Rachel Bilson is a Deli Delicacy

I love Rachel

@42

The O.C as one of the most well known TV shows of our generation? Whose generation? The ones who are going on what…18? Please….it got ruthlessly canceled after only four years and it was going down hill after a year and a half. Check the shows ratings. And, for what it was known, it wasn’t in a good way since it was ruthlessly made fun of.

Jumper was only number 1 for a week in the U.S and maybe, MAYBE 3 total internationally. ONE WEEK. Please check your facts on the box office before saying anything. No offense intended.

Fashion mags? More like tabloids. The fashion mags that have her on the cover DON”T sell (check for yourself) and only the tiniest of mentions other than that. She’s not that big in fashion; not sorry to say. She’s featured more online and then it’s only a couple of sites. Not to mention she copies off of, first mostly Kate Hudson, and now she’s throwing in Mary-Kate Olsen. Already seen it. Please fact check again on that as well. Again, no offense intended.

And…..that shoots down the idea that the paps even follow her just to follow her of their own accord. She’s not that popular. Her pics don’t sell really or there would be more of her in the publications and more sites would feature her more often. Try again on that count.

If you really do think she’s THAT sweet…oh, my god….No one, I mean NO ONE, is THAT sweet and it’s for real. It’s an act. That sweet and nice means the girl is playing that act and is actually far from it. It’s the same for someone who’s happy and chipper all the time. Just not humanly possible. Rethink that assessment to account for her being human and then ask why she’s ACTING so nice. Usually it’s not for a good, nice reason…..

Personally, I don’t hate her. I don’t care about her either way. Nothing spectacular about her in the slightest. Typical Hollywood airhead in my opinion. There’s bigger fish to fry out there. She’s basically annoying but harmless. I could care less if she happens to be with Darth Vader. Good for them but anyone who thinks that it’s a true relationship is a gullible idiot because, yeah, the long distance and emotional unavailability of that fact dictates it to be so. Anyone who has had a long distance relationship knows how hard it is and how unavailable both physically and emotionally you become. Only people who are naive about such things go into them knowingly. They would know about it given the nature of their jobs and where both have chosen to live with NEITHER willing to move to where the other has called home permanently. If that floats their boat, then it floats their boat and more power to them. But, let’s skip the barf-worthy, starry-eyed, naive thoughts of happily ever after with these two like a few are going on about. THAT’S what is so stupid. And, what’s so wrong about Bilson is she’s actively trying to play up to the press like the princess when she’s far from it and she’s not an innocent sweetheart. Other than that, I personally don’t have a beef with her. She’s a waste of time to me since she’s only an airhead fashionsta with really NOTHING important and noteworthy to say.

@ reality check

why would you think the way you think about these two. They are in a serious relationship and Hayden is happy with her. Are you just a jealous fan?! tell me!

I do like the way you talk,so dont get me wrong. I just want to know why you think the way you think?!

@55

No. Why would I be jealous when I don’t even like Christensen and really have no interest in a lot of the things Bilson does and is into? And, hun, that’s not a serious relationship when they are available to one another. A serious relationship is when two people are available to one another both physically AND emotionally AND they are willing to make the sacrifices necessary into order for the relationship to work and actually be serious. In other words…..one as to make the decision and sacrifice of changing where they call their permanent home and actually commit to it. That’s how true serious relationships are. A compromise and filled with sacrifices. NEITHER want to sacrifice anything for the other. NOT A SERIOUS RELATIONSHIP. I’m just someone who knows about relationships.

And, just because someone says what they think and it just happens to disagree with what you think and believe doesn’t make them a jealous fan. They just disagree. If they have valid points like I have stated, than that doesn’t make me or anyone like me a “jealous fan.” Just someone who isn’t fooled very easily and questions things by nature. It’s a good thing to question things especially on the internet and ANYTHING Hollywood. I know a lot of people wish it was a serious relationship for these two because it gives those people hope but let’s just not kid ourselves when it just doesn’t add up. Do either of them go the extra mile for the other? NO. Do other make any effort or show any signs of true, heartfelt, unmistakable, can’t cover up and hide no matter how hard you try, affection towards one another? That whole when two people are truly in love you see it even when the other person in that couple in question isn’t around. They have this goofy glow and they have this high effect. They are giddy and they can’t temper it no matter what they try to do in order to hide and temper it. That’s just human nature and subconsious human reactions that are hard-wired in EVERYONE. These two are going against it therefore they aren’t in love and in a serious relationship. You can’t argue with mother nature and how we are biologically and evolutionarily hard-wired. You can’t fight being human when you are human. It’s like asking the sun not to rise in the morning. Whether you see it or not due to cloud cover or what not, the sun still raises. Think about that then rethink this.

