Top Stories

Rush Limbaugh Praises Angelina Jolie

Rush Limbaugh Praises Angelina Jolie

Republican bullhorn Rush Limbaugh praised Angelina Jolie yesterday on his radio show, saying she makes more sense than the Democrats when it comes down to the issue of Iraq.

Here’s what Rush, 57, had to say about Angie:

“Everybody today is raving about a piece in the Washington Post by Angelina Jolie in which she just got back from Iraq. She says, ‘We have finally reached a point where humanitarian assistance, from us and others, can have an impact.’ Her point is to stay, help the Iraqis, especially those who are out of the country, want to come back home, the time is right now, and that the surge is working. Now, if you read the piece by Angelina Jolie today in the Washington Post, you will conclude that she is deeper and in ways more specific than Obama about this if you read the whole article. She makes more sense than Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama or anybody on the Democrat side about this. It’s stunning. I’ve had some people, ‘Rush, you realize, she didn’t write it.’ I don’t know that she didn’t write it. I’m not going to assume she didn’t write it… That’s another thing, that’s a good point, too, it’s pretty brave of her to do this, given Hollywood and so forth. But she’s big enough to withstand it, and it sort of makes me appreciate this Brad Pitt guy a little more. He’s gone after substance here, is all I’m saying. This really is a good piece.”

To read Rush’s whole schpeel, click on over to RushLimbaugh.com.

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Jennifer Garner's alleged stalker is arrested - PopEater
  • Heidi Klum and her kids go to the mall - PopSugar
  • The Jersey Shore gang rocks out - Celebuzz
  • Nicole Kidman doesn't care to talk Scientology - Dlisted
  • Celebs come out for Vanessa Hudgens' party - JustJaredJr
  • A CSI: Miami star is arrested - TheSuperficial
  • Penelope Cruz & Javier Bardem visit NYC - LaineyGossip
Rachel Worth/WENN

1,534 Comments

Pages: « 17 8 9 [10] 11 12 1362 » Show All

This thread is so useless…..let’s just all agree with one thing about what was said…..our Angie is MAGNIFICENT!!! She’s a very intelligent woman, and will act on what she is committed to.

I am a Republican, but, gosh..politics really has no place on this thread….we can all argue back and forth about who is the better party..

All I am interested in is how our Angie appeal to all sides….nothing more……! She is a woman to be admired, and appreciated for the amazing work she is doing as a humanitarian. On top of that…a great partner and mother…..!

GOD….STOP THIS CRAZY madness……..!

Those who oppose anything that has to do with Angie, will always waste their time spewing their hatred….such idiots…if they hated her so much…why come here?! If I don’t care to read about a certain celebrity, I don’t bother going in their thread.

thelookoflove1365 @ 03/01/2008 at 4:44 am

#199 and #200 Yes,RL most certainly implied ever so slightly that his xs’ were not women of substance, otherwise why even bother bringing Brad’s name into the mix. I don’t recall any of the x interview both print and tv to be compelling or interesting at all.

Oh, if you want some scholars to write this article so the world will listen and pay attention ,you’re delusional. The world is paying attention and reading angies article, and that’s exactly was her purpose-to bring attention to the problem. What is the point of authoring high minded op/ed piece that no one will read much less understand? It is not dumbing down the message, it’s called knowing your audience. Angies fan base comes from different background, so the message was tailored so everyone can understand it including the high minded people-it got your attention, didn’t it?,

Look, even with this simple but well written article, the haters are already having comprehension problems, can you imagine if Angie throws in pies (not food) chart, graphs, Iraq’s gdp, per capita income, pollution number, ratios, ect, ect. Got my drift? NO? Oh well!

see, here’s the thing - if they really just wanted to APPEAR concerned and like they are doing something, they could have just had her show up with cameras and then schlubbed her off on some mid-level military and political officials. That’s all they would have had to do. But instead she was invited to meet with General Petraus and the leader of Iraq, and sit in on some of the meetings.
———————————————————————————————–

Um, no they couldn’t of. If a star like Angelina is sent to these places they have to make it credible. If they pawn her off on hangers on then it’s clear they can’t even be bothered faking interest in Iraqi refugees and that this is 100% about a bit good press and a lot if deflection. If she speaks to the highest on the food chain then a little of their credibility rubs off on her and when reporters ask what’s been done in a few months they have the records to show they are talking to the right people.

