Top Stories

Angelina Jolie’s Presidential Pick is Undecided

Angelina Jolie’s Presidential Pick is Undecided

United Nations goodwill ambassador Angelina Jolie hasn’t decided who she’s voting for between Presidential hopefuls John McCain and Barack Obama.

The 33-year-old new mom said in a statement to Variety managing editor Ted Johnson via political adviser Trevor Neilson: “I have not decided on a candidate. I am waiting to see the commitments they will make on issues like international justice, refugees and how to address the needs of children in crisis around the world.”

Back in February, Angie wrote an op-ed piece for the Washington Post, “[calling] on each of the presidential candidates and congressional leaders to announce a comprehensive refugee plan with a specific timeline and budget as part of their Iraq strategy.”

To read the full piece on Angelina Jolie’s endorsement, visit WilshireAndWashington.com.

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Jenna Fischer talks Pam Beesley's baby - PopEater
  • Heidi Klum: Back to L.A. after strutting in NYC - PopSugar
  • Taylor Swift takes home 4 AMAs - JustJaredJr
  • 50 Cent does Chelsea Lately - LaineyGossip
  • See who wore a Gagaish outfit to the AMAs - Dlisted
  • Miranda Kerr poses for the 2010 Pirelli calendar - TheSuperficial
  • See Katy Perry and other true celeb dolls - Celebuzz
Photo: Jason Merritt/Getty

209 Comments

# 1

u go obama!!!

# 2

u go obama!!!!

# 3
[☆I n F a m o u s☆] @ 08/11/2008 at 1:48 pm

….why` is this news? lol

obama!

# 4
Sculpture Of Caramel @ 08/11/2008 at 1:51 pm

Come one Angie…vote for OBAMA!!!!! ;)

He’s the best!! :D

# 5
passing through @ 08/11/2008 at 1:53 pm

STFU Fuggy. Your ass posted here, so you must’ve thought it was news!

# 6
[☆I n F a m o u s☆] @ 08/11/2008 at 1:56 pm

stop stalking me bish.

…jolie’s endorsement isn’t guaranteeing anyone a win so who caresss…

# 7

Well, that’s easy… she can’t vote for McCain since he’s so privileged (you know, being white and all). That’s how she picks her favourite candidates as well as her favourite children.

# 8

In the end, she’ll be voing for Obama like every important Hollywood celebrity. She’s not as ignorant sounding as her dad, Jon Voight.

# 9

I hope the stupid Brangieloonies and Aniston loonies don’t turn this thread into a mess. They’re both so annoying.

a total fan @ 08/11/2008 at 2:00 pm

Being an actress doesn’t mean she is stupid ,when it comes to politics. She just might have an insight to many things being an United Nations goodwill ambassador. With that said ,it doesn’t mean that I will depend on actors to tell me who to vote for.

She is looking for the winner.
It will later say that they O (s) bama, if he wins.
It will later say it was for McCain if he wins.

_________________________________________________

She is looking for the winner.
It will later say that they O (s) bama, if he wins.
It will later say it was for McCain if he wins.

Cola @ 08/11/2008 at 1:57 pm
====
That is an ignorant statement Cola, you don’t know sh*t about who Angie will vote for! And important HW celebrities should not be the basis for who we choose to vote for. Use your own judgement.

I really glad Angie isn’t automatically jumping on the Obama train……I’m wondering what the fans here have to say about this because if I remember right they were all trashing Jon Voight beacuse he is a McCain supporter. What are you going to say about Angie if SHE votes McCain?? It just goes to show all you who thought you knew her every feeling about everything,lmao, you guys don’t know sh*t about what really goes through Angie’s mind! :-)
YAY ANGIE!!!

You mean she’s actually registered to vote?
Didn’t she brag about the fact she had never voted?Whoa,she’s seen the light.
Anyway when november comes she’ll be too busy with the Oscar campaign to waste her precious time with a presidential race.

who is she voting for? It’s her own damn business. Y’all are up her booty no matter what she does so it’s good if she just stays neutral.

My bet is that she wont even vote at all

poor thing @ 08/11/2008 at 2:15 pm

she’s french, she can’t vote! bwa wha wha

even though i love her—im not really interested in her politcal allegience. the media is ridiculous—leave her alone and let her have her family time in peace.

even though i love her—im not really interested in her politcal allegience. the media is ridiculous—leave her alone and let her have her family time in peace.

i want obama to win but im not even old enough to vote it is HER OWN CHOICE so y is this news?

Who the he*ll cares who Angelina Jolie is endorsing? Stick to what you know- making movies.

just jesse @ 08/11/2008 at 2:27 pm

Is this the current thread for the jolie pitts that everyone is using? If not - which thread is being used? Thanks

Do we care???? I surely don’t.

Andrómeda @ 08/11/2008 at 2:29 pm

Hi everybody!!. Hope you are having a nice monday.
I´m not north american, but i ´d prefer if she picks Obama.

angie is a smart woman! she will vote for the one who has great knowledge and interest in international foreign policy regarding humanitarian issues! God bless you more angie!

i really love the fact that she hasn’t decided and is considering what both have to say cuz many people don’t they just vote without really considering what each candidate truly beileves in so it’s good to take your time and make a decision and i am so glad she is saying its good to look into them carefully before choosing

I hope Brad and Angelina don’t reveal who they are going to vote for. It’s fine to bring awareness to charitable causes. It’s not wise to clamor your political beliefs to people who don’t give a fcuk. All they do is bash you, no matter what you say or do.

What’s up with all the fcuking knuckle-dragging, lamebrain tards who constantly come on an Angelina thread saying that they don’t care what she thinks, or what she wears, or what movie she’s in but can’t seem to stop themselves from clicking on her thread. What is wrong with you people. Do you have some sort of disorder where you have to constantly talk about people you care nothing about.

And its always the same tards who do it over and over again. If you don’t care about her stop clicking on her thread. All you are doing is making her even more popular than she already is. Don’t you get it you MORONS if you don’t pay attention to her you won’t see her face. ITS SO FCUKING SIMPLE.

Well it figures, since she always talks like she’s so committed to international issues and the promotion of world peace, yet she hardly addresses the Iraq war topic or anything allusive to Bush administration.
She doesn’t deserve that much recognition just for talking about refugees or giving away money. If she was so involved she would talk openly about politics and wouldn’t give these vague statements.
Makes sense, that way she’s still worshipped and treated like she’s Mother Theresa.

IT IS A SLOW NEWS DAY AND ANGELINA’S NAME GUARANTEES HITS. This is the 4th website I have found this on and it is NOT news…just a traffic makers (and yes, I am aware I am a contributor) .BTW, just because you’re an actress, a plumber or a nose picker …. doesn’t mean you can’t have valid statements or thoughts about politics or the world around you be it your backyard or a more global concern. People really need to grow the **** up.

How about we work on the problems we have right here in our own country before we worry about solving the rest of the world’s problems.

An Injustice anywhere, is an injustice everywhere.

-Martin Luther King Jr.

BrangelinaFan @ 08/11/2008 at 2:59 pm

You know, I read about that in my local newspaper this morning. And to tell you the truth, it concerns me. :-(

I mean, I don’t honestly know if I would look at my girl the same positive way if she were to come out and actually endorse McCain — a guy who not-so-jokingly said he’d “Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” and suggested that Iraqis be sent cigarettes to “kill them off.” The man’s an increasingly-dementia ladled, hateful warmonger, who sounds a lot like her own crazy-ass, estranged father Jon.

It would tell me that she’s narrow-minded and not concerned at all with the U.S. domestic issues that are also of utmost importance in this election. And what about the other issues like women’s issues?
Shouldn’t that be a part of her voting criteria as well?

This indecision on Angie’s part, I must admit, and regretably, puts a taint on her in my view. It would concern me because otherwise, I’m a big supporter of Angelina and her humanitarian efforts.

As a matter of fact, I would prefer that she not vote at all, if she’s not going to vote for Obama. But if she doesn’t, I hope she keeps her mouth shut and not do like her crazy-ass father did and announce it to the world, because I think she’d soon realize that any goodwill towards her now would be diminished among even her most hardcore fans.

:-(

Cola @ 08/11/2008 at 1:58 pm I hope the stupid Brangieloonies and Aniston loonies don’t turn this thread into a mess. They’re both so annoying.
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
Thank you for saying that. The same people do the same thing on both threads. It’s getting so old and stupid. Seems to be a mental condition. Any way why can’t who she vote for be private. I would be upset if I had to reveal who I was going to vote for.

ANGIE IS FULL OF SCHITT. IF SHE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT THE CANDIDATES STAND FOR BY NOW, SHE WILL NEVER KINOW.

EVERYBODY AND THEIR GRANDMOTHER KNOWS HOW THE CANDIDATES STAND ON THE ISSUES.

WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN ANGIE. HAVE YOU BEEN LISTENING?

OBAMA 2008!

Of course she can’t afford to take side right now.You know it would hurt so badly her bid for the Nobel Peace prize.She must appear so above mean little struggles.
She’s so oecumenical,her endorsement is too precious to be wasted on either one of those common mortals.

Hillary all the way @ 08/11/2008 at 3:10 pm

I am a Hillary supporter and I will vote for John McCain.

Well, panderer that he is, I’m sure Barack Obama will come up with some kind of policy that says exactly what he thinks Jolie might want to hear. Although, he did introduce that global poverty act, which will commit the US taxpayers to billions of dollars every year from now on to fight poverty in other countries.

But, I agree with the poster above…I hope they keep it to themselves. I’m tired of celebs coming out and telling who they’re going to vote for, as if it means something to the rest of us.

And, the fact is, many Americans feel the same way as Angie. According to the polls about 10-12% of Americans have not made up their minds.

BrangelinaFan @ 08/11/2008 at 2:59 pm

————————————————————-
I don’t think you are Angelina fan at all. Some thing is wrong with you Aniston Loonies. Please get help for you self.

i like Brangelina and their Beautiful Family. but…why print this story?

Angelina is popular, people like to Love and Hate her. Either way, it still makes her popular, LOL!

Via a political advisor? Taking ourselves a little too serious, aren’t we?

Obviously Angie and Brad are not revealing who they are voting for.
Best they leave it that way. Some people can hate them over what they wore last friday so if they put their political choices out there all it will do is cause nasty ugly posts thru the whole thread.

