Gisele and Tom Brady’s Father’s Day

Wow, the maturity level on today’s internet blog is amazing. People, who have nothing better to do than to criticize the lives of others by judging them from afar (with no intimate details about their lives) feel the need to make comments like “bath the baby from STDs,” “kill the nanny,” and “he {Tom Brady} treater her {Bridgette} like dirt.” These individuals are simply living their lives and clearly they don’t live for the approval of mere website junkies. I applaud Tom, Giselle, and even Bridgette for being mature enough to handle this situation as best they can…even under the prying eyes of nosy people.

And, of course, how can I forget the many experts here who claim the child is a victim. Of course, how can such wisdom be denied when these same experts live in close proximity of the child to gauge their intellect. As long as their is media and selfish minds who chose to dramatize everyone else’s lives, without dealing with their own issues, people will continue to look at Tom and Giselle and Bridgette and judge. But, remember, you’re judging from the outside, looking in.

So, while you’re relying on a blog for your gossip meal, the real people are actually in the mix of the real stuff not caring if you’re there or not. I like that difference!

leave tom brady alone!!!!! i’m so glad tom brady don’t like a father day.

Hey Tom,

There’s a reason John’s last name is MOYNAHAN. It’s because you’re an immature playboy and cheater. I feel sorry for most celebrities for how the paps constantly take pictures of them; however, I do not feel any sympathy whatsoever for you or your girlfriend. My suggestion to you would be to release a statement explaining your lack of involvement in the baby’s life. Then people might back off you a little more.

On an ending note, some people will say “Bridget moved to CA to make it hard for him to see the baby.” I disagree big time. Instead of going to Costa Rica for a month, he could have spent that time with his son. I think Bridget knew and knows that, regardless of where she lives, Brady will only be an occasional presence in the baby’s life. She is raising him near good friends who have been a great support system to her and it’s great to see her doing that.

these 2 are such attention whores….why of all days do they want to spend father’s day with John when Tom doesn’t even know the meaning of being a “daddy”…Gi, it’s the same baby that you’re holding that you wanted aborted just more than a year ago…my, my what changed? hypocrites of all hypocrites…no wonder people can’t stand you and your boy toy. HAVE A MERRY life suckers!

Gisele’s feet are huge!!! No shoes look good on big feet.

gisele is built like a giraffe..wow

I think this is such a sad situtation, especially for Bridget Moynahan. She has been through so much, hurt so much by Tom Brady and Gisele Bundchen..And Bridget’s situtation has been so public..Tabloids, comments(lots of which were hateful)..I think it is sad that Gisele thinks she has a right to this child, I also think it is sad that Brady thinks he has a right..He was not there for this child during Bridget;s pregnancy, nor afterward to amount too much (especially for the publicity he gets for spent time with John). I could not give Gisele the privilage of holding my child. Now, Gisele is on GQ mag, as usual half naked, but that is who she is..I don not agree with the mag, Tom Brady is NOT the luckiest man. There are many more women in this world that are more beautiful than Gisele, in fact I this she,without being made up, is ugly..

In her interview with GQ, Gisele says, ” When you are out there with the wolves,you have to play with the wolves, you know”. Brady might want to check on “the wolves” she is playing with….

rae, you idiot, bridget has NEVER complained..gisle is just doing her “show myself being good” by slobbering over Bridgets son..I am a mother and I would not be as kind as Bridget, for that tranny gisele would never touch a child of mine. she is pure filth…

Bridget has NEVER complained, rae. If anyone is complaining, it’s Brady groupies who put all the blame in Bridget but never stop to think that maybe, just maybe, their hero should have worn a condom if he did not want children. Brady lovers such as yourself refuse to hold him accountable. It’s not like he can’t afford condoms.

Here’s my take on the situation:

I think Bridget moved to CA because she’s got a great support network out there. I also think that the only reason Brady sees the baby is because he wants to improve his image. He said in 2007 that he wants for young children to idolize him. He gallivanted around the world with a supermodel while Bridget Moynahan was pregnant with his child. That fact alone makes him the antithesis of good role model material; that fact alone makes most parents want their children to look up to anyone BUT him. He spent 1 month of his off-time in Costa Rica with his supermodel and her family. Having mentioned that, why should Bridget make it easy for him to see John? Instead of spending one month in Costa Rica, he should have spent that time with his son. However, Tom Brady and Tom Brady alone comes first for Tom Brady. He’s a playboy. Any good parent (i.e. Bridget Moynahan) does not want their child(ren) to idolize playboys and their ****** girlfriends.

Oh, please. You drama queens are killing me. Poor Bridgette!?!? Hate Tom and Giselle!?!?

I stand behind the simple understanding that none of us know the details of what’s going on behind the scenes. Tom did not abandon his child. It’s obvious he’s handling it. He may not be handling it THE WAY YOU WANT HIM TO, but the beauty in that is that it’s not your issue to deal with.

He doesn’t need to take a pic with his son to help you sleep better at night either.

Ofcourse, if bridget’s uncle said it, then it must be the gospel.

Ofcourse, Bridget is the first and only woman who has had a child without the aide of a husband or boyfriend (and then to have a magazine cover to tell her story) while other women have barely gotten that much attention.

Ofcourse, since Tom was not with Bridget every waking moment of her pregnancy while HE WAS PLAYING FOOTBALL IN EVERY STATE IMGAINABLE, he would be the culprit.

Ofcourse, this baby is a victim because he’s suffering from the abuse of living with his mother in Hollywood while his father is playing professional football and paying thousands in child support while other parents are barely getting that kind of settlement living in the ghetto.

Ofcourse, Giselle is a control freak because she’s accompnaying her boyfriend during his travels and is seen, on camera, with him and his son in tow.

Then, then there’s the greatest crime of all: The nanny is hugging the father of the child. How dare she show affection to the parent of the child she’s caring for? How dare she develop a relationship that’s conducive to the environment that the child is growing up in? Kill the nanny! Stone her!

I’m amazed that some people are still stuck in the mentality of the 1950s where chauvenistic stereotypes, pompous attitudes, and the instrusiveness of conservatism was ramapant. I’m even more amazed at how chilish and juvenile these comments are, ranging from “she’s ugly” to “she would never hold my child.” I imagine the age range of the posters are from 3 years of age to 93 years of age. It’s almost as if these comments come from the Maury Povich/Jerry Springer Hall of Famers. I for one feel for this child, not because of the intimate details of his personal life, but because of the implications of the public and what effect people like you will have on him when he gets older. Soon, you’ll be saying “Oh, dear….how dare that ******* child live like us normal folks when he was a supposed to crumble up and die.”

i had the same thing happen to me… girls says shes on the pill… stoped talking to her… i even remember the instance …pushed for the day after pill and all… once some women find a winner they try to trap him. hoping surely bc they have a baby with them they will stick around. well these women need to realize that real winners will figure out a way to make it work for the child and still look good with out being with them owell men really dont have rights in these situations. even if you want to keep the baby, the women can abort it… if the man doesnt want it, the women can keep it and hold him financially responsible .. shucks … better like kids or join the dead beat club…. thankfully i fell in love with my baby girl ;)