Sat, 29 March 2008 at 4:23 pm

Katie Holmes is Broadway Bound

Katie Holmes is in final negotiations to make her Broadway debut!

The 29-year-old actress is slated to star in a revival of All My Sons, Arthur Miller’s heartbreaking, post-World War II family drama. She would play a woman who visits the family of her former lover, a missing pilot.

Katie has reportedly committed to participating in a workshop of the play in May but a rep for Katie tells People that she is in discussions but also says, “nothing is set.”

Broadway veterans John Lithgow and Dianne Wiest have already signed onto the play.

Photos: WENN
Posted to: Broadway, Katie Holmes
Related posts:

JJ Links Around The Web

Kim Kardashian gets a make-under - PopEater
Mark Wahlberg screens The Lovely Bones - PopSugar
One of Tiger Woods' alleged mistresses will hold a press conference today - TheSuperficial
A magazine makes strange claims about Tom and Katie - Dlisted
Two Harry Potter stars get close - LaineyGossip
Lady Gaga was deemed ineligible for a Best New Artist Grammy - Celebuzz
Ashley Tisdale is Styl'n - JustJaredJr

Jemal Countess/Getty

72 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All

# 51

McLovin @ 03/29/2008 at 10:12 pm

She’s not copying anyone #43. So what is Nicole Kidm,man did a play a a few YEARS ago? It’s just a coincidence. And she does NOT dress anything like Cruise’s ex.

@reply | Flag This

# 52

Mari @ 03/29/2008 at 11:34 pm

they play is all my sons based from the description provided
i think she will be playing ann

@reply | Flag This

# 53

earth @ 03/29/2008 at 11:51 pm

Im *so* happy for her.

@reply | Flag This

# 54

Miapocca @ 03/30/2008 at 2:21 am

This child is as “sexy” as roquefort cheese

@reply | Flag This

# 55

Miapocca @ 03/30/2008 at 2:22 am

thats an old picture when she run away from om to attentd fellow scientoshi-ts travolata play on braodway

@reply | Flag This

# 56

Miapocca @ 03/30/2008 at 2:26 am

Midget may pull the same stutnt at the marathon and this time folks will be wondering , did she really act in that play…:) hahha

@reply | Flag This

# 57

Jessica @ 03/30/2008 at 4:14 am

She is part of the cult. You cannot trust anything this woman says or does as long as she is part of that cult. Everything she does is decided by the cult FIRST. It is all for PR, nothing else. They instruct her to do things they think will improve her/ Scientology’s image. She is there as a fake role model for Scientology, everything about her image is fake. Her only purpose on earth now is to drag more innocent victims into the cult so that they can lose their money, freedom, self-respect and families.

Do NOT support her or her films, plays, or anything else they tell her to do, as long as she does not DISCONNECT with the cult. Scientology is dangerous. It ruins people’s lives, it brain washes people and destroys them, and they make them disconnect with their families unless the families also join the cult.

She is a part of that, and she chose that life voluntarily when she married Tom Cruise. Do not feel sorry for this living PR robot, feel sorry for the victims of Scientology.

@reply | Flag This

# 58

solaris @ 03/30/2008 at 5:41 am

God, please save Arthur Miller!!!

@reply | Flag This

# 59

me 2 @ 03/30/2008 at 8:22 am

Jessica— Everything you say is true. She is a SERVANT to the cult now. She will do ANYTHING that the cult asks her to. She has no other purpose now except to serve David Miscavige.

@reply | Flag This

# 60

bumblebeej @ 03/30/2008 at 9:53 am

#25 - she always has her family by her side? She has her husband and one daughter always by her side. What about her step kids? The ones who call Katie ‘mom’?

@reply | Flag This

# 61

Miapocca @ 03/30/2008 at 10:31 am

What about her father who negotiated the sale of his daughter…ahahhahah….He and his robot wife also show up once in a while to stand by her side when they are ordered by the midget…noney really can make you grown an extra inch or so,…ahhahah

@reply | Flag This

# 62

annnymouse @ 03/30/2008 at 11:09 am

She sold out to scientology. Wouldn’t pay a dime to see her in anything. Sorry.

@reply | Flag This

# 63

McLovin @ 03/30/2008 at 1:04 pm

Oh shut up, Jessica! You don’t know her and you couldn’t possibly know all that.

@reply | Flag This

# 64

Gina @ 03/30/2008 at 1:52 pm

Bravo Katie and God bless!!!!

@reply | Flag This

# 65

Casey @ 03/30/2008 at 2:04 pm

Love Katie Holmes….it’s good to see her breaking away from film so she can develop more of her talent!

@reply | Flag This

# 66

ydzonline.com @ 03/30/2008 at 2:33 pm

gr8 smile.

handbags@
http://www.ydzonline.com

@reply | Flag This

# 67

andy @ 03/30/2008 at 2:41 pm

#65 casey, she’s not “breaking away from film” of her own will. It’s the film industry which has broken away from her a couple of years ago. No one in Hollywood wants to take her in their project. She’s even been replaced in the Batman sequels. She was pointed out as the only weak link of BatmanBegins and was replaced by a stronger actress. The weak link of MadMoney too.

“if” Katie ever goes to Bway, it’s because she has no other opportunities.

@reply | Flag This

# 68

sibi @ 03/30/2008 at 4:09 pm

Lots of luck to Katie…..

@reply | Flag This

# 69

D @ 03/30/2008 at 7:28 pm

Tom is a lucky guy. He’s got a classy and hot wife.

@reply | Flag This

# 70

genesis @ 03/30/2008 at 11:50 pm

I pity the ugly unhappy souls of trolls.

@reply | Flag This

# 71

emma @ 03/31/2008 at 7:39 am

Wow, she’s well known to be a weak actress - I wonder how she’s going to pull it off live? Critics pan her every time her face appears on screen. Sounds like the rest of the cast is good, it would be a shame to let her bring it down that way.