Hope we get another thread soon that is not a tab . Those Ass Us tab threads are so full of lies we might as well be reading The National Enquirer.
I really like Angie and Brad if there is no news so be it.
Hate when the tabs make it up because there are people who love to gossip about lies.

I got my Hello and People Mag with pics yesterday. Couldnt be more pleased. I cracked up at Brads few coments and the pics are so down to earth. Priceless.

What a waste of time.

BREAKING NEWS….. Angelina Jolie is not sure who she will vote for.!

Like the world cares.

I’m sure if your were to ask Brad he would repeat in a bland monotone her word for word thoughts.

dianad1968 @ 08/11/2008 at 3:34 pm

Angie says, ” I have not yet decided on a candidate”, NOT ” I have not yet decided who i am endorsing”. I suppose when she decides, she will vote her conscience without making it public, as she has to work with whomever wins , in her humanitarian efforts.

I certainly have not decided if i will vote, and may decide the morning of. Some Obama supporters are turning me off with their “either or attitude”, and i am a registered Democrat.

Angie has said she is a reistered Independent, a move i am considering myself.

it’s a sick troll on here that always goes around reading threads and stealing my names, every time i use/pick a name the next thread this crazy un original person use it the next time, make up your own names and stop stealing mines ( poor thing), i’ve changed my name 3 times already because of you. copy cat loser.

BrangelinaFan @ 08/11/2008 at 2:59 pm You know, I read about that in my local newspaper this morning. And to tell you the truth, it concerns me.

I mean, I don’t honestly know if I would look at my girl the same positive way if she were to come out and actually endorse McCain — a guy who not-so-jokingly said he’d “Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” and suggested that Iraqis be sent cigarettes to “kill them off.” The man’s an increasingly-dementia ladled, hateful warmonger, who sounds a lot like her own crazy-ass, estranged father Jon.

It would tell me that she’s narrow-minded and not concerned at all with the U.S. domestic issues that are also of utmost importance in this election. And what about the other issues like women’s issues?
Shouldn’t that be a part of her voting criteria as well?

This indecision on Angie’s part, I must admit, and regretably, puts a taint on her in my view. It would concern me because otherwise, I’m a big supporter of Angelina and her humanitarian efforts.

As a matter of fact, I would prefer that she not vote at all, if she’s not going to vote for Obama. But if she doesn’t, I hope she keeps her mouth shut and not do like her crazy-ass father did and announce it to the world, because I think she’d soon realize that any goodwill towards her now would be diminished among even her most hardcore fans
*****************************************

Precisely, the fact that Angie decided to let Trevor issue the statement is beacuse her Dad insinuated that she likes Mccain more than Obama. I think she has said before that it is best for her to be neutral and independent because you need the backing of both parties when it comes to pushing for bills relating to her causes.

I admire Angie for telling people that her priorities are really the causes and plight of the Iraq efugees, which by the way are the creation of the United States, and which they should be responsible for its resolution.

Why would Angie be concerned with the domestic issues of America, when the American people are much much better off than all of those refugees, which in the first place have existed because of the war created by the US.

Even if you think Obama has less to do with the Iraq war, it is just right that Angie will not vote for him, if he will have nothing to do with those refugees. The war happened already, what is more important is how to finish it and help those that needed help.

And I think McCain’s agenda is better in helping those refugees, because he knows better the foreign situation than Obama.

As you know there are really not much difference bet Obama and Mccain in most of the domestic issues, women issue, economic issues, etc and both would be good presidents. The problem is mostly on international issues since Obama is perceived weak because of his lack of experience.

Who cares who she is voting for?

She will decide fo OBAMA,

Very diplomatic way of saying that she is not saying.

{wish there was an edit key}

Obviously Angie and Brad are not revealing who they are voting for.
Best they leave it that way. Some people can hate them over what they wore last friday so if they put their political choices out there all it will do is cause nasty ugly posts thru the whole thread.

What a waste of time.

Hope we get another thread soon that is not a tab . Those Ass Us tab threads are so full of lies we might as well be reading The National Enquirer.
I really like Angie and Brad if there is no news out there so be it.
Hate when the tabs make it up because there are people who love to gossip about lies.

On a better note i got my Hello and People Mag with pics yesterday. Couldnt be more pleased. I cracked up at Brads few comments and the pics are so sweet and down to earth. Priceless.

…I could care less which way she votes…I’m sure as informed as she seems to be on international affairs she’s aware of the candidates’ positions…she KNOWS who she would prefer but ain’t telling…and this is her right…as a member of the UNHCR, she has an agenda and shouldn’t announce her preference…my choice for president has nothing to do with whomever she chooses.

Passing Through @ 08/11/2008 at 3:55 pm

# 596 an oldie @ 08/11/2008 at 12:51 pm

# 594 passing through @ 08/11/2008 at 11:37 am
==================

I love your comments on this matter. i totally agree. Is it why Geffen is siding with JA by producing her movie “Goree girls”?

++++++++++++++++++++

I doubt that has anything to do with it. Geffen is a well-known “inglorious b#stard”. He doesn’t make day-to-day decisions on financing movies, though. For the most part oversees the business aspects of Dreamworks and does the dirty work for Spielberg, and when he was part of the main company, Katzenberg as well. David Geffen’s bottom line is always going to be his ego and money - in that order.

If you haven’t read the the December 2007 story, check it out. It’s pretty obvious that while Sumner Redstone is an old coot who’s better business days are behind him…Geffen is just plain mean and petty. Geffen brokered that deal, then when Spielberg didn’t think Par was defferential enough to him he got mad and when Spielberg is unhappy, then Geffen comes in to make Steven happy. Brad Grey is just another casualty of Geffen’s ego.

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/12/paramount200712

Angelina, what about the children and adults in crisis in our OWN country! What about, how are americans going to afford to heat their homes this winter? What about the homeless children and adults HERE in our own country. That’s pretty important too.

RachelSun @ 08/11/2008 at 4:00 pm

Angelina will never tell who she will vote for because her causes depend on whoever is in office. The media always ask this question, this is nothing new. Also, she issued this through a press statement which shows there must be alot of people asking her this question.

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20218334,00.html
Meet Brad Pitt: Olympic Boxer for Australia
Photo by: Mark Nolan / Getty; Jim Spellman / WireImage
Fight Club just got a whole lot more real.

It turns out Brad Pitt really is a no-holds-barred fighter – as a member of the Australian Olympic boxing team.

The Aussie Pitt, 25, quit his day job as a painter to train as a heavyweight boxer for the 2008 Games. And while he still gets the occasional taunt about his name, he’s learned to put up with it.

“Mate, I’ve been living with that other bloke’s name for years, it doesn’t worry me at all,” he told Australia’s Herald Sun while practicing.

His mother said he found out about his more famous counterpart during elementary school, when a child brought in a newspaper clip about the actor during show and tell.

“He likes to be known for his talent, not his name,” his mother Leanne told Australia’s The Age.

Talent he has. Ranked 33rd in the World Championships in Chicago in 2007, he’s gearing up for a medal run in Beijing after a grueling training session in Thailand to acclimate himself to Chinese conditions, and is ready to make a name for himself – his own name.

“I’ve always been Brad,” he tells the Daily Telegraph. “Let him change

Passing Through @ 08/11/2008 at 4:11 pm

# 587 ?? @ 08/11/2008 at 8:07 am

# 596 an oldie @ 08/11/2008 at 12:51 pm

++++++++++++++++++++++

BTW - If you don’t have time to read the entire VF article you can get the gist of it from the author in a video at the link below. You’ll notice that Brad Grey’s name is NOT mentioned in the video. He’s just the poor schlub who was dumb enough to take the job and get stuck between Redstone & Geffen. I’m sure there’s been many a day in the last 3 years when he wished he was back at Plan B with Brad.

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/video/2007/burrough_video200712

CANADA LOVES OBAMA

Passing Through @ 08/11/2008 at 4:18 pm

# 7 [☆I n F a m o u s☆] @ 08/11/2008 at 1:56 pm

stop stalking me bish.

…jolie’s endorsement isn’t guaranteeing anyone a win so who caresss…

++++++++++++++++++

ROTFL. It’s not stalking when someone insists on being someplace they’re not wanted. Then it’s merely pest control.

Come on,of course she is going to vote for Obama!

# 55 cook @ 08/11/2008 at 3:50 pm …
I could care less which way she votes…I’m sure as informed as she seems to be on international affairs she’s aware of the candidates’ positions…she KNOWS who she would prefer but ain’t telling…and this is her right…as a member of the UNHCR, she has an agenda and shouldn’t announce her preference…my choice for president has nothing to do with whomever she chooses
==============

Why don’t you show your intelligent side all the times, like you just did in this post, Cook? As my name shows, I’ve been on JJ for a while and have read some of your posts I really like. But sometimes you are just annoying as h e l l.

To PT. Thanks for the answer. Do you know DG is also rumored to be buying the LA Times?

piper, with a low @ 08/11/2008 at 4:27 pm

Errrr… didn’t Angelina say this months ago?

Poor sad, pathetic US Weekly; just because JV attempted to paint himself and Angelina as political soulmates doesn’t mean that JV has a toehold on anything having to do with her.

Sadly, JV will apparently appear on O’Reilly tonight; who knows what sort of $h*t he will kick up and how US will attempt to profit from it.

THIS IS SO NOT NEWS. WHO ANGELINA VOTES FOR SHOULD BE OF NO MORE VALUE THAN ANY OTHER PERSON. FRANKLY, HIGH PROFILE PEOPLE SHOULD NOT PUBLICLY SAY WHO THEY ARE ENDORSING. WHO JOH EDWARDS IS VOTING FOR IS OF MORE INTEREST.

I think it’s best if the celebs stay out of politics. Their opinions really don’t matter much. Case in point, 4 yrs ago, everyone in Hollywood jumped on the bandwagon endorsing John Kerry, and look who’s in charge now.

Since when is Mr. Nielson a political advisor? ***rolling my eyes***.

She is actually a registered independent and her views are the same as McCains concerning the middle east. It wouldn’t surprise me if she votes for McCain. I also think Obama’s “plan” and views are a bit distorted and uninformed.

Who cares?

Variety should be more interested in if Atlas Shrugged will get off the ground ok?

oh oh, just what we needed a political thread. I’d frankly prefer not to know celebrities’ political choices.

