Top Stories

Entertainment Tonight Experiencing Technical Difficulties

Entertainment Tonight Experiencing Technical Difficulties

Earlier this morning, Entertainment Tonight reported Angelina Jolie gave birth to her twins.

“Babies are great and so is mom,” they were told.

People Magazine later put those rumors to rest with Angie’s rep saying, “Angelina has not given birth. She is fine, enjoying her home and her family in France.”

Now, for some bizarre-o reason, the Entertainment Tonight website seems to be experiencing “technical difficulties.”

Check it out at ETOnline.com!

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Steven Tyler: Aerosmith is not breaking up - Dlisted
  • Ashley Tisdale rocks red lips - JustJaredJr
  • Sharon Osbourne apologies to Susan Boyle - PopEater
  • More from Justin Timberlake on the Social Network set - PopSugar
  • Amy Winehouse shows off her new self - TheSuperficial
  • Meryl Streep rules New York City - LaineyGossip
  • Taylor Swift covers InStyle in 3-D! - Celebuzz
Photo: Andres Otero/WENN

84 Comments

# 1
ThEoRiGiNaLMrS.JoEjOnAs @ 05/30/2008 at 6:28 pm

first!

# 2
ThEoRiGiNaLMrS.JoEjOnAs @ 05/30/2008 at 6:28 pm

first!

# 3
Dante Speaks @ 05/30/2008 at 6:30 pm

LMAO! That is beyond hilarity.

# 4
the shiznack @ 05/30/2008 at 6:30 pm

haha serves them right lying ********

is star magazines website still down as well

# 5
the shiznack @ 05/30/2008 at 6:33 pm

“Babies are great and so is mom,” lol

methinks the ’source/close friend/Professional BullSh!tter’ just got fired

# 6

Perez reported it too and as usual without giving credit to his source. He just reads other sites and copy and pastes it as his own. He was quick to delete it and call out ET on their wrong info.

# 7
something @ 05/30/2008 at 6:40 pm

IDIOTS!!

# 8

Lol at that. But come on, you made this thread just to get a lot of comments!

# 9

Who cares.

LMAO, they so can’t take it that they’re wrong, they intentionally stopped the site.

Oops, somebody jumped on a story without checking out the facts ( a major journalism no-no) and that same somebody will be checking out the employment ads in tomorrow’s paper. Either that or the Jolie-Pitt births are capable of causing a major media meltdown!

Just found this now on the ET site:

ET is also hearing that the names are ISLA (pronounced eye-la) MARCHELINE (after Angie’s mom) and AMELIE JANE (after Brad’s mom) JOLIE-PITT.

it is working for me, and they havent taken the story down

Is that your screenshot? Because you should really be using firefox or opera. IE sucks ****. Totally not relevant to the topic, but just passing on my words of wisdom.

ISN’T ANYONE WATCHING E!? ON THE SCROLLING NEWS BAR THEY ANNOUNCED THAT BRAD AND ANGIE DELIVERED TWIN BOYS, THEY DID NOT REVEAL NAMES, MOTHER AND CHILDREN ARE FINE!!! OMG!

The media just needs to calm the eff down. Jesus.

Thanks Jared! ROTFLMAO!!! This is too funny.

[☆I n F a m o u s☆] @ 05/30/2008 at 6:55 pm

jared, you just taken any and every lil tiny opportunity you can to talk about her, huh?

i don’t blame you. these loons are like crack-heads, and you’re just the supplier.

I just clicked the link provided, and it was fine. No technical problems what so ever. I even watched a video of Eva Longoria helping some pap.

the reason DListers hate Angelina can be summarized as follows:

1. She’s a hypocrite. Depending on her mood and whatever “cause she’s crusading” her answers will change to meet her personal agenda.

2. Her “holier than thou-Save the World” attitude. She seems to have forgotten what she was in the past and instead wants to adopt this “Susie Homemaker” image which is a sham.

3. Endless promises to charities and other organizations that seem to disappear when her interest in them wanes off. For example, she and Brad Spitt jumped on the Hurrican Katrina bandwagon going so far to pretend to move to New Orleans. Now that its not fashionable to support that cause, she’s moved on.

4. She suxs as an actress and is clearly OVERRATED.

5. She has no remorse nor does she take any responsiblity for her past actions and the impact it had on others. While I hate Jennifer Anniston with a passion, the fact she kept yapping she would “never date a married man” while all the while was boinking Brad Spitt was 2-faced of her…and goes back to her being a hypocrite.

