Katie Holmes’ Broadway Break

blah..

whateva

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=EqOJ_JedEFk

Unlimited shopping was part of her contract. She probably spent more than what they reported, and rightfully she earned this with every awkward stupid wrist hold. When you marry for money you earn every dime, which is evident by the happiness she displays in most photos, these included.

Anyone think maybe she is just tired?

LOL @ #10 .. anyway, she seems so weird . . .

-Social Elitist

So talent less Katie Holmes will star opposite the outstanding Oscar winner Dianne Wiest and Tony winner John Lithgow in a production of Arthur Miller’s ‘All My Sons’.?????

What a huge joke . . .

Does anyone remember her awful movie ‘Mad Money’, and how it fared so poorly at the US box office and how her dreadful performance was essentially panned by the critics.

It’s obivious she is being considered for roles (or getting them) because of her relationship to Tom Cruise, not because of any acting talent she possesses. She should be embarrassed to accept roles based merely on her marriage to Tom Cruise. What a creepy, pathetic woman. . .

In other news, TomKat is reportedly suing Petit Tresor, a baby boutique in Los Angeles for publicizing false shopping details of a $350,000 spending spree at the store. “Petite Tresor is trying to get publicity for themselves by telling the press that celebrities are shopping in their store when they’re not,” says a rep for the couple.
——————–

TOM IS SOOO LITIGIOUS DANG.. MANY BIG STARS JUST IGNORE **** LIKE THIS….

Jared they are not suing them. A lawyer sent them a letter telling them to stop telling the media what they buy from the store, wether it is true or a lie. Because Petit Tresor keeps telling the media that celebrities buy things at their store that they didn’t buy or that they spend an amount that they didn’t even spend on merchandise.

pathetic!

Jarred what is wrong with you ??? They are not suing Petit t . !!! Why you are soo a liar about Tomkat ??????????? Live this family alone , please !

She looks very sad. Hope she’s ok.

Cant wait for this Katie play….

I don’t believe it was that Petit Tresor publicized a shopping spree by Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise but the details that they spend $350,000.

The “average income” of the average working stiff in the US is around $46,242 a year. (That data comes from the U.S. Census Bureau). So, for people to realize K&T are spending that kind of money, at one time, on one little kid just sounds so self-absorbed and self-centered.

The economy is in the crapper and many people are out of work and there is Katie Holmes pampering this one child to the extreme. Gosh, $350,000 is more money than most people could dream about in a lifetime and here is this silly woman squander such a large amount of money on this one child while so many other children go without simple necessities ~ like food and medical care.

Who would want anyone to know you were so out of touch that you would buy an additional $350,000 worth of crap to add to your child’s already over-the-top mountain of things/stuff.

i dont understand u people…when d stars get dressed or dolled up ull say theyr so full of themselves but wen dey go natural and less made up ull say dey should dressed up..in short ur a negative person nothing good to say..1 thing im sure of is ur lives are miserable,no money no luvlyf nd mybe no friends lol

Only the lowest common denominators read and believe tabloid crap.

Katie will rock Broadway!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

big screen doesn’t like u….off to broadway!!!

# 35 Katie did TV,movie and now broadway and more of the bigscreen for her. What did you do for the world and others?
insulting people you dont know is not community service or a testament to good family upbringing or church life about not juding others but letting God do it.

Also, Katie’s Mad Money DVD is selling superbly and soars at the rentals too. Read on CNN Money and MSNBC.

God bless her and Tom. She is so beautiful along with her daughter Suri.

Between Suri and rehearsals and performing 6 times a week
will be a challenge. Way to go,Katie.

————-

Especially if she is looking this tired not rehearsing or performing. she only has one child, and plenty of childcare help. Hope she is ok

Good to see her because I miss her,Tom and Suri.

Oh the agony of envy because this is such a prestigious Arthur Miller play. What a perfect cast this is.

Run Katie! Make your escape…………

Is she covering a black eye

Regarding Petit Tresor. Why shop there TomKat? They always release information on purchases made by their celebrity clientale. Surely TomKat knew this going into the shop. And now he wants to sue?
I will give Mz. Holmes points for bravery. Her talent is no where near that of Lithgow, Wiest, and Patrick. The role of Ann is way beyond her meager acting talents.
Seems like she is morphing into Nicole. Tom turned Nicole into a fashion icon…now he is trying to do the same with Katie. Nicole did a play in London to rave reviews, now Katie is doing broadway. Tom called Nicole Nic, now he is calling Katie-Kate. The examples of are numerous.
Why does she put it up with it?