Passing Through @ 08/11/2008 at 4:37 pm

# 60 lila @ 08/11/2008 at 4:13 pm

CANADA LOVES OBAMA

+++++++++++++++++++

Canada the country or is Canada your name? Cuz Canada the country don’t get a vote…

It’s none of our business who she will vote for. That’s why they make privacy wall’s when casting your vote.

Passing Through @ 08/11/2008 at 4:40 pm

# 63 an oldie @ 08/11/2008 at 4:26 pm

To PT. Thanks for the answer. Do you know DG is also rumored to be buying the LA Times?

++++++++++++++++++++

DG? Who’s DG? I knew there were rumblings that the LA Times was about to be taken over in a hostile bid, but I didn’t know who it was. They’d better watch out or they’ll be just like Anheuser-Busch. The most American of beers…now owned by Germans…soon to be made in Mexico…

I hope Angelina does not come out and say who she supports because with her UNHCR and other humanitarian activities she needs to work well with all people in charge of the government. I support Mc Cain. I certainly am not going to say she has to vote for Mc Cain or I am not going to support her .

oldie,

…not because I have to, still I will indulge you…It’s nice to have some intelligence and unfortunate to be “annoying”…however, considering what’s given here, “annoying” is more fun…I have long gotten over myself…I don’t need approval in either way I comment…Enjoy your day.

It is probably a good idea to listen and “learn” up on both candidates’ position on various issues and register to vote while you are at, before knocking a celebrity who is doing just that. When it comes to AJ, it is criticize first and read the rest of the statement later. AJ is a United Nations Ambassador and humanitarian. As such, it is beneficial for her to remain impartial. I don’t won’t a thousand people in the voting booth with me. It is a personal decision. Peace to all.

Jennifer Aniston is a Barack Obama supporter. I wonder if Angelina knows that? I read where she sent a donation.

Brad and Angie should pay Trevor double check. He is working as a family rep also right now since Brad and Angie both doesn’t have any reps right now. I’m looking forward to see IF Cindy G isgoing to be at Venice or not,If she isn’t,then I will be sure Brad has stopped being with her anymore.

#30 S
As an Ambassador Angie can hardly keep stirring up the pot. Ambassadors are suppose to facilitate change in a gentle, non-violent way–harmony etc.
She can hardly run around calling the government awful, talk openly about politics etc., without offending people world-wide that are in a position to help aid the refugees.
Her job is to negotiate, to create a harmony for discussion. Not rile the world’s leaders up.

#65 Yawn
Your statement makes no sense whatsoever. If high profile people are suppose to keep their mouths shut, then that includes Edwards. And Yawn to him.

Big Angie fan and I would be really disheartened if she, as a woman, supported a Republican who wants to take away our rights over our bodies. I also disagree that we should stay in Iraq. I hope she is as anti-war as I imagine her to be - and staying in Iraq further fuels war. We can save refugees even if we are out of there. So if she is properly quoted - I have to disagree with her on Iraq. We should be out of there! They don’t want us and our soldiers are dying.

And last, I believe the rights of American women’s bodies should take precedence over Iraqis. We spend billions on this war. No thinking woman could POSSIBLY think voting McCain is a plus. Angie, please do more research on McCain - the guy who says we should BOMB Iran. I know you are against bombings in Darfur and throughout the world. Certainly, I hope you are as concerned about Iranian life. Think of all the Iranian children who will die if we support McCain. Seriously, it would be a tragedy.

I hope she won’t vote to John Mc C. The man is going to put us in another war in Middle East. I certainly don’t want to see more people from America or Iran to die.

The man is going to bomb Iran,there will be more refugees if Angie cares about this issue which i’m sure she does.

I am disappointed at the Angie’s fans who do not understand what she’s saying. First, she was asked a question about who she’s supporting and like a true ambassador she has registered as an “independent”, the true meaning of which she’s not on any side. It makes her work well with whomever is in power. I don’t think she will publicize her preference, she will just consider someone who favors refugee programs and the things that interest her. She does not support war, she supports taking care of the refugees.

PT, DG is David Geffen. That’s why that E Snead is so pro JA. She knows who is going to be her boss.

Showers of Blessings @ 08/11/2008 at 5:36 pm

God Bless the Jolie-Pitts

God Bless the Jolie-Pitts

God Bless the Jolie-Pitts

God Bless the Jolie-Pitts

God Bless the Jolie-Pitts

God Bless the Jolie-Pitts

Passing Through @ 08/11/2008 at 5:40 pm

# 77 Lyn @ 08/11/2008 at 4:56 pm

Jennifer Aniston is a Barack Obama supporter. I wonder if Angelina knows that? I read where she sent a donation.

+++++++++++++++++

What’s that got to do with the price of tea in China? X’s support doesn’t mean jack. That’s why you don’t see Barack Obama on the nightly news and CNN saying, “Golly…I wonder if I have Jennifer Aniston’s support! Michelle, call the ho and find out!”

On the other hand…if Obama finds out he’s got Angie’s support, he’ll name-drop like a mofo. And so would McCain.

JP Fan 4Evah @ 08/11/2008 at 5:40 pm

#60 lila HUH! What you said ..Canada loves Obama???
Speak for yourself madear. That is a very broad statement. Do not paint a whole nation with the same brush.
Not that it matters b/c as everyone knows we cant vote but if we could we would not get one province to vote on your comment alone . Let alone all of Canada. Geesh!

49 raye @ 08/11/2008 at 3:42 pm

…, the fact that Angie decided to let Trevor issue the statement is because her Dad insinuated that she likes McCain more than Obama.
——-
Did he? Do you remember what he said that makes you think that?

On the wrong side @ 08/11/2008 at 5:43 pm

I feel sorry for John McCain. In 2003, when Bush decided to go to war, McCain was against it, and got all the flak. Now, suddenly he is painted as a war mongering villain because he thinks we need to finish what we started in Iraq (which he didn’t approve in the first place). Always on the wrong side of the fence.

54 cook @ 08/11/2008 at 3:50 pm …

I could care less which way she votes…I’m sure as informed as she seems to be on international affairs she’s aware of the candidates’ positions…she KNOWS who she would prefer but ain’t telling…and this is her right…as a member of the UNHCR, she has an agenda and shouldn’t announce her preference…my choice for president has nothing to do with whomever she chooses.
——-
Hi cook! ITA.

Angelina has never helped anyone without issuing a press release or staging a photo-op. There’s a story in the press today that Obama and McCain are hoping for her endorsement. Yeah Right. I suspect this story comes from her camp in order to make herself look relevant. She is an overblown celebrity who lives in France, has never voted, has never had children in the US, has never cared about American issues, has three children born out of wedlock and turned herself into the most famous woman in the world by sleeping with a married man. She is the biggest most self-important publicity seeker on the planet. Brad called her one of the most important people in modern times. Huh? What like JFK, FDR, MLK? Stop drinking her kool-aid people. She doesn’t want to be left alone. She hasn’t picked a candidate because she wants people to keep hanging on her every word. She wants the publicity. Angie, stop issuing press releases. No one cares what you think and neither candidate wants your endorsement.

Passing Through @ 08/11/2008 at 5:40 pm

“On the other hand…if Obama finds out he’s got Angie’s support, he’ll name-drop like a mofo. And so would McCain.”

Too true and that is the crux of the whining. The fact that AJ is an influential, UN Ambassador has a few up in arms. The fact that an op piece was written about her and her decision to not name who she is voting for, has gotten some in a tizzy. How dare this woman, who is a mere celebrity, have such clout. At the end of the day, we are responsible for our own voting decisions.

hi guys,i love here regardless of who she vote for,am not a US citizen so i really i will not vote,i hate all politicians, to me they will do anything to get elected

Passing Through @ 08/11/2008 at 5:51 pm

# 85 an oldie @ 08/11/2008 at 5:32 pm

PT, DG is David Geffen. That’s why that E Snead is so pro JA. She knows who is going to be her boss.

+++++++++++++++

Duh. LOL. Sorry…I completely missed that. Now the Goree Girls question makes sense. Okay, Geffen doesn’t oversee day-to-day operations at Dreamworks. He’s the “big picture” guy and mostly retired, except for when Spielberg is unhappy. He’s got people who’s job it is to keep Spielberg happy and when he feels that Spielberg - or Katzenberg - isn’t getting respect, then he’s all over the people at Par. Katzenberg technically has a separate deal from Dreamworks and the deal for Dreamworks Animation runs through 2010 or 2011, so for the time being he’ll be staying when Spielberg/Geffen leave. Katzenberg will probably opt out in 2010 and rejoin the other two are the reformed Dreamworks, but that’s a problem Par will have to deal with later.

So bascially what I’m saying is that Geffen has no clue that Dreamworks has signed on to POSSIBLY produce a movie that X is producing and may be in. However, that’s a moot issue, because all of the projects at Dreamworks that are “in production” when their contract with Par runs out on Dec 31, 2008 STAY with Par. Ergo, if I were Geffen, I’d greenlight Goree Girls, get it in the hopper…and dumpt it on Par as a parting gift. Meanwhile, just because Dreamworks has greenlit something before they leave…doesn’t mean Par has to keep the project. They can very easily cancel the production and take a loss on whatever money has been put into the project. And since it was a movie X was producing and possibly starring in…I doubt it was ever slated for more than $20-25MIL to begin with. It was a first-look deal, not a sure thing.

56 bethany @ 08/11/2008 at 3:57 pm

Angelina, what about the children and adults in crisis in our OWN country! What about, how are americans going to afford to heat their homes this winter? What about the homeless children and adults HERE in our own country. That’s pretty important too.
——-
bethany, that is a question for the government.
Angelina is not a member of the government. She works for the UNHCR.

I rest my case judging from the last comment from the hen. AJ is just one woman. There is no need to give into conspiracy, voodoo and ranting.

[☆I n F a m o u s☆] @ 08/11/2008 at 5:53 pm

Passing Through,

you’re still stalking me. lmaoooo stop!

Then she should keep her mouth shut, cause in her attempt to keep herself “neutral” but still concerned with these causes, she’s coming across as someone that is very naive for a UN ambassador and whose promotion of international justice is rather tepid.
Being a “humanitarian” and somewhat diplomat, she should think of better ways of saying she’s not telling who she will vote for, since both candidate’s positions on international issues are pretty clear by now and the fact that she even suggests that she still hasn’t decided just shows how involved she really is.

chris ,you are such a stupid fool,get your facts right,bye guys,

[☆I n F a m o u s☆] @ 08/11/2008 at 5:56 pm

… as soon as jolie say’s “obama”… hundreds of loons will run and vote for him. lmbaoo

God forbid AJ has a diplomatic answer when ask a question. Too funny, yet sad.

in this case, she should vote for mccain cause his foreign policy is better than obama’s.

