Top Stories

Nicole Kidman Gets Concert Shout-Out

Nicole Kidman Gets Concert Shout-Out

Nicole Kidman carries newborn daughter Sunday Rose as she boards a Gulfstream 5 plane bound for London earlier this month.

Husband Keith Urban had a concert at the Konocti Harbor Resort & Spa in Kelseyville, Calif., on Saturday night. He flew into San Francisco from Sydney, Australia, that very afternoon.

For the encore, he brought out his digital camera so he could send a message back home to his wife.

“So she knows what I’ve been doing,” he said with a grin.

According to CMT, he then showed his vulnerable side and played “Tonight I Wanna Cry.”

Kidman-concert nicole kidman concert shout out 01
Kidman-concert nicole kidman concert shout out 02
Kidman-concert nicole kidman concert shout out 03

JJ Links Around The Web

  • A possible D.C. Housewife crashes a White House dinner - Dlisted
  • An ambulance is called to David Hasselhoff's home again - PopEater
  • Justin Timberlake hangs out on the Social Network set - LaineyGossip
  • Zoe Saldana poses in a bikini for Details - TheSuperficial
  • Glee will make way for American Idol - Celebuzz
  • Zac Efron gets starstruck - JustJaredJr
  • Kate Hudson and Ryder check out Cirque du Soleil - PopSugar

92 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All

JESUS!!!!!!!!
PLEASE STOP IT!!!

Stop to blame this woman, now what is the problem? How she’s carring her baby? WHAT?! She’s her daughter she can carry her whatever she likes. Is it for that you judge her like a bad mother? Very stupid.

Egocentric? Narcissistic? Do I remember stupid anonymous user that Nicole dropped out from The Reader for this little girl?
And do I remember you that after two weeks of Suri’s birth Tom was around the world to promote Missione Impossible: 3?

Get a life, Kidman haters are more stupid, pathetic everyday, and espacially boring. She didn’t use botox, she’s had this baby naturally and she’s a loving mother and wife. Are jelouse of that? Sorry but it’s not a problem for her and for us.

love!!!!!!!!!!!

sweet baby

la bebe no se ve mucho solo el pelo pero no se le nota el color .nicole and keith estaran locos por sunday rose imajinate su primer hijo pero quiero ver su cara tendra hojos azules me imajino los dos lo tienen azules .pero nicole viaja mucho no descanso con su bebe trabajo muy rapido pobre sunday rose sus padres no estaran mucho con ella los dos trabajan mucho no descansan.y lo de el asiento protector me imajino que tendra uno en el avion y en todos los carros que la bebe este. acuerdencen nicole es millonaria y puede tener muchos acientos protector.

victoria - Bella and Connor were NOT in Nashville for a week. It didn’t happen - period! Also, if Bella and Connor went to Oz to spend time with their adoptive mother’s family - where are the pictures? Why didn’t they come off the plane and get on the plane with their “mom”? Please provide the CNN link for us all to see. For one thing, Keith doesn’t drive around in Nashville in limo - he drives himself - unlike when he is on her turf! Maybe you need to watch Oprah and see Tom’s reaction to Oprah’s question on their custody. It sure appears the Queen isn’t too involved!

I can’t understand the rush to travel 15 to 20 long hours with such a young baby in plane. If she wanted to be close to her family after birth, why she didn’t stay in Australia instead of coming back to Nashville? Ok, she wanted her baby to be american but there is other way to keep her american even if she’s not born on the land.

By the way, Nicole looks great. I do believe that a baby carrier is already in the plane. If not, they are out of traveling rules.

Sunday Rose and Mum Nic look gorgeous

Bella and Connor were in Nashville in July. I live there and saw them in the Whole Foods store. So no more speculating on if they were there or not. They were! I am just as anxious to see pictures of Nicole and Keith’s baby girl but understand they want privacy. But due to their careers and out in the public eye, no doubt pictures will be taken by paps. I am sure they are good parents. It’s their careers and lives. So many others have busy careers and travel and no doubt take their kids with them. Again congrats to Nicole and Keith on their new baby girl!

NICOLE IS GREAT MOM, ONLY NICOLE HATERS OR MAYBE EXACTLY RIGHT IF I SAY SCIENTOLOGY CULT, WHO JUDGE HER, HOW SHE CARRY HER BABY OR RUMOR ABOUT BOTOX.

HEY HATERS, SHE NEVER USE BOTOX, AND SHE IS REALLY PREGNANT WITH THIS SUNDAY ROSE.
GO AWAY YOU GUYS FROM THIS BEST FAMILY IN HOLLYWOOD.

BETTER YOU STAY TO LOOK TO CRUISE IDIOT FAMILY.

