Top Stories

Rachel Bilson is Herve Leger Lovely

Rachel Bilson is Herve Leger Lovely

Rachel Bilson looks rather lickable in Herve Leger at the Whitney Art Party and auction at the Skylight gallery space on Tuesday in New York City.

At the event, the 26-year-old former O.C. star (in Lanvin shoes) cozied up with fashion designer Max Azria. Music was provided by DJ Stretch Armstrong.

The dress code for the evening was “Art Chic.”

DO YOU THINK Rachel Bilson fit into the evening’s dress code?

10+ pictures inside of Herve Leger Lovely Rachel Bilson

Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 01
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 02
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 03
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 04
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 05
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 06
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 07
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 08
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 09
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 10
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 11
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 12
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 13
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 14
Bilson-leger rachel bilson herve leger 15

JJ Links Around The Web

  • The Kardashians want Oprah - PopEater
  • Victoria Beckham checks out Barneys - Popsugar
  • Ashley Tisdale to lend her voice to Santa - Just Jared Jr
  • George Clooney and Elisabetta Canalis hit Rome - Lainey Gossip
  • Courtney Love's rants appear on Facebook - Dlisted
  • Katie Couric's old sexy photos surface - TheSuperficial
  • Peter Facinelli thinks a Cullen Thanksgiving is weird - Celebuzz
Photo: WENN

151 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 » Show All

Now there’s a true statement if I ever heard one. She’ll show soon. She has a lame, unoriginal “clothing line” to promote if it’s to be out by back to school time…..brace for the continuing media wh*ring that is, again, about to begin…..

Now there’s a true statement if I ever heard one. She’ll show soon. She has a lame, unoriginal “clothing line” to promote if it’s to be out by back to school time…..brace the continuing media wh*ring that is, again, about to begin…..

@ 86 It must be true since it was deleted on her IMDb page! LOL

If you watch the uncensored documentary on the digital special edition of Jumper (extra features) you will see that it’s clear Rachel slept with Liman prior to getting the role in Jumper (her cell number just happened to be on speed dial on his cell phone, which is how she got the call to be in it.) Hayden looks like he wants to throw up as Liman demonstrates how he (Hayden) should make out with Rachel. Rachel is clearly an talentless **** who brings shame to every honest actress everywhere who tries to make it on talent alone and won’t spread her legs on a casting couch.”

voice of reason @ 07/01/2008 at 4:39 am

@97 I’m banned from DH so I don’t post there. Jen has my IP lighted up like fire LOL

flowerpower @ 07/03/2008 at 3:14 pm

what a pity that they broke it off !!rache and adam brody are perfect together…!i know it`s a very long time ago but..it´s sad i think!!

If you go to rachelb-france.com….someone took a picture with her on a plane and said her and Hayden were in the Bahamas and are now in toronto together.

Who gives a rats f**k where rachel is, hopefuly the b***h is dead!
Im pissed Jen’s fat azz banned me from the forum, I was beth90210 and the ***** banned me! I f**kin hate her azz! I’m still there but she just dont know it so ha ha to her stupid fat b***h!

_______________________________________________________

You’ll never know my REAL name Spider & Jen! f**k you both!!!!

Raven once again! get a got damn life and stop:

1. Bashing Jen

2.Using other peoples name and getting them blamed for it. When they dont even know that this website nor Hayden or Rachel exist! you should be reported!

3.Coming to here if you dont like Rachel. GROW UP!

4.Telling me lies. You know what you did to me you a$$!!!

voice of reason @ 07/09/2008 at 7:14 pm

@Raven such great language your mother must be so proud of you, or are you just annoyed because yet again your multiple names have been found out-for someone who hates Rachel you spend alot of time on her boards.

Aint that right sweet

That picture is of Rachel and someone else (another girl) on a plane, but there is no proof around when it was taken. It was also posted at IMDB, supposedly by the girl in the picture, but she changed elements of her story about it as soon as she was questioned about what happened. There’s also another very blurry picture of what is supposed to be Hayden with his back to the camera, walking up some stairs, taken at the same time. There is a woman walking next to him but she’s too tall to be Rachel and there is no indication of when or where that picture was taken either. The picture doesn’t look recent. This story about Rachel and Hayden together in Toronto is garbage.

@ 104 if see this i was too ban that jen from desring hayden is wacked and a stalker if you ask me just because she has a few pics of him she acts like she owns him, maybe if hayden knew how she treated his fans maybe he would think twice on meeting her again.also maybe should ban her a**.

Jen. I dont like her azz. someone has a fatjen fansite and its soo funny. I never seen those pictures of her before! ( jen) she is extremley ugly. she should ban herself from her own life and commit suicide. stupid b***h!

@ 110

RELEVANT THEORY!

@ #106

Keep on dreaming & wishing but tell your sources to work more on “credibility”!

The girl who put the picture up of herself and Rachel on the plane has removed all the encoded data from the picture, the only reason someone would remove that data is so that no one could check the date it was taken.The picture of the two people walking up the stairs was taken in 2005 with a different camera.

Charlie Quinn @ 07/10/2008 at 11:31 pm

This chick is HOT!

@ 115

why would someone go to the trouble of doing something like that ? seems like an whole lotta work for a genuine fan encounter. unless it is something else altogether. thank you so much for the information though. it makes sense to me now .

voice of reason @ 07/11/2008 at 4:48 am

@115–so Rachel just happens to be wearing the same clothing? as for encoding a picture–impossible to tell from the internet, you have to have the original or print. And just a point of note–two pictures on the Net can’t possibly tell you what camera was used.

This toad just SUCKS!

@ 118 no offense but you have no idea what you are talking about. It is possible to encode a picture and get camera information from a picture on the internet, you do not have to have the original or a print. I know this for a fact.

@ 118 - I do not mean to offend, but you have no idea what you are talking about. It is possible to encode a picture and get camera information from a picture on the internet. I know this for a fact.

voice of reason @ 07/11/2008 at 7:58 am

And it took you two times to post your rubbish information, what camera was used in the second shot-seeing as you are an expert in this field.

@ 122 obviously the double post was an error, but then you knew that. It is funny how even though according to you my information is rubbish you still wish to know what camera was used in the second shot. You seem like a very angry person and I no longer wish to discuss this with you.

For the record, yes I am an expert in this field.

@ # 117 - why would someone go to the trouble of doing something like that ?

Some “pathetic zealot/s” would sometimes do just about everything and anything…

Thurmen Murmen @ 07/11/2008 at 4:05 pm

humm… Rachel is not very sun-tanned for somebody who comes back from Bahamas, but she has a dark-haired skin. It could be a mobile phone pic, without EXIF informations, or they were abolished during layout on the site.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.