^ my comment was in response to #79
Dancer @ 08/11/2008 at 5:06 pm
As an Ambassador Angie can hardly keep stirring up the pot. Ambassadors are suppose to facilitate change in a gentle, non-violent way–harmony etc.
She can hardly run around calling the government awful, talk openly about politics etc., without offending people world-wide that are in a position to help aid the refugees.
Her job is to negotiate, to create a harmony for discussion. Not rile the world’s leaders up.

i feel sorry for “you”
i am not even metioning your name. You have no life.
checking on the site 24/7 thinking people really care what you have to say. I hope that you are just a teenager…..otherwise you need to kill yourself.

# 99 S @ 08/11/2008 at 5:53 pm Then she should keep her mouth shut
=================

I am sure she would not have issued any statement, had people on both sides not claimed she is supporting them. Wasn’t there an article just 2 days ago claiming she and Brad were going to attend a fun raising event for the Democrats, and wasn’t jon Voight on Fox last week saying that she favors McCain? I don’t blame her one bit for setting the records straight. She has said before on Larry King, when asked, that she doesn’t endorse any candidate publically. If I remember correctly, aren’t you jenhens the ones always claiming celebrities should not be public about their political endorsements?

68 joy @ 08/11/2008 at 4:31 pm

She is actually a registered independent and her views are the same as McCains concerning the middle east.
I don’t know about JMcCain, but AJ would prefer the troops to stay to help the roughly four million refugees come back and resettle in their home country. That would win a lot of hearts.
I think they should stay to build what they have destroyed, not to fight.

It wouldn’t surprise me if she votes for McCain. I also think Obama’s “plan” and views are a bit distorted and uninformed.
Since Hillary lost, I’ve stopped following the campaign and only
pick up bits from the main news, and I hear that Obama has been flip-flopping. I guess he needs to move to the middle from the extreme left to win more votes.

Who cares what her and the rest of hollyweird thinks on the politcal front. I am so tired of her, brad, jenn, paris, and the rest of the wackjobs that some call hollywood stars voiceing thier opinions. Especially with the way they live.

See, this is what I hate about bloggers and the media… In the original story posted yesterday it stated that both Obama and McCain were trying to court her so that she would endorse them. Thus she released the statement printed above… Its not like out of she blue she asked Trevor to release a statement to let the world know her indidcision about the candidates. So all the idiots stating who care, well Obama and McCain does..

oh would you idiots shut up whining, angie said she was a registered independent for a reason. Plus, this whole blurb, which of course Jared is obediently regurgitating from Us rag is old as hell. For all we know AJ has long since decided. AJ is pretty f*cking smart, you see what good Brad, Affleck, Damon and assorted other celebs did John Kerry and Al Gore…Angelina knows EXACTLY the incendiary reaction she causes and how she’s perceived by some (especially the mini vans) and she also knows a person in her position (i.e. the most famous woman in the world) would be an idiot to come out and endorse anyone. Many of AJ’s hardcore fans are already voting for Obama, not because of AJ but because of WHO they are. So she’d be selfishly preaching to the choir coming out and egotistically making some announcement…aj doesn’t think her vote is better than anyone elses but she sure as hell knows her vote will cause a sh*t storm. I mean, the woman comes out and gives you no clues as to who she’s voting for, and she says she’s a registered independent waiting to see how they will act on issues important to HER (by the way, the country would be a LOT better off if we all gave a big F.U. to the two party system) and look at the waves that non statement is causing. It’s crazy. LOL The repubs are chomping at the bit for her to choose them while the dems are praying she goes with them…the only reason why it’s even being discussed is because people do know she’s an intelligent serious stateswoman who makes sense and saves lives and gets sh*t done. She’s not Madonna Wildenstein, who announces her endorsement of whodaf*ckever and then we all watch said candidate lose in a landslide. There have been so many times I’ve wanted to gag that b*tch and scream STFU Madonna, do you actually think you’re HELPING !ohn Kerry, or Al Gore, or whatever dem comes up short. Why do you think we haven’t heard hide nor hair from Babs Streisand?? Because she finally GETS that sh*t.raise money, call up a candidates personal cell, then shutit

84 question @ 08/11/2008 at 5:29 pm I am disappointed at the Angie’s fans who do not understand what she’s saying. First, she was asked a question about who she’s supporting and like a true ambassador she has registered as an “independent”, the true meaning of which she’s not on any side. It makes her work well with whomever is in power. I don’t think she will publicize her preference, she will just consider someone who favors refugee programs and the things that interest her. She does not support war, she supports taking care of the refugees.
——-
That is it!
Now the war over South Ossetia has made more refugees! Thousands have fled. I’ve been following that. Russia will probably occupy South Ossetia. I’m so glad Georgia isn’t a member of NATO!!!

S @ 08/11/2008 at 5:53 pm

Angelina said COMMITMENTS not positions.

Angelina has dealt with with Republicans and Democrats. Hillary Clinton to Codi Rice. She does not need your advice on how to be diplomatic. Angelina questioned Pres Bush slow reaction in NO. But that did not stop Pres Bush from allowing his close advisers to speak to Angelina nor did it stop him from increasing the money for refugees.
Which is something Angelina was highly involved in.

88 JP Fan 4Evah @ 08/11/2008 at 5:40 pm

#60 lila HUH! What you said ..Canada loves Obama???
Speak for yourself madear. That is a very broad statement. Do not paint a whole nation with the same brush.
Not that it matters b/c as everyone knows we cant vote but if we could we would not get one province to vote on your comment alone. Let alone all of Canada. Geesh!
——-
:lol: I always say that! It’s surprising how many people like to speak for others.

Orchid,

Hi…if you aren’t following the race since Hillary left, I believe it’s uninformed and irresponsible to pay attention to hearsay about Obama…the phrase “sore loser” comes to mind for those Hillary people not getting over or are intending to punish for Obama’s being selected by the Democrats…

fresh @ 08/11/2008 at 2:19 pm
even though i love her—im not really interested in her politcal allegience. the media is ridiculous—leave her alone and let her have her family time in peace.
*******************************************************************

I could not agree with you more. I like her and admire her — but she will not influence my vote, nor will anyone else.

first and last post @ 08/11/2008 at 6:39 pm

Re: #63
An oldie,
Re: #55 cook
Not that cook needs defending but more like deciphering then transcribing his posts since he writes in “cook dialect” only known to him and a few followers LOL…no offense big fella.

I think what cook is trying to state is that AJ as an international representative of the UNHCR, which in theory has an “apolitical” agenda, should be apolitical in her public persona because it would be inappropriate and a misuse of her position with the UNHCR. She technically is not their political spokesperson but a “messenger of awareness.” By clearly having stated her concern is for refugees…at this point it is not clear what Obama or McCain’s position is regarding refugees, therefore AJ cannot really support one or the other unless and until one or both of them focuses and details specifically on the refugee issue as a separate entity from the many other complex issues that entrench any country engaged in conflict.

Lyn @ 08/11/2008 at 4:56 pm
Jennifer Aniston is a Barack Obama supporter. I wonder if Angelina knows that?
**************************************************************

Oh for Christ’s sake, grow up. She almost certainly doesn’t know it, and if she did, why would she care?

YOO-HOO EVERYBODY…

There is no such thing as a “registered Independent”. An independent voter is someone who votes for a candidate without regard to party lines. Most independents are not registered in any political party, which means they cannot vote in that party’s primaries, but they can vote in the general election. I’m an independent and usually vote for democratic candidates but I have voted for republicans on rare occasions when I felt they were the better candidate. That said, there is no way north of hell I will vote for McCain.

first and last post @ 08/11/2008 at 6:45 pm

Re: #63
An oldie,
Re: #55 cook
Not that cook needs defending but more like deciphering then transcribing his posts since he writes in “cook dialect” only known to him and a few followers LOL…no offense big fella.

I think what cook is trying to state is that AJ as an international representative of the UNHCR, which in theory has an “apolitical” agenda, should be apolitical in her public persona because it would be inappropriate and a misuse of her position with the UNHCR. She technically is not their political spokesperson but a “messenger of awareness.” By clearly having stated her concern is for refugees…at this point it is not clear what Obama or McCain’s position is regarding refugees, therefore AJ cannot really support one or the other unless and until one or both of them focuses and details specifically on the refugee issue as a separate entity from the many other complex issues that entrench any country engaged in conflict.

remember da truth @ 08/11/2008 at 6:48 pm

You/Me #12 people weren’t trashing Voight for supporting McCain, but for the idiotic comments he was making and the ranting, rambling dopey fashion they were made!

The man is a lunatic and proved it with his weird comments. If anything, he did McCain a lot of harm, which is why no one in McCain’s camp jumped forward to capitalize on them. They were happier when Lauren Bimbo Conrad endorsed McCain than nutjob Voight!

Dosn’t matter whom she votes for. I still love her.

remember da truth @ 08/11/2008 at 6:54 pm

Jane #36 you apparently didn’t read what Angie said.
She has specific issues she’s looking at, which neither candidate has elaborated upon. They both make speeches which hit emotional buttons, and offer quotable soundbites, but neither has made their actual views on the specific areas she talks about known.

Personally, I think she is trying to keep her vote to herself, and is using the fact that everyone wants to know how she will vote to force the issues she’s concerned with to the forefront and force the candidates to address them.

Keep in mind that there are quite a few United Nations Goodwill Ambassadors who are celebrities, but only Angelina Jolie has made it a priority in her life and studied to the point where her testimony is sought after by world leaders. She was voted to join the Council on Foreign Relations. This is not for pretty faces who occasionally go on photo ops to foreign countries, but for serious individuals who know the facts and the issues.

Why do people keep supporting this idiotic woman? She has never done a single nice thing for anyone without immediately issuing a press release, giving a press conference, staging a photo-op or sitting down with CNN to let EVERYONE know how she just did something nice for someone. When that’s not enough she releases her tax returns which doesn’t feed or shelter anyone. It just puts a dollar amount on her ‘generosity’. We hardly ever get any follow up on her ten million causes. What happened to the orphans in Cambodia, or the people of Namibia, or the refugees in Iraq? I bet they are still orphans, still refugees. We hardly ever get a phone number or a website address so we can help her help these people w. There are many ways to help people without keeping the attention on focused on herself. But for Angelina, what would be the point of that if you’re a shameless self-promoter?