She’s a pretentious, egocentric, media ***** who loves the spotlight.

the real tita @ 05/30/2008 at 6:59 pm

So what happened to Angie’s new thread? It stopped at 245 and the comment section isn’t there anymore.

They just denied her giving birth in AH and showed the other pics inside the VF interview. The pics were amazing! Much better than the one outside. She wears a long black wig with full bangs, gorgeous. The other one she wears a short wig in green and it was equally gorgeous. Another one had her in a prone position in a hammock, I think. Looked like a S t. John’s ad. Very sexy!!!

Okay, I’ll buy a mag on Monday…just to add the collection.

If so many people are trying to reach the site at the same time, it can happen.
If those are the names, they are beautiful.

the real tita @ 05/30/2008 at 7:03 pm

Oh, if it’s not 1 boy and 1 girl in the oven, it’s 2 boys, IMO. When you’re having boys, you really want to dress up, put on make-up and go out. She was never like this with Shiloh.

I’ll believe it when I read it in The New York Times

# 22 the real tita @ 05/30/2008 at 7:03 pm Oh, if it’s not 1 boy and 1 girl in the oven, it’s 2 boys, IMO. When you’re having boys, you really want to dress up, put on make-up and go out. She was never like this with Shiloh.
________________
lol
I WANT BOYS

ET really had rotten eggs in their face today, can’t wait to see what is there excuse for the faulty information.

the real tita - Thank you for the info., I can’t wait to see it tonight and will for sure buying this issue.

Is it just me or is the last Jolie thread about Vanity Fair locked?? I can’t post any comments, and that last comment was from 5pm.

Twätzilla is destroying the Internets — A bunch of tubes which, by the way, I invented.

Birmingham lass @ 05/30/2008 at 7:13 pm

Should have guessed, because those two names were just too normal and beautiful

yeah like this web site never has problems of its own….. pffd, hypocrite.

On ET Canda, them mentioned the rumour about her pregnancy, then they quote AJ’s rep that the rumour is NOT TRUE.

Makes Me Feel ‘Sexy’
Originally posted Friday May 30, 2008 06:50 PM EDT

Angelina Jolie, who is expecting twins this summer, says being pregnant makes her feel womanly and sexy.

“It makes me feel that all the things about my body are suddenly there for a reason,” she says in the July issue of Vanity Fair. It makes you feel round and supple, and to have a little life inside you is amazing.”

Plus, the actress says that her partner, Brad Pitt, “finds pregnancy very sexy. So that makes me feel very sexy.”

The 32-year-old – already mom to Maddox, 6; Pax, 4; Zahara, 3; and Shiloh, 2, – also says she is awed by what the human body can do. When giving birth to daughter Shiloh, “I had a C-section and I found it fascinating. I didn’t find it a sacrifice and I didn’t find it a painful experience,” she tells the magazine. “I found it a fascinating miracle of what a body can do.”

As for her child-rearing philosophy, she says that as artists she and Pitt emphasize communication and play at home. “We communicate to the point where we probably annoy our children,” she says. “We have art around the house, we have books, we go to plays, we talk. Our focus is art and painting and dress-up and singing. It’s what we love.”

Jill @ 05/30/2008 at 7:06 pm
I’ll believe it when I read it in The New York Times

——————————————————————–
Hey girl, I thought about you today when I read the news about the crane collapse - what is going on with that? Was it around your area?

Orange Clockwork @ 05/30/2008 at 7:19 pm

OMFG! GTF OVER IT!

WHAT IN THE WORLD IS GOING ON????????????????????

I had to crawl away from my sick bed because my laptops isn’t working to get on my desktop when I turned on to The Insider and they mentioned the birth. I was like WTF? Then i burst out laughing when they said that sources told them the names of the girls, that isal and jane or whatever it was…I was llike bwhahahahhah, but then I was like wait a minute ..they were so sure and had some new pics of security at the chateau…I was like I gotta find out THE TRUTH on JJ! LOL! Well I’m shocked at the amount of new threads since my last visit but as I was logging n a NY local station “broke news” that People magazine broke news that this has been a rumor. Why can’t people just wait from an official spokesperson? This will teeach all these stupid media outlets never to use “sources” or to troll on blogs that have no authenticity. MOG I’ve gotta go back to all those fab threads. I could only imagine the drama and confusion. I took a quick peek at the Vanity Fair Cover and all I can say is F A B U L O U S.

