Keira Knightley - “Vogue” September 2008
Keira Knightley is the cover girl for the much-anticipated September fall fashion issue for Vogue.
The cover headline reads that Keira is a “fashion star, pirate queen, history’s sexiest Duchess.” Her new film The Duchess actually opens in the UK on September 5 and in limited release in the USA on September 19.
The 23-year-old British actress last appeared on the June 2007 cover, which was the second-lowest seller of that half of the year. It sold a mere 405,000 copies.
As for the other September cover girls, Penelope Cruz does Glamour, Jessica Simpson does Elle, Blake Lively does Cosmopolitan, and Vanessa Hudgens does Teen Vogue.








Older











49 Comments
Again? This woman has been on the cover three times already. Anna Wintour is getting very predictable and boring.
Block/Report this user/ flag their videos. This user is hacking into the Jonas Brothers youtube account!!! They already deleted the Burnin up music video so please help delete this hacker!
http://www.youtube.com/leeonalewis
^^btw,
this is NOT the real “Leona Lewis”
just letting you know.
hahaa=]
thnx for ur help!
I like the cover, but the hair ruins it. Vogue loves their cover girls to have their hair pulled back for some reason, and this makes her look like she’s 12 year old boy who finished chemo a while back and is in the middle of growing back her hair.
I think it’s time for Anna Wintour to be retire or be fired.
LuckyL - This is the SEPTEMBER issue…. FALL……. Of course it will sell.
It’s very 80’s that’s for sure….. Keira is such a beauty, she can even pull off this hot mess and still look gorgeous.
This doesn’t look much like autumn, either.
her outfit is on point but other than that her hair and face looks fug
Whats the deal with this cover? I am not impressed the September issue is supposed to be one of the most important issues of the year. This is just very flat and boring.
That’s what I was thinking…..this doesn’t look anything like the special, festive September covers they always used to do with the kind of outdoorsy Fall colors. September Vogue always used to be an event, but they’ve gone low-rent, from what I can tell.
Does anyone know what the newstand price for this issue ? I think , last year, they wanted close to $10.00, but this year’s cover looks like any other generic throwaway month. Nevermind the underwhelming gal they decided to utilize…
Big disappointment !
American Vogue is ****
LuckyL @ 08/11/2008 at 4:09 pm
This will not sell, yet again.
********************************************************
The September issue always sells. June and July are their lowest sellers every year. But what in the world is that mess she’s wearing? I can’t even tell what it is.
The cover is a disaster. It doesn’t look anything like September or fall. Keira’s hair looks like somebody cut it blindfolded with a weed whacker. That outfit doesn’t make sense on any level.
Anna Wintour is losing it. She takes a beautiful young woman and turns her into a bag lady. The magazine has been going down the tubes for the last year. The clothes are unwearable. The only decent outfits are the ones in the advertisements.
The publisher should take one look at this cover and fire Wintour on the spot. I don’t even want to renew my subscription behind this. From now on I’m sticking to British Vogue. It’s a much classier magazine.
I just e-mailed Vogue and suggested they take a look at some of these comments. :lol:
This is a Vogue cover? For the September issue which is the biggest of the year????? WTF? it looks like that supermarket checkout magazine Women’s Day.
WTF? @ 08/11/2008 at 11:42 pm
This is a Vogue cover? For the September issue which is the biggest of the year????? WTF? it looks like that supermarket checkout magazine Women’s Day.
****************************************************************
You got that right. Good lord! This is Vogue?! I don’t even want to read the September issue after seeing that cover. What in hell were they thinking of? That outfit Keira is wearing looks like something from the Good Will store.
This has to be an old picture because recently she was photographed and she had long hair in indonesia.
she looks awful, the hair looks awful, her clothes look awful, the background looks awful, her make-up looks awful.
beautiful girls are made ugly by vogue
Woo Keira. Im not a fan of the cover though. I think thats what lets sale down. Not keira shes gorgeous.
does the duchess have a poodle perm?
wtf is going on with her hair?
It is not the cover ugly but the subject. She is totally overrated as an actress. I do not know why she continues to work. An academy award nomination??????? Hopefully the first and last. She didn’t diserve it.
this is an awful cover, again American Vogue sucks ass.
why is vogue usa so obssesed with british actresses for its september cover..last year was sienna miller..(awful)…and now is this stupid, unpretty, ordinary, super common keira who is even more ugly and more awful than keira..common…you guys should have put charlize theron, or liv tyler, or anne hathaway everyone but keira..keira is pathetic and doesn`t represent what vogue is..vogue is fashion she is not fashion, vogue is class and sophistication and she is certainly not that..just look at her hair,,lol hahaha awfullll
i have read nothing by horrible reviews for this cover…
my company is in here and i hope otherwise…
i think that it looks good, caught my attention!
we made front bottom right with the Fitness Phenomenon Miracle Machine.
this issue is supposed to be huge and i hope that it does good for us at least…
as for the cover girl…
i agree with you guys…
they could have done her up differently…
but you have to admit she trendy as ****!
I think that she is sexy on the cover. Perhaps what we weren’t expecting, but, Keira is HOT and can carry most any look off. She will sell these copies.
jesus god tell me that is a joke, look@ the state of her her, she looks mingin, I better lookin than her, why arenat i on the cover, I’m sorry that cover is absolutely hideous, really horrible
I don’t care too much for the cover choice or photo, but this magazine is terrible. The letter from the editor (1st article) starts on page 312 or something like that. I can’t remember exactly, but it was definitely in the 300s. I don’t know about you, but I didn’t spend $5 to flip through ads. Even the articles are interrupted by 3+ pages of ads. Useless!
Pages: « 1 [2] Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!