Jennifer was told by Oprah to support Obama

dumbbisch @ 08/11/2008 at 7:03 pm

WHO CARES! I’m undecided. I guess I’ll send out a press release.

“New mom”? This chicks had a litter of kids for awhile now!
And I’m so sure this is her own commentary and thoughts, and not someone working fir her *rolls eyes*
She needs to shutup and raise her kids. She could also spare us her acting and retire. It’s nit like any of her movies besides Tomb Raider have done all that well. And certainly the only thing she got acting applause for, was for basically playing her own loony a*s in Girl Interrupted.

First off, registered independent voters are, people who have registered to vote but are not affiliated with a political party.
Secondly, there is no need to start a talk about JA, she’s not relevant to what the topic is.
Thirdly, chris if you want to know about Angelina and her humanitarian work, there are many people here to help you, you don’t have to insult Angelina to get an answer.

Oh, excuse my typos. Tho I think if you read it aloud I will probably sound like a German exchange student trying English.. which is always funny stuff.

I’m with #123/Chris! Everytime she wants someone to know she’s up to any good, she’ll talk about it or release info on it. Charity and humanitarian work isn’t about the glory.

The amount she gives and the time she puts into stuff isn’t even anything of much substance, compared to how much she wastes on herself and her tribe. Also considering she is grossly overpaid, she could certainly do more.

I suppose her excuse and the excuse of her fans for seeking publicity is, she’s bringing awareness to the cause(s). She can do that without pointing every little thing out and patting herself on the back.

Angie has turned me against her. If she can’t see how detrimental voting for McCain will be and that she should vote for Obama, she is not the person I thought she was.

At least Brad can see the light, and is supporting Obama.

Angie is a disgrace to not have made up her mind to support Obama. Shame on you Angelina Jolie. I would hate to think you are like you disgusting father Jon Voight.

chris, whatever and werd, Angelina is one of the biggest stars of her time. What she does is news. If you don’t like it, don’t get on her thread, don’t watch her movies and don’t listen to what she has to say, it’s simple and you’ll avoid her. What she does has practical significance to a lot of her fans, like the people she has touched by her work. I guess there is nothing you can do about such people who sincerely care about Angelina. Give it up and don’t waste your time.

If Angelina Jolie can’t see that Obama is the best for our country right now, then all her humanitarian work is a farce.

How in the hell can you be a humanitarian and can’t elimination warmonger McCain from your decision for president. We will just have more years of the Bush adm, if McCain is elected.
I am disappointed in Jolie. I will rethink my opinion on her.

Thanks God Brad sees the light.

regardless…..I don’t think either candidate- be in Obama or McCain. They are not going to be any good for the mess our country is in!

whatever @ 08/11/2008 at 7:09 pm
…I think if you read it aloud I will probably sound like a German exchange student trying English.. which is always funny stuff.
*********************************************************************

Not to worry. Stupidity like yours is never funny stuff. Take your ass back to FF where you belong.

remember da truth @ 08/11/2008 at 7:28 pm

#127 question

Dayum, I love your post!! But you do realize that making sense and giving facts in a polite but firm way, correcting irritable people who haven’t a clue and prove it with their erroneous posts in bitter tones, and your trying to be helpful will only brand you a “loony” by those who insist on such nonsense as “Angie only does nice things to promote herself”, and all the people here who obviously care deeply what she is saying but can’t fathom that perhaps a reporter or two asked her the questions she is answering.

I hope you keep posting, as you are spot on.

stop stalling @ 08/11/2008 at 7:30 pm

Ain’t that a b*tch. Talking about she haven’t made up her mind who she will vote for yet.
What are you waiting for Angelina? Are you waiting for November 4th to roll around.

If a person has not made up their mind by now, there is only two things going on. Either, they are not voting at all, or they don’t want anyone to know who they are voting for.

Some people have no clue as to what she does or doesn’t do. People should read up on some of the issues Angelina’s talked about rather than juding her based on your own ignorance. She champions refuges who’s been displaced by political interests, which some of that’s been done by Bush administration.

She maybe an actress, but she has a cause that goes beyond the surface. Inteasd of criticizing her every move, people should make an effort to gain some understanding of the global issues that will affect your own life and the lives of your children.

Bunch idots! Most of you are too short sighted. Pray that your children would have better understanding of themselves and their surroundings!

You do not live in this world all by your stupid self. Like it or not, you are inter connected to the rest of the world. Thus, better be aware of the happenings in the world.

chanel @ 08/11/2008 at 7:24 pm
If Angelina Jolie can’t see that Obama is the best for our country right now, then all her humanitarian work is a farce.
********************************************************************

Obama being the lesser of two evils doesn’t make him the best for our country right now. It just makes him better than McCain — which isn’t saying a whole lot.

I remember being so disgusted by both candidates in the1988 election that I just sat the whole thing out and voted for neither.

I’ll vote for Obama this time, but I still have some reservations about him. Just because he’s not McCain doesn’t make him the messiah.

First of all Angie, GET MARRIED, you and Brad are not setting a good example for your children.

Secondly, REGISTER TO VOTE, AS A DEMOCRAT
McCain is a warmonger and he has no idea what to do about the economy. How can any rational mother even consider voting for McCain.

VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA!

114 cook @ 08/11/2008 at 6:33 pm Orchid,

Hi…if you aren’t following the race since Hillary left, I believe it’s uninformed and irresponsible to pay attention to hearsay about Obama…the phrase “sore loser” comes to mind for those Hillary people not getting over or are intending to punish for Obama’s being selected by the Democrats…
——-
cook, I don’t have a vote.
I used to follow everything when Hillary was still in it, because it’s SO interesting to see a woman running for office, but stopped after she lost. It was good actually, because my eyes and ears were hurting!
It was too much!
Now I watch the news and I heard that Obama has changed his views on things (flip-flopped) which is understandable. He IS ultra left and HAS to move to the middle to win more votes.
Hmmm, I suppose McCain has to move to the middle too, but is he far right? I hear he is not conservative enough for many Republicans.

#139, #132 and probably plenty of others I don’t have time to look through all the comments of. Why are you voting for Obama? And “I want change” isn’t a real answer. It’s what people who don’t know say. I’d really, really love to hear why you people want to vote for him.

I get the feeling there is a lot of bandwagon voting this time around. And depending on which celeb is endorsing who, is how some people are going to vote.

duduh...... @ 08/11/2008 at 7:57 pm

chris/whtever/jane,etc………I WILL ONLY CARE WHT JENNIFER IS VOTING FOR!……….u all sounded the same….all ur comments SCREAMS JENNIFER ANASTYNESS FANS!….very typical and very obvious!..i am not implying , she is nasty ,it’s the nasty fans….i mean they would use any excuse to slam miss jolie to make themself better, when the reality is ……..UR JUST NOTHING BUT JUST A NASTY PEST!.

OH GoD the suspense is NOT killing me. Please, you couldn’t get that bia within 50 ft of pulling a republican lever but she likes to play politics for the same reason she sells pics of her kids to bring attention to her causes (or stay relevant :-/)

Adam @ 08/11/2008 at 7:53 pm

#139, #132 and probably plenty of others I don’t have time to look through all the comments of. Why are you voting for Obama? And “I want change” isn’t a real answer.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Because I believe in a woman’s right to choose and I don’t believe in back alley abortions. The next President will nominate Supreme Court judges that can alter the lives of Americans.

Because I am anti-war and I want someone who believes that peace and negotiation is the way to go before we decide to bomb people who then can turn around and hate us more for bombing their countries (regardless of what good intentions we had)

Because I believe in his health care plan.

Because peace is not negotiable for me.

Vote Democrat in ‘08!!

Same troll over and over. Give it up troll. If you have to say the same thing with different names, then you are getting paid minimum wage.

If she hadn’t decided, just say no comment - saying haven’t decided says she actually would consider voting for a pro-war war monger - so against her ongoing petitions to stop violence in Darfur. How can she support peace in Africa but not peace in Iraq? How can she actually think McCain will be pro-peace and against war? Does this not contradict everything she has ever stood for? If she votes for McCain, she can’t continue to complain about women and children being raped in Darfur. Or the plight of refugees. The Republicans don’t give a rat’s tail about no refugees. Angelina: just say NO COMMENT but please stare us the double talk.

dianad1968 @ 08/11/2008 at 8:09 pm

#84

question,

Very well said. It seems some fans will probaly start “hating” her if she does publicly “endorse” who they support. Never mind the issues sh believes in.

dianad1968 @ 08/11/2008 at 8:13 pm

^^^^ should read “probably”, and “does not publicly endorse whom”.

You have up to the time you punch your choice on the ballet box to choose a President or decide who to vote for in the various categories. So it is probably a good idea to study all the issues.

116 first and last post @ 08/11/2008 at 6:39 pm

…….AJ as an international representative of the UNHCR, which in theory has an “apolitical” agenda, should be apolitical in her public persona because it would be inappropriate and a misuse of her position with the UNHCR. She technically is not their political spokesperson but a “messenger of awareness.” By clearly having stated her concern is for refugees…at this point it is not clear what Obama or McCain’s position is regarding refugees, therefore AJ cannot really support one or the other unless and until one or both of them focuses and details specifically on the refugee issue as a separate entity from the many other complex issues that entrench any country engaged in conflict.
——-
Hi FALP! There you are!!! ITA!

groundcontrol @ 08/11/2008 at 8:25 pm

cook @ 08/11/2008 at 6:33 pm Orchid,

Hi…if you aren’t following the race since Hillary left, I believe it’s uninformed and irresponsible to pay attention to hearsay about Obama…the phrase “sore loser” comes to mind for those Hillary people not getting over or are intending to punish for Obama’s being selected by the Democrats
#######

Oh, please. Give it a rest. There are many, many people who know Obama very well and have a lot of problems with him. I’d like to know how many of his rabid supporters really know his actual Illinois State Senate record as well as his lack of a record in the US Senate. There is simply not a lot there.

For instance, Obama has issued troubling statements about a woman’s right to control her body, his proposed “solution” to Iraq as well as the rights of other minorities like gays and lesbians. His use of rabid and ignorant homophobic preachers in his past and present campaigns is shameful. The misogyny rampant in his campaign and the smearing as racists of good and decent people with decades long work on behalf of minorities as racists for no other reason than to wrestle away African American Clinton supporters is - in my book - almost unforgivable.

