Gwyneth Paltrow - “Vogue” May 2008

Mon, 14 April 2008 at 3:50 pm

Gwyneth Paltrow brings a superhero flair to her high glam look on the May 2008 cover of Vogue.

“I simplify everything,” Ms. Paltrow tells Vogue on juggling her kids, career and husband Chris Martin.

According to FWD, the 35-year-old actress is wearing a gold, tissue-lame, embroidered Pre-Fall 2008 dress by Oscar de la Renta and Robert Lee Morris cuffs.

Gwyn is resting her elbow on an Iron Man mask. The superhero flick flies in theaters nationwide on May 2.

Photos: Steven Klein
Posted to: Gwyneth Paltrow
Related posts:

97 Comments

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 » Show All

# 31

julie @ 04/14/2008 at 4:32 pm

I can’t believe Gwyneth would want this picture of her on the maganize cover. YUCK. Her kids probably wouldn’t even recognize her.

Report Abuse

# 32

Rae @ 04/14/2008 at 4:33 pm

This is not her best cover. She looks surprised.

Report Abuse

# 33

Michelle @ 04/14/2008 at 4:37 pm

I have never found her to be pretty -she is homely to me

Report Abuse

# 34

lola @ 04/14/2008 at 4:38 pm

oh god…I will not be looking forward to my May issue of Vogue arriving in the mail. I HATE her. Why does Anna Wintour keep putting her on the cover? She has **** style now and is doing **** films. And whenever I read about what the general public has to say about her, it is usually negative. There are some die hard fans who actually believe that she is nice and pretty but the general sentiment is that she is self-absorbed, elitist, a *****, and a tranny. Stop putting her on magazine covers! As if she is going to have anything interesting to say. Her last vogue article was about kids, marriage, and juggling work. BORING!

Report Abuse

# 35

pipi @ 04/14/2008 at 4:40 pm

Me thinks Vogue needs new blood *cough* Anna *cough* and seriously she got the cover for Iron Man? lol

Report Abuse

# 36

Harley @ 04/14/2008 at 4:48 pm

She should not have gotten a cover for Iron Man. That is soooo wrong!

Report Abuse

# 37

WWD @ 04/14/2008 at 4:50 pm

Too much PS or is she botoxing now?

Report Abuse

# 38

fina @ 04/14/2008 at 5:06 pm

photoshopping is and has been a huge part of media for a while now. GET OVER IT. i’m sure if one of the haters actually gets to be on a magazine cover, chances of that happening are super slim to none, others will be quick to point out PHOTOSHOP THIS TRANNY MESS THAT.

Report Abuse

# 39

Captain Obvious @ 04/14/2008 at 5:15 pm

Duh! Everyone knows photoshopping is part of the media but there is such a thing as going overboard. Yup, she looks a tranny mess!

Report Abuse

# 40

Jenn @ 04/14/2008 at 5:18 pm

I think Anna must have a soft spot for limp-haired blondes with fading careers.

Report Abuse

# 41

richard @ 04/14/2008 at 5:21 pm

lol at the idiots who say why she got the cover. SHE”S A STAR. Oscar winner, fashion icon, married to Chris Martin, Madonna’s best friend,
She looks great. I love her

Report Abuse

# 42

Vanessa @ 04/14/2008 at 5:25 pm

they definitely went to town with the air brushing. she looks thinner here than on the Harper’s cover which they air brushed the hell out.

Report Abuse

# 43

lucky @ 04/14/2008 at 5:27 pm

This should be a good interview; Gwyneth is notorious for putting her foot in her mouth.

Report Abuse

# 44

adore dior @ 04/14/2008 at 5:31 pm

The dress is beautiful but I’m also disappointed they chose Gwyneth. She hasn’t been a style icon for a long time. The Vogue covers of late are becoming very generic.

Report Abuse

# 45

nora @ 04/14/2008 at 5:32 pm

She needs to reinvent herself asap because she’s getting Ultra BORINGGGG and Ugly.

Report Abuse

# 46

Audrina @ 04/14/2008 at 5:38 pm

Is this really US Vogue and not the UK?

Report Abuse

# 47

prettypretty @ 04/14/2008 at 5:46 pm

I do not think anyone they put on the cover of Vogue now is really a major star. Those days are gone.

Report Abuse

# 48

green fairy @ 04/14/2008 at 5:52 pm

The gown is beautiful. The hair looks like she just got out of bed.

Report Abuse

# 49

xxxxx @ 04/14/2008 at 5:53 pm

ugh i hate it. why do they insist on putting celebrities on the cover? almost every other edition of vogue mostly feature models. seriously, what place does gwyneth paltrow has in the fashion world?
and what’s with all the writings on the covers? they look so cheap, like a tabloid or something. look at italian vogue’s cover a few months baack, a gorgeous model with nothing but ‘icon’ written on it.
anna wintour has got to go.

Report Abuse

# 50

Courtney @ 04/14/2008 at 5:59 pm

I dont like the facial expression. But otherwise I like the cover.

http://celebritysource.blogspot.com/

Report Abuse

# 51

Stella @ 04/14/2008 at 5:59 pm

The colours are all wrong for her.

Report Abuse

# 52

TRIUMPH OF THE FUG @ 04/14/2008 at 6:03 pm

FUGRIFFIC!

Report Abuse

# 53

Lala @ 04/14/2008 at 6:06 pm

The mask on her head would have been realistic.

Report Abuse

# 54

zzzzzzzzzzzzzz @ 04/14/2008 at 6:10 pm

boring…………………………………..

Report Abuse

# 55

MS. PARKER @ 04/14/2008 at 6:15 pm

****! I SO WANTED TO SEE SJP ON THIS COVER. DAMN YOU, ANNA!

Report Abuse

# 56

Cindy @ 04/14/2008 at 6:19 pm

I don’t like it. She looks uncomfortable.

Report Abuse

# 57

tabitha @ 04/14/2008 at 6:21 pm

Why is Fishsticks still on all these covers and treated like she’s still relevant? She’s over. No one liked her because of her snooty attitude and stupid pretentious comments she makes in the press. In the 90s when she was letting her fame get to her head she went in this one interview going on about how she is an icon and everyone copies her style and she invented long hair. And her mother was telling the press she is the new Grace Kelly. Please Gwyneth you are and never was Grace Kelly get over yourself.

She used all her family and business connections to make it in hollywood. Seh doesn’t deserve anything And she sure as hell shouldn’t be on the cover of Vogue when she’s not relevant. And all the great parts are going to Cate Blanchett and Kate Winslet now. Sorry Fishsticks!

Report Abuse

# 58

sweetie @ 04/14/2008 at 6:35 pm

I guess Emily Blunt was busy?

Report Abuse

# 59

Red One @ 04/14/2008 at 6:38 pm

Would love to see Julianne Moore on next month’s cover.

Report Abuse

# 60

DeeJay @ 04/14/2008 at 6:43 pm

They could have did a better job on the photoshop. It looks like her head is falling off her neck.