OlderThu, 24 July 2008 at 10:44 am
Angelina Jolie Twins Conceived Through In Vitro?
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt turned to fertility treatments to conceive twins Knox Leon and Vivienne Marcheline, reports Us Weekly.
“They conceived through in vitro fertilization,” a source tells the mag. “They both desperately wanted more babies soon.”
Apparently the chance of having fraternal twins at Angelina’s age (33) naturally is under 1 percent; with in vitro, the chances are 25 percent.
Continues the source, “[Angie did it so] she wouldn’t have to deal with the stress of trying to get pregnant. She could just knock it out.”
FYI: In vitro fertilization costs around $12,000 per procedure.
Share This Post:
Posted to: Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Celebrity Babies, Knox Jolie-Pitt, Vivienne Jolie-Pitt
Related posts:
593 Comments
Pardon me for a second, folks. I told myself I wasn’t going to get caught up in yet another CliniquackGate, but I’m sick of seeing her BS lambasting Jared…and her ass is STILL here when she’s got the option NOT to be. Jared is under no obligation to bend to her will. Something she obviously has a problem recognizing.
# 2073 CLINIQUA @ 07/27/2008 at 11:41 am
Whine, whine, whine, whine, whine. I thought you were moving to the sanctity of Pittwatch.com? Go already and STFU.
Jesus. You’re beating a dead horse. It’s obvious that Jared doesn’t give a shite what you think, so why keep nattering on about it? Obviously he’s one of the MANY people you can’t bully into complying with YOUR idea of a properly reverential Jolie-Pitt site. So why don’t you go start your own blog where you can do and post whatever the hell you want?
Stop telling Jared how to run HIS SITE. HE is the only blogger/forum you’ve posted on who’s allowed you to continue posting after all the problems you’ve created on the blog and all the name-calling you’ve done towards him. Show some gratitude that you’re still allowed to post your rantings and he hasn’t IP banned you like almost every other Jolie-Pitt sites in cyberspace.
Pittwatch is apparently one of the few places where you haven’t worn out your welcome. So go over there until they get sick of your antics, too. It’ll happen sooner or later because there’s yet to be a site that you haven’t managed to piss off 80% of the fans. Sure, you’ve got a few followers, but most people are just sick of your bullshit.
PS - I’m sure you’ll have your usual psychotic reaction to my post, but I just really don’t give a fcuk. You’re probably the biggest damned psycho I’ve ever had the misfortune to run across in cyberspace and I’ve been on the internet for over 15 years. I thought I’d seen it all, but you take the cake, the pie and a few donuts, too.
Now…back to the thread. I will NOT be responding to this loser, but I needed to get that off my chest…
# 2079 Skype @ 07/27/2008 at 12:28 pm
Hehehehehehehehehe….
I love reading CLINIQUA’s post.
She is a stong supporter of the Jolie-Pitt family. That’s good enough for me.
I certainly hope CLINIQUA will stay on and not be bullied by some fellow fans.
stong = strong (excuse me for spelling error)
I posted these in the J.An. and Mayer’s post but I felt bad for that afterwards since I don’t want to be perceived as trying to start something… anyways, here’s a lovely thread on ONTD with gorgeous pics of the J-Ps!!! Enjoy!
http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/26179061.html?thread=3228722165#t3228722165
Sherry @ 07/27/2008 at 2:39 pm
AJ is not a US ambassador. She is a UNHCR goodwill ambassador.
Their kind of life is none of your business.
Not every woman can get pregnant. That’s why there’s IVF. Thank God for IVF. AJ got pregnant easily first time. We don’t know whether they used IVF second time. They haven’t said anything. If they did, so what?
The kids are not Angelina’s only. They are hers and Brad’s.
There was no ‘home’ to wreck. It you still haven’t got that through your head, you must be awfully slow.
People with a shrimp head, Please think first !
NO Marriage and Home to begin with !
From Hollywood Reporter
Sony’s “Hancock” with Will Smith finished second on the weekend with an estimated $19.2 million from 7,563 situations in 71 markets, besting DreamWorks Animation/Paramount’s “Kung Fu Panda,” No. 3 with an estimated $17.8 million from 6,565 screens in 59 territories. “Hancock” has rolled up a total international gross of nearly $300 million ($294.6 million) while the animated “Panda’s” overseas cume stands at $305 million.
Universal’s “Wanted” opened in the top spot in Taiwan, grossing an estimated $6.2 million overall from 2,560 screens in 40 markets and pushing its overseas cume past the $100 million-mark ($105.4 million). Marvel Prods./Universal’s “The Incredible Hulk” opened No. 1 in France. It pulled $4 million overall on the weekend from 1,110 screens in 40 markets, shoving its overseas gross total past $100 million ($108.5 million).