There are many reasons to not want to vote for Obama. The scare tactics of the Obama followers don’t work with people who have lived through decades of elections. As long as the dems hold the Senate and take the House, we should be alright.

As for Jolie, what she said was perfectly appropriate and wise for a rep of the UN who must work on a bipartisan basis for the good of her organization. I also agree that we cannot just pull out completely. The blood bath that would follow would be on our heads. I remember our pull out of Vietnam all too clearly. As much as I actively opposed the Vietnam war, I still consider our method of abandoning the south the way we did to be one of the most shameful episodes in US history. I don’t want to repeat that. No one who cares about other human beings would want that repeated.

is this coming out party? everyone has opinion? if what ange has said doesn’t suit your agenda, then she’s worthless? wow, can we have the difference in opinion without putting all balme on ange?

This is an old Angie quote being used to answer a new question. Why does Angie never get the benefit of the doubt. Come on AJ fans. Stick up for our girl.

To: chris

STFU and get lost. Who invited you on this thread?

To think my vote was with Obama now after reading these comments l dont think l want to.

Jennifer Aniston is a Barack Obama supporter. I wonder if Angelina knows that? I read where she sent a donation.

————————————————————————-
u know,maniston should buy another dog with that donation and named the dog OSCAR!!!!she can utilized this oscar everyime she felt itchey lol which she always does……..to lick her vavavagina.

I just heard Angie’s dad on The Factor. There must be other conservatives in Hollywood. It’s just that the others don’t want to say it, while Jon Voight is not a young guy trying to make it in Hollywood.

I never knew that the McCains have adopted a daughter from a third-world country.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117990392.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

Oh goody I sense another raging debate about to happen. Watch out for those Sci Fi bloggers. It is bad enough with the spamming hen. Too funny

Jolie replaces Cruise in Col’s ‘Salt’

“Edwin A. Salt” is about to undergo a gender change.
Once expected to star Tom Cruise, the Columbia Pictures espionage thriller will be redrafted by screenwriter Kurt Wimmer as a star vehicle for Angelina Jolie. Philip Noyce remains attached as director and Lorenzo di Bonaventura and Sunil Perkash are producing.

Jolie is close to a deal to play the title character, a CIA officer who’s accused by a defector of being a Russian sleeper spy and must elude capture long enough to establish her innocence.

Cruise had long flirted with the project, but that ended recently. The well-regarded script had several male movie stars circling.

Jolie took a liking to it, prompting the studio’s decision to rewrite it. Sources said the project won’t require that much of an overhaul to suit her.

After Universal beefed up Jolie’s role in “Wanted” and then marketed the action film squarely on Jolie’s shoulders and watched it gross $132 million domestically, Jolie reestablished in the wake of “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” that she is the rare female who is viable in an action genre that has been almost the exclusive domain of men.

“Edwin A. Salt” will undergo a title change, and if everything falls into place, the film shapes up as a return vehicle for Jolie, who recently gave birth to twins. Another candidate for her return is the Lionsgate drama “Atlas Shrugged,” which has been adapted by Randall Wallace from the Ayn Rand novel.

Jolie, who also provided a lead voice in the DreamWorks Animation hit “Kung Fu Panda,” drew strong notices at the Cannes Film Festival for her starring role in the Clint Eastwood-directed drama “The Changeling” for Imagine and Universal. That film opens in late October.

Jolie replaces Cruise in Col’s ‘Salt’

“Edwin A. Salt” is about to undergo a gender change.
Once expected to star Tom Cruise, the Columbia Pictures espionage thriller will be redrafted by screenwriter Kurt Wimmer as a star vehicle for Angelina Jolie. Philip Noyce remains attached as director and Lorenzo di Bonaventura and Sunil Perkash are producing.

Jolie is close to a deal to play the title character, a CIA officer who’s accused by a defector of being a Russian sleeper spy and must elude capture long enough to establish her innocence.

Cruise had long flirted with the project, but that ended recently. The well-regarded script had several male movie stars circling.

Jolie took a liking to it, prompting the studio’s decision to rewrite it. Sources said the project won’t require that much of an overhaul to suit her.

After Universal beefed up Jolie’s role in “Wanted” and then marketed the action film squarely on Jolie’s shoulders and watched it gross $132 million domestically, Jolie reestablished in the wake of “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” that she is the rare female who is viable in an action genre that has been almost the exclusive domain of men.

“Edwin A. Salt” will undergo a title change, and if everything falls into place, the film shapes up as a return vehicle for Jolie, who recently gave birth to twins. Another candidate for her return is the Lionsgate drama “Atlas Shrugged,” which has been adapted by Randall Wallace from the Ayn Rand novel.

Jolie, who also provided a lead voice in the DreamWorks Animation hit “Kung Fu Panda,” drew strong notices at the Cannes Film Festival for her starring role in the Clint Eastwood-directed drama “The Changeling” for Imagine and Universal. That film opens in late October.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117990392.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

alexanderina @ 08/11/2008 at 8:38 pm

WOW it is a little crazy on the thread, anyway thanks Jared for the thread.

And this is my opinion on this topic. I agree with Angie. I, for one, don’t know who I am voting for. I have reservations regarding both candidates. I don’t get some of their views or what they stand for. And if I am honest I can’t stand either of them. But I guess I will have to vote for the lesser of two evils.

Belle
Great minds thinking alike. Beat ya to it, Belle. Let the fun begin.

Things people need to look up about all candidates before blindly bashing others:

Health Care Plans
Economic Plans
Energy Plan
Environmental Plan
Women’s Rights
Minority Rights
GLBT Rights
Military Plan– Includes Iraq
Immigration Plan
Foreign Policy
Plan on the handling of firearms
National Security
Education
Ethics Reform

That was in no particular order, but until you know whoever you’re supporting/ hating on’s plans very well, please STFU. THAT’S why some people are still undecided. There are a BUNCH of points to still come to understand, especially if you are not really a political person.

140 # 140 Orchid @ 08/11/2008 at 7:49 pm 114 cook @ 08/11/2008 at 6:33 pm Orchid,

Hi…if you aren’t following the race since Hillary left, I believe it’s uninformed and irresponsible to pay attention to hearsay about Obama…the phrase “sore loser” comes to mind for those Hillary people not getting over or are intending to punish for Obama’s being selected by the Democrats…
——-
cook, I don’t have a vote.

I used to follow everything when Hillary was still in it, because it’s SO interesting to see a woman running for office, but stopped after she lost. It was good actually, because my eyes and ears were hurting! It was too much!

Now I watch the news and I heard that Obama has changed his views on things (flip-flopped) which is understandable. He IS ultra left and HAS to move to the middle to win more votes.
Hmmm, I suppose McCain has to move to the middle too, but is he far right? I hear he is not conservative enough for many Republicans.
——-
Oops, I must rerwrite that paragraph!

I used to follow everything when Hillary was still in it, because it’s SO interesting to see a woman running for office, but stopped after she lost. My eyes and ears were hurting from too much TV!

alexanderina @ 08/11/2008 at 8:42 pm

Thanks bdj and Belle for the article. Good for Angie

http://www.miamiherald.com/entertainment/people/story/636752.html

Hanging out with hotties all in a day’s work for Adriana Barraza

You’ve worked with your share of hunks.
Gael García Bernal [in Babel and Perros] is a total pleasure. As for Brad Pitt in Babel, I mostly talk to him on the phone. I was in Miami, and he was in Marrakech. But I did get to meet him, and I have to say he is just as good-looking in person as he is on screen. Maybe more. You don’t realize how tall he is. He was very courteous, a gentleman.

SOME people are WELL-INFORMED voters

Orig Ruth @ 08/11/2008 at 8:43 pm

JILLIAN @ 08/11/2008 at 7:37 pm

Third, STFU!

If she hadn’t decided, just say no comment - saying haven’t decided says she actually would consider voting for a pro-war war monger - so against her ongoing petitions to stop violence in Darfur. How can she support peace in Africa but not peace in Iraq? How can she actually think McCain will be pro-peace and against war? Does this not contradict everything she has ever stood for? If she votes for McCain, she can’t continue to complain about women and children being raped in Darfur. Or the plight of refugees. The Republicans don’t give a rat’s tail about no refugees. Angelina: just say NO COMMENT but please stare us the double talk.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What is she going to achieve by saying “no comment”. She’s an advocate for refugees and needy children around the world. She’s saying I would consider a candidate who makes that a priority. Does it mean she’s saying this because she wants the candidates to think war is not an answer? I’ll say yes. In the case of Iraq where there is an existing war, she previously stated that the money spent on the war could have been used for other important things signifying her lack of approval for the war, at the same time the war is already on, and has been going on for some time, she’s then saying as we think of ending the war, please let’s make it our responsibility not to forget the refugees. She and Brad have followed that up by making personal donations recently to the children affected by the war both in Iraq and in America. Her position is very clear, there is absolutely no double talk here, she’s merely reinforcing her beliefs.

*****New Thread####

I doubt that anyone really cares who Angie is going to vote for. It is my opinion, after reading a few of these threads, that the average age of the brangelina fan is about 12 or 14 so they are not even old enough to vote. Those with a little more maturity would not be influenced by the voting habits of celebrities.

My grandfather always don’t me to listen and ask questions. But don’t make up your mind based on one thing. IMO Bush was elected because he as the anti Bill Clinton (ie no scandals). But look what we go instead ….IRAQ. Good for Angelina for keeping her mind open and her brain working.

m @ 08/11/2008 at 8:52 pm
hmmm. I think you got lost and looking for the ZacChace thread. If you have been reading the threads, then you will know that the BP and AJ fans are well-informed, committed to various causes and international Peace.

dianad1968 @ 08/11/2008 at 9:01 pm

#151,

groundcontrol,

The problem is that the rabid Obama supporters dont realise that if he wins, there will be no immediate pull-out in Iraq. It’s as Colin Powell said,”we break it, we fix it”, and Obama knows this. What he is doing and saying is disingenious at best, because he knows that is what people want to hear.

I was ALWAYS against this ill-fated war, and had many a heated argument about it…. “shock and awe” my a**. However, now that the US have started this debacle, it’s not fair to the Iraqi people to just up and leave their country in shambles, vulnerable to terrorists, which was unheard of during the Saddam regime. I don’t want to see more American lives lost, but also no more innocent Iraqi lives either. In the beginning of the war, before the number of American casualities, no one was talking about pulling out, and at that time there were horrendous stories about the Iraq people being murdered, so what changed?.