Just the truth please @ 08/26/2008 at 9:50 am

I like Nicole Kidman. I love Keith Urbans’ music and they seem well suited for each other. I do not know any of these people personally. There is a lot of truth you can see and know from their own interviews and stuff we will never know. I only fault her in that seems she should have used a carrier even goingup steps on a private plane. . She could see those kids, Isabella andConnor , more. Seems Tom Criuse has a lot to do with that. Something is so weird. Why did n’t Nicole get joint custody. She does not even have visitation rights. They do call Katie- Mom per Katie’s words. They call Nicole- Nic sometimes per Nic’s own words. Nicole now hs a man and a baby, she should sort of retire. She won theOscar ,let it go. Keith’s career is big now ,but still he is kind of new.
Celeb marriages do not last because people are not together. I hope hers last and they stay happy. and together.

Just the truth please - here’s the truth - Kidman has joint custody with Tom - she does have visitation rights, but waives them. Now you put the pieces of the puzzle together. She chooses to not have a home in the same city where the kids are living. Yes, we have seen articles saying that they have purchased a home in LA now, but they haven’t moved in and lived there either!

Funny how some say they actually saw Bella & Connor in Nashville, when in the world of reality, during that same time, they were photographed at other events - events that did not take place in Nashville, but other parts of the country!

Wow, could you all stop speculating about what is going on with her and her first two children? None of you have ANY idea. The only people who truly know what’s going on are the four of them. Period.

Second, for all the people who needed to criticize Nicole for carrying the baby in her arms rather than in a carrier, I have on question. When you are at home and need to walk upstairs with your baby for any reason, do you stop and put that child in a car carrier every time? Didn’t think so. Stop being judgemental and ridiculous. It seems that more and more people just think of stupid sh*t so they have a reason to post in these threads.

Hostas–
Bella and Connor were in Nashville. The error came in reporting the timeframe, not the visit itself.
And yes, Nicole has joint custody (see Smoking Gun-divorce papers). She had physical custody of the kids for several years after the divorce. Either Tom or Nicole said the kids wanted to settle down in LA and Tom was the one that decided to settle with them (probably if I may; be so uncharitable to indoctrinate them in Scientology).
Nicole sees the kids a lot more than the news/blogs/paps would report. She flies in and out on a private jet. I know people that have worked with her and she is in constant contact with them and often on the weekends flew to LA to be with them. Nicole herself has said she guards their privacy quite fiercely.
She must know that she is being criticized for appearing not to see them and she could change that perception instantly by being photographed with them each time she is with them (kind of like Tom and Katie pimping out Suri). She does not. If you look at picture archives, there are very few pictures of Bella and Connor as children. She has stated over and over that she does not believe in violating their privacy.
And I truly believe if the situation were reversed, Nicole had physical custody and we didn’t see them often with Tom, none of this criticism would be happening. Nicole is someone, it appears, that you either love or hate and the haters like to jump on the bandwagon that she is an unfit parent, never sees her kids blah, blah.
I don’t see such hatred toward most of the hollywood fathers that don’t see much of their kids or don’t get photographed with them. The hatred is reserved for Nicole.

you’re right about the california law; but for nicole it’s an easy cop out. if nicole really wanted those two children with her in australia she would have made it happen. she has high powered attorneys and those two children are old enough to make their wishes known. many divorced people in california are able to get the court’s permission to take the children out of state on holidays. my brother does it all the time. the fact is she has decided to abandon those kids to the care of their father. sunday rose is her biological child, neither one of those two older children are.

dani - just an FYI - the day Ohyes claimed to see them, and yes, i do know the day she claims, they were photographed elsewhere. This “sighting” I’m sure was created after the PR story came out that the kids flew into town. Too bad they were photographed elsewhere during that time. Just like the story that came out that Bella was in Oz for Christmas with Kidman. The very same day that story came out, Bella, Connor and Katie were photographed delivering a tree and gifts to a needy family!

let’s see nicole is off in australia with new husband showing off her new baby to the family. well. connor and bella are her children as well. they should be there. their place is with their mother. if nicole didnt’t think that she was capable of being the kind of mother these children need she should not have been party to their adoption. it’s all a shell game on nicole’s part. hostas is right; i remember that story. it’s very interesting how nicole supposedly had pictures of herself with bella in australia for xmas. excpet that the same day the picture was supposedly taken bella was with connor and katie delivering a tree and gifts to a needy family in the united states. there are god knows how many photographers are able to testify to that. so tell me, how can a child be in two different countries; one half way around the world from the other, on the same day.

Oh! so wonderful,

“I love how mall moms are telling a jetset mother of three how to travel with a baby on a privately owned jet. Too funny.”