Starrynites - for your #13 post - I make no claim to be a Broadway critic, and don’t know if there is a significant correlation between box office hit and talent.

So I am asking you since you made those remarks. Here is my first question. Because Mad Money failed to be a BO hit, does it suggest that Holmes has no acting talent, and she alone carried the banner for its failure ? Or, are there any considerations ?

And finally, how is it obvious that Holmes only consideration for any project or film is her marriage to Cruise. Should a woman be limited to accept roles because of her marriage to Cruise. And for that you call her creepy and pathetic.

I am cognizant that you are expressing an opinion, however misplaced they are. Expressing you opinion is your right, and whether I like it or not, or however cruel or misplaced, they are duly protected.

We should be so proud as Americans - pettiness is so ingrained in our national character.

Just my opinion.

Starrynites - it has been published that Petit in several credible media outlet does release information on celebrity clients. At the very least, this is a propriety issue, and at worst illegal.

The issue raised by your post # 27 is sensitivity. The median annual income in the US is $46,242. Based on that premise, how dare the Cruises spend $350 K on a shopping spree for 1 child and in doing so they are viewed as self-absorbed and self-centered.

Valid criticism - to a point. One - but for Petit release of the money spent by the Cruise, no one would have known. Petit had no right to advertise that information to the press or to the public. The release of these information is problematic because it chipped away our privacy rights. Two - the Cruises’ are not the “average US family. They have an income to the gazillions. It is not our business to dictate what, where, and how, why, and how much they spend their income. There is no law that prohibits them to spend their money for their child.

As to the Cruises, they should have known better that the public will scrutinized every move they make, and that people like you will always have grudges, right or wrong to air. After all, critics like you will exercise to express an opinion, however misplaced.

I agree on the sensitivity issue, but not the release of these private information, and hence, there should be no issue at all.

They didn’t shop there, #51. That’s the thing.

Quit blaming him for everything. How did he turn Nicole Kidman into a fashion icon? And why is Katie Holmes copying his ex-wife just because she starred in a play a decade ago?

She puts up with it, Dancer, because she’s paid millions each year to put up with it and be Tommy girls beard.

Her acting skills have never been anything impressive and this stint on B.way will prove she’s going nowhere fast.

I actually wish they were suing Petit Tresor. They are notorious for spread false information. I love how Joel Madden called them out on their bull ****. They also said that JLo did some ridiculous nursery with them. I have no doubt she would go overboard, but I doubt it would be with them.

She IS NOT Jackie O!! Jackie was a ‘One of a Kind” and she is DEAD!! Katie looks like a walking CORPSE!!

Every time we see her she looks more and more MISERABLE and has nearly no make-up on (even though she clearly is gorgeous without it …). I think she is probably coming to the realization that she is trapped in this weird, controlling marriage and is desperately wanting out. I feel sorry for her. She’s young and had no idea what mess she was getting into…

TOMMMYGIRL can’t even dress himself let alone dress anyone, d best we’ve seen him dress was during the NICOLE KIDMAN days since then not just his sense of style but his reputation has spiralled downwards and seriously his union with this chick only worsens his situation

God bless you,Katie. I will be watching.

good for her and loving those purse.

She looks like she’s turning into The Fly

I heard TC bought KH a few lines in the play as a way to get rid of her
and that he plans to leave her here so he can rebuild (or try to)
his life.
Is this true?

@ 63- SHE IS OUR GENERATION’S JACKIE O! IF NATALIE PORTSHIT IS SUPPOSEDLY OUR GENERATION’S AUDREY (GASP) EVEN THOUGH SHE LOOKS LIKE A TROLL AND CAN’T ACT HER WAY OUT OF A PAPERBAG, THEN KATIE THE BEAUTIFUL IS JACKIE O! AND JULIE, CALM DOWN, YOU NEVER ACTUALLY BELIEVED THAT TOM CRUISE WOULD MARRY YOU NOW DID YOU LOL

Why is KH Jackie O? Because she wears Jackie O style glasses? I can’t see the analogy. Jackie O was from a blue blooded family, well bred, intelligent, elegant, a first lady, a great mother, well read, and greatly admired and respected. KH is none of this. Perhaps she is admired for marrying TC by you. To me she should stay in TV land. But frankly, even there she is quite limited.

NP is no Audrey Hepburn also.

What happened to her? She looks hideous.

