Gwyneth Paltrow - “Harper’s Bazaar” July 2008

Gwyneth Paltrow - “Harper’s Bazaar” July 2008

Gwyneth Paltrow looks positively flawless in Versace on the July 2008 cover of Harper’s Bazaar, out June 17.

In the mag, the mother-of-two talks about staying in shape: “All the negative things have actually ended up being really positive because they’ve kick-started me into thinking how I want to look for the rest of my life.”

Continued Gwyn, “And you know, I don’t want to look like a mother who doesn’t care. For myself, for my work and for my relationship, I want to look good.”

And she surely looks good here!


Posted to: Gwyneth Paltrow
Related posts:

80 Comments

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All

the cover looks a bit strange…i think its her body positioning. i think gwyneth’s very pretty and i applaud her for not wearing so much make up here! she looks a lot like her mother. i like her hair like this but still…somethings missing on the cover.

Beautiful smile but bad camera angle. Makes her nose look big.

I don’t find her attractive but she does have good bone structure.

Check out here:
360.yahoo.com/thanhhuysing

I agree. fantastic body but ugly face.

blue skies @ 06/03/2008 at 4:08 am

Horrible. Cover.

I don’t think she’s ugly by any means just a normal looking person.

eddie jones @ 06/03/2008 at 4:12 am

how many beers did jared have before making this she looks good comment? You would need more then typical beer goggles to even venture close to this human waste of space.

I don’t know why magazines fuss over her. She’s not even that pretty. I think she’s so plain.

Love the makeup…don’t know about that dress.

I think the makeup is too understated for such a glamorous gown.

She’s just so normal that she’s boring

cute but models are prettier

I really like the new hair but she needs to do something about the top. It’s too flat.

Average but sitll applaud her for not going under the knife.

man-face
not hot

I’m sorry I think Gwyneth is not very pretty.

Much better when she smiles

remember da truth @ 06/03/2008 at 5:16 am

Do you people call ALL women “manly”? Is that a new word you learned?

She doesn’t look manly at all. She’s not strikingly beautiful, but she’s sure not ugly. If she worked in your office, she’d be the cute girl compared to all the ordinary housewives in Mom jeans and Supercuts hairdos who let themselves go after two kids.
Is that why you all hate her so much? You know deep down that you couldn’t look this good, and it’s not all that hard to achieve but you’re too lazy to try?

Of course she looks flawless, Thats airbrushing for ya!

Blackworm @ 06/03/2008 at 7:16 am

I love her hair shorter. She looks great!

so beautiful, insanely talented actor - whats not to love?

Newport beach, 92660 @ 06/03/2008 at 7:46 am

#20

How in the world could she have a masculine body?

magazines love her because fashion biz and upper class people love her.

she doesn’t attract nomal/middle class type.

sorry. but just get over her if you don’t like her, cuz there’re still so many people that do.

There is nothing masculine about Gwyneth. She’s tall and thin, but not manly. Do we all have to have big *sses and huge fake t*ts to be considered womanly now? Sad. I agree that the middle part does nothing for her, but she looks pretty and happy here.

msguidedmama @ 06/03/2008 at 10:05 am

I like that unlike Vogue, they do not over-airbrush and photoshop their covers!!!

:)

---------- @ 06/03/2008 at 10:07 am

same ol’ boring face

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.