I don’t know why you assume that everyone writing here is a “mall mom”. Maybe because you are one yourself. The fact is that this is not the proper way to carry an infant. In case she slips the baby will get hurt or die.

The argument that she is rich and owns her own plane and therefore cannot have an accident and fall like everyone else is “too funny” and stupid. Does this mean that rich people never injure themselves and fall down the stairs in their own homes, on their planes, or wherever? I never realized this only happens to poor folks. Thanks for enlightening us LOL

These girls are so cool! beautiful!

Sunday is so sweet

Sunday is so sweet

She is irresponsible holding her baby while climbing the stairs? Would that be the 5 or 6 staircases she is climbing to get into the plane or are we talking Mount Everest here? She is wearing appropriate shoes, not heels that could have had her tottering.

And how many of you put your babies in carseats while carrying them up and down the stairs in your homes?

If you are going to crucify her, at least, wait till she is wearing high heels/stilletos a la Jennifer Lopez up and down the steps of a plane or heels a la the scienobotwife, Holmes and tripping while out shopping with kid in hand. Until then, go back to the botox insults, that way, you actually sound like you make sense and it doesn’t look like you are scrapping your already empty barrels for ammunition.

Christine @ 08/26/2008 at 4:55 pm

I agree with Emma. That’s NO way to carry a baby. She obviously doesn’t care if she falls and hurts the child! She also has a very strange way of carrying her, not close to her chest but down her belly, almost as if she was carrying a piece of cargo, a wooden box or something. There must be something very wrong with her, she obviously lacks maternal feelings.

Christine @ 08/26/2008 at 4:59 pm

By the way, I couldn’t care less whether or not she uses botox. She obviously does, but what does matter is that she should treat her baby right, and be a caring and protective mother. She doesn’t seem like one in the pictures I have seen of her and her child. It actually surprised and disappointed me.

Big deal that Nicole Kidman doesn’t see her kids, are they babies? Bella will be 16 in 4 months, Conor is 13. They are old enough to take care of themselves and don’t need mummy to wipe their arses.

While Cruise is credited with having them with him and tottering them out on occasions for us to know that they are actually around, half the time where exactly are they? the fact that they are teenagers is not the answer to their obvious absence. They’ve been in LA with his sister while he gallivants all over the place. At least, Kidman is not pretending about having them with her. She has said more than enough times that they live in LA and she doesn’t, she hasn’t lived there since 2003 and the kids only moved back in 2005. If you listen to people, you would think Cruise has had them since the divorce but that is not the case, it was Kidman who was there in those fragile years after the divorce even successfully getting them away from the influence of scientology until 2005 (the same way she got Cruise away in the 90s). Cruise trots out his press release about how great a father he is until you start paying attention. He has been in NY for the better part of 2 weeks, now and they are not there, last year he spent more than half the year away from LA but where were those apples of his eyes. I mean, we saw Suri but not them. Before they moved into their $35m house, Tom, Katie and Suri were living separately from Bella and Conor, why is that, is it because they didn’t have enough space at the scientology centre? We don’t ever see Bella out and about with Katie Holmes or even her dear sister Suri, the one or two pics of her shopping with Holmes in 2005/2006 had her looking like she wanted to be somewhere else. For a man and woman claiming that they are all a big family, you will be hardpressed to see them all out together and laughing. They try very hard but it is all rather unconvincing. And to think that these were the same people who didn’t find a weekend they couldn’t spend sitting at the side watching the kids play sports. I guess now that the Strong, Amazing Woman known as Suri is here, the other two are now somewhat unnecessary. The few times that there have been pics of Bella and her mother, you can see her chatting away and smiling up a storm. Pictures of Conor on the set of “Australia” last year also gave a marked difference. The difference in interaction is clear.

If the kids want to see their mother, they can get on a plane and head to Nashville but then again, considering they are now scientologists, it will be in Kidman’s best interest to deprogramme them first before allowing them to stay more than a few days with her side of their family especially with little Sunday as she is growing up, they must have no influence on that child because as anyone who knows scientology knows, there is nothing like a child scientologists, they are all scientologists. You don’t know what they are listening to you say or watching you do.

And for anyone who knows how to get people out of a cult, we wouldn’t mind a few pointers so that we can send them to Kidman just so she gets on rescuing her kids because as we know, getting people out of cults when the other parent is in along with grandmother, aunts and counsins is just an easy thing to do.

hello; under california law she is LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE for those two children until each of them reaches the age of 18. it doesn’t matter is she and tom are divorced; under the law nicole is their mother. it doesn’t matter that bella will be 16 in 4 month; under the law she is a minor child for another two years. connor will be a minor child for another 5 years. for the record; the court in california can, if it decided to, charge nicole with neglect of her two minor children.

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.