This war will be a permanent failure on US foreign policies, and none of the candidates, no matter what they say, have any good plan to solve this mess. I however, agree with Angie, and have been saying it for the past how many years this “occupation” has been going on. the US has to say and fix that country. Its the only decent thing , and since the US is such a God-fearing country and all, the only righteous thing to do.

For the first time, i am not enamoured of either candidate, and am really saddened that this is the best America has to offer for a presidential election. Like Angie, i am still listening. No harm in that.

to whom it may concern,

Yes, I’m very serious…there are many who know the records of most campaigning for the top job…

…it wasn’t very long ago that the Bush campaign and other Republicans cut Mccain a new a sshole, and like a good sheep this time around, he has fallen in-line…In 1995, I could’ve voted for that Mccain, Chuck Hagel, and John Warner…the other two are still good but not this new Mccain.

I voted Clinton twice and by the time the world learned about his bulls hit shenanigans, alot of us paid closer attention…then, ultimately in 2000, the Clintons selfishly disrespected and ignored Gore’s challenges for their own later political pursuits…unforgiveable to me and a lot of others…Hillary followed along, voted for that war in Iraq errantly like a sheep without a conscience and trying to seem tough…She would probably vote AGAINGST a woman’s right to choose if it would get her the nominee and explain her decision later…She has always taking advantage of her power over females.

Barack is as credentialed as anyone else running…Why not give him a
chance?…He has been consistent with what most Americans and the World can see and has withstood challenges brought on by people associated with him for years to the contrary and has made it clear, this is his opinion and not mine…Noone who isn’t a sheep agrees with everything their pastor or bishop says.

I haven’t just got interested in my civil duties since Angelina was in grade school, I was taught at home many years before and have always participated in civil affairs…I’m selflessly okay with my choice.

chris @ 08/11/2008 at 6:57 pm #123
==========================================

You said Jolie was an idiot, what support do you have for that statement? Idiots are not given the position of Goodwill Ambassador to the United Nations Refugee Agency. Idiots are not paid 15-20 dollars per movies. Idiots do not donate their time and money to charitable causes. Idiots do not raise 6 kids and do those other things and make it work. Idiots type on blogs complaining about the GOOD works that someone else does. Idiots don’t reason, they just hate.

This is your statement ” What happened to the orphans in Cambodia, or the people of Namibia, or the refugees in Iraq? I bet they are still orphans, still refugees.” Now I want you to take a DEEP breath and realize how much of a jack-a-s-s you are for making it. Of course there are still orphans and refugees. One person nor can a thousand solve ALL of the problems in one country. However, through donations, awareness and works the numbers can be reduced. You seriously need to get involved in helping others if all you can do is complain about someone who does help.

You condemn Angelina then complain that she hasn’t provided a website or phone number so that you can help. I hardly think you’re interested in helping. You seem to use this as proof that she is merely promoting herself. If you were interested in helping the people in those countries, you have a computer, you’d Google charities that support them. I’d do it for you, but I know it would give you such pleasure to find them yourself. . But then again you could just sit there jaw yapping about what Jolie does.

I seriously doubt that Angelina is out making press releases on everything she donates to charity. Why don’t you provide a list of the releases that came directly from her or through her representative. I know you would want to support your twisted view that she is somehow doing this all for her own benefit.

Everyone who has a cause including Belinda and Bill Gates have had their contributions chronicled in the papers and television. They have made speeches and had interviews about the donations and causes they support. But somehow I don’t think you’d be complaining about them being self-promoters, you reserve that for Jolie.

Why don’t you do something nice for someone yourself. It might shock the h-e-l -l out of me, but I promise i won’t ridicule you as being a self-promoter.

eddie jones @ 08/11/2008 at 9:17 pm

who cares what hollywood elites think, they have more money then the president, they run the country more then the president.

Arora. I have just as much right to be on this thread as you do. Using the STFU statement against says a lot about what kind of un-democratic person you are. We are all entitled to our opinions, including me. I work in the entertainment industry and have actually met her. She is a self-absorbed nutcase, like most celebrities. Very few of them do something out if the goodness of their hearts. Almost all of them are in love with their own publicity, including Angelina.

Anonymous @ 08/11/2008 at 9:34 pm

Jolie replaces Cruise in Col’s ‘Salt’

“Edwin A. Salt” is about to undergo a gender change.
Once expected to star Tom Cruise, the Columbia Pictures espionage thriller will be redrafted by screenwriter Kurt Wimmer as a star vehicle for Angelina Jolie. Philip Noyce remains attached as director and Lorenzo di Bonaventura and Sunil Perkash are producing.

Jolie is close to a deal to play the title character, a CIA officer who’s accused by a defector of being a Russian sleeper spy and must elude capture long enough to establish her innocence.

Cruise had long flirted with the project, but that ended recently. The well-regarded script had several male movie stars circling.

Jolie took a liking to it, prompting the studio’s decision to rewrite it. Sources said the project won’t require that much of an overhaul to suit her.

After Universal beefed up Jolie’s role in “Wanted” and then marketed the action film squarely on Jolie’s shoulders and watched it gross $132 million domestically, Jolie reestablished in the wake of “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” that she is the rare female who is viable in an action genre that has been almost the exclusive domain of men.

“Edwin A. Salt” will undergo a title change, and if everything falls into place, the film shapes up as a return vehicle for Jolie, who recently gave birth to twins. Another candidate for her return is the Lionsgate drama “Atlas Shrugged,” which has been adapted by Randall Wallace from the Ayn Rand novel.

Jolie, who also provided a lead voice in the DreamWorks Animation hit “Kung Fu Panda,” drew strong notices at the Cannes Film Festival for her starring role in the Clint Eastwood-directed drama “The Changeling” for Imagine and Universal. That film opens in late October.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117990392.html?categoryid=13&cs=1
—————
This is great news!! Another Jolie film I’ll look forward to. I can’t believe they’re changing the male character into a female. That just shows how in demand Jolie is in Hollywood.

#44 truvy @ 08/11/2008 at 3:21 pm

Via a political advisor? Taking ourselves a little too serious, aren’t we?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Surely no more serious then having a Publicist and PR Manager??

i dont understand some fans why is so big deal who AJ vote for..

If she choose MCain or Obama is her right.. nobody can dictate her who she wants to vote..

After reading the headline I really thought this was from The Onion. This is too funny to be serious. Who cares?

123 chris @ 08/11/2008 at 6:57 pm

Why do people keep supporting this idiotic woman?
Because we like her on the screen and she does good work outside Hollywood.

She has never done a single nice thing for anyone without immediately issuing a press release, giving a press conference, staging a photo-op or sitting down with CNN to let EVERYONE know how she just did something nice for someone.
If you’re referring to her UNHCR job, IT IS HER JOB to be in the news, issuing press releases every time she has done something to draw attention to the refugees. Actually, I read that it’s the local UNHCR branch that takes care of the press release after her visit.

When that’s not enough she releases her tax returns which doesn’t feed or shelter anyone.
You can read in her UNHCR fact sheet that she donates to their projects, which are about feeding and sheltering refugees.

It just puts a dollar amount on her ‘generosity’.
I hope other celebrities with as much or more money, who are not donating yet, will follow her lead.

We hardly ever get any follow up on her ten million causes.
You can find plenty of information on the net, but I don’t think you’re really interested. I think you just want to bash her. What has she done to YOU?

What happened to the orphans in Cambodia, or the people of Namibia, or the refugees in Iraq? I bet they are still orphans, still refugees.
That is a very dumb thing to say.
Not one leader, not one country can solve the refugee crisis, or place all the orphans in homes, overnight. It takes the combined effort of many countries over a long period of time to do that, but every little bit that is done helps.
What is sad is that as soon as a number of refugees are settled in other countries, new ones are created by wars, like now in the war between Russia and Georgia.

We hardly ever get a phone number or a website address so we can help her help these people w. There are many ways to help people without keeping the attention on focused on herself.
If you really want to help, go to the UNHCR website, and there’s Brad’s NOLA housing project too.

But for Angelina, what would be the point of that if you’re a shameless self-promoter?
She’s staying home with her babies, but people talk about her!
People are interested in her. Including those who claim not to like her.

Orchid, I never asked many of the questions you asked. Good job at bringing up what you see as her pluses tho.

JANE @ 08/11/2008 at 7:17 pm Angie has turned me against her. If she can’t see how detrimental voting for McCain will be and that she should vote for Obama, she is not the person I thought she was.

At least Brad can see the light, and is supporting Obama.

Angie is a disgrace to not have made up her mind to support Obama. Shame on you Angelina Jolie. I would hate to think you are like you disgusting father Jon Voight.

____________________________________________________

Gee.

This kind comments really made me not want to vote for Obama.

Cult that much?

chris @ 08/11/2008 at 6:57 pm
Werd @ 08/11/2008 at 7:14 pm
———-
LOL we have two hater-fans here who claim to be “informed”…
maybe you should try to do a little research, the job of a Goodwill Ambassador is exactly that.. RAISE AWARENESS
here http://www.un.org/works/goingon/refugees/angelina_story.html let me help you, dumb troll

Please, please do not include Angie to all the dirty politics.
Angie I know you are smart enough to stay away from this foolishness.
Politics…too dirty.

At any rate, whoever you pick, I wouldn’t change my admiration to Angie and Brad and their family.

Just stay away from politics.. Not worth it.

#184 is claiming to be Chris when she/he is not. Nice try. No wonder you love Angie. You both like to deceive people.

The fact is there are plenty of celebrities out there who give millions to charity and don’t always keep the attention on themselves. Paul Newman is a good example of that. Jon Stewart visits injured troops without bringing cameras with him.

BTW donating a million dollars to a charity the day before “Wanted” hits theaters is a PR stunt. Running to an orphanage with Brad less than 72 hours after they first got caught on that beach in Africa having that relationship they swore they weren’t having is damage control whether you want to accept that or not. Forbes magazine which is not exactly a tabloid, wrote an article about how touting their charity work saved their careers from serious damage. There is reason to be cynical when it comes to public figures. Most of the time there is a lot more to their supposed selflessness.

Keep an Eye out for Deceivers @ 08/12/2008 at 3:38 am

Orchid might want to turn off the “bold” on her computer after her rant and before she pretends to be Chris.