The media is realing because AJ doesn’t often confirm or deny anything. The must feel the need to make it up.

Wow I saw some of the VF pics on Extra and she looks great. Her in all black and the green wig. Terrific. I can’t wait to buy the mag.

OMG!!! I just saw ET and she showed a preview for monday’s episode where they showed the VF pics! She looks gorgeous. Shes in a black wig, a green wig…Also there’s one where she’s laying on this couch. She looks MAMS sexy!!!

The sites back and they still have the story on there!

The story is still on the ET site. Ha.

ET is now in the same bag as OK and Star mags. Make up a story and quote an “inside source.”

AJ is one sexy mama.

Frenchy–I just watched ET they are still sticking with their story saying some sites say this is not true but their source was someone who was in the delivery room!!!! WTF????
They also showed VF pix…OMG she is gorgeous I can’t wait to buy that issue, the pix are supposed to be on ET on Monday….

Andrómeda @ 05/30/2008 at 7:43 pm

That happens when you write lies ET.

where is everyone post?

guli @ 05/30/2008 at 7:42 pm

Guli I can’t believe it!!!! they are reporting it like it was very real. who is this rep that spoke with people? From now on if I don’t see a person’s name, i’m not gonna believe it. cindy G would be the one to say anything not some “rep”.

missouri girl @ 05/30/2008 at 7:51 pm

She will have em when she has em’ let it go people, tabloids, pervs, whoever

access hollywood said it was just a rumor

missouri girl @ 05/30/2008 at 7:53 pm

# 44 test @ 05/30/2008 at 7:44 pm where is everyone post?
…………RIGHT HERE………

ET is sticking by their story! They just said that they received their info from someone who was actually in the delivery room. I don’t know what to believe now, but I’m sure there weren’t too many peoplein the delivery room if she did give birth, so that person should be immedately fired.

OMG they also gave a snippet of the Vanity fair interview and pics, and Angie is gorgeous, gorgeous, gorgeous!! She looks like she had a ton of fun drssing up in different styles- she’s waring a couple of wigs, bith long and short, and looks like liike she did in her modeling days. You can tell she is definitely having fun and is really happy. I hope they do name the babies those names- they are beautiful!

I am laughing so hard at the entertainment shows running around acting all crazy.

:lol:

You know, I think it’s fun for us fans to discuss and guess and imagine great and positive things for the actors that we like, we don’t really need to be accurate. it’s all fun. But when legit media acts like some gossip site, printing all kinds of rumors well Houston, we have a problem.

anoble @ 05/30/2008 at 7:18 pm

Anoble, hey there. Yes, another crane collapse, nowhere near me, thank God, but this one happened at 8 a.m. right in the middle of the morning rush hour. Thank God there was only one casualty. NYC is in the middle of a building boom and there are too many buildings going up too fast. Somebody is cutting corners and there is going to be hell to pay.

mia2 @ 05/30/2008 at 7:53 pm
ET is sticking by their story! They just said that they received their info from someone who was actually in the delivery room.
************************************************************

ROTFLMBAO! Did they try to bribe a nurse, the way Star Magazine tried to bribe the parish priest to back up their phony story about the marriage that wasn’t?

This is getting absolutely insane. The babies aren’t even due for another month and a half.

and am I the only one who notices how ridiculous JJ is?

He bags on E for having technical difficulties yet he disabled the comment section for the AJ VF thread.

Hypocrite much?

Anyone with eyes can see that Angelina is not due yet. She’s not that big.

vickifromtexas @ 05/30/2008 at 8:09 pm

#57, j.j. is great. if you are unhappy with it i’m sure there is somewhere else you could go.

new thread @ 05/30/2008 at 8:12 pm

————————– new Thread ———————-

blythe @ 05/30/2008 at 8:04 pm
Anyone with eyes can see that Angelina is not due yet. She’s not that big.
**************************************************

She’s big, all right, but she hasn’t dropped enough yet. (If you’ve ever had a baby you’ll know what I mean.)

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS @ 05/30/2008 at 8:13 pm


GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

GOD BLESS THE JOLIE-PITTS!

