OlderGwyneth Paltrow is See-Worthy in See-Through
Gwyneth Paltrow wears a see-through Stella McCartney mini to a private screening of her latest movie, Iron Man, at NYC’s Tribeca Grand Screening Room on Monday.
Thankfully, her dress covered up all of her bits and pieces in all the right places!
On Letterman on Monday, Gwyn talked a little about her daughter Apple, 3, and son Moses, 2. She shared:
“Boys and girls are very fundamentally different, aren’t they? (laughs) So there are some interesting things going on in the house. They just play so differently. She’s quiet and imaginative and very verbal. She likes to sit with her things and build houses and hotels for her dolls. My son will just come and thrash the hell out of anything she’s doing. And if he can inflict pain on her while he’s thrashing, then even better. Then she gets furious and says he’s ‘antagonizing’ her. We call him our ’sensitive thug.’ It’s a line from a Jay-Z song and it fits him perfectly.” (If you’ll remember, Gwyneth and husband Chris Martin attended Beyonce and Jay-Z’s wedding reception.)
DO YOU THINK Gwyneth Paltrow is see-worthy in see-through?
Share This Post:
88 Comments
Where is the Iron Man?
Why no RDJ?
prepared for her naked pics ..LOL!!
Did she cut her hair? Cute but she needs some volume on the top.
I watched the Iron Man trailer, already. Awesome! But I saw Gwyn only for a glimpse. And if she thinks by wearing this cloth will drag me to the cinema….she better thinks twice. She didn’t impress me in Captain Sky, she will not either, this time.
BTW, where is the Iron Man?
Love the pattern but it just doesn’t work.
I agree with Enough. Enough of this pretentious ugly body woman. She should take a cue from ashley olsen and dress for her body type, and get more stylish hair and makeup and acessories
Every time she is using much less fabric for her dress. At the end, we are going to see her with a leaf covering her private (which I also doubt)!
We have seen a lot of her legs, almost her rear ( have a look at Perez Hilton website s.v.p.).
I have also started thinking that something might be wrong in her marriage or she is VERY scared to have another unsuccessful movie.
She is not Kate Moss, not Sienna, definitely not Charlize. She looks bad and cheap in this kind of dresses. She needs to stop.
Her legs are awful. Her thighs are all flabby when she’s not in high heels and look at her knees, her calves are HUGE. Her legs are all misshapen. That comment about her son? What does she expect when his father acts the same damn way?
I like it on her, she looks fresh and playful and very young.
definitely one for the worst-dressed list. looks a bit ******, and yes - it’s like the type that britney spears would wear.
She’s one of the last people who should be wearing see-through anything. A dress like those polygamist folks would be better for Gwyneth, along with a bag over her head.
Gwynie is outta control! waaaaay too short dresses and now this?! i don’t wanna know what’s next….
-> NAKED
I get she has nice legs but she’s too old to wear mini dresses.
English is not my mother tongue and I didn’t start to learn English when I was still a young kid.
I would like to ask a question to all who has English as mother tongue.
Were you using a word “antagonising” when you were only 3?
Apple must have parents who speak perfect, high class English at her home. Lucky her!!!
Gwyneth, I never like you. And I do hope that your daughter will much smarter than you because you are so idiot and the worst part you don’t know even about it! This is my personal point of her. You have a right to think differently.
Come back to America, Gwyneth!
GORGEOUS!!!
Gorgeous!! Whoever said she has horrible legs is INSANE. If your legs looked like that, you’d be wearing short dresses as long as you could. She’s only what, 35? Jealous much? It’s a unique dress, but the woman can wear anything. It’s part of being tall and thin with a model’s figure.
I think she looks fabulous. I don’t care how old she is. If she has the body and the legs to pull off that outfit then more power to her. So what is she’s the mother of two children. I sure her children will be glad when they get older that there mom doesn’t look like an old hag.
She looks silly, it reminds me of that top Renée Zellweger wore to the Chicago premiere!
The dress would look really nice if had a white dress under it. Anyone agree? She’s just showing off too much and somehow I don’t think you’re meant to with this dress.
Once again she is trying too hard. Enough of this pretentious obnoxious has been woman. No one likes her! Yet she’s prancing around like SHE is the star of this. Her style SUCKS. Has always sucked. But in Gwyneth’s mind everything she does is “so high fashion and iconic” That’s the way this woman thinks. She doesn’t realize she looks stupid. Now Charlize Theron and Cate Blanchett? These are two ladies that can dress and be high fashion. Gwyneth Paltrow? She doesn’t have IT and she thinks she does.
Get over yourself Gwyneth. There is not one thing appealing about her talent, personality, looks or fashion sense. Yet she thinks she is so iconic and high fashion. Remember you have no career now and aren’t getting any good roles. You’re just the thankless female part in a super hero movie. Get over yourself!
Charlize Theron has much better legs. And Gwyneth does not have a hot body. Her boobs are saggy and gross and her posture is awful.
She is very old for this dress
All. Leggy.
And. No. Booboo.
?
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!