothing in her 8th month.

shoes4life @ 02/20/2008 at 4:46 pm

I had a friend who hardly showed at all and then when she got to her 8th month into her pregnancy it was like overnight she was huge! Some women barely show until late into their pregnancy. I use to tease my friend and ask her if she was sure she’s pregnant because literally she could still wear some of her loose fitting clothes and only went into full pregnancy clothing in her 8th month.

Nicole and Keith are so excited about this baby. I can see Nicole just loves to