Where do you ‘hear’ these crazy things, #75?

I find it strange how you conveniently miss all of the smiling and happy pics of her without her husband and then offer a ridiculous explanation for pics like these when she could be simply annoyed at the paparazzi or something completely unrelated to her husband, Emma. There is no pattern you idiot. It’s all in your head.

Julie, read the play, then you tell me what is so exciting about the play. Arthur Miller is one of the great American writers (are you an American? I thought all American were familiar with the ex husband of Marylin Monroe!). It is about a family grief waiting and hoping their son coming from war….I don’t want to write a spoiler here…Your fellow citizens are still in Iraq, fighting useless war…may be the play is the right thing to understand the feeling of many parents, brothers, sisters…

And somebody like KH plays in this play?! Isn’t it a waste? From a person from an organization which cares only about money?! From a person who acted so lousily that gained an award as a worst supporting actress in a film?

I don’t envy KH. I am in grief for Arthur Miller.

Solaris, what I meant was what is so exciting about KH performing IN the play, not to criticize the play, you are right. She is a misfit so wrongly cast, her BF must have bought her the part. It is a dishonor to the play.

I agree 100% with Emma, KH is manipulative & cold. She puts on the makeupless poor me look, then comes out all spray tanned and pancaked up with her vapid look and nauseating smirk looking ugly.
She is one calculating *****, we see right through her.

American, TC wants to dump her in NY for all the above reasons. For damage control, he is no bargain either they are detrimental to eachother because they are one of a kind.

I don’t appreciate being called an idiot, especially not by a scientologist . That’s the pot calling the cettle black.

The idiots aren’t the ones questioning this fake, cold and superficial b**ch, who doesn’t ever do anything but shop. Does she have any genuine interests at all, or is it all about spending money and make PR for the cult?

She is putting on a fake facade, trying to be mysterious and fragile. She is anything but mysterious and fragile. She is cold, shallow and manipulative. That’s my opinion, and I’m entitled to it just as you scientology freaks are entitled to believe she is genuine and sincere.

She married for money and fame. It backfired. She is seen as a freak, a brainwashed Stepford wife, and all she’s known for are her weird hairdos, crazy shopping habits, ugly teeth, anorexic body, and the arrogant smirks she puts on when she’s with her crazy husband.

She lets their child be brainwashed by the Cult of Scientology, she is a major flop professionally, and she has lost all her looks, which was all she had to begin with. What an accomplishment. lol

When is the venue and schedule? Its good that actions on stores and tabloids are done because their wrongful acts and lies are not acceptable.

Emma #89, I agree with everything you said. I think you’ve got this golddigger figured out!

#94, “American”…..we know that you are a scientologist so why do you try to hide it? Are you ashamed of being a scientologist? Do they (COS) believe that the only thing you are good for is to patrol this board and defend the beard? How sad….

No, I don’t know that at all “American Scientologist”. I’m convinced that you are a scientologist. You are working for a fascistic cult, and lie about it. You have an agenda here, and people here see that. Since you cult people are so far removed from reality you have a hard time understanding how transparent you really look.

I detest hypocrisy and greed and that is exactly what she and her commercial cult stand for. I’ll repeat what I wrote about her;

I don’t appreciate being called an idiot, especially not by a scientologist . That’s the pot calling the kettle black.

The idiots aren’t the ones questioning this fake, cold and superficial b**ch, who doesn’t ever do anything but shop. Does she have any genuine interests at all, or is it all about spending money and making PR for the cult?

She is putting on a fake facade, trying to be mysterious and fragile. She is anything but mysterious and fragile. She is cold, shallow and manipulative. That’s my opinion, and I’m entitled to it just as you scientology freaks are entitled to believe she is genuine and sincere.

She married for money and fame. It backfired. She is seen as a freak, a brainwashed Stepford wife, and all she’s known for are her weird hairdos, crazy shopping habits, ugly teeth, anorexic body, and the arrogant smirks she puts on when she’s with her crazy husband.

She lets their child be brainwashed by the Cult of Scientology, she is a major flop professionally, and she has lost all her looks, which was all she had to begin with. What an accomplishment. lol

Totally off the wall. Even if she bought Suri a $5000 dress, she’d have to buy Suri 70 such dresses to spend that much. Even Katie isn’t that crazy.

Of course, if she could spend $2 million on a wedding dress… I mean hey, you never know…

Damn,that Tom is a lucky guy!

Julie, understood!

And Emma, Yay for you, Girl!