This is their major effort at the moment. Sending Angelina is biggest thing the government has done for refugees recently (and I believe the only thing they will do in the near future). They have to do it right in order to get away with doing nothing.

thelookoflove1365 @ 03/01/2008 at 4:53 am

hey guli and TRT-that was long post from c2 but i think I would love reading her long ass post smacking the trolls. I was glad i didn’t know about JJ back in 05 and 06, otherwise, I would have failed all my classes ,cuz I will be here reading all you guys posting. I now believe things happen for reasons-hahahaha.

tita-yup I agree, separation of church and government. but in PI church’s always meddled in politics.

josephina @ 03/01/2008 at 4:54 am

#228-

Where did you get this … information? It reads like a transcript.

coalharbourqt @ 03/01/2008 at 4:59 am

Well Laydidah, you know that I disagree with you wholeheartedly… guess we’ll see what happens down the road. It’s unfortunate that you don’t think that the US is taking this issue seriously - I’m more optimistic. Angie has done her job - she has brought awareness to the issue and offered her opinion. Which is exactly what she was asked to do.

Now I’m off to bed.

Oh, if you want some scholars to write this article so the world will listen and pay attention ,you’re delusional. The world is paying attention and reading angies article, and that’s exactly was her purpose-to bring attention to the problem. What is the point of authoring high minded op/ed piece that no one will read much less understand? It is not dumbing down the message, it’s called knowing your audience. Angies fan base comes from different background, so the message was tailored so everyone can understand it including the high minded people-it got your attention, didn’t it?,

———————————————————————————————–

First of all, THE WORLD is isn’t reading Angelina’s article. She hasn’t got that much reach.

I did not say a scholar would reach more people but that they would reach the right people. It doesn’t matter how many people know about an issue, it matters how many people act. So many people know about Sudan since George Clooney started talking it up, but all that’s done is make it a highly talked about crisis. Nothing substantial has been done and all those people it’s reached dont seem to care much. At least not enough to actually do something.

BTW, do you really think anyone who reads The Washington Post would have trouble reading a scholars work? I think you are confusing The Post with Perez Hilton.

aniston freaks @ 03/01/2008 at 5:06 am

god,the same troll,the last time her name was under un,now under laydiad,or whatever the hell she is calling herself-lol-yeah she donated time and money like aniston donated her dried up eggs for freezing-go back to your padded room and take your meds-play time is over.

coalharbourqt @ 03/01/2008 at 4:59 am Well Laydidah, you know that I disagree with you wholeheartedly… guess we’ll see what happens down the road. It’s unfortunate that you don’t think that the US is taking this issue seriously - I’m more optimistic. Angie has done her job - she has brought awareness to the issue and offered her opinion. Which is exactly what she was asked to do.
========
EXACTLY !

It’s unfortunate that you don’t think that the US is taking this issue seriously
———————————————————————————————–

Here’s the thing. If they were taking it seriously this issue would have been sorted years ago. They would have had a plan for it before invading. It would have implemented throughout the occupancy. Instead they’re playing a little game of catch-up, getting some PR miles and making sure to leave the mess for the next administration, who’ll have bigger fish to fry for at least the first year.

god,the same troll,the last time her name was under un,now under laydiad,or whatever the hell she is calling herself-lol-yeah she donated time and money like aniston donated her dried up eggs for freezing-go back to your padded room and take your meds-play time is over.
———————————————————————————————-
Well you’re just lovely aren’t you. You would really be better off using that vitriol on people like ‘JOLIE PULLED HER NOSE’, not someone like me who is trying very hard not to cause offence.

