OlderFri, 11 July 2008 at 2:52 pm
Tom & Katie Send Gifts To Nicole & Baby Sunday
Nicole Kidman was sent a large basket of baby gifts by ex-husband Tom Cruise and wife Katie Holmes to celebrate her new daughter Sunday Rose.
According to People, TomKat sent new mom Nicole and her country superstar husband Keith Urban’s little girl chenille giraffe baby blankets, posh items from the Hermes baby line as well as other baby goods.
Sunday Rose was born Monday in Nashville.
“We feel immensely blessed and grateful to be given this beautiful baby girl,” the Aussie power couple has said. “She’s an absolute delight.”
Share This Post:
Photos: Stephen Lovekin/Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty
Posted to: Celebrity Babies, Katie Holmes, Keith Urban, Nicole Kidman, Sunday Kidman-Urban, Tom Cruise
Related posts:
Posted to: Celebrity Babies, Katie Holmes, Keith Urban, Nicole Kidman, Sunday Kidman-Urban, Tom Cruise
Related posts:
115 Comments
Wish katie would grow her hair out and be the girl she used to be.
Got a new contract eh?
So who leaked the news of the gift? The Urbans?
and the award for nicest classies family
goes to Tom and Katie.
American and when is the last time you have seen Nicole and Tom together enjoying time with their children after the divorce? Yes, they have two children together, but it isn’t like they are Demi or Bruce. Now, you can say that THEY are a big part of each others’ lives, but the Kidman/Cruise ex’s…. not as much as your graniose statement that “Tom Cruise… is a big part of Nicole Kidman’s life.” implies.
Don’t be an idiot… I’m not playing any games… you however…… are the one that bashed someone and stated that they needed to provide “evidence or shut up”. You are the one that claimed ,first off, that you read where Kidman’s rep claimed a gift from Tomkat in an article… and now you say “Everyone, from E! to People to Access Hollywood, are reporting the gifts sent to the happy couple from TomKat.” STILL with no “evidence” of any such article. Pathetic. Looks like you have mastered the art of “playing dumb”.
There was no leak, #78. Kidman’s rep told the press.
You’re nit-picking, #80 about that life comment. And it doesn’t change the fact that the media, regardless of what either person wants, is interested in what each other think of whatever big events happen in their lives.
You’re playing dumb and I’m not catching the bait. Just google it. Everyone is reporting this news matter.
You really are THICK… Where is the proof that Kidman’s rep told the press? Just because you keep saying it doesn’t make it true. What article did you read the “Kidman rep told the press” claim?! Where is your evidence?
“Playing dumb”? What are you talking about? Obviously the ‘gift’ giving is being reported… duh!… I’m not even arguing that point. Refer back to above paragraph…..
American isn’t THICK, he’s paid to be Cruise’s mouthpiece on gossip blogs.
If I recalled, we, you & I , you and some others, have played this game of ‘producing evidence or shut up’ before and you did not provide evidence, just as this time. Again, you said Kidman’s rep said as if you were there when the rep said it. You shut up for a short while and I thought you’ve learned your lesson not to utter gossip as if it is fact. E!, Access, whatever channels are all gossip shows.
Who the hell are you, #83? Forget it. Don’t bother. You’re just another wacko who thinks people taht aren’t crazy enoyugh to spend their time bashing TomKat and actually defend them against such vultures are paid flunkies.
I never ‘utter gossip as fact.’ That’s your department. I never claim that Suri Cruise isn’t his daughter or that she was fired from the Batman films, and etc. without proof now do I? And E! and Access Hollywood are respected news sources.
By the way, #80. I was misread that article and Kidman’s rep did not report tell the press but in not one single article has it been found that TomKat’s camp released this.
What news do E! & AH report? Economy? War on Iraq? Reliable? BS, these two are ‘entertainment news’ channels and the bulk of their so called news are rumors whenever there isn’t a face to face interviews shown.
I never said Suri was fired from Batman. I know she’s two. I did said Holmes was terrible in Batman and that was my OPINION as a movie watcher. Anyway, whatever you claimed, if you are not the Cruises’ rep or relative or friend, you still need to show proof, especially when you try to defend them. The burden lays on your shoulders, TC’s defender!
You were misread that article? What does this statement mean? You were misunderstood? If Kidman’s camp did not report the gift and Cruise’s didn’t either, who did? That was a simple a question. You argued as if you’re in the know, so show proof. Why bs around and around?
Tom is so lucky to have Katie.
Entetainement news sources #85. Quit playing dumb.
I was just pointing out examples of some of things critics say without proof. (And actually, the burden of proof lies on the accuser. It’s always been that way.)
Who’s BSing? I just admitted that I misread the article and Kidman’s rep was not the one who told the press about the gifts. No one knows who the ’source’ was.
Katie wasn’t fired from the Batman films??? I mean, of course she wanted to do Mad Money instead of Dark Knight. What great actress would have missed the Mad Money opportunity. Hmmm.. what a shame that Dark Knight will be a huge summer blockbuster mega hit. But who could have guessed?
HeeHee.heeeheeee…. Ok, ok… so she was respectfully let go. Uhhhh… I mean she wasn’t fired.