People are so quick to jump to call others jealous when it’s really a lack of genuine interest and care. When someone doesn’t invest that much care into something, that much heart, they see things a little more clearly. So, don’t be so quick to call people jealous or haters when we just don’t care about the particular person in question. This is a prime example. What that person, in this case Bilson and Christensen, do is on them. It doesn’t really affect my life. I only stumbled upon this on a break from my life. They aren’t in it and they don’t affect it so why should I care that they are dating or not. I’m only saying that I’m like most in this world who have experienced long distance relationships, are knowledgable about relationships and know when I see it when one is serious or not. This whole argument over are they or aren’t they is ridiculous because it’s so obvious that it’s not a relationship but an understanding and arrangement between them. If they were truly serious, either Christensen would permanently move to LA and be with Rachel, leaving his family back up in Canada or Bilson would move up to Canada and not be in LA anywhere near as much. Have either of them? No. Does it appear and do either show any intention of doing that? No. Case closed.

They have the SAME talent agency/management; that’s for sure that “anything” (surreally stupid) can happen!

@60

Getting a Ph.D in Psychology. So, yeah, I know quite a bit about relationships. How about you? It’s very apparent you don’t, so until you do, keep things to yourself about others in any form, ok? And, please look up words before you use them such as hypocrite. You definitely don’t know when to spot when it’s in need of use. Thanks. Would you really like to know if I was a personal friend or something. LOL Do you really think any sane person is going to give you a straight answer? It’s online, hun. You could be a psycho stalker for all I know. Not going to play the odds. Not saying whether you are or not, just not going to play the odds. The last time I checked I didn’t have stupid tattooed to my forehead and I don’t have to proof a damn thing to you. If you don’t like what I have to say and how much long it happens to be, don’t read it. Plain, simple, and it’s all on you. Since you have the time and care to read it, maybe you should look into the mirror and say hypocrite and get a life before saying it to someone else. Just some food for thought. Have a nice day and a nice life. :)

@58

Oh, they are together. I already said that. I said it’s not serious and that shows. You and the others are talking about visiting one another. That’s only natural because they live so far from one another and if they want to see each other, that’s naturally what they are going to have to do and what they happen to do. Meeting family doesn’t necessarily mean serious. Lots of people both just friends and in romantic relationships meet the other’s parents. It really doesn’t mean a lot when it comes down to it. It’s up to the couple in question themselves whether it’s serious or not by the choices they make. Since they have been together over a year, then the signs of something serious would be starting to show if not already been showing. It hasn’t. The whole public thing is a complete load since it doesn’t matte how private you are, we’re talking biology here; how we humans are hardwired to behave. They can’t deny that. Signs would show no matte how much they don’t want them to. Those signs haven’t so these two are just having fun. Since it’s not serious, it’s not going to last. They are just young adults having fun not wanting a commitment. Nothing wrong with that in the slightest. It’s actually healthy. Like I said before, whatever floats their boat. At the moment, they float each others boat but it’s not going to last long. Let them be young and have fun. Stop the arguing over it.

Reality Check: you definitely need one. You scare me. You need help - you are OBSESSED!! Go live you rown life and stop trying to shove your own over-baked, over-analysed thought processes down our throats.

And FYI, as of May 13, Jumper has made $220,507,983 at the Box Office, which makes it the 4th highest-grossing film in the world so far this year. Hmm. Pretty popular, no? I’m sure you’ll come up with some twisted bitter way to deny that. Grow up, and stop generalising about everything and pretending like you know celebrities when you don’t.

Also your claim “Stop the arguing over it” is the antithesis of the thinking of a graduate student, particularly one at PhD level. You ought to argue everything, critically analyse everything, and only submit that nothing is an end in itelf.

People like you, Reality Check, who can’t handle people like Rachel Bilson’s vastly superior wealth and appearance and lifestyle, need to stop visiting celebrity sites. We’re here to appreciate celebrities within their funcitoning capacity as ENTERTAINERS, not life-subsitutes or fake psych clients. Just go.

63, 64, 65, 66

I agree with all of your comments, all were very well said.

#68 has it right. All need therapy. Follow it way too much and take it all way too seriously.

You know how it goes, it doesn’t matter if the thread is about Rachel or Hayden the other will be mentioned it’s just the way it is.