——–
GREAT for Angie.
KFP hitting 513 million while Wanted total cume 234 million and still counting!
520 A2B @ 07/27/2008 at 2:45 pm
I wish Jared was not connected to a magazine but I am not leaving him. He has ups and downs. I am here for the Ups so I will stay for the Downs….
——-
Me too!
To Jennmark: Any fraternal twins on the father’s side of the family would have no bearing at all on whether Angelina tends to release multiple eggs. Let’s face it, the mother to the world who said she felt guilty having a child because that was one less home for an orphan had in vitro. I would say that makes her as big a hypocrite as the rest of Hollywood. Children are not accessories that you carry around the world with you to show how cool you are and the one with the most wins, Those poor kids.Who is really going to take time to build them a stable home or worry if each one is getting what they really need. I predict that 20 years from now they will make Brittany Spears and Amy Winehouse look stable.
Katherin @ 07/27/2008 at 11:33 pm .
##############
Jolie has multiple births on her maternal side - a number of them in different generations including her own does that have enough bearing for you?
From all accounts those kids are thriving and doing great. If you think the only way you can get stability is from a zip code then you have limited experience.
What is it exactly that you have based your entire lengthy screed on? Some gossips want to start a rumor about IVF and you take it as gospel? Any evidence that they didn’t just have a baby the natural way like they did a mere 2 years ago? Why is it so important for the JP haters to insist that she used IVF? It is a bizarre obsession. And leads me to this prediction: In 2 years you will have lost any common sense you ever had.
537 Katherin @ 07/27/2008 at 11:33 pm
——-
Do you care how all other people’s children turn out, or are you only interested in Brad&Angie’s children? Mind your own business!
Boy people sure are buying this US weekly . I was at the grocery store and the lady in front of me purchased a copy.
test
Peculiar. My test post go through but my opinions dont. Good thing I’m not paranoid.
by Stephen Whitty/The Star-Ledger
Friday July 25, 2008, 9:14 PM
Jolie, Pitt and progeny, under the press’ watchful eye.
“Have you no sense of decency, sir,” the U.S. Army attorney asked Senator Joe McCarthy, as the red-baiter tried to push his witch-hunt on. “At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”
It’s a question the press must now ask itself.
In America, Us Weekly has just reported on the recent birth of twins to Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt, and speculated on whether or not their beginning was in vitro. And many American papers dutifully picked up the story.
In Israel, Barack Obama — who, like all American politicians, is now prey to celebrity reporting as well — has had the prayer he wrote and stuffed into the Western Wall retrieved by a yeshiva student, published in an Israeli newspaper and circulated via blog.
And I think: Has it really come to this?
What’s next? Shall we now aim surveillance microphones at confessionals? Go through the garbage outside celebrity ob-gyns?
True, there is no love lost between Brad Pitt and Us Weekly. (I was at a “Troy” junket where, before sitting down for a press conference, the actor first made sure that the gossip magazine’s correspondent was ejected.) And Obama has many critics within American Jewish and Israeli circles.
But is this what the press is now reduced to?
Writing stories about what did — or didn’t — take place during the conception of a couple’s children? Stealing a man’s private prayer — and please don’t waste my time with legalistic definitions of “abandoned property” — in order to display it?
Could any ethicist come up with a clearer definition of “invasion of privacy” than this?
I won’t repeat the Us story — or link to images of Obama’s note — here. That would only legitimize the reporting.
But as a journalist — as someone who has spent more than a quarter of a century trying to ask people what I thought I needed to ask, but only what I thought people needed to know — I have to look at these other writers, and ask them what Joseph Welch asked more than 50 years ago.
Have you no sense of decency? In the end, have you left no sense of decency at all?
# 2221 lulu @ 07/27/2008 at 10:30 pm
To 2210 hahaha @ 07/27/2008 at 9:53 pm
You are confusing yourself. X was not in the top 10 paid actresses. Reese is No 1 follow by Angie # 2, No. 3 is Cameron Diaz. the no 10 spot is Drew Barrymore who was paid 10 million per film. Maniston was not even worth 10 million per film.!!!
The Forbes list is the total grosses make from May 2007 to July 2008, money paid on her 3 ****** movies and her sitcom residual. Do your own math, she ’s paid less than 7-8 million per film.
+++++++++++++++++++++
As I posted earlier, X DID NOT MAKE $7-8MIL ON ANY OF THE 3 MOVIES SHE FILMED IN THE LAST YEAR!!!!! SHE BARELY AVERAGED $4MIL FOR ALL 3 MOVIES!
I cannot emphasize that enough. The bulk of her income came from the syndication residuals for Friends. When Friends went into syndication there was a story (Radaronline IIRC) that talked about how it was the most lucrative syndication deal of all-time for the 6 actors involved. The initial payout was $500MIL for 5 years - $100MIL per year, with the actors splitting the money equally.
Usually when a show goes into syndication the studios try to stiff everyone concerned - creators & actors alike. This was one of the few deals where everyone involved in the making of the show knew that the residuals would be huge. Just like with Seinfeld & Frasier. It’s been a lot harder for the studio to hide the profits from these shows because they’re shown practically everywhere in the U.S. in heavy rotation.
# 2230 Bored @ 07/27/2008 at 11:02 pm
http://i34.tinypic.com/ok8uuw.jpg
just look at how pretty she used to be. what did Brad do to her?
++++++++++++++++++
ROTFLMAO. She looks the same, moron. The only difference is that now she’s got that huge family she’s always wanted and a man who’d gladly chop of his right arm for her if it made her. Deal with it.
# 2233 lylian @ 07/27/2008 at 11:10 pm
#2230 Bored @ 07/27/2008 at 11:02 pm
>>>>>>>>>>>
Brad helped her grow from merely pretty to utterly beautiful. Know the difference?
++++++++++++++
This Bored twit wouldn’t know sh#t from shinola.
# 2231 yay @ 07/27/2008 at 11:07 pm
when jen has her baby, they will offer her thirty million for the pics.
++++++++++++++++
ITA. Actually…those pix of the first alien-human hyrbid could go for an even higher price.
# 2247 ages of actresses in HW @ 07/27/2008 at 11:37 pm
I am trying to make a list of HW actresses and how old they are. Could you guys help, please?
Jen Aniston = 39 1/2
J Lo = 39
Jen Garner = 33 ?
Reese W =32 ?
Cam Diaz =35?
Gwen P =36?
Nicole K = 40?
Angelina = 33
Kate Hudson=27?
Katie Holmes= ?
Julia R = ?
Sandra B =?
+++++++++++++++++
By actresses I assume you mean real actresses and not the wannabes like Biel, Alba, Fox, Hohan, Johansson, Knightley, Miller and that lot of 20-somethings who are better known for who they’re sleeping with that the movies they’ve been in? Okay…I’ll throw Keira Knightley a bone. I think she’s wretched, but she has been in a handful of popular movies.
People I would consider A or B+ List…(notice I left X & Katie Holmes off)
=========
Angie - 33
Nic Kidman = 41
Sandra Bullock = 44
Halle Berry = 41
Julia Roberts - 40 (41 in a few months)
Kate Winslet - 32 (33 in a few months)
Rachel Weisz = 37
Cate Blanchett - 39
Jodie Foster = 45 (46 in a few months)
Charlize Theron = 32 (33 in about 3 weeks)
Penelope Cruz - 34
B and B- List
==========
Jen Garner = 36
Kate Hudson = 29
Drew Barrymore = 33
Kate Beckinsale = 35
Maggie Gyllenhaal = 30 (31 in a few months)
C List
======
Katie Holmes = 29 (acting-wise, she’s C-list with A-list name recognition)
JLo = 39 (acting-wise, she’s A-List for name recognition
# 2248 Bored @ 07/27/2008 at 11:40 pm
http://i34.tinypic.com/ok8uuw.jpg
Aggie,
That pic is only about 4 years old she wasn’t 26.
+++++++++++++++++
You’re math-impaired. If that pic is 4 years old, then Angie was 29, not 26. Are do you seriously not know she’s 33 now, not 30?
480 Julia @ 07/26/2008 at 3:08 am
Those two are a waste of space anyway……..they just bore me to death.
——-
Really? Then why are you here, posting about them?
# Bored @ 07/27/2007 at11:40pm
Angelina is now more refine and elegance just like how mother of 4 now 6 supposed to be, the picture you send is a pretty care free spirited Angie years ago .. but today beautiful Angie is a women of substance with this peaceful Aura of mother earth.
How sad for people to be so self conscious about their ” IMAGE ” to always and forever trying to look dress and act like a teenagers when you are 40 years old, no wonder Aniston refuse to have a family , so she can forever be a teeny bopper in tiny bikini, legs open wide in the air.. long bleach blond extensions Lindsey lohan look alike ..even Nicole Richie now that she is a mother have change her Image.. LOL.
Obviously, we know this is bullsh**
AND MY NAME HAS BE STOLEN. I HAVE NO POSTED IN A WEEK OR SO. IGNORE ANY POSER.
Thanks. The haters are getting ridiculous. Time to e-mail Jared.
Pages: « 1 … 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!