TMZ also claims to be entertainment news source. I’m not playing dumb because I’m not dumn. Can’t say the same for you. You didn’t see that your misuse of words allowed people to ‘nitpick’?
Burden of proof lies with both sides, dimwit, especially those stating hearsay as ‘facts’ (yes, even if you heard ‘news’ from E!, Access, those news are hearsay). The critics giving opinions don’t have to prove a damn thing.
When you stated Holmes wasn’t fired, that wasn’t an opinion. And the list goes on.
She wasn’t fired, #88. Even the makers have come out to deny that rumor. She took a year off to be with her newborn kid. That’s all. A perfectly logical explanation backed up by many. Is there any proof that she was fired? Oh yeah. A tabloid heard from a ’source close to the star’ that she was fired. Credible eh?
You nit-pick because you’re stubborn and play dumb constantly. I didn’t mix up anything. TMZ is in no way, shape or form as respected and accalimed as Access Hollywood and E! and so on and you damn well know it!
No. The critics sure as hell have to prove their accusations. You can’t just say that Tom Cruise is gay or Katie Holmes was fired without backing it up.
Ofg course when I stated that Holmes wasn’t fired it wasn’t an opinion. It’s a proven fact. Anyone questioning it is a stubborn moron now.I’ve long since proven that rumor wrong a long time ago.
“sigh”……. Remember that thing called a contract… Actors have to sign them when they do a movie… when they did the first movie they knew that a second one was also going to be made… the actors, Katie included, were under contract to do the second movie…unless—-THEY didn’t want you back. If I remember correctly, it was said by Katie’s people that she was already obligated to do Mad Money, so she was unable to do the Dark Knight. It is called ’saving face’, and of course the people involved in the Dark Knight aren’t going to say otherwise. Maybe it was part of the deal when releasing her from the contract. Let her people say whatever they need to and then….. move on. She may not have been ‘fired’ per say, but she most certainly was ‘let go’.
I hate that ’saving face’ excuse everyone keeps using. Not only is it based on rumor but it also shows the sheer arrogance and hypocrisy of critics. You’re arrogant enough to say that all the people involved in the matter are all lying and you know the truth and it’s hypocritical because if Nolan and co. had said something negative about Holmes, you’d believe them. You only believe them when they say negative things but positive things are always suspect. (I mean, did you even see this contract?)
Face it. She left because she wanted to spend more time with her kid.
More wonderful people like the Cruises should fill in this planet. Kidman sent gifts during Katie and Tom’s wedding and now Tom and Katie along with the kids do the same on the birth of her child. Awww.
You are a simpleton.
I said critics GIVING OPINIONS don’t have to prove a thing. I also stressed many times that facts stated not by the subjects him/herself need concrete proofs. You just happen to be the one who always stated facts AS IF you are Cruise or Holmes or in the latest case, Kidman.
I also wrote TMZ claims to be entertainment news channel, as do E! & AH. You choose to take the last two serious. I, on the other hand, lump them together. This is your right and by stating so I want you to know that by this reasoning others have right to take this as fact and that as gossip.
Now, let’s agree that you had proven that Holmes wasn’t fired and she chose not to reprise her role in Batman and chose Mad Money instead. Then my OPINION is in choosing MM she showed that her wit is as dull as her acting in Batman. And if TC, as her loving and more HW experienced husband, did not advise her to stick with BM franchise (as he certainly know the power of a popular franchise can do for a mediocre actor), he may have had little interest in helping her establish a career in HW.
Can you see now that this is one defense of yours that does nothing positively for your idol or his wife?
wise of Holmes to ditch Batman because all superhero girlfriends sucks and its just a jokerized role now if you’re Batman or playing a villain that’s a different story.
I used the term” jokerized role”not to spoil the movie for some folks who follow the Batman news and spoilers.
The links are being monitored here so google “Dark knight Helmer Unhappy with Holmes ” it reveals Nolan was so sad that Katie didnt wonna do the sequel anymore.
Also google Maggie Gyllenhaal asking Katie Holmes permission to do Batman and read Maggie’s Parade magazine interview because she ask Katie’s permission to do TDK. Warner TPTB assured her that its ok with Katie.
Katie left….
- avoid all the Bale and Eckhart affair rumors
- avoid the crazy promotional blitz esp Europe and Asia…too much for her.
-more time with family esp Suri./ TDK is a long shoot unlike MM a short one and only a domestic promotional blitz.
You’re the simpleton, #94.
You;re right taht critics have a right to their opinions but can’t have to distinct them as such and not claim them as facts which I do not. If you do, back them up.
Everyone takes E! and Access Hollywood seriously. I see no shame in that. They’re respected sources of entertianment news. If you want to lump them together that’s your right but it’s not the case no matter how much you;d like it to be so.
They’re not my idols and no. My defense still works. You’re not a mindreader so all that is your unsubstantiated opinion. That MIGHT be the case but you have nothing to back it up and will always fall apart under scrutiny. Until you prove your opinion, this good defense stands.
Katie’s career is hot but once she resorts to naked publicity,pornish and naked films then it means her career is dying. Most actresses do low cheap stunts once they need the attn or career survival.
“As empty vessels make the loudest sound, so they have the least wit are the greatest blabbers.” Plato
LET THE HATING BEGIN LOL
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!