Blythe, I agree with you. I unfortunately got all caught up in the hype liek everyone else who is just excited for our couple. But you are right- she’s not yet big enough to be close to a full term delivery. I’ve had twins and know what an 8 month pregnant with twins belly looks like lol! Not to mention your feet, hands, face, neck and that wobble/scooting walk!

jjb @ 05/30/2008 at 7:50 pm another VF pic
http://img143.imagevenue.com/loc795/th_91059_aj_122_795lo.jpg

Thanks for posting. She looks sexy.

bwahaahahahaaha

Why is this ET thing post worthy?? Slow day Jared?

and we do we care about et technical difficulties????? all we care is about angelina!!

PR Machine @ 05/30/2008 at 10:14 pm

Once again - another publicity stunt.

They havetheir people leak something, just to have it denied later.

The Brangelina did the same regarding a wedding in New Orleans.

They have movies to promote and they would pull any trick.

PR Machine @ 05/30/2008 at 10:14 pm

Once again - another publicity stunt.
~~~~~~~~~

I wish — I would love it if AJ/BP f***** with the “media” — no one deserves to more than they — but I very much doubt they would waste their time.

I thought her due date was around August 12th. Those cute little buns have some more baking to do.

There is way too much hoopla surrounding this “leak”. This is not the Second Coming. I think the world needs to take a step back and take o collective deep breath and get back to reality. This has been a big news day here in NYC (the crane collapse) and yet this “rumor” has made our 5pm and 6pm news shows. Incredible.

lilyanne @ 05/30/2008 at 10:27 pm
I thought her due date was around August 12th.
******************************************************

I doubt she’ll go that long. I’m thinking late June/early July.

lilyanne @ 05/30/2008 at 10:27 pm
This has been a big news day here in NYC (the crane collapse) and yet this “rumor” has made our 5pm and 6pm news shows. Incredible.
****************************************************************

ROTFLMBAO!! Can you imagine what will happen when she really does give birth? They’ll be interrupting their regularly scheduled programming with the news. Just watch.

I can imagine how angie and Brad felt. I wonder if they watch much tv. I bet angie thought she had dozed off for a little nap and woke up with news of her having the babies already. That much be some strange feeling to have.

ah well…..people is now my number 1 source. never lies and puts lame rumours like some other desperate tabloids.

lyn @ 05/30/2008 at 11:56 pm
I can imagine how angie and Brad felt
**********************************************

They probably thought the whole thing was hilarious. E! Online finally retracted the story. At least they had the grace to admit they were the first to circulate a false rumor.

ET took the article off their website. Hmmmmmmm. Mary Hart swore tonight that she gave birth because HER source said so.

I hope ET has egg on their face.

Of course ET Online is experiencing “technical difficulties”…

THEY GOT CAUGHT WITH EGG ON THEIR FACES!!!

Now, mind you, I don’t watch “entertainment shows” EVERY DAY like I used to… But I did in the past, & they were usually right. By right, I mean they tended to check their stories out BEFORE airing them.

The website has NOTHING re: the births… Other news, yes, like Charlie Sheen getting married, etc. They don’t even offer what they used to do in the past - AN APOLOGY FOR GETTING IT WRONG! Then again, it’s really a fluff show, when compared to more serious & respectable media forms (i.e. CNN {TV}; Newsweek, People, etc. {print})

I wonder if they’ll have the guts to MENTION THEIR ERROR on the weekend or Monday edition of the show… Or if they’ll deal with their error in embarrassed silence…?

Question: Have any of you lost respect for ET, or do you think they were caught up in the hysteria that seems to surround the Jolie-Pitts every time they’re mentioned?

nikomilinko @ 05/31/2008 at 6:07 am

I can´t understand how they give false information

http://www.clicksia.com/index.php?ref=nikomilinko

Whoever constantly posts God Bless the Jolie-Pitts on all these threads …….seriously? My goodness someone needs a family of their own.

Bingo! Finally they got the rotten EGGS! I stopped watching ET since last year. The sequences of their reporting are very topsy turvy, there’s no order and I got a lot of headaches and confusions on the way they presented each segment. Ridiculous. Mary Hart should change heart. She is not credible anymore.

If Angelina is indeed still pregnant, then she should step out in public and show us she is pregnant!!!

ha thats what there lying asses get! they will nvr b a reliable source

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.