laydidah @ 03/01/2008 at 4:19 am Not because of some dislike of her, but because she isn’t the most qualified and these issues don’t deserve anything less.
========
THEN WHO IS THE MOST QUALIFIED. ? I THINK MOST FAMOUS ACTRESS WOULD RATHER BE IN PARIS FASHION SHOW OR ME-JI-KO BEACH DISPLAYING THEIR NEWLY TONED BODY AND WAX PUBIC RATHER USING THEIR EXTRA TIME , RISKING THEIR LIFE , TRAVELING 16-20 HOOURS TO A WAR TORNED COUNTRY WITNESSING THE IMPOVERISHED REFUGEES.

Angie might not be the most qualified one but she does done her best in bringing awareness to the Iragi refugees.problems and yes, it was sad, the UN had degraded themselves using HW actors to drew awareness. but at least, it’s working. Do you have other option ?

The point is you dislike her in the very beginning. so everything she done is wrong,not worthy, and with motives. that’s it !

Tinkerbelle @ 03/01/2008 at 5:38 am

ANGELINA JOLIE for PRESIDENT.

ritzy,
with your talent for writing is
for so many lies
so much waste of talent
amen

Mondo Bongo! @ 03/01/2008 at 5:41 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^..What….A….D!ick…. H!ead..^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

—————————————————————————–
Hey guli couldn’t sleep, are U still here?
going back to bed, got your email, will touch base tomorrow..

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS @ 03/01/2008 at 5:45 am


GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

ritzy,

you are very knowledgeable about everything

what a waste of talent

amen

i love herrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

i love herrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

Angie might not be the most qualified one but she does done her best in bringing awareness to the Iragi refugees.problems and yes, it was sad, the UN had degraded themselves using HW actors to drew awareness. but at least, it’s working. Do you have other option ?
———————————————————————————————–

What good is attention if it doesn’t lead to action.

It is not working. The UN is not about drawing attention the various crises, it’s about using that awareness and turning it into action. It doesn’t make a bit of difference how many people know about something if they do nothing about it. Those in a position to deal with these issues ie. the government are not acting, and the people are not making them. But don’t worry, I’m sure the Iraqi refugees will take heart in the fact that their plight has produced an article Rush Limbaugh has deemed worthy of praise.

The point is you dislike her in the very beginning. so everything she done is wrong,not worthy, and with motives. that’s it !
———————————————————————————————–
I don’t dislike her at all. She is an excellent actress, she’s made some great films and I have no doubt she is trying to do good. I wouldn’t call myself a fan, but I have no distaste for her personally, just the state of affairs that leads to her being a voice for the UN.

ritzy

what a waste of your writing talent

amen

I don’t dislike her at all. She is an excellent actress, she’s made some great films and I have no doubt she is trying to do good. I wouldn’t call myself a fan, but I have no distaste for her personally, just the state of affairs that leads to her being a voice for the UN.

———–
I know you don’t.
jealousy ?

laydidah @ 03/01/2008 at 6:02 am
_____________________________

If someone is “qualified” to speak about refugees is Angelina Jolie. She is been doing this for 7 years. She has been to more countries, spoke to more refugees and workers in the field, learn more… about the refugee situation in the world than anyone i know of.

Why do think than Collin Powell think highly of her and always takes the time to speak with her. Or why Condolisa Rise takes up her busy time to listen to her?

Yikes, somebody hired a writer to malign OUR Angie.

These a*ssholes are indeed shaking in their boots. They feel threatened. They tried everything and thrown everything including the kitchen sink, yet Angie is undeterred and her star just keeps getting brighter by the day.

The more they smear Angie, the more people come to know and see her goodness and kind heart.

There are 22 pages of comments under Angie’s Washington Post article. Hmmm, them evil-doers are truly worried.

Do enjoy ritzy’s one -man show

at the jew hater lmao. People are trully sad man.

Pages: « 17 8 9 [10] 11 12 1362 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.