Top Stories

Nicole Kidman is a New Mattress Mommy

Nicole Kidman is a New Mattress Mommy

Nicole Kidman shows off her post-pregnancy figure while on the hunt for a new mattress with country superstar husband Keith Urban on Wednesday in Nashville, Tenn.

Just a week after the birth of daughter Sunday Rose, Nicole recently emailed The New York Post, “We are in heaven. Can’t stop staring at her in complete awe. Feeling incredibly blessed to have been given this precious little angel. Can’t wait for you to meet her!”

Rumor is that the Aussie power couple will not be selling photos of their daughter!

Kidman-mattress nicole kidman mattress 01
Kidman-mattress nicole kidman mattress 02
Kidman-mattress nicole kidman mattress 03

JJ Links Around The Web

  • A possible D.C. Housewife crashes a White House dinner - Dlisted
  • An ambulance is called to David Hasselhoff's home again - PopEater
  • Justin Timberlake hangs out on the Social Network set - LaineyGossip
  • Zoe Saldana poses in a bikini for Details - TheSuperficial
  • Glee will make way for American Idol - Celebuzz
  • Zac Efron gets starstruck - JustJaredJr
  • Kate Hudson and Ryder check out Cirque du Soleil - PopSugar

104 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 » Show All

She’s is stunning.
Amazing, beautiful.
Her baby is going to be gorgeous too.

I’m sorry but some of you people know you are lying about selling your baby’s pictures.  If a magazine offered you a million dollars you know damned well you’d sell those pictures in an instant.  And I’m sorry, she is as naturally thin as AJ and AJ looked pregnant both times she was pregnant.  Nicole is 40 years old, supposedly suffered a couple of miscarriages and she’s spinning the day before she gives birth?  She never stopped dyeing her hair and she never gave up the botox.  Which hospital did she give birth in, the baby’s weight, c-section or vaginal?  When is the last time that a celebrity gave birth and the details weren’t leaked to the press? Something fishy.

#43 - But breasts always get bigger AFTER pregnancy because all the milk is coming in. As for her stomach, JJ posted this picture in 2006 and she wasn’t pregnant, it doesn’t look much different than we’ve been seeing. Sorry, her pregnancy was bogus.

http://media.justjared.com/headlines/2006/06/nicole-kidman-pregnant.jpg

For Brad & Angelina, I don’t think it is as much about media attention as it is that they realize that their will be a bounty on those babies’ heads until pictures are seen. Maybe sharing a few pictures (taken in a controlled setting) will defer some of the incredible attention and paparazzi. As long as the money goes to charity, I think it is great!

If Nicole and Keith decide not to share a photo, fine, great, whatever. It is their baby, their choice.

#7 IF YOU HAVE EVER HAD A BABY, YOUR LAST 3 MONTHS IS WHEN U REALLY START TO SHOW.. GET REAL.. SHE IS SKINNY ANY WAY..

Oh Canada @ 07/17/2008 at 6:57 pm

I believe Nicole had a baby; but there’s no way this woman just gave birth. Even n”naturally slim/skinny women gain some weight and cleavge when they are pregnant for nine months.

Either Nicole is from another planet or she was never really pregnant.

Such a shame…such a fraud….

Can someone explain to me how she looks “stunning” in these pics? All I see is an average woman with fried hair.

why aren’t people outraged at the fact that these magazines and agencies send photographers to stalk celebs and take pics of their kids which they sell for thousands of dollars and go out with that money and buy luxury cars and homes. When a celebrity sells them and donates or keeps the money, it’s a problem.

Please explain to me why these agencies can make money off of celebrity babies but the people who give birth to them can’t

Gosh people don’t you know that’s a file photo?

Fried hair? I’m sorry I didn’t notice, I too distracted looking at the picture of Keith stand in front of “Private Sleep Room”.

There is No way she gave birth to her baby, absolutely No WAY. And it’s fine, it’s a beautiful thing for her to have her child by a surrogate mother. Nicole is the mother, it would be so much more respectable if she hadn’t lied. It reminds me sadly, of TC lying that he’s Suri’s biological father. People know the truth, the truth is so much better than all the lies and scams.

Email for sale @ 07/17/2008 at 8:06 pm

very natural to email the Post …. if you’re on Murdoch’s payroll that is!

Why is she always wearing a denim jacket? It’s over 90 degrees in Nashville. And being with child makes you hotter than heck. Very bizarre.

Why does Nicole have to “announce” she is not selling pics of her child. Plenty of celebs have not sold their baby pics and don’t go around “announcing” it. She claims to be private, but she makes announcements about every detail of her life. Usually when she has a movie coming out. I would have been more impressed if she acted like Sarah Jessica Parker who walked out of the hospital and let people take their quick pic before they went home. That’s classy.

Interesting that Keith didn’t open the door for her. He makes such a point of doing that when the cameras are on them. I guess the honeymoon is over. lol

I can’t believe people won’t give up the ’she wasn’t pregnant story.’ get over the fact that she looks amazing after giving birth. Everyone criticized her for exercising, to help with delivery and afterward. Clearly it worked so stop criticizing for her looking great. And not EVERYONE gets boobs with a baby. I laugh at my sister cause she was already small and after children she got smaller!

NICOLE IS A THE QUEEN OF FRAUD JUST READ THE NY POST SAYING THAT SHE WANTED 3 MILLION FOR THE BABY PICTURE AND THAT THE MAGAZINE EDITOR SAID THEY ARE NOT WILLING TO PAY HER 3 MIL BECAUSE SHE IS NOT PROFITABLE LIKE BRANGELINA NO ONE CAN STILL THE THUNDER FROM THE JOLIE-PITT TWINS SO KEEP ON DREAMING NICOLE HECK SHE CAN’T EVEN OPEN A MOVIE. SHE IS PURE BOX-OFFICE POISON.

yeah,right. @ 07/17/2008 at 9:35 pm

A source close to the situation reveals that, “Kidman’s camp has reached out to several of the celeb mags.” But, “she wanted too much money” and when she didn’t get the price she wanted, she “decided to walk away from negotiations instead of taking a lower dollar figure.”

Nicole’s people NEVER announced they were not selling the pictures. The meidia started the whole story themselves because they are not selling them.

And then some idiot who got turned down supposedly went to Perez & lied to him about it. Well guess what people her reps & Keith’s rep have all said they never entertained any offers & never approached any magazien they came to them.

There sure is a lot of jealous people on this thread. Maybe if you try exercising you will find that you actually like it & it does help in delivering a baby!

Keiht doesn’t have to open the foor for her all the time. Their’s is an equal partnership. He chooses to do it because he is a gentleman.

no baby boobs @ 07/17/2008 at 9:59 pm

c @ 07/17/2008 at 9:20 pm

*******************************
The proof is how she suddenly popped out a belly at the last minute, and she has never had baby boobs. Her chest has always been as flat as it is now. The boobs are the first thing you notice when a woman is with child. Nicole had a surrogate most likely.

She doenst have that normal huge post birth boobs????

Why???

# 30
ju @ 07/17/2008 at 5:25 pm

SHE IS INCREDIBLE!!!!

This couple is worthy, the daughter doesn’t have price
***********************************
How is she indredible? She is a pasty, stringy hair, botoxed skeleton.

nicole is right. it is better that a tabloid photographer gets rich than have the money go to needy children.

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.