189 Keep an Eye out for Deceivers @ 08/12/2008 at 3:38 am
——-
I am me! Chris is Chris. You must be drunk or something.
Btw, why are you hiding behind that stupid ‘name!’

189 Keep an Eye out for Deceivers @ 08/12/2008 at 3:38 am
——-
I have to bold my comments to separate it from the post I’m responding to. Not only do I think you’re drunk, but you’re not very bright.

chris @ 08/12/2008 at 3:05 am
——-
LOL apparently we have an undercover x fan…

Hmm I wonder if you go to threads of other people like oprah, bono, roger federer, nicole kidman, shakira etc to complain about their charity work, and btw they’re VERY public about it. So according to you bono’s nobel prize nomination was a PR stunt.
Also if I’m not mistaken, Jon & Paul are not ambassadors that’s why they are able to do it privately, so show me a goodwill ambassador who doesn’t get in the news by doing their job (you know.. raise awareness)

Politics just like religion are two controversial topics that cause heated arguments. Now that politics is being discussed in this thread, it surely has heightened ones emotions, as everyone has his own choice of candidate.

In my opinion, I see nothing wrong about Angie’s statement that she’s still undecided yet on her presidential candidate. I think she issued that statement thru her political advisor maybe because she’s always asked about it. Just like any American citizen, Angie has every right to voice her opinion. That’s the beauty of democracy, right? Yes, she’s a popular celebrity, UNHCR Goodwill Ambassador and a member of the prestigious Council on Foreign Relations, but she’s still FIRST & FOREMOST a U.S. citizen who must weigh certain issues of the two presidential candidates before she chooses. Besides, every citizen is asked, one time or another, who’s his candidate. So, Angie is no exception. It just so happened she’s very popular.

As far as I know, she said this before :

“Everyone thinks that I have made up my mind…..but my decision is still very much open. I have listened very carefully for what Obama and McCain stand for, which is something that every voter should do. I will make my decision only after I know what both candidates plan to do in the areas that are important to me.”

My understanding is she’s not trying to convince or force anyone, her fans, people, to also choose who she decides to vote. Angie will not also like it, that her fans will just follow her choices just because she said so. Let’s not judge her just because she issued a political statement.

Whether she’s for McCain or Obama, she will definitely displease someone. It’s like a case of “no way out” or “damn if do, damn if you don’t” kind of thing. Anyway, she’s no intention to please everyone. Remember, she’s a very independent woman

I think what she’s driving at is SHE IS HOPING THAT EVERY VOTER SHOULD THINK WISELY BY LISTENING TO EACH CANDIDATE’S PLATFORM OF GOVERNANCE BEFORE DECIDING WHO TO VOTE FOR. THAT PERSONALITIES ARE NOT ENOUGH BUT TO STUDY WHAT EACH CANDIDATE STAND FOR.

Orchid @08/11/2008 at 11:50pm
Very smart answers to some of the most ignorant comments I’ve read. Instead of trying to emulate the good she does, they prefer to question her sincerity. And insult her out of jealousy.

neer @08/12/2008 at 9:31am
“My understanding is she’s not trying to convince or force anyone…”

“Anyway, she’s no intention to please everyone. Remember, she’s a very independent woman.”

Well said! I enjoy reading your comments, they are always spot on.

chris @ 08/11/2008 at 9:20 pm Arora. I have just as much right to be on this thread as you do. Using the STFU statement against says a lot about what kind of un-democratic person you are. We are all entitled to our opinions, including me. I work in the entertainment industry and have actually met her. She is a self-absorbed nutcase, like most celebrities. Very few of them do something out if the goodness of their hearts. Almost all of them are in love with their own publicity, including Angelina.

=====
So i hope you included in your list Oprah Winfrey, Bono, Shakira, Madonna, Gwyneth P, Jennifer A. to name a few because all of them announced their charities they involved in. And you said your work in ENTAIRTAINMENT INDUSTRY?? TED C??? LMAOOO!

question @ 08/11/2008 at 8:43 pm
refugees. She and Brad have followed that up by making personal donations recently to the children affected by the war both in Iraq and in America. Her position is very clear, there is absolutely no double talk here, she’s merely reinforcing her beliefs.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

No she is not. Voting for McCain is a contradictionof any humanitarian stance. Point black. No two ways about it. She is being a hypocrite here. A total hypocrite to not tarnish her image as a goodwill person. Mother Theresa and Ghandi were VERY clear about who they did not support politically because they know A TRUE humanitarian stands up for something even when it is not safe or popular. She showed herself here and I used to think she was sincere about humanitarian issues. McCain and refugees in the same sentence? Gimme a break.

angie=ex-humanitarian @ 08/12/2008 at 1:08 pm
——–
This is exactly what happens when ignorant people start to express their opinion based on their limited/lack of knowledge. Or maybe just another hater complaining about everything.

188 chris @ 08/12/2008 at 3:05 am

The fact is there are plenty of celebrities out there who give millions to charity and don’t always keep the attention on themselves. Paul Newman is a good example of that. Jon Stewart visits injured troops without bringing cameras with him.
Who doesn’t know about Paul Newman, and many people visit injured troops (except Obama when he was in Germany!), but these are men. Angelina is prettier to look at. The world loves pretty a face.

BTW donating a million dollars to a charity the day before “Wanted” hits theaters is a PR stunt.
How cynical, but even if that’s true, so what? A million dollars went to charity. That is good, isn’t it?

Running to an orphanage with Brad less than 72 hours after they first got caught on that beach in Africa having that relationship they swore they weren’t having is damage control whether you want to accept that or not.
I’m not sure what you’re talking about but, again, if they did good work, so what? If that visit controlled whatever damage you’re talking about, I’m glad for them.

Forbes magazine which is not exactly a tabloid, wrote an article about how touting their charity work saved their careers from serious damage.
If that is true, then I hope other Hollywood celebs who aren’t doing good work yet and could do with some good publicity, follow B&A and other celebs who are already into charity work. Both the needy and the celebs themselves would benefit.

There is reason to be cynical when it comes to public figures. Most of the time there is a lot more to their supposed selflessness.
Probably. Nobody is perfect. Doing good things for others is never wrong.

Correction:

The world loves a pretty face.

(I really wish Jared would make it possible for us to edit our posts.)

dits @ 08/12/2008 at 3:59 pm

angie=ex-humanitarian @ 08/12/2008 at 1:08 pm
——–
This is exactly what happens when ignorant people start to express their opinion based on their limited/lack of knowledge. Or maybe just another hater complaining about everything.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What???!! My hero is Mother Theresa. And Ghandi is a close second. I am saying if Angelina aspires to spread their gospel - helping the poor, refugees, hungry people, and people of all backgrounds - then how is voting for a man who said we should BOMB Iran and send our enemies cigarettes so they can die be aligned with humanitarianism to the point where Angelina would say she is not sure whether she will vote for him or not. Are you kidding me?

200 angie=ex-humanitarian @ 08/12/2008 at 6:04 pm
——-
A US leader of either party would bomb Iran if he has to, and if Israel does it, the US leader of either party will back Israel.

A US leader doesn’t have to send cigarettes to other countries. Since more and more western countries outlaw smoking, the cigarette manufacturers sell their cancer sticks in third world nations. It’s up to these third world nations to reject them.

Angelina’s main concern is the wellbeing of refugees, especially the children. They need to go back to their home country (or settle in another country) and go to school. The troops in Iraq can be of great assistance in bringing the Iraqi refugees back to Iraq and help them resettle. After all, it’s the invasion that created the refugees.

i really wish Obama would win! and even though i really dont care who angie votes for, if McCain wins it’ll be just as bad as Bush being our president!

McCain is just as stupid as Bush! they’re both idiots that have NO business being or trying to be president!

and it really sucks because even though Obama is the best person for it, McCain will probably win because hes white and our country is sooo damn racist!

BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!

God bless Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and their beautiful family always.

God bless Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and their beautiful family always.

# 188 chris @ 08/12/2008 at 3:05 am

I think your late night posting is robbing you of rest and making you delusional. The ONLY thing your irrational rant is convincing of is that you don’t like Angie. Boo hoo. A waste of words and a disposable post. Next! (Can’t one of you fools at least be funny?)

Shannon M. @ 08/26/2008 at 7:39 pm

hmmmm….Angelina I believe that would be Obama…..DUH……..

Their are so many ignorant people who think obama is awesome. WHY!!!! WTF has he really done? McCain loves America! He will keep us safe! Palin ha ssaved Alaska tons of money, she will help the economy. And Angelina has the same values as the McCain family, They are so passionate that they have adopted children of poverty and have taken them in as their own.

Why are people for obama, because he seems cool. That’s stupid, and not as important as having love for our country!!!!!!! When I think of Obama supporters, I think of the movie idiocracy!!!!! Obama seems nice, but his wife admitted that she wasn’t proud to be an American! I could go on, but I am busy!

Just think for yourself before you vote! Watch their speeches! research both of the canidates fully! Don’t be a follower and vote for someone just because they seem cooler! That is ignorant!

Their are so many ignorant people who think
Obama is awesome. WHY!!!! WTF has he really done? McCain loves America! He will keep us safe! Palin has saved Alaska tons of money, she will help the economy. And Angelina has the same values as the McCain family, They are so passionate that they have adopted children of poverty and have taken them in as their own.

Why are people for obama, because he seems cool. That’s stupid, and not as important as having love for our country!!!!!!! When I think of Obama supporters, I think of the movie idiocracy!!!!! Obama seems nice, but his wife admitted that she wasn’t proud to be an American! I could go on, but I am busy!

Just think for yourself before you vote! Watch their speeches! research both of the canidates fully! Don’t be a follower and vote for someone just because they seem cooler! That is ignorant!

Also, McCain is not the same as Bush. If people would actually do the research, they would see that their veiws are different on MANY things!

And our country is not racist!!! I am sick of people saying that, because that is stupid. I am black, I am not voting for Obama and obviously I am not a racist. What is racist is people voting for him because of his color alone!

I have traveled all over the world and this is the least racist country. Our country is built on accepting different races and freedom. If you travel, you will notice how diverse and wonderful this country is.

Do the research, are you for the same things as him? Will he keep the country safe? Will McCain keep us safe! YES!!!!!!! I don’t want to have our country bombed again like Sept 11th, so being safe is my #1 priority. And I know that McCain